Thread: Dear DNC, Why Did You Put a Sharia Supremacist on Convention Centerstage?

The PCE, Pt. 26:
Dear DNC, Why Did You Put a Sharia Supremacist on Convention Centerstage?


AUG3Written by: Diana West
Wednesday, August 03, 2016 3:22 AM



The Post Constitutional Election, Part 25 is here.

Dear DNC,

Doubtless, I would reach more people if I wrote the following message in a private, hackable email, but I am concerned Russian cyber-trolls are distracted this week by heaps more breaking scandal about Hillary Clinton's loyal services to what some people like to call "Mother Russia." Between that Hillary-approved uranium deal transferring 20 percent of US uranium to Russian control (netting $145 million for the Clinton Foundation) and, now, her success in getting US investors to fund Russian military research in Russia's very own "Silicon Valley," I am afraid my little email might languish unread on some cold NSA server. If anyone in Russia isis reading, though, do pass along a suggested name change for that Russian R&D hub Hillary has done so much for: "Clinticon Valley" has a wonderful ring to it, don't you think? Or, maybe better -- Clinticonovna Valley.

My subject today, though, is the Constitution-waving Khizr Khan (above), who caused such an uproar at the DNC as the father of a fallen US officer in Iraq, Capt. Humayun Khan, killed in action in 2004, that he now wishes to exit the limelight and has even scrubbed his own website, the one listing his immigration legal services in the (strictly legit!) sale of visas to foreign millionaires.

The question I have is: Don't you people vet your speakers? Do you even realize now that by inviting Khizr Khan to speak you that put a sharia supremacist on centerstage at the 2016 Democratic National Committee Convention to endorse a candidate for president of the United States? Hello? Is that the message you want to send America -- that the Democratic Party is also the Sharia Party?

I do not exaggerate. Young Capt. Khan's ultimate sacrifice for this country is something all Americans respect and mourn. But his father's sharia supremacism is something all Americans who defend the Constitution that Khizr Khan was waving around like a prop must learn is the ideological foe of that Constitution, just as much as Communism ever was -- I mean, is. Islam, like Communism, is a totalitarian movement targeting, not through "workers' revolution," but jihad and the spread of sharia, our liberties that come to us from the God of the Old and New Testament (not the God of the Koran, who behaves quite differently). These God-given liberties are enshrined in our founding documents. They are not props.

In his essay at Pajamas Media, "Khan-flict: Freedom-Fighter Son, Sharia Supremacist Father," Andrew Bostom highlights the "tragic irony" on display here -- if, that is, you people at the DNC had only looked. On the one hand, there is the ultimate sacrifice Capt. Humayun Khan made for this country while fighting in Iraq in 2004; on the other, that sacrifice is in effect negated by Capt. Khan's father's published writings in support sharia, this country's ideological foe.

What published writings? You people at the DNC just aren't paying attention. These works by Pakistani-born Khizr Khan are easily available online and in English, as both Bostom and Paul Sperry quickly discovered.

Bostom explains the significance of Khzir Khan's obeisance to the work of Said Ramadan, son-in-law of Muslim Brotherhood founder Hossan al-Banna, and an important progenitor of Islam in Europe. In his 1983 article in the Houston Journal of International Law, Khan "gratefully" acknowledges "the writings of S. Ramadan," specifically citing Ramadan's book, Islamic Law -- Its Scope and Equity, whose endorsements of sharia Bostom discusses here.

About Ramadan himself, Bostom writes (links in the original):

Said Ramadan (d. 1995) was a notorious Muslim Brotherhood ideologue, and a founding member of the Muslim World League, a mammoth Saudi global missionary organization.

From his Geneva, Switzerland home (where he moved in 1961), Ramadan personally established the Islamic Center, a combined mosque, Muslim community center, and think tank. Swiss investigative journalist Sylvain Besson included "The Project," a 14-page manifesto dated 1982, and discovered by the Swiss secret service in 2001, in his La conquête de l'Occident: Le projet secret des Islamistes (Paris: Le Seuil, 2005, pp. 193-205.)

"The Project" -- a blueprint for installing Sharia-based Islamic regimes in the West by propaganda, proselytization, and if necessary, jihad war -- is believed to have been authored by Said Ramadan.

If its authorship is uncertain, "The Project," written in 1991, has been verified as a key Muslim Brotherhood document, entered as US government evidence in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism-financing trial. It is worth recalling that it is from "The Project" where we find the chilling term "civilization jihad."

To wit:

The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihad Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions.
Hello, DNC?

Now, do you wonder even a little what it was Khzir Khan was so "gratefully" acknoweldging in the writings of Said Ramadan, and whether he would today repudiate them? Frankly, delving into Khan's writings is akin to discovering that another DNC convention speaker was a devote of Karl Marx or Saul Alinksy. Oh, wait -- that describes the two leading Democratic candidated for the nomination!

Maybe that's why it's so hard getting through to you.

Here's one more try.

The headline of Sperry's piece at Breitbart News says it so clearly even a DNC official should understand: "Khizr Khan Believes the Constitution `Must Always Be Subordinated to the Sharia.' "

The quotation comes from a 1983 review Khizr Khan wrote of book compiled of speeches made at a seminar in Kuwait. In this review, Khan is extra-enthused about the contribution of a Pakistani named Allah K. Brohi, whom Sperry describes as "a pro-jihad Islamic jurist who was one of the closest advisors to late Pakistani dictator Gen. Zia ul-Haq, the father of the Taliban movement."

See the red flag waving, DNC? Recall that the "war on terror" Capt. Khan was killed fighting in Iraq was also being waged in Afghanistan against the Taliban.

It would be helpful if you read and took notes on both pieces, DNC, but the money quote -- and I write metaphorically here, not literally, as when we discuss Hillary and Bill'$ Clinton Foundation -- is here in Khizr Khan's very own words:

“The invariable and basic rules of Islamic law are only those prescribed in the Shari’ah,” Khan writes. “All other juridical works… must always be subordinated to the Shari’ah.”

Dear DNC: "All other juridical works" include the US Constitution.

Get it?

http://dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/E...nterstage.aspx

Get it?

Oh yeah, I get it. Trump Supporters get it. And when more Americans take the time to learn the truth about the Khans, they'll get it too. God Bless Donald Trump for having the guts and character to stand up against these self-serving Angry Muslims. And those American military families who have jumped to conclusions based on inaccurate and inadequate Mainstream Media Reporting will be ashamed of their positions, and yes, that includes you General Allen.

Speaking of Allen....

Flashback: General John Allen’s ‘Phone Sex Email’ Scandal

AP Photo/Charles Dharapak

by WARNER TODD HUSTON
3 Aug 2016

Making himself a political ally of Hillary Clinton, retired Marine Corps General John Allen spoke before the Democratic National Convention and since then has said there would be a military revolt if Trump becomes the commander-in-chief.

But wanting Hillary as president isn’t the only thing he has in common with the Democrat nominee. Like Hillary, Allen also has an email scandal hanging around his neck.

General Allen spoke at the Democrat convention and slammed Trump for seemingly advocating for the U.S. to abandon her allies overseas. And since the convention Allen has claimed that if Trump were to become president the military may launch a full scale revolt against him.

Some, though, have criticized him saying that former members of the joint chiefs should not engage in public politicking. Retired Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, for instance, has criticized Allen for his appearance at the convention saying that officers of his status should never endorse candidates or engage in overt political activism.

But Allen has another reason to have stayed silent. He has his own email scandal to forget.

Back in November 2012, news broke that General Allen, then serving as the American commander in Afghanistan, was embroiled in controversy for having sent “inappropriate communications” with a close friend of the David Petraeus family.

When first reported, the contents of these emails were so racy they were deemed little different than “phone sex.”

The emails amounted to several hundred messages spanning two and a half years of time, starting in 2010, right around the same time period as the sex scandal that took down General Petraeus was roiling.

An investigation was launched that year into the ribald emails between Allen and Petraeus family friend Jill Kelley, a 37-year-old socialite. Ultimately, Obama’s Pentagon decided that Allen’s emails didn’t rise to conduct unbecoming an officer, but they were so flirtatious that the damage was done. The investigation was such an embarrassment that Allen resigned his commission and bowed out of the hunt to be named the supreme allied commander in Europe early in 2013.

Emails showed the pair calling each other “sweetheart,” some playfully saying “you rock” to each other, and others discussing “doggy style.” All were discovered among the hundreds of messages which were reportedly exploited by Petraeus biographer Paul Broadwell, according to the investigation.

Other emails in the batch accuse Kelley of groping General Petraeus under a dinner table and “parading around the base” in skimpy clothing.

“Be sure to watch Jill’s hands under the DC dinner table this Friday. They have been seen there before,” one of the emails warned about Kelley and Petraeus.

Despite the finding of no wrongdoing, though, Allen clearly got more involved with Kelley than merely sending a few off-color emails. Along with the “flirtatious” messages the pair exchanged photos of each other through the emails.

In addition, Allen got so involved in Kelley’s life that he wrote letters of recommendation for Kelley’s twin sister, Natalie Khawam, in a messy child custody case during a divorce.

Kelley herself had a rather checkered involvement with members of the upper echelon of the U.S. military. For instance, she used her contacts with Allen and Petraeus and other officers to try a wheedle her way in as an “ambassador” for the U.S. government. The emails show Kelley cajoling both Petraeus and Allen, among other Pentagon officers, to make her an Honorary Ambassador to Central Command in Tampa and an Honorary Consul for the Republic of Korea.

One batch of emails also reveals her anger when she found out there may be other such “ambassadors” and features her telling the officers how upset she was over the possibility that her “title” was not as special as she wanted it to be.

“Bob,” Kelley wrote in one email. “WHAT IS THIS ALL ABOUT??? You never informed me of ‘3’ other Honorary Ambassadors??????”

Naturally, her wished-for diplomatic career was cut short once the emails became public.

Kelley and her husband Scott also founded what even the left-wing Mother Jones magazine called a “questionable charity” for cancer patients. An investigation found that the charity spent most of its cash on parties, travel, and attorney fees before it went bankrupt in 2007. Oddly, the charity was formed with an initial bank deposit of $157,284 but by 2007 had spent exactly that amount on operations, the bankruptcy filing revealed.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...email-scandal/

So Allen is a sleazebag. No surprise there. I guess the military has lowered the standards of actions unbecoming an officer.