Thread: They (Mexico) are not even being shy about it anymore

They are not even being shy about it anymore
By Carolyn Hileman (09/03/07)

President Felipe Calderon, today blasted our deportations and said "Mexico does not end at its borders." And speaking to Mexicans in the US many of them here illegally he told them "Where there is a Mexican, there is Mexico." Now I may be wrong but I don’t think I am, I believe this man is encouraging illegal immigration and calling it immigrant rights. Now I have to wonder if Bin Laden were to have said those same words if our government would be so calm about it. For those of us who have been wondering if this was in fact a systematic take over by the Mexican government, a war against the USA without ever firing the first shot I think we now have our answer.

You can call it just tough talk by a useless president all you want but the fact of the matter is we now have so many of his people in our country that we would be in big trouble if he told them to attack. Think back to the marches, do you remember just how many of these people took to our streets, do you honestly believe that without the aid of the National Guard they could have been beat back? Let’s stop all the humanitarian thought for just s few minutes and really think about this for a few moments. How comfortable would you have been if these were all Muslim fanatics protesting a cartoon? What about if they were in full uniform and were Russians marching in our streets would we have just looked the other way?

The fact is in many ways they have already taken over, Cops in LA were reprimanded for doing their jobs and ending a protest, and as a result are now afraid not to do their will for fear they will lose their jobs. So much so that when American citizens had a permit to march in a park there they were turned away because the Latinos promised a mini riot. We have our senate about to sponsor a bill for housing for their favorite group you guessed it right LARAZA. Every time we try to do something about this deluge of illegal people the ACLU steps in and buys of a judge to make sure our plans go down in flames.

They do this under the name Civil right as though that would make an illegal immigrant legal, unfortunately for them some of us know how to do research and civil rights….

Civil rights are the protections and privileges of personal power given to all citizens by law. Civil rights are distinguished from "human rights" or "natural rights", also called "our God-given rights". Civil rights are rights that are bestowed by nations on those within their territorial boundaries, while natural or human rights are rights that many scholars claim that individuals have by nature of being born. For example, the philosopher John Locke (1632–1704) argued that the natural rights of life, liberty and property should be converted into civil rights and protected by the sovereign state as an aspect of the social contract. Others have argued that people acquire rights as an inalienable gift from a deity (such as God) or at a time of nature before governments were formed.

You see as long as we can be duped into believing that what they are doing is exercising their civil rights we will be quiet and sit down, but when the cover is pulled back on that lie as well as the rest of them the people begin to understand that this is not a civil right issue we are dealing with at all this is the systematic take over of our country with the aid of our leaders and the ACLU. You see, Laws guaranteeing civil rights may be written down, derived from custom or implied. In the United States and most continental European countries, civil rights laws are most often written. Examples of civil rights and liberties include the right to get redress if injured by another, the right to privacy, the right of peaceful protest, the right to a fair investigation and trial if suspected of a crime, and more generally-based constitutional rights such as the right to vote, the right to personal freedom, the right to freedom of movement and the right of equal protection. As civilizations emerged and formalized through written constitutions, some of the more important civil rights were granted to citizens. When those grants were later found inadequate, civil rights movements emerged as the vehicle for claiming more equal protection for all citizens and advocating new laws to restrict the effect of current discriminations. No where does it say that civil rights pertain to any non citizen and just in case you were wondering who is a citizen I checked that for you as well…

Citizenship is membership in a political community (originally a city or town but now usually a country) and carries with it rights to political participation; a person having such membership is a citizen. It is largely coterminous with nationality, although it is possible to have a nationality without being a citizen (i.e., be legally subject to a state and entitled to its protection without having rights of political participation in it); it is also possible to have political rights without being a national of a state. In most nations, a non-citizen is a non-national and called either a foreigner or an alien. In the United States, because there is state citizenship, foreign is the legal term for someone not a citizen of the state, and alien is reserved for someone not a citizen of the United States. Thus New York insurance companies are foreign in New Jersey, while a Dutch insurer is alien.

So the next time someone tells you that those people are just exercising their civil rights tell them for me that is bunch of hog wash and we want them off our streets. If we the people do not respond to this take over no one else will, it is that simple. Because they are trying to take over our country and they are not even being shy about it anymore …

Carolyn Hileman
http://thevoice.name/?p=3210

http://www.americandaily.com/article/20145

I have said from day one....."WHAT RIGHTS"?????????
Love the article and maybe this will help in the courts...
The invaders always seem to have more rights in this country than citizens...
Thank-you....

Our judges need to start supporting the law and enforce the border. We owe mexico nothing and all Mexico is doing is invading the USA and now admits it. Enough is Enough. Illegals go home. You are not wanted!!!

Just where did he get the idea Mexico does not end at the borders somebody please give the man a geography lesson




-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION ALERT REQUESTS!!
Please activists leave comments,at below link
http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=F ... ic&t=79828
ALIPAC AUGUST FUND RAISER
PLEASE help ALIPAC stay in the fight against illegal immigration!!This has been extended to 9/11 ALIPAC's anniversary date, we have fallen short of the goal and have so many fights ahead of us, remember all small donations add up .
http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=F ... ic&t=75673
FOOD FOR THOUGHT
WHAT WOULD WE DO WITHOUT ALIPAC???
__________________________________________________ __________-
THE FERN AND THE BAMBOO
http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=F ... ic&t=80573

They have been saying this for a long time. He was paraphrasing what Zedillo said in the '90s. Zedillo: "I proudly affirm that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders, and that Mexican migrants are an important -- a very important part of it."

He said this to a La Raza audience, that ripped up in auplause and cheers after the statement. It was then that they started their promotion of dual citizenship for ALL of Mexican background. I remember some guys on an LA radio station saying that Mexico is invading and we need to declare war.

Isn't this some sort of political skill taught in Politics 101? Just go ahead and act and assume you have what you are reaching for.

I still want to know what Mexico has over Bush. Maybe we are already the North American Union with documents signed, sealed, and delivered. That would give Calderon the grounds to speak the way he does.
We keep saying Jan. 1, 2010, but I think that they signed us away in March 2005 with that infamous meeting.

Originally Posted by saveourcountry

Isn't this some sort of political skill taught in Politics 101? Just go ahead and act and assume you have what you are reaching for.

I still want to know what Mexico has over Bush. Maybe we are already the North American Union with documents signed, sealed, and delivered. That would give Calderon the grounds to speak the way he does.
We keep saying Jan. 1, 2010, but I think that they signed us away in March 2005 with that infamous meeting.

Well if Bush did that it is not legal, he can not act with out congress, I realize this is hard for him to believe but it is true and not legal if he has done anything out side of the NAFTA agreement it can be stopped.

That third world cesspool of a country called Mexico stops at the border period. If a Mexican crosses it, he or she will be arrested on the spot and deported quickly.

It all comes down to one simple thing. The people of Mexico have stopped just migrating or immigrating here and have started colonizing the United States.

What this means is any politician who supports letting Mexicans stay in the US instead of returning them to Mexico is a traitor, they are letting Mexico take over parts of the US, that is treason.

What Calderon said is equivalent to a declaration of war, not a war fought with tanks and bombs, but a foreign invasion none the less. I would call it a declaration of invasion.