Thread: RED ALERT – Fox News Abandons Patriotic Americans

RED ALERT – Fox News Abandons Patriotic Americans by Selling Out to Muslim Interests
By Jerry McConnell Tuesday, February 16, 2010

A recent column of mine alluded to a deal that Rupert Murdoch had concluded with one of the Princes in the Saudi Arabian Muslim leadership. At that time there were no details available, but since that time we have seen Fox News and its affiliates swarming with actions favorable to our worst enemy, Muslim law.

Old favorites on Fox that once preached good old fashioned American values and candidates such as O’Reilly, Beck, Hannity and others are now, according to a fresh blog from Neil Turner, Citizens for the Constitution on February 15, 2010, “in the enemy camp, and will be promoting ISLAM, a political system that is abhorrent to our Constitution, as it advocates the overthrow of our Government and our Sovereignty BY FORCE!â€

WHO IS INFLUENCING AND CONTROLLING FOX?

By Dr. Laurie Roth
February 12, 2010
NewsWithViews.com

Most folks have believed that Fox TV and their many conservative shows is the last bastion of conservative safety left on TV. You have your Sean Hannity, Bill’ Reilly, Greta Van Susteren asking the hard legal questions and more. But with all the conservative, multi millionaire and popular conservative voices, did you also know that the second largest owner of Fox, parent corporation Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp is Prince Ahwaleed bin Talal of Saudi Arabia.

Prince Ahwaleed has been buying his anti Semitic and Muslim way right into American life. Let us review just how generous he is a moment. He purchased a 5.6% stake in News Corp. in 2005, second from the top now. He manipulated Islamic study departments into place by giving $20 million each to Georgetown and Harvard Universities.

Ahwaleed is a man who gave $500,000 to CAIR, Council on American Islamic Relations, and then there is the mother load of $27 million in 2002 to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers. Naturally, he called them ‘martyrs.’

The prince is also rather close to James, Murdoch’s son who is known for his anti-Israel views and left wing radical environmental and global warming nonsense.

He is not a man of mystery in anyway. Before he jumped in bed with Murdoch and his son James, he revealed his true heart on Arab News. Just some of the things he said were: “Arabs should focus more on penetrating U.S. public opinion as a means to influencing decision makingâ€

It is the Repub judges on the Supreme Court that have opened the door to having corporation dominate elections.

Prince Ahwaleed binTalal is the person who allegedly got Barack Obama into Harvard Law School, and I think provided the funding for him to attend.

http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/2010/02/06/ ... iz-alsaud/

http://newsmax.com/KenTimmerman/obama-s ... /id/339914

http://www.examiner.com/x-33619-Denver- ... to-Harvard

This was all revealed by a reporter doing research on Obama during the campaign but everyone pooh poohed it.

And if you look at the pictures of Obama and Malcolm X and Obama and his purported Kenyan father, you'll question who is father is. He is the spitting image of Malcolm and doesn't look a thing like his mother, purported Kenyan father or his grandparents. He looks exactly like Malcolm X without glasses.

They say we have 15 or 20 almost near duplicates of ourselves across the world now so it could just be coincidence, but I swear the resemblance is uncanny.

http://octaman.com/comments/MalcolmO.html

April, thanks for posting.

Tonight O'Reilly had Morris Dees the head of SPLC on and they were talking about the Tea Party being taken over by right wing extremists. He said the Oath Keepers was a dangerous group because they are made up of ex Law Officers and Military Men.

Oath Keepers stated goals -

1. We will NOT obey orders to disarm the American people.

2. We will NOT obey orders to conduct warrantless searches of the American people

3. We will NOT obey orders to detain American citizens as “unlawful enemy combatantsâ€

Originally Posted by Bettybb

It is the Repub judges on the Supreme Court that have opened the door to having corporation dominate elections.

Not really, Bettybb. The ruling of the court protected the right of a corporation to spend whatever it wants on advertising for a candidate or an issue under the First Amendment. The same ruling also preserved the spending cap for contributions to a political campaign by corporations such that they are still limited to the amount that they contribute to a political candidate's fund.

What the court declared as unconstitutional were caps on advertising and protected corporations like the 527's that ran the Swift Boat ads against Kerry. These were citizens, voters, individuals, who formed a corporation to raise money to run these ads and get this message out during the campaign. Citizens operating through corporations should have that right, whether we agree with their message or not. The court preserved our right to spend whatever we want to run ads during campaigns, a right the court believed was protected by the First Amendment. For example, lets say in 2010, a whole bunch of Americas want to run ads against Pro-Amnesty candidates running for Senate or the US House of Representatives or in 2012 for President, under McCain-Feingold, we'd be limited in our spending and thus limited in our ability to get out our message. Same on opposing free trade or supporting the FairTax or any number of issues we feel are important.

The US Supreme Court actually preserved our right as citizens to form corporations to raise this money, get out our message over television through paid advertising, separate from the political campaign funds, separate from the RNC and DNC, and do it ourselves.

Think about who is upset by this? The DNC, McCain, Obama, etc. Americans are upset because the press has reported it as if it's globalist business corporations being able to take over political campaign funds, when that's not what this ruling did at all. It preserved our rights as citizens to raise money through corporations as well to form corporations to raise money to run ads to get our message out during political campaigns, separate from the candidate's purse, separate from a party purse, and only for advertising, which I think the court ruled correctly is a protected act of political free speech under the First Amendment which can not be restricted or capped by spending or volume by the US Congress or any other governmental body.

It will be interesting to see how this changes the information we have available to us through the 2010 elections. I think we'll see a lot more real ads about real issues from unions fighting for jobs for American Workers, small business fighting for the FairTax, citizens and legal employers fighting against Amnesty and Illegal immigration, oil companies fighting to lift the ban on oil drilling, and many other issues. I think it will be a positive improvement to our election process, because we already know that the canned cookie-cutter ads of the DNC and the RNC aren't worth the money they spend on them because they're too general, they aren't issue related, they're all about the fable life of the candidates instead of what they really stand for, really believe, have really done and will really do.

I'm looking forward to hearing more from other groups of people than just what the political parties typically have to say or want us to know.

This Supreme Court Ruling is a good thing, because free speech is always a good thing that we will never have enough of and thus never should be capped by our government.

At least that's how I see it, so lets give it a shot and see how it plays during the 2010 elections. I truly believe you all will be very pleased with what this ruling means for "we the people".

April, thanks for posting.

You're welcome!

[quote="DEEDEE"]April, thanks for posting.

Tonight O'Reilly had Morris Dees the head of SPLC on and they were talking about the Tea Party being taken over by right wing extremists. He said the Oath Keepers was a dangerous group because they are made up of ex Law Officers and Military Men.

Oath Keepers stated goals -

1. We will NOT obey orders to disarm the American people.

2. We will NOT obey orders to conduct warrantless searches of the American people

3. We will NOT obey orders to detain American citizens as “unlawful enemy combatantsâ€

Oathkeepers are great men!

Surely no one is surprised by this. Murdoch has always used his power to control the masses. Looks like it worked too, since we have so many people spouting Fox talking points even the FACTS disprove whatever they say. Fox and MSNBC need to stop following party lines and start reporting the news.

RIP Walter Kronkite