Results 11 to 19 of 19
Thread: Hi again folks...
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
11-22-2006, 08:29 AM #11
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- North Carolina
- Posts
- 571
I work in a technology industry where we outsource a lot of
work to India. I can tell you it's not working very well. The
alternative is hiring a lot of people here. I don't meet a lot of
kids who see engineering & science as an alternative. Even
when I was in grad school 25 years ago, only about 10% of
the dept were American citizens. So we import a lot of people
with H1B, & if your company has foreign national employees in
other countries, L1. The big difference is H1B & L1 visas are
LEGAL!!! The activities opposed on these boards are ILLEGAL
ones.
To say the dismantling of our native keystone technology industries
is legal doesn't mean I think the actions of large corps is patriotic
or I don't wish to change these practices. But I believe there are more
urgent matters at hand when our borders are so ignored in a post
9/11 world.
Pilgrim did get one thing right -- there are a lot of damn fine
Americans posting on these forums.
-
11-22-2006, 10:23 AM #12
Re: Hi again folks...
i
Originally Posted by newpilgrimfamil1
-
11-22-2006, 07:39 PM #13
Hi Dem4Labor,
Originally Posted by dem4labor
Never mind, for this argument, that lots of H-1Bs are indentured.
Congress/Senate are preparing to double the H-1B population in accordance with the "Nukes for Mangos" trade agreement. .
Labor shortage is a fabricated lie, published by NASSCOM and other lunatic fringe lobby organizations. If companies were willing to hire applicants over 40, every vacancy could be easily filled.
Recommendation: Terminate the H-1B program, give the H-1Bs 1 month (or less) to depart the US. Will today's politicians do that? Nope. They're subservient to NASSCOM and the [taxpayer funded] Friends of India Caucus.
Oh, and, the Council on Foreign Relations won't allow anything but increases in the H-1B quota
The activities opposed on these boards are ILLEGAL
ones.
Bangalore, India, where our jobs go.
Kali Ma
Why is the U.S. Post Office using FOREIGN labor?
are they above the law?
What part of "We don't owe our jobs to India" are you unable to understand, Senator?
-
11-22-2006, 07:49 PM #14
Hi Millere, how ya doin?
Originally Posted by millere
I want to ask the New Pilgram Family just a few questions before he gets himself banned again.
New Pilgram Family - Are you a H-1B or L-1 visa holder?
Are you a TATA, Infosys, Wiprospectramind, HCL, Accenture, or Satyam employee? In other words, do you work for a body shop?
New Pilgram Family, were you trained by an American who was about to be fired?
New Pilgram Family, are you a member of the NASSCOM staff?
Just thought I'd ask.
Oh, just one more question, if I may, New Pilgram Family,
Are you indentured? Hope you don't mind if I ask you that.
Thanks, Millere, for letting me jump in here. Coto
What part of "We don't owe our jobs to India" are you unable to understand, Senator?
-
11-22-2006, 09:20 PM #15Originally Posted by dem4labor
-
11-22-2006, 09:39 PM #16Originally Posted by Coto
http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/2962
U.S. Immigration Policy on the Table at the WTO
Sarah Anderson | November 30, 2005
Editor: John Gershman, IRC
In the contentious negotiations leading up to the December 13-18 World Trade Organization (WTO) summit, the big drama has centered around agricultural trade and whether the richer countries will grant expanded market access to commodities from the Global South. However, there has also been a battle brewing between developing countries and the U.S. government over immigration. Led by India , several countries are demanding expansion of U.S. visa programs for temporary professional workers.
How did immigration wind up on the table at the WTO? Under the global trade body's General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), governments can regulate the supply of services performed by foreigners. The technical term for this type of service trade is Mode 4. Thus far, the types of visas being discussed are those for executives and highly skilled professionals, such as Indian software engineers who have come to work in the Silicon Valley and other high-tech hubs in the United States . Some developing countries are pushing for the Mode 4 talks to cover less-skilled workers as well.
http://www.dollarsandsense.org/archives ... 06sen.html
The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), now being negotiated in the World Trade Organization (WTO), is likely to reduce migrant workers to the status of commodities. "Mode 4" of GATS deals with "movement of natural persons," i.e., the migration of people to foreign countries as workers. (Mode 4 of the GATS is one small part within the entire scope of the WTO; see "A Map of the WTO.") GATS Mode 4 does not deal with immigration, as in people from one country moving to, and settling down in, another. It deals only with temporary migrants, who go to a foreign country to work for a limited (often specified) time, for a particular job with a particular employer or to fulfill a specific contract. This category of workers is often called guestworkers.
http://www.focusweb.org/services-indust ... tions.html
SERVICES INDUSTRY DRIVES INDIA GATS NEGOTIATIONS
Friday, 30 June 2006
Benny Kuruvilla*
MUMBAI, June 12, 2006: Since the 2001 WTO Doha Ministerial Conference there has been a fundamental shift in India's position on services. From leading the opposition during the Uruguay Round it is today in the driver's seat in moving forward the GATS (General Agreements on Trade in Services) agenda. In August 2005, India submitted one of the most ambitious revised offers. During the Hong Kong Ministerial in December 2005 India broke ranks with its long-standing allies and supported, and in fact drafted, key sections of the infamous Annex C that sanctioned the plurilateral method (a group of countries jointly demanding market opening from trading partners) of services negotiations. It has coordinated aggressive plurilateral requests made in cross-border supply of services (Mode 1) and movement of labour (Mode 4). India's alliances in services are now commercial, not political. [what?]
As negotiations move towards the impractical December 2006 deadline, reports from New Delhi indicate that India will continue to lead from the front towards wrapping up both a revised services agreement and a new set of market access commitments. This short note provides an overview of the India game plan on services.
-
11-22-2006, 10:11 PM #17Why is the U.S. Post Office using FOREIGN labor?
are they above the law?
-
11-22-2006, 10:20 PM #18
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- North Carolina
- Posts
- 571
Hi Coto,
Of course, I don't support anyone breaking the
law to overstay any visa. I work with lots of
foreign nationals in various stages of H1B->
green card -> naturalization. Some of these
people are real assets to our country. Many
have been through rigorous selection in their
country & were educated at their country's
expense. However, I would like to see all American
engineers employed first. I am sad that many
young people don't see engineering as a viable
profession. The tech meltdown didn't help, but
other than serving in the military, I don't see a
more critical skill to be kept at critical mass in
the US. Personally, I feel that large corporations
see labor as their highest cost & will try to expand
supply to dilute costs. I know some conservative
people see this as a right by people who have the
capital. Personally, I think you have to balance
patriotism (primary) & sound business practices
(secondary). I have been to India many times &
I can tell you it's a nightmare I hope we never
have in this country.
-
11-23-2006, 12:16 AM #19
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Posts
- 1,021
Newpilgrim, I much prefere shipping jobs to India than sharing space with illegals and jerks like you.
Citizenship Audit Finds 1,634 Noncitizens Attempted to Register...
05-09-2024, 04:30 PM in Non-Citizen & illegal migrant voters