Thread: Is this true about the SKIL bill?

If so, we had a worse squeaker than we thought. Anyone know?

http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showt ... 531&page=2

"The message to call Sen. Sessions was indeed from IV core. The reason to call Senator Sessions was that our information indicated that of the 91 or so Senators who were present in the senate, 90 had consented to the bill. The only Senator who had a "hold" on the bill was Sen. Sessions. Our information at that time also indicated that this was because he was not getting any feedback from the pro-immigration community. How much of this information was based on fact or assumptions is a moot point. There was also much discussion in the core whether it was a good idea to even call him knowing his strong anti-immigration views. As a result of these discussions, a consensus emerged which was "what have we got to lose at this point?""

According to NumbersUSA, this is NOT true!

Wow, those folks over at immigrationvoice.org are certainly a naive bunch! I can't believe they honestly think Sen. Sessions was the only senate member against the bill. Oh well, let them go on thinking only one man stands between them and their license to steal American jobs!