Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Sturgis S Dakota
    Posts
    833

    Huckleberry Thank You

    When listening to Huckebee thank the people of Iowa, I thought to myself :WHY NOT THANK HIS CORPORATE SPONSORS?"
    Before he made his speech before the CFR, he was in the basement with Duncan Hunter. So, why the sudden surge?
    Answer: Instead of saying Thank You Iowa, he show have said Thank You Tyson, Thank You American Express, Thank You Bank of America and so on.
    Piss on the PEOPLE! WHO NEEDS THEM? As long as you have the backing of Corporate America...ANYONE can blow smoke up our butts.
    <div>MY eyes HAVE seen the GLORY... And that GLORY BELONGS to US... We the PEOPLE!</div>

  2. #2
    Senior Member zeezil's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    16,593
    Keep in mind Huckabee is a master of deception. His immigration plan is designed to placate those who want action on illegal immigration, but in reality, it is designed to legalize the mass millions of illegal aliens that are here within a few days of the implementation of its touchback provision. The majority of the American public won't dig deep enough or look behind the curtain as to what the true intent is of his plan. They prety much believe what the plan is on it's surface...action on illegal immigration.

    It is up to us to get the word out as much as possible as to the deception and smoke and mirrors Huckabee is using in his plan. The only way for people to wake up to its deception is for us (and those like us) to plant a seed of doubt in the minds of people concerned about the issue of illegal immigration. The MSM certainly won't.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member Populist's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    8,085
    From CBS:

    "Despite attacks by Romney that Huckabee was weak on the issue of illegal immigration, Huckabee eked out an edge among GOP voters who chose immigration as the most important issue nationally."

    Agreed, we have to expose Huckabee's amnesty scheme to voters in NH and beyond, although don't forget that NH has not been impacted that much (yet) on illegal immigration.

    Romney has to peg McCain rightfully as the typical Washington insider. Huck only got 14% of the non-Evangelical vote in Iowa, so I hope NH voters see through him and his phony populism.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member Saki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    856
    Both McCain and Huckabee need to be forced to divulge the particulars of their illegal immigration proposals. No ducking and dodging or ambiguity. It's perfectly reasonable, for example, that Americans demand Huckabee give a timeframe for any "touchback" proposal. We need to make both of them squirm.

  5. #5
    PFWAG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    177
    Quote Originally Posted by Populist
    From CBS:

    "Despite attacks by Romney that Huckabee was weak on the issue of illegal immigration, Huckabee eked out an edge among GOP voters who chose immigration as the most important issue nationally."

    Agreed, we have to expose Huckabee's amnesty scheme to voters in NH and beyond, although don't forget that NH has not been impacted that much (yet) on illegal immigration.
    Here are the actual facts on all the candidate's stand on the most important issue nationally, illegal illegal immigration:

    http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-96896.html

    Maybe its time to bring back literacy tests. The DEMS at least proved its OK for women to vote.

    John Adams, signer of the Declaration of Independence and later president, wrote in 1776 that no good could come from enfranchising more Americans:

    "Depend upon it, Sir, it is dangerous to open so fruitful a source of controversy and altercation as would be opened by attempting to alter the qualifications of voters; there will be no end to it. New claims will arise; women will demand the vote; lads from 12 to 21 will think their rights not enough attended to; and every man who has not a farthing, will demand an equal voice with any other, in all acts of state. It tends to confound and destroy all distinctions, and prostrate all ranks to one common level."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •