Thread: Jerome R. Corsi - Evidence: Syria gas attack work of U.S. allies

WND EXCLUSIVE

Evidence: Syria gas attack work of U.S. allies

Contrary evidence arises as U.S. considers punishing Assad regime

Jerome R. Corsi

Published: 4 hours ago
4 Videos at the Page Link:

NEW YORK – As the U.S. considers a response to what it calls a chemical weapon attack by Syria’s Bashar al-Assad regime that killed hundreds of civilians, reliable Middle Eastern sources say they have evidence the culprits actually were the rebel forces trying to take over the government.

Secretary of State John Kerry accused the Assad government Monday of covering up the use of chemical weapons in “a cowardly crime” and a “moral obscenity” that shocked the world’s conscience. Kerry claimed the Obama administration had “undeniable” evidence “that the Assad government was culpable in the use of chemical weapons on civilians” in the Aug. 21 attack in Damascus suburbs.

Reports that the Obama administration is considering a military strike against the Assad government continued to circulate Monday. Meanwhile, U.N. weapon inspectors in Syria were fired upon by snipers as they attempted to investigate the site of the Aug. 21 attack.

Assad has rejected charges that his government forces used chemical weapons as “preposterous” and “completely politicized,” the Los Angeles Times reported.

He argues Syrian forces were in the targeted area.

“How is it possible that any country would use chemical weapons, or any weapons of mass destruction, in an area where its own forces are located?” Assad asked in the interview with Izvestia, according to a translation provided by Syria’s official news agency and published by the Los Angeles Times.
“This is preposterous! These accusations are completely politicized and come on the back of the advances made by the Syrian Army against the terrorists.”

Rebel attack?

With the assistance of former PLO member and native Arabic-speaker Walid Shoebat, WND has assembled evidence from various Middle Eastern sources that cast doubt on Obama administration claims the Assad government is responsible for last week’s attack.

A video posted on YouTube, embedded below, shows Free Syrian Army, or FSA, rebel forces launching a Sarin gas attack on a Syrian village.

Another video posted on YouTube shows what appears to be Syrian rebel forces loading a canister of nerve gas on a rocket to fire presumably at civilians and possibly government forces.

As seen below, a screen capture from the video shows rebel civilian forces placing a suspicious blue canister on top of a rocket-launching device.



A separate YouTube video from Syrian television shows a government-captured arsenal of what appears to be nerve gas weapons seized from a rebel stronghold in Jobar, Syria.

The image below shows canisters in the seized rebel arsenal from Jobar that appear to resemble the canister launched by rebel forces in the first image above.



Syrian TV news report of rebel weapons seized in Jobar, Syria

A close-up from the Syrian television news report, seen below, shows a chemical agent identified as having been made by a “Saudi factory.”



Syrian TV news report showing chemical agents identified as manufactured in Saudi Arabia

A report from the Russian Arabic-language channel RT Arabic shows captured rebel arsenals apparently with chemical agents manufactured in Saudi Arabia and gas masks, supporting Russian claims that the rebels are the culprits in the alleged chemical attack.

On Aug. 23, LiveLeak.com hosted an audio recording of a phone call broadcast on Syrian TV between a terrorist affiliated with the rebel civilian militia “Shuhada al-Bayada Battalion” in Homs, Syria, and his Saudi Arabian boss, identified as “Abulbasit.” The phone call indicates rebel-affiliated terrorists in Syria, not the Assad government, launched the chemical weapons attack in Deir Ballba in the Homs, Syria, countryside.

The terrorist said his group, which comprises 200 terrorists escaped from al-Bayadah to al-Daar al-Kabera through a tunnel, needed to buy weapons to attack Homs.

The Saudi financier, who was in Cairo, asked the Syrian terrorists to give details about his group and how it will receive the money. The Saudi admitted his support to terrorists in Daraa and the Damascus countryside. The Syrian terrorist told him that one of the achievements of his “battalion” was the use of chemical weapons in Deir Ballba.

The recorded phone call disclosed the cooperation between two terrorist groups in Syria to bring two bottles of Sarin Gas from the Barzeh neighborhood in Damascus.

Russian media sources have consistently reported Syrian military have discovered rebel warehouses containing chemical weapons agents and have documented rebel chemical weapons attacks on the Syrian civilians the military.

Should U.S. military take sides in Syria's civil war?

• Yes, the U.S. should do everything possible to topple Bashar Assad's regime
• Yes, the U.S. is taking appropriate measures to topple Syria's leadership
• Yes, but Obama is going too far with military engagement and supplying arms to al-Qaida types
• Yes, but we're supporting the wrong side!
• Yes, but only if Congress declares war, as is constitutionally required
• I don't know who's who over there. Don't we have enough problems here to worry about?
• No, this is just some new world order scheme
• No, Assad is a monster, but he has protected religious minorities. That will be over when Brotherhood takes over
• No, didn't we learn our lesson from Egypt and Libya?
• No, Sarah Palin had it right: The U.S. should let the 2 sides fight and 'Let Allah sort 'em out'
• No, both sides are evil – but the current regime is better than what's coming if it's overthrown
• Other

View Results

http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/video-sho...tack-in-syria/

Should U.S. military take sides in Syria's civil war?

• No, Sarah Palin had it right: The U.S. should let the 2 sides fight and 'Let Allah sort 'em out' (50%, 162 Votes)
• No, both sides are evil – but the current regime is better than what's coming if it's overthrown (25%, 83 Votes)
• No, didn't we learn our lesson from Egypt and Libya? (9%, 28 Votes)
• No, this is just some new world order scheme (5%, 15 Votes)
• No, Assad is a monster, but he has protected religious minorities. That will be over when Brotherhood takes over (5%, 15 Votes)
• Yes, but only if Congress declares war, as is constitutionally required (2%, 8 Votes)
• Yes, but Obama is going too far with military engagement and supplying arms to al-Qaida types (2%, 5 Votes)
• Yes, but we're supporting the wrong side! (1%, 4 Votes)
• I don't know who's who over there. Don't we have enough problems here to worry about? (1%, 4 Votes)
• Yes, the U.S. should do everything possible to topple Bashar Assad's regime (less than 1%, 1 Votes)
• Yes, the U.S. is taking appropriate measures to topple Syria's leadership (less than 1%, 1 Votes)
• Other (less than 1%, 1 Votes)

Total Voters: 327

Vote

http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/video-sho...tack-in-syria/

WND Related Stories

Greatest threat to U.S.: These 6,000 jihadists
Islamists decide to back Syrian uprising
Syria 'used Chinese intel to bomb' U.S. arms shipment
Exposed: Syria's backroom deal with Russia
VIDEO: Syrian 'rebels' behead man, execute 2 women
N. Korea rebuilding damaged Syrian missiles
Iran commander warns Obama on Syria
Syrian forces training to storm Israel's border
Syrian rebels to Christians: Flee or die!
Turkey unrest 'payback' for fueling Syria insurgency?
Syria: Game-changing missiles already deployed
'Big mistake' for Israel to downplay missiles to Syria
Assad: We already have S-300 missiles
McCain's rebel host in Syria leads al-Qaida-allied council
Syrian civil war spills into Lebanon
Claim: More game-changing missiles reach Syria
Syria helped by Israeli bombing?
Syria 'to open borders' for flood of terror
Shock claim: Israeli strike timed with Syria rebels
Iran, Syria prep retaliation for Israeli airstrikes
Obama, Hamas helping same side?
Obama OK with American joining al-Qaida?
Syrian rebels to hold unusual, immediate meeting
Report: U.S. training Syrian rebels
U.S. to instigate insurgency in Lebanon?
Obama to change course on Syria?



http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/video-sho...tack-in-syria/

http://www.alipac.us/f19/russian-hel...2012-a-276079/

http://www.alipac.us/f19/wesley-clar...-years-261909/

US Planned Chemical Weapons False Flag Attack for Syria, According to Leaked Documents

August 26, 2013 | Filed under: AFRICA | MIDEAST,JG Vibes,War | Posted by: JGVibes

Back in January the mainstream media uncovered a US backed plan to launch a chemical weapons attack in Syria and blame it on Assad’s regime.

(Photo by Uriel Sinai/Getty Images)

By JG Vibes
Intellihub.com
August 27, 2013

The US government and the United Nations are on the verge of invading Syria under the pretense of a humanitarian intervention.
While Assad is definitely a tyrant, a US invasion of the country is a worst case scenario for the people living there.
Many details of last week’s chemical weapons attack remain a mystery, but there are a few very suspicious clues pointing to a false flag attack.
ANI and Yahoo News Reported that “The Obama administration gave green signal to a chemical weapons attack plan in Syria that could be blamed on President Bashar al Assad’s regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country, leaked documents have shown. A new report, that contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence, showed a scheme ‘approved by Washington’. As per the scheme ‘Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons,’”[1]
Adding to the evidence, on August 23, Russia Today published an article titled “Materials implicating Syrian govt in chemical attack prepared before incident – Russia.”


According to Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Aleksandr Lukashevich:

We’re getting more new evidence that this criminal act was of a provocative nature.”
“In particular, there are reports circulating on the Internet, in particular that the materials of the incident and accusations against government troops had been posted for several hours before the so-called attack. Thus, it was a pre-planned action.”[2]

As the world has become smaller with global communication it has been more and more difficult for governments to justify war. Most of the average people on the planet don’t want war, so now these invasions are being sold to the general population as humanitarian interventions.
Like any head of state Assad is definitely a tyrant, and has been killing people by the thousands for years, but invading the people that he has enslaved will do nothing but cause more death and destruction, just as it has in similar cases throughout the Middle East and Africa.
Sources:
[1] US ‘backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria, blame it on Assad govt’: Report – Yahoo
[2] Materials implicating Syrian govt in chemical attack prepared before incident – RT
Writer Bio:

JG Vibes is an Intellihub.com investigative journalist, staff writer and editor. He is also the author of “Alchemy of the Modern Renaissance”, an 87 chapter e-book and is an artist with an established record label.

For media inquires, interviews, questions or suggestions for this author, email: vibes@intellihub.com or telephone: (347) 759-6075.

Read more articles by this author here.


http://intellihub.com/2013/08/26/us-...ked-documents/

Russia Warns Chemical Weapons May Come From Obama's Rebels, Not Assad...

August 26, 2013/ RedFlag


AP

(THE GATEWAY PUNDIT) -- Why does Obama support terrorists?
What a mess in Syria – Russia says the gas that killed innocent civilians was set off by the rebels who benefit more from it than Assad. If Obama attacks Assad then he will be siding with terrorists again, like in Libya, when Obama bombed Kaddafi forces and sided with the rebels including Al Qaeda, and in Egypt when Obama sided with the terrorist Muslim Brotherhood regime. The fear is that like before World War I, Islamists are hoping to start up another World War.
The Daily Mail reports,

As the centenary of the 1914-1918 Great War approaches, historian Christopher Clark points out that conflict’s eerie, modern relevance.
‘The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand began with a cavalcade of automobiles and a squad of suicide bombers: the young men who gathered in Sarajevo with bombs on 28 June 1914 had been told by their handlers to take their own lives after carrying out their mission, and received phials of potassium cyanide to do it with,’ he says in a London Review of Books essay.
‘Behind the outrage at Sarajevo was an avowedly terrorist organisation with a cult of sacrifice, death and revenge: extra- territorial, secretive, scattered in cells across political borders, its links to any sovereign government were oblique.’
Sound familiar?
Al Qaeda stokes the ire of Muslims angry at what they see as the defilement of their lands by the oil-seeking, infidel West.
Our retaliation for its September 2001 attack on America with hijacked passenger jets, killing more than 3,000, was to invade Afghanistan and Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, costing more than 100,000 Islamic lives on top of our own sad audit of dead and maimed.
But 9/11, as Americans call it, did not trigger the Third World War. On the contrary, for a brief moment — before the retaliation began — Americans enjoyed the sympathy of most of the world.
The West is drawing up a list of targets for Cruise missile strikes aimed at crippling the Assad regime.
How will Syria’s main allies, Russia and Iran, respond? Putin’s spokesmen deplore the poison gas attack, but suggest it might have been the work of the Syrian rebels, which include Al Qaeda elements. They point out that Assad’s military is winning and doesn’t need to resort to using illegal weapons, and suggest that only the rebels stood to gain from the international anger aroused by such an attack.
Now, it’s different. America, urged by its European allies, considers action against the ruling Assad regime in Syria, which stands accused of using poison gas to kill hundreds of its people.

Read more via The Gateway Pundit...


http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines...bels-not-assad