Results 1 to 2 of 2
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: Lowry: Trump v. the elites on immigration

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443

    Lowry: Trump v. the elites on immigration

    Updated Sep 2, 2016
    Rich Lowry

    Donald Trump’s speech in Arizona has occasioned wailing and rending of garments among the commentariat and “respectable” people everywhere.

    At bottom, the cause of the freakout is simple: Trump believes in immigration laws, and the country’s elite really doesn’t.

    Minus a few trademark excesses that are too ingrained in the Trump shtick to abandon at this point — e.g., we are going to build a wall and Mexico is going to pay for it — Trump’s speech was rock-solid on policy. The core of it represents what, more or less, any realistic regime of immigration enforcement would look like. That the opinion elite recoiled in horror shows how out of sympathy it is with borders and what it takes to enforce them.

    It was understandable that everyone felt whiplash. Trump had primed people to expect something different, both with his public wobbliness over the past week and his quick strike into Mexico, where he lucked out in a successful meeting with that country’s hapless president, Enrique Peña Nieto.

    And Trump didn’t do himself any favors by giving the Arizona speech in a rally setting. When he is in his shouty mode, Trump could read the phone book and make it sound like an outlandish screed.

    All that said, Trump nailed a few theses to the door of his promised great, impenetrable border wall that are important and too often neglected:

    — Immigration policy should serve the interests of the United States and its workers. This should be axiomatic. Yet it has taken Trump to make the proposition central to the immigration debate. There is no doubt that illegal immigration is good for illegal immigrants, but the first obligation of the United States is to protect its citizens and legal residents.

    — Illegal immigrants compete against low-skilled workers already here and are a net drain on the government. The conventional rhetoric around immigration makes it sound as though we are overwhelmingly welcoming engineers and the like, when about half of illegal immigrants are high-school dropouts. Even if they work hard (and most do), they are unlikely to earn enough to pay much in taxes, and their families access welfare benefits through their children.

    — “Anyone who has entered the United States illegally,” Trump said, “is subject to deportation.” This sounds radical only because of the progress the Left has made in delegitimizing deportation. If we aren’t going to have a sweeping amnesty or tolerate the status quo, illegal immigrants must be subject to deportation.

    — Legal immigration, too, should serve the interests of the nation. Republicans tend to obsess with illegal immigration. But it is a decades-long surge in legal immigration that has us on pace to hit a historic high in the foreign-born population. It shouldn’t be out of bounds, as Trump suggested, to want to tap the brakes and adjust whom we are accepting to emphasize “merit, skill and proficiency.”

    The opinion elite was never going to accept a Trump speech that didn’t have the “right answer” on the 11 million. By ruling out amnesty for now, Trump emphatically gave the wrong answer — although one that makes sense if we take our immigration laws seriously.

    An amnesty will act as a magnet for future illegal immigrants unless we have a comprehensive, functioning system of enforcement in place to dissuade them from coming. That’s why enforcement has to come first.

    On the merits, Trump’s speech was the soundest immigration speech ever delivered by a presidential nominee, and a total policy victory for restrictionists. There are two problems, though.

    One is that it is such a tough-minded agenda, it needs to be presented with a deft touch. Instead, Trump seemingly went out of his way to make his policy sound as audacious and threatening as possible.

    Two, if Trump loses, this agenda will be discredited, and restrictionists will instantly be as embattled as ever, once again fighting a desperate rearguard action against a political establishment and opinion elite that consider their priorities bizarre and hateful.

    http://www.heraldextra.com/news/opin...303d99300.html
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    It appears NOW that the National Review is working towards relevancy again. Nice to read this. We can probably forgive their prior mistakes working against Trump for no valid reasons of any kind, but rest assured, National Review, most of us will not forget them.

    When you try to demonize or diminish someone who does not deserve it, there is duty to be paid.

    Americans may not always agree on issues and policies, we may not all like the same person running for an office, and we expect supporters of one to attack the candidate of the others, but there is a line that even we won't cross. However, we expect and in the future will demand a Press that crosses no lines and that has no bias or corruption in the coverage of political elections.
    Last edited by Judy; 09-04-2016 at 12:28 AM.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Similar Threads

  1. Seeing Trump as vulnerable, GOP elites now eye a contested convention
    By ALIPAC in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-09-2016, 08:20 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-09-2016, 04:35 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-01-2016, 06:39 PM
  4. GOP ELITES PLOT TO PURGE TRUMP
    By Newmexican in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-14-2015, 12:43 AM
  5. William Kristol and Rich Lowry: Kill the Immigration Bill
    By Jean in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-09-2013, 05:45 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •