Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    working4change
    Guest

    Numbersusa Fax your Reps

    On April 15, the House of Representatives debated a motion to recommit H.R. 5719 (Taxpayer Assistance and Simplification Act) with instructions to add language to deny tax exempt interest with respect to bonds of sanctuary states and cities. The motion failed due to a tie vote.

    Had the motion passed, states and cities that practice "sanctuary" policies to protect illegal aliens would have faced pressure to start enforcing the law.

    If you visit the Numbersusa site you can fax your rep to say "thank you" or to say "shame" on you. Many reps who have co-sponsored the Save Act voted Nay to cutting off funds to sanctuary cities.




    I hope this isn't a duplicate

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Oregon (pronounced "ore-ee-gun")
    Posts
    8,464
    And a related story from NumbersUSA from this morning -

    Immigration activist: Bush has gotten message on border enforcement
    OneNewsNow : April 17 , 2008 -- by Chad Groening

    "The Numbers USA leader hopes that that enforcement momentum will carry on into the next administration. 'One thing we can hope for is that they move aggressively so far down the line in enforcement that by the time the next president takes office next January, it will be too hard and too embarrassing for them to totally turn everything back,' [Beck] says. 'So I think ... in that sense there's some real optimism about what's happening inside the Bush administration right now.'"

    The head of the grassroots immigration organization Numbers USA believes President Bush has finally gotten the message when it comes to the problem of illegal immigration and is allowing federal agents to step up enforcement. Roy Beck shares his pleasure with the increased enforcement in recent months both on the border and in the interior of the country, with Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents making more workplace raids on companies that hire illegal immigrants.

    Beck says the administration is finally letting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) do its job -- in contrast to the first few years of the Bush administration.

    "The early Bush, for six and a half years, was open borders," Beck asserts, suggesting that the president had decided he was not going to allow his DHS to enforce the law. "[W]e know for a fact, from talking to DHS people, for the first six years as soon as the DHS would start to enforce the law, the White House would smack 'em down.

    "But ever since last summer, whenever the amnesty was [turned away by Congress], I don't think it's so much that he's pushing enforcement -- I think he's allowing enforcement," Beck continues. "He's finally allowing the enforcement people in DHS to do their job."

    The Numbers USA leader hopes that that enforcement momentum will carry on into the next administration. "One thing we can hope for is that they move aggressively so far down the line in enforcement that by the time the next president takes office next January, it will be too hard and too embarrassing for them to totally turn everything back," he says. "So I think ... in that sense there's some real optimism about what's happening inside the Bush administration right now."

    Beck admits it is more likely that Senator John McCain (R-Arizona) would carry on with enforcement than would the two Democratic presidential hopefuls -- particularly Senator Barack Obama (D-Illinois), who he believes would likely gut enforcement completely.


    http://www.numbersusa.com/news?ID=9967
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member ourcountrynottheirs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    1,176
    Done. Thanks for the heads-up!
    avatar:*912 March in DC

  4. #4
    Senior Member Populist's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    8,085
    Beck admits it is more likely that Senator John McCain (R-Arizona) would carry on with enforcement than would the two Democratic presidential hopefuls -- particularly Senator Barack Obama (D-Illinois), who he believes would likely gut enforcement completely.
    So am I to take from this that I should vote for ... McCain? I respect Roy Beck immensely for what he and Numbers are doing, but I am still unsold on McCain. Granted, McCain may be more committed to enforcement than Obama and Clinton, but in terms of stopping a mass "pathway" amnesty attempt, I would venture to say that it would be easier for rank and file GOP members to oppose Obama than an empowered McCain on this issue. Just my somewhat defensive speculation, and I wish it didn't come to this.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •