Thread: NumbersUSA: Duncan Hunter best on immigration

Excerpt from an email I received from NumberUSA this morning:

OVERALL Presidential Candidate Ratings On IMMIGRATION
How Well Would Each Candidate PROTECT Workers, Communities and Taxpayers FROM OVER-IMMIGRATION?

(SEE BELOW FOR HOW POINTS WERE ASSIGNED ON 36-POINT SCALE.)

EXCELLENT
34 points:


DUNCAN HUNTER

GOOD
28 points:

FRED THOMPSON
22 points:

MITT ROMNEY

Fair
20 points:

RON PAUL
18 points:

MIKE HUCKABEE

Poor
8 points:

RUDY GIULIANI

Bad
7 points:

CHRIS DODD

JOHN McCAIN
5 points:

JOE BIDEN

JOHN EDWARDS

DENNIS KUCINICH

BILL RICHARDSON
4 points:

HILLARY CLINTON

BARACK OBAMA

HOW POINTS WERE ASSESSED:

Points are based on candidate promises as of 2JAN08 on
(a) amnesty,
(b) stoppping future illegal immigration and
(c) reducing importation of foreign labor competition, plus
(d) rating of past immigration actions in political office.

Look at full ratings in 16 categories at Presidential Candidate Ratings website.

Points were assigned to the ratings for the first four overall categories: 0 points for "abysmal" rating, 1 for "bad", 3 for "poor", 5 for "fair", 7 for "GOOD" and 9 for "EXCELLENT".

The above needs to be considered if your priority issue is immigration!

According to NumbersUSA, the information was updated and modified just today. Hunter has taken a clear lead on the issue!

See rudy should have ran as a Dem.. he would be a shoe in to get the Nomination..

The Dems really were stupid

Rudi should have been their guy

I like Duncan. So, tell me. Why is it he has so little support?

Originally Posted by usanevada

The Dems really were stupid

Rudi should have been their guy

Actually it is quite cunning... If it is Rudy VS any Dem.. they are still defacto winners..

Just me, but Hunter is good on illegal immigration, and I would gladly vote for him if he is nominated.

To me, his some of his other ideas are not good - such as school vouchers, same sex marriage, foreign policy, etc. They almost seem like a carbon copy of this President's ideas and this administration can't possibly be so wrong on immigration, trade, domestic policies, etc., and right on foreign policy.

Just my opinion, but once again, if he is nominated, I would certainly vote for him.

Originally Posted by nntrixie

Just me, but Hunter is good on illegal immigration, and I would gladly vote for him if he is nominated.

To me, his some of his other ideas are not good - such as school vouchers, same sex marriage, foreign policy, etc. They almost seem like a carbon copy of this President's ideas and this administration can't possibly be so wrong on immigration, trade, domestic policies, etc., and right on foreign policy.

Just my opinion, but once again, if he is nominated, I would certainly vote for him.

To me that is a negative. That is my only concern with him. He appears like more of the same. Except on immigration and he is by far the best left. This is just my perception, so please anyone, feel free to enlighten me on how he has broken with the current administration? I am sure he has, I just am not aware of those facts.

Originally Posted by Pistov

Originally Posted by nntrixie

Just me, but Hunter is good on illegal immigration, and I would gladly vote for him if he is nominated.

To me, his some of his other ideas are not good - such as school vouchers, same sex marriage, foreign policy, etc. They almost seem like a carbon copy of this President's ideas and this administration can't possibly be so wrong on immigration, trade, domestic policies, etc., and right on foreign policy.

Just my opinion, but once again, if he is nominated, I would certainly vote for him.

To me that is a negative. That is my only concern with him. He appears like more of the same. Except on immigration and he is by far the best left. This is just my perception, so please anyone, feel free to enlighten me on how he has broken with the current administration? I am sure he has, I just am not aware of those facts.

Hunter voted against NAFTA during the Clinton administration, and against CAFTA. Although the "trade agreements" that the Globalists love so much are part and parcel of regionalization schemes, and therefore tied to the illegal invasion, he has also called for scrapping our trade deals with China, and starting all over again. He also recognizes the PRC for the threat it is, which Bush does not seem to. Hunter was instrumental in scuttling the Dubai Ports World Deal, that Bush wanted so bad, he could taste it.

That is good to know.. For me Hunter or Paul are the only choices. for me anyway.

both have positives and negatives..

We're from all different backgrounds and persuasions here. I myself spent forty years voting Democrat. Don't throw out the conservative baby with the bathwater because Bush is sitting in it. Anyone that believes that the sanctioned illegal invasion symptom of globalism can be stopped in a liberal, progressive, socialist welfare state needs to keep learning on this issue.