I don't have a link on this as it was emailed to me.


National United Nations Research Association



NEW LAW - addendum to bush press release

C:data/NUNRA/TREATIES/SEN/DOC-87





HOW & WHY IS THE ALIEN INVASION "LEGAL" & ENCOURAGED?

(BECAUSE IT WAS PLANNED THAT WAY)


(Excerpt From) SENATE DOCUMENT #87

REVIEW OF THE UNITED NATIONS CHARTER


January 7, 1954
U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.


Page 165

30. REPORT OF THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ON

THE CHARTER OF THE ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES,

AUGUST 24, 1950 30


The Committee on Foreign Relations, to whom was referred the Charter of the Organization of American States (Ex. A, 81st Cong., 1st sess.), signed at Bogota on April 30, 1948, unanimously report the Charter to the Senate and recommend that its advice and consent to ratification be given subject to the reservation set forth in the resolution of ratification.

_____________________________________

30 S. Ex. Rept, No. 15, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Appendixes omitted. For text of the Charter see document 152.




Page 166 REVIEW OF THE UNITED NATIONS CHARTER


1. THE MAIN PURPOSE OF THE CHARTER


The (OAS) Charter is the legal constitution of the inter-American system. It establishes the Organization of the American States, on a permanent treaty basis, as the regional agency of the 21 American Republics within the United Nations. Its basic purpose is to reorganize and to consolidate the international organization of the Americas in the interest of greater efficiency and to meet the changing needs of the postwar period.

The Charter does not represent any radical departure from what has gone on in the past; it is the product of over 60 years of evolution in the New World. As such it represents a continuation of the progressive development of the cooperation started in 1889 when the first inter-American organization was established at the initiative of the United States.




FOLLOWED BY –




American Convention on Human Rights

"Pact of San Jose, Costa Rica"

(Un-Constitutional "treaty" entered into force in 197

Preamble


The American states signatory to the present Convention,

Reaffirming their intention to consolidate in this hemisphere, within the framework of democratic institutions, a system of personal liberty and social justice based on respect for the essential rights of man;

Recognizing that the essential rights of man are not derived from one's being a national of a certain state, but are based upon attributes of the human personality, and that they therefore justify international protection in the form of a convention reinforcing or complementing the protection provided by the domestic law of the American states;

Considering that these principles have been set forth in the Charter of the Organization of American States, (of which the U.S. is a member "State") in the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, and in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and that they have been reaffirmed and refined in other international instruments, worldwide as well as regional in scope; (Added, UnConstitutionally authorized by U.N. Charter Article 52)

Reiterating that, in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the ideal of free men enjoying freedom from fear and want can be achieved only if conditions are created whereby everyone may enjoy his economic, social, and cultural rights, as well as his civil and political rights; and

Considering that the Third Special Inter-American Conference (Buenos Aires, 1967) approved the incorporation into the Charter of the Organization itself of broader standards with respect to economic, social, and educational rights and resolved that an inter-American convention on human rights should determine the structure, competence, and procedure of the organs responsible for these matters,

Have agreed upon the following:



PART I - STATE OBLIGATIONS AND RIGHTS PROTECTED

CHAPTER I - GENERAL OBLIGATIONS

Article 1. Obligation to Respect Rights



1. The States Parties to this Convention undertake to respect the rights and freedoms recognized herein and to ensure to all persons subject to their jurisdiction the free and full exercise of those rights and freedoms, without any discrimination for reasons of race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, economic status, birth, or any other social condition.

2. For the purposes of this Convention, "person" means every human being.



Article 2. Domestic Legal Effects



Where the exercise of any of the rights or freedoms referred to in Article 1 is not already ensured by legislative or other provisions, the States Parties undertake to adopt, in accordance with their constitutional processes and the provisions of this Convention, such legislative or other measures as may be necessary to give effect to those rights or freedoms.



CHAPTER II - CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS


Article 3. Right to Juridical Personality



Every person has the right to recognition as a person before the law. (WHICH LAW?)



Article 4. Right to Life



1. Every person has the right to have his life respected. This right shall be protected by law and, in general, from the moment of conception. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.

2. In countries that have not abolished the death penalty, it may be imposed only for the most serious crimes and pursuant to a final judgment rendered by a competent court and in accordance with a law establishing such punishment, enacted prior to the commission of the crime. The application of such punishment shall not be extended to crimes to which it does not presently apply.

3. The death penalty shall not be re-established in states that have abolished it.

4. In no case shall capital punishment be inflicted for political offenses or related common crimes.

5. Capital punishment shall not be imposed upon persons who, at the time the crime was committed, were under 18 years of age or over 70 years of age; . . . . .


AND THEN, MORE "HUMAN RIGHTS” INCLUDING RIGHTS TO SOCIAL SECURITY; ADEQUATE MEDICAL CARE; DECENT HOUSING; PAID VACATIONS; FREEDOM FROM WANT, FEAR, DISCRIMINATION,( etc, etc.) FOR EVERYONE. (See International Covenant On Civil & Political Rights – 1992



The "New Law"of the Land

The United Nations Charter & Treaties



"…Decency, security, and liberty alike demand that government officials shall be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the citizen. In a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy…” Mr. Justice Brandeis, U.S. Supreme Court -- dissent passage in Olmstead V. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (192


The Constitution of the United State of America, Article VI, par. 2, stipulates that the Supreme Law of the Land consists of three elements: (1)This Constitution, and (2)the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof (the Constitution), and (3)all Treaties made (past tense), and which shall be made (future tense), under the Authority of the United States (government), shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.


Note the above underlined QUALIFYING PHRASE ("under the authority of the United States")! The authority of the United States (Government) is strictly limited by original intent! The Government possesses no inherent or written authority to amend the fundamental character and/or structure of itself. Amendments (changes) must be lawfully executed in accordance with Article 5 of the U.S. Constitution – NOT BY EXECUTIVE ORDERS, TREATIES, CONGRESS, NOR THE SUPREME COURT.


U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISIONS FROM THE PAST:

1…In the case of New Orleans v. U.S. (10 Pet. 662 (1836) ), the Court said that “Congress cannot by legislation enlarge the Federal jurisdiction nor can it be enlarged under the treatymaking power"..


2. Again in Doe v. Braden ( 16 How. 635 (1853) ), the Court indicated it thought that the Constitution was superior to a treaty when it stated:

"The treaty is therefore a law made by the proper authority, and the courts of justice have no right to annul or disregard any of its provisions, unless they violate the Constitution of the United States. * * *"


3. Later, in The Cherokee Tobacco Case (11 Wall. 616, 620-621 (1870) ), the Supreme Court stated:

"It need hardly be said that a treaty cannot change the Constitution or be held valid if it be in violation of that instrument. This results from the nature and fundamental principles of our Government".


4. The Court, in the case of Geoffroy v. Riggs (133 U.S. 258 (1890) that:

"It would not be contended that it (the treaty power) extends so far as to authorize what the Constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the Government or in that of one of the States, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter, without its consent".


5. U.S. Supreme Court, Reid v. Covert. 354 U.S. l (1957):

"[No] agreement with a foreign nation can confer power on the Congress, or on any other branch of Government, which is free from the restraints of the Constitution. .

[There] is nothing in [the supremacy clause] which intimates that treaties and laws enacted pursuant to them do not have to comply with the provisions of the Constitution. Nor is there anything in the debates which accompanied the drafting and ratification of the Constitution which even suggests such a result.

It would be manifestly contrary to the objectives of those who created the Constitution, as well as those who were responsible for the Bill of Rights*let alone alien to our entire constitutional history and tradition*to construe Article VI as permitting the United States to exercise power under an international agreement without observing constitutional prohibitions. In effect, such construction would permit amendment of that document in a manner not sanctioned by Article V. The prohibitions of the Constitution were designed to apply to all branches of the National Government and they cannot be nullified by the Executive or by the Executive and the Senate combined...."” CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, Stone, Seidman,Sunstein Tushnet - p. 216.


BUT the Senate and President DID change the fundamental character and/or structure of government via the bogus U.N. Charter treaty! See United Nations Charter Article 25: "The Members of the United Nations agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council in accordance with the present Charter". Also, see Chapter VII, Article 39-51 to see why Congress hasn’t declared war ever since the United States spawned and ratified the U.N. Charter. Un-Constitutional U.N. "treaties" serve as quasi-legal "obligations” and the "cornerstone of U.S. domestic and foreign policy" (Sente Document #87) through a deliberate and unlawful perversion of the the U.S. Constitution that authorizes the President and Senate to ratify legitimate mutually beneficial treaties with other sovereign nations – not to subvert or override the Constitution itself.

The United States of America has been stealthfully subverted by the U.S. Government and changed from a Constitutional Republic to a subservient member state of the United Nations without the general knowledge, understanding and/or permission of the Several States and the People. The Constitution of the United States of America no longer serves as the Law of the Land but only as an irritating word to traitors – as one recently stated that: “It is only only a G-d damned piece of paper”!! And, about declaring war, the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee said “. . .we don’t do that anymore . . . it’s anachronistic”! It’s time to take back our INDEPENDENCE !


GET US OUT OF THE U.N. NOW !!! -- SUPPORT HR-1146 -- TELL YOUR U.S. SENATORS & REPRESENTATIVE TODAY !!