Thread: the NAU by 2010 and the New World Order

"When the facts are known it is clear to me that anyone who takes an oath of office to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States and then deliberately attempts to subvert the sovereignty and the strategic interest of this nation in favor of those of another government - world order or not - is guilty of, in a word, treason. Think again of the words of Richard Gardner, former deputy assistant secretary of state, that appeared in the CFR journal: 'We are likely to do better by building our "house of world order" from [the] bottom up rather than from the top down . . . an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, is likely to get us to world order faster than the old fashioned assault.' (Emphasis added.)

"How dare an official (or even a former official) of the United States government set out to erode the sovereignty of the United States piece by piece! How dare a cabal of elected and unelected officials set out to subvert our constitution, our national sovereignty, and our democratic way of life!

"Have any of us been told that the secretaries of state, the secretaries of the treasury, the heads of the CIA, the heads of the National Security Council, the heads of the Federal Reserve Board, and countless others are in agreement that American sovereignty is to be 'eroded piece by piece'? When has there ever been a referendum for all of the people to decide whether they want to discard our Constitution in favor of a one-world government? The clear answer is, 'Never!'"

Pat Robertson, The New World Order, p. 109, Word Publishing, 1991

On Tuesday, May 29, President Bush visited an immigration officer training facility and urged Congress to
"fix this system now, before it's too late."

Too late for what? It is always in order to repel an invasion, at any time, late, early, or right now.

Too late for what? Will we be overrun by illegal aliens and swamped by uncontrolled immigration if S.1348/S.1639 does not pass in 2007?

Too late for what? Does he mean that if it doesn't pass now, next year will be too late, with accountability to the voters staring Congress in the face on election day?

Too late for what? Will S.1348/S.1639 become politically untenable in another year or two, as the number of American citizens displaced from their jobs becomes unmanageable and impossible to ignore?

Too late for what? Is there a confidential timetable for the NAU and the NAFTA superhighway, which requires passage of S.1348/S.1639 now rather than in 2008 or 2010?

What did Pres. Bush mean by the phrase, "before it's too late"?

The Council for Foreign Relations (CFR) has projected the date for the North American Union (NAU) at
2010.

They have it figured out. The Hispanics are going to vote and Hilary and Obama will set NAU in motion. I know that there are powerful people involved in this. Bush is a liberal hiding behind the Republican Ticket. Now is the time for conservatives to start a rucus. The Republicans better speak there minds now or there party is gone. I am sure that some Republicans are hiding behind there party also.