Thread: ntel pros say Bush is lying about foiling 2002 terror attack

I know this has nothing to do with illegal immigration but as we all know so many things tie into the issue. Just thought you would like to read this. I have felt that he has used stuff like this for a while when the heat on him gets to hot. He has cryed wolf so many times since 9-11 how can yuo believe him! You cry wolf to many times and then when there really IS credible information who will believe him?

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/blog/200 ... ing_a.html

Home / Email this page



Intel pros say Bush is lying about foiling 2002 terror attack
Posted at February 10, 2006 06:56 AM in The Rant .

By DOUG THOMPSON

Outraged intelligence professionals say President George W. Bush is "cheapening" and "politicizing" their work with claims the United States foiled a planned terrorist attack against Los Angeles in 2002.

"The President has cheapened the entire intelligence community by dragging us into his fantasy world," says a longtime field operative of the Central Intelligence Agency. "He is basing this absurd claim on the same discredited informant who told us Al Qaeda would attack selected financial institutions in New York and Washington."

Within hours of the President’s speech Thursday claiming his administration had prevented a major attack, sources who said they were current and retired intelligence pros from the CIA, NSA, FBI and military contacted Capitol Hill Blue with angry comments disputing the President’s remarks.

“He’s full of shit,â€

I've heard arguments made that Bush was actually involved in the 9/11 attack. through his involvement wtih th Bin Laden family. Has anyone ever heard that Bush sold his oil company to the Bin Laden family when it was failing? Or that Bush's grandfather supported the Nazi party?
It seems pretty far-fetched, I guess. But the more he miraculously produces that boogety man Osama every time he needs him, the more credible it starts to sound.

And using discredited reports now, to bolster his program to grab more power? What is holding him back? The Senate? Would another nice BIG attack do it for him? One has to wonder.

Another attack on American soil would destroy him and all that have supported him on the immigration issue because they are the ones leaving our borders wide open. I would not want to be in ANY of their places if we are attacked! While our soldiers are fighting and dying in Iraq to protect and preserve our country, Bush and his cohorts are DESTROYING the very country they are defending!

I had a thought the other night. Now I understand why middle class Americans are under attack (taking our jobs, our land, our helath care, etc). WE are the ones that are in the middle, we are what stands between the rich and the poor. We are the thorn in the politicians side! We work hard, we don't depend on the government to pay our way, we are not being CONTROLLED as they want! They HATE that! They want no middle, they want rich and poor. They want us to be totally dependent on them. If we aren't it will be much harder for them to gain control! Think about it!

It's not near as far-fetched as you might think. Google Prescott Bush, he's Dumya's grandfather. Lost 2 businesses in 1943 for 'trading with the enemy'. It's a helluva story.

As for Bin Laden, google Harken Energy and Carlysle Group. It'll make you feel like 'Neo' in 'The Matrix'. Post back and tell me what you find.

Hahaha! This man is a true idiot. He thinks we are all going to thank him for 'SAVING AMERICA?' What a liar.

Oh MY! Here's the first one:


http://www.nhgazette.com/cgi-bin/NHGsto ... ush_Nazi_2



“Bush - Nazi Dealings Continued Until 1951â€

Oh MY!!


http://www.wordsasweapons.com/warconnections.htm


Inspiring social change through print, spoken word, and creative action.
SOMETHING SMELLS IN DC

Written by: Richard Shaffer

Possibly the only private airplane flying in US air space after the 9/11 crimes against humanity, was a Saudi Arabian private jet picking up members of the bin Laden family who were scattered around the country. It flew from Los Angeles,to Orlando, to Washington, and finally to Boston. When the FAA permitted overseas flights, the jet flew to Europe.

This raises a question. What is the relationship between the bin Laden family and the Bush family? George Bush senior has been a houseguest of the bin Ladens when he visited Saudi Arabia. Not only that, the bin Laden family was heavily invested in the Washington based Carlisle Group with huge interests in defense contracting. The names that crop up in connection with the Carlisle Group are George Bush senior, James Baker, and former British Prime Minister John Major. The chairman of the Carlisle Group is Frank Carlucci, a former Secretary of Defense, and associate of Donald Rumsfeld. There are too many connections to be overlooked.

It is odd that the Bin Laden family should be profiting in the war that is allegedly being waged against Osama. The Bush family is reaping millions in profits through the Carlisle Group, in direct relationship to the alleged War on Terror, which has been initiated by Bush the Younger? There are some obvious conflicts of interest.

The Unocal Pipeline, a 1,005 mile oil pipeline through Afghanistan and Pakistan. As late as August of 2001, just prior to the 9/11 crimes against humanity, the Bush administration was negotiating with the Taliban, trying to establish stability that would allow American oil ventures to proceed safely. At the receiving end of the pipeline is Ken Lay and the ubiquitous Enron. At the other end is the Taliban, whom the Bush Administration had given $43 Million supposedly to eradicate opium-poppy cultivation. In the book Bin Laden: the Forbidden Truth by Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasique it is claimed that the threat "we'll either carpet you with gold or carpet you with bombs." was bantered about. If this is true, doesn't it illuminate why the US attacked Afghanistan rather than Saudi Arabia, where most of the alleged terrorists came from? The Unocal pipeline brings up more names. Halliburton, the pipeline construction firm would be a huge benefactor. Halliburton was once headed by Dick Cheney, and was also a generous contributor to the Bush-Cheney campaign. Lawrence Lindsey, a Bush economic adviser, has been an Enron consultant. Bush has appointed Zalmay Khalilzad as his special envoy to Afghanistan is a former Unocal consultant, and Hamid Karzai, Afghanistan's interim leader was also a Unocal consultant. There are too many connections to be coincidental.

Now we hear that the Bush administration was forewarned of a terrorist attack prior to 9/11 and did nothing. If the allegations of a threat to carpet Afghanistan with either gold or with bombs is true, is it unreasonable to assume that people who would be willing to sacrifice the lives of innocent Afghans in order to promote their commercial enterprise would also be willing to sacrifice American lives in order to justify an attack on Afghanistan? What were those records that Arthur Andersen destroyed relating to Enron? Why is Dick Cheney resisting turning over records of meetings with Ken Lay and other Enron officials?

The connections between the Bush Administration, Enron, Unocal, the Taliban, and Afghanistan need to be illuminated. There are too many connections to be ignored. The possibility that the Bush Administration is promoting commercial enterprise behind a cloak of patriotism and fear mongering is not unthinkable. There are too many unanswered questions.