Thread: Obama Admin & Media Make Claim Of Hitler: Children Don’t Belong to Their Parents

22 Mins Ago by Tim Brown

Obama Admin & Media Make Claim Of Hitler: Children Don’t Belong to Their Parents


In a recent piece I wrote concerning the Romeike family who gained asylum in the U.S. because of persecution in Germany and have now come under persecution of the Obama administration. In the Obama DOJ’s push they seem to think that children don’t belong to their parents and thus don’t have a right to educate their children as they see fit. We had Hillary Clinton years ago claiming that It Takes a Villageand now we have MSNBC liberal village idiot Melissa Harris-Perry claiming that our children don’t belong to us as “a reward from God” as Scripture teaches, but rather they belong to the community. None of this is new, just like the atheists who claim they are free thinkers is new. It’s all come before. What’s interesting is that the leaders of the Third Reich Adolph Hitler beat them to it back in 1933.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=N3qtpdSQox0

Harris-Perry, who probably has no idea what her own daughter actually does all day or with whom since she is a career oriented woman that apparently thinks part of that career is to tell you your kids are not yours and not a home oriented woman, in the video above declares:

“We have never invested as much in public education as we should have because we’ve always had a private notion of children, your kid is yours and totally your responsibility. We haven’t had a very collective notion of these are our children.

“So part of it is we have to break through our kind of private idea that kids belong to their parents or kids belong to their families and recognize that kids belong to whole communities.
“Once it’s everybody’s responsibility and not just the household’s we start making better investments.”

There is much I could do to completely demolish here argument about “investing” in public education. The first thing that comes to mind is look at how much money is pumped into the public education system and yet look at the results. Statists looking to indoctrinate children don’t produce results that benefit society at all. They are a miserable failure, but they are too proud to admit it and scrap the entire thing, just like they do with all welfare programs and yes, the Federal government’s involvement is a welfare program. I pay for other people’s children’s education and then I also pay for my own.

But it’s more than that. This psychosis of people like Ms. Harris-Perry, Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton and the like are nothing new. They believe they know what is best and that we, “the little people” in their eyes, need to listen to them. But they are providing us with nothing new.

Gary Demar, in a recent article at Godfather Politics cites Adolph Hitler’s objective as he came to power:

“When an opponent declares, ‘I will not come over to your side,’ [Hitler] said in a speech on November 6, 1933, “I calmly say, ‘Your child belongs to us already. . . . What are you? You will pass on. Your descendants, however, now stand in the new camp. In a short time they will know nothing else but this new community.’” And on May 1, 1937, [Hitler] declared, “This new Reich will give its youth to no one, but will itself take youth and give to youth its own education and its own upbringing.”

Adolf Hitler had banned home schooling in 1938 and the law was never repealed. What’s even more interesting is something I found at the German Way blog:

Many English-language blog and newspaper attacks on the German homeschooling ban like to blame it all on Hitler and the Nazis. While it is true that the Third Reich passed such laws in 1938 (and added criminal penalties), they were only an extension of education laws that have been around since 1871. (Prussia was also the first country in the world to require state certification of teachers, and was offering free, compulsory elementary education as early as the 18th century.) In 1919, the Weimar Republic re-introduced compulsory school attendance (allgemeine Schulpflicht). When the Federal Republic of Germany was created in 1949, the compulsory attendance idea made its way into Article 7 of the Grundgesetz (constitution). In September 2006, the European Court of Human Rights upheld the German ban on homeschooling, in a religious-freedom case that began in 2003. The European court argued that parents can’t use religion to justify homeschooling in Germany. (Under German law, parents can decide whether or not their offspring will receive the religious instruction offered in German schools.)

What about U.S. military families and homeschooling? That appears to be a gray area. For military folks under SOFA (Status of Forces Agreement), most people claim that German law does not apply. However, even the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has not always supported homeschooling. A 1989 directive said children of military families were expected to attend the DoD dependent schools. More recent DoD directives have allowed homeschooling. But anyone living in Germany who does not fall under SOFA is subject to German law.
See? Nothing new. Even our own DoD expected children to attend state sponsored schools.

The problem is that when the statists control your children, they will inevitably control you, if they haven’t already. They will turn your children against you. This is not paranoia, it is fact when you look at the history of communist countries and how they get the children to spy on their parents and report back to government teachers.

They do this as an outright attack on the family, which is the primary institution in society and God established it as its own jurisdiction. By way of education, the family determines how it will educate their children. Many homeschoolers reference Deuteronomy 6 as a command to do so. It reads:

“Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one! “You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your strength. “And these words which I command you today shall be in your heart. “You shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, when you walk by the way, when you lie down, and when you rise up. “You shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes. “You shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates.”

It is the parent’s duty and responsibility to train up their children in the way they should go so that when they are old they will not depart from it, not the state. A passage we read as soon as our children are born, and that I’m looking forward to reading to our child about to be born, is Psalm 127 and 128. There we read:

Behold, children are a heritage from the LORD, The fruit of the womb is a reward. Like arrows in the hand of a warrior, So are the children of one’s youth. Happy is the man who has his quiver full of them; They shall not be ashamed, But shall speak with their enemies in the gate.

Notice that children are not a curse, a problem, or an inconvenience. They are a heritage or more commonly understood as “possession, portion, inheritance, or reward.” They are gifts from God and they are not to be taken lightly, but treasured and nurtured in the fear of the Lord. To trim it all down to the skinny, they are ours, not the community and not property of the state.

But look further. The Scriptures also tell us that they are like arrows in the hands of a mighty man and the man who has his quiver full is blessed. Why? Because a man with man children has the opportunity to impact the world long after he has passed off the scene and the Socialists and the Communists know this. This is why they strike at the heart of society to take it over. They strike at the family and look to steal the children from those God graciously gave them to. That’s right, our government and our media is scared of us believing that our children belong to us.

They fear our numbers in large families like the Pharaoh feared the children of Israel as they grew in number in Egypt, even though they had made no threats to him or the nation.

My friends, the mentality that says that children are a part of the community and that they don’t belong to their parents comes from those who are in rebellion against God. We must stand, call them out and declare that our children are gifts from Heaven and that we are entrusted with them for a short time in order that we might aim them at the world to advance the Kingdom of Jesus Christ and promote the Christian faith. If we fail to do this, we will reap what we have sown and judgment will come upon our own homes. Our children do not belong to the community or to the state. They belong to their parents!

Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/04/ob...#ixzz2Q0c3NhgN

It takes a village to raise a bunch of communist idiots like Melissa Harris-Perry!

W

Mind control, the shell game, and the stealth gods

By: Jon Rappoport

Of the many definitions of collectivism, this simple one is my favorite: “The practice or principle of giving a group priority over each individual in it.”

When I was starting out as a reporter 30 years ago, one of my first editors sat down with me and said, “In America, collectivism is what the government does to people to make them deaf, dumb, and blind, so the corporations can steal everything from them.”

He went on to tell me, off the record, that his paper wasn’t interested in collectivism, only the corporations. That was his line in the sand.

An early assignment was interviewing a congressman. As I sat in a tony cafe with him, an idea kept buzzing in my head: he was giving things away that weren’t his to begin with.

I couldn’t make that idea sharper. It was a stray thought, and it kept nagging at me, long after the interview was done. It somehow reminded me of the classic shell game. Three shells, one pea. Guess which shell is hiding the pea. What if the pea isn’t there at all?

I realized I was trying to understand something about collectivism, the psychology of it. Another image struck me: the old telephone game, where one person whispers a phrase to another, and that person passes it on, until the last person announces what he’s heard; and of course now it bears no resemblance to the original message.

How about starting the game with no message at all? You just make a kind of hissing mumble. And the last person in the circle emerges with “life is good.”

That’s a metaphor for collectivism.

Collectivism is a system by which people give each other what they don’t have.

If this seems like a magic trick, it is. It’s magic founded in mind control.

Collectivism is rife with contradictions. That’s why it bedevils the incurious mind and comes to dominate it.

People who don’t have freedom, because they renounced it, somehow give it to each other. People who don’t have money give it to each other. People who don’t have power give it to each other.

This is a perverse ritual, aimed at conjuring what has been forsaken and reinstating it in a mob.

The mob, in turn, maintains strength by destroying thought, language, and meaning: Freedom and money and power and equality become senseless grunts that translate into: “we have It.” “It” is never defined. It is felt, like an approaching wave of sudden gifts out of nowhere.

The mob is told that what they feel is, indeed, a harbinger of the Good, is a sign that their rights are being served. Justice has finally arrived.

Of course, such manipulations do not simply appear out of a void. As George Orwell wrote in 1944, “It cannot be said too often…that collectivism is not inherently democratic, but, on the contrary, gives to a tyrannical minority such powers as the Spanish Inquisitors never dreamt of.”

The tyrannical minority, posing as benefactors, use their elite status to work over the mob like a chunk of soft dough, shaping it to their ends.

In our time, these elitists are called Globalists.

The term “collectivism” has been dropped out of the public vocabulary. It has been made into a joke by pundits and academics, who treat it like a misbegotten child of bygone Cold War paranoids.

Now, just as Orwell predicted, we have the word “freedom” twisted to mean a property or quality of the group, as if there was never really any freedom of the individual; as if freedom was merely a construct invented to allow heinous criminals to run wild.

Interesting, because the true heinous criminals are the very ones who have reformed the language to conceal their own intentions.

Now they give us “the greater good,” “we’re all in this together,” “we have to work together to make freedom mean something.” These empty perversions ring hollow to anyone who is awake, but to the mob they signal the elevation of disability to paradise.

This is an extremely bizarre psychology. It is formulated on the basis of “give to everyone what you’ve forsaken for yourself,” “transfer every positive aspect of the individual—aspects which never actually existed—to the homogeneous group.”

There is enough illogic there to submerge a rational mind.

But if you put every politician in Washington in a bag, from the lowest-ranking bureaucrat in some obscure federal agency all the way up to the president, shook the bag, and pulled out any dozen of the species, chances are quite good you would come up with men and women who are automatic living, breathing, and talking end-products of this through-the-looking-glass philosophy.

You could do the same bag trick with academics, and obtain the same result. These creatures are sniffing dogs with good radar. They sense which way the culture-winds are blowing, and they invent collectivist attitudes and words to make hay for themselves in their mad circuses.

Inside colleges and universities, there are, of course, hard-core collectivist minders and operators, who are straight-out sociopaths. They keep the dogs in line. They set the tone. They know how to work the levers and intimidate the fence-sitters.

In Hollywood and other venues of celebrity, the stars are mere dupes who can exercise their penchant for making humanitarian gestures and thereby contribute to the overall cause, because…

Collectivism is couched entirely in humanitarian terms. It’s all about help, it’s all about assistance for the needy, it’s all about leveling the playing field. And, at the upper levels of the op, far beyond the celebrities, it’s all for show. Nothing is genuine. Nothing is honest.

Collectivism all about replacing I with We. Whatever contributes to that infernal substitution will receive support.

Starting in the early 1960s, the spiritual component of collectivism was drawn into the West from ancient Asian practices, distorted selectively, and redesigned to produce a picture of enlightenment, in which the individual soul would ascend to universal homogeneous consciousness. The One vaporized into the All.

Popular books and teachers preached a doctrine in which greater attainment was defined as merging with a Whole.

“As long as you are you, you are never what you really are.”

This was the essence. The individual is an illusion. The illusion can only be shattered by enlisting in the cosmic collective.

Then came the radical environmentalists. Their leaders and investors were vastly rich men, who cared about the environment only as their private preserve, who pursued depopulation as their holy grail, who bankrolled a philosophy of interconnectedness. Nature was one interlocked system, of which humans were a minor component, with no more status than that of a germ.

Humans, therefore, needed to sustain Nature by submitting to it, by becoming a worshiping biological corpuscle in the Great Body.

Stop pollution? Clean the rivers? Find new renewable sources of energy? Not enough. Not nearly enough.

Crowd more and more people into vertical cities? Leave millions and millions of acres of land under the stewardship of the “wiser, better” government? Smash the small farmer and replace him with titanic tracts of chemical/genetic pseudo-food? Yes, but more was required. The individual and his own mind must disappear into a mystical ecological network.

And now, the technocrats. These rootless nomads of the machine promise to cull, out of electronic soup, a parallel brain, a thing far more powerful than what resides in the human skull; and in order to gain intelligence and avoid hopelessly falling behind, we have to attach ourselves to master computers and access the wisdom of right decisions.

An ultimate super-brain will supply such decisions for us, to achieve our apotheosis. No longer individuals, we will jump the track and make our home, all of us, inside the new mathematical Oversoul.

The hive, the nest, the colony, the collective.

Knowing the agenda, the stakes, the battle, the war, we can forfeit to the default, we can finesse and tap dance and take the road to a false dead-end unity, or we can disengage from the program.

Stepping back from the enormous babble of collectivism, we hear a silence that reveals no one is there to tell us what to do. Each one of us must use and invent enough freedom for that choice.

And then make it. And then act on it.

Collectivism means everyone will share equally. Since this is both a theoretical and practical impossibility, the leaders of the pack, and their leaders, decide on the terms of the contract. No matter how much is given to whom, or how little, every particle of every gift is defined as a thing of beauty.

It is all coming from some dispensing god, who has thrown off selfish pride and instead is making offerings from the heart.

These invisible collectivist Royals are humbly bringing manna.

That’s the projected image.

“Who was I to think I could create abundance? No, it comes from above. I bend to the wheel and make my small contribution to the Whole. That is all. This should be the source of my contentment.”

If this sounds like religious speech, it is, adjusted to the philosophy of our time. Collectivism always was a religion. It was launched in ancient eras, by men who perceived that minds could be led and shaped by certain ideas. How better to build the future than by codifying those ideas in the center of a great crime and using them to recast the criminal enterprise as the highest Good?

What could possibly achieve more success than that?

On the receiving end, the bedazzled and bewildered soul, the individual, is driven to discard his every idea and thought and impulse and desire, thus achieving supreme emptiness, a condition longed-for by seekers of peace.

Triumph.

Ignorance is strength. Freedom is slavery.

Lord Acton, who coined the universally quoted maxim about power and corruption, also wrote: “By liberty I mean the assurance that every man shall be protected in doing what he believes his duty against the influence of authority and majorities, custom and opinion.”

Acton assumed that the State might be willing, in the long run, to protect the individual against the influence of authority—when the State is that authority.

Eric Hoffer, the longshoreman and self-educated author of The True Believer, cut closer to the bone: “Of what avail is freedom to choose if the self be ineffectual? We join a mass movement to escape individual responsibility, or, in the words of the ardent young Nazi, ‘to be free from freedom.’”

Collectivism is the last refuge of the tyrant, the mob, and also the individual who refuses to discover his own strength. The outline of the true conspiracy includes all three participants. To try to excuse any one of these is an error.

It is also the result of intentional blindness.

People like to make a distinction between the criminal lunatics who launch war after war of government-corporate imperial conquest, those “run amok capitalists,” and the government leaders who, instead, want to “share and care and give for the sake of equality and justice.” The truth is, they are both on the same side. They and their banker-betters are engaged in an age-old operation of subduing the populace and bringing in a collectivist equality that labels every human with the same zero.

If we are blind to that as well, we will take the bait and enroll on the side of the angels, and there will be no angels.

My old editor was right in a way. The government uses collectivism to make people deaf, dumb, and blind to what is going on. And believing in what the government is dispensing to them, the people fail to notice that corporations, in concert with government, are stealing and poisoning their way to a level of control that would have made the ancient pharaohs stand back in awe.

“The individual is nothing. The group is everything.”

But it turns out that, under collectivism, the group is nothing, too. That’s the final turn of the card in the magic trick.

All the “humanitarian giving”, all the so-called justice, all the sharing and caring, all the sympathy; they’re props in a stage play invented to create a giant ant colony.

Back in the 1980s, I interviewed a Catholic priest for an article that was never published. I asked him about a recent Church scandal in Italy that involved the Vatican bank, a giant construction company, Immobiliare, and the P-2 Masonic lodge.

“Mistakes were made,” he said.

“Yes,” I said, “but all that money originally came from church collection plates, didn’t it? Don’t you owe your ‘shareholders’ a coherent accounting?”

“Our work,” he said, “is to provide our people with a way to God.”

“What about the doctrine that everyone is equal before God?”

He smiled. “You’re not the first person to make this argument, you know. I suppose you’re going to say we, the priests, give ourselves special dispensation to be the guides, the conduits.”

“Yes. And you would say you’re providing the only connection possible. That’s quite an elite point of view.”

He said, “There are numerous references in religious speech to a flock and a shepherd. Think of the flock as a collective. They need a voice.”

“What about a direct phone call to the Higher Power?”

“Things don’t operate that way.”

Jon Rappoport is the author of two explosive collections, The Matrix Revealed and Exit From the Matrix, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails atwww.nomorefakenews.com

http://www.activistpost.com/2013/04/...alth-gods.html

Melissa Harris-Perry pitches the Neo-Pedophile Appetite of the Progressives

April 10, 2013 at 5:00 am / by Jackie Anderson Christensen

An MSNBC ‘Lean Forward’propaganda ad promotes Melissa Harris-Perry’s view of necessary changes in American culture:

“We have to break through our kind of private idea that kids belong to their parents or kids belong to their families, and recognize that kids belong to their communities.”

We’ve put up with a lot of things in the name of ‘tolerance’ but this hedonistic, rapacious claim to our kids is so far over the line that it’s obscene. Socialist- driven policies over many decades have allowed government to attach themselves to our children like a disease through federal programs such as Common Core which intends to track children from birth through their entrance into the job force. As Mao Zedong’s reshaping of society was done in the name of industry and agriculture (called ‘The Great Leap Forward’), the Left is doing the very same in the name of ‘education’. The idea that your children are part of the communal property of the state ranks up there with the likes of Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, various university professors and feminist culture combatants.

“Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.”Vladimir Lenin

I call the Progressive posture for our children ‘neo-pedophile’ because of their intentions once they have them as possessions. It is predatory and unique to this culture of genitalia-focused politics. They are not just creating an army of young socialists; they want to sexualize them. They want to provide them with condoms, abortion pills and sex ‘education’ that could include homosexual education as young as kindergarten. In college they will teach them to be sensitive to ‘sexual diversity’ such as bestiality, incest and prostitution (i.e. Yale’s hosting of ‘sensitivity training’ by “sexologist” Dr. Jill McDevitt), all the while desensitizing them to the brutality of abortion. Northwestern Universityhad a stint with a live demonstration in which a naked woman had an orgasm onstage. The American brand of Progressivism pivots around the hyper-sexualization of its youth.

Don’t let the word ‘BIGOT’ distract you from their real feelings towards children. In spite of their candy-coated and amplified “warm fuzzies” for the little buggers, the Left see’s children as suited best for the abortionist’s trash. But there is a plan C (plan B already taken) for the escapee’s of the death camp called ‘Choice’. It is education.

“Parent’s attitudes about what they want for their children represent one of the greatest barriers to successful implementation of school-to-work.”–U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Educational Research and Improvement

The sadistic pursuit for the surrender of our God-defined values is fierce, omnipresent and near irreversible. Consider the 2008 federal civil rights law suit filed by David Parker of Lexington, Mass. Mr. Parker, a father whose three year fight over objections to a homosexual curriculum in his son’s kindergarten class ended in the dismissal of the case in 2007. The U.S. District Judge Mark L. Wolf stated that teaching the homosexual curriculum was ‘reasonably related to the goals of preparing students to become engaged and productive citizens in our democracy.’ At the appeal in 2008, and the subsequent denial, the Federal Appeals Court Judge Sandra Lynch’s statement in the ruling text included: “the mere fact that a child is exposed on occasion in public school to a concept offensive to a parent’s religious belief does not inhibit the parent from instructing the child differently.” In other words … tough.

The elitists like Melissa Harris-Perry are firm in their unapologetic assertion that we cannot manage without their social engineering of our life. Their support for the communist specter that haunts America will not yield. Every parent should see the interwoven evil in the fabric of this movement. The worship of man (as government) at their virtual temple is alive and thriving with the required sacrifices of our children.

Ezekiel 16:20-22
20: “‘And you took your sons and daughters whom you bore to me and sacrificed them as food to the idols. Was your prostitution not enough? 21 You slaughtered my children and sacrificed them to the idols. 22 In all your detestable practices and your prostitution you did not remember the days of your youth, when you were naked and bare, kicking about in your blood.

http://politichicks.tv/column/meliss...-progressives/

MSNBC Has Declared War on America! - The Five Team Goes Nuclear Over Harris-Perry's Promo



http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=qJeslyOnH0A

The conservative criticism of Melissa Harris-Perry's latest MSNBC promo came to a head on Fox News' The Five this afternoon when the hosts held up the 30 second video as representing everything that is wrong with liberalism and the Democratic Party in American today. Broadening out the message in the promo about the "collective notion of these are our children" to accuse the rival [COLOR=#0000CC !important]network[/COLOR] of promoting "socialism," Eric Bolling declared that "MSNBC has declared war on the American fabric."

Read more at http://www.fiscalconservatives.com/v...psfPXzpKpJc.99