Thread: PALIN WOULD GIVE AMNESTY , BREAKING

Originally Posted by SecureTheBorder

Originally Posted by bigtex

What I question is whether or not Bill O'Reilly supports comprehensive immigration reform (aka. AMNESTY)

O'Reilly is a "secure the borders first" guy. He only allows "secure the borders first" people and OBL people on his show to talk about illegal immigration. He constantly uses the fallacious argument that our only two choices are mass deportations or amnesty for the illegals who are already here. He had Dana Perino on his show with an OBL goon to talk about illegal immigration recently and I couldn't finish watching the whole segment without a barf bag nearby.

He fakes "watching out for the folks" by getting all upset about the wide open border and the crimes that illegals commit on a regular basis, but deep down, he's just another Harvard elitist who wants amesty for the 12 million illegals who are already here. I'm also getting so sick of people saying there are only 12 million illegals in the U.S. The OBL has been using that same number for as long as I've paying paying attention to this topic.

What really upset me this week was finding out that Charles Krauthammer is also a "secure the borders first" guy. I may be wrong, but I think Hannity and Beck are the only talking heads on Fox who aren't for amnesty after the border is supposedly secured.

And I wouldn't be too sure about them...


Kathyet

Originally Posted by SecureTheBorder

Originally Posted by bigtex

What I question is whether or not Bill O'Reilly supports comprehensive immigration reform (aka. AMNESTY)

O'Reilly is a "secure the borders first" guy. He only allows "secure the borders first" people and OBL people on his show to talk about illegal immigration. He constantly uses the fallacious argument that our only two choices are mass deportations or amnesty for the illegals who are already here. He had Dana Perino on his show with an OBL goon to talk about illegal immigration recently and I couldn't finish watching the whole segment without a barf bag nearby.

He fakes "watching out for the folks" by getting all upset about the wide open border and the crimes that illegals commit on a regular basis, but deep down, he's just another Harvard elitist who wants amesty for the 12 million illegals who are already here. I'm also getting so sick of people saying there are only 12 million illegals in the U.S. The OBL has been using that same number for as long as I've paying paying attention to this topic.

What really upset me this week was finding out that Charles Krauthammer is also a "secure the borders first" guy. I may be wrong, but I think Hannity and Beck are the only talking heads on Fox who aren't for amnesty after the border is supposedly secured.

When I used to watch O'Reilly, he would always say, "we cannot deport 12 million illegals," which is nothing more than an avoidance of the issue and a weak excuse at that! Michelle Malkin pretty much made him look like an idiot when he had her on last year and tried to make that pathetic argument.

O'Reilly would have no problems giving "12 million invaders" amnesty, with the condition precedent the border be secured - whatever that means - and when or how do we know the border is finally "secured!"

Charles is for amnesty after the borders are secured also

That just leaves Hannity

I'm not sure about Beck either , even though I like his style

Originally Posted by SecureTheBorder

What really upset me this week was finding out that Charles Krauthammer is also a "secure the borders first" guy.

Charles has always been that way or worse, years ago he supported amnesty along with enforcement, ie. CIR.

I am for securing the border first. But I won't stand for a subsequent amnesty. Harsh workplace enforcement, legal status checks where appropriate and elimination of entitlements to any non citizen. Remove the magnets and they will all self deport.

All these so-called radio conservatives are really imposters when it comes to amnesty, they support it in one form or another. That's because they work for the oligarchy.

Originally Posted by SecureTheBorder

O'Reilly is a "secure the borders first" guy.

What really upset me this week was finding out that Charles Krauthammer is also a "secure the borders first" guy.

I love these politically correct way to hide amnesty. Secure the borders first, the same thing McCain, Bush, Ted Kennedy, Pelosi, Reid, Obama and all the rest want. Just different words. The Democrats all want comprehensive immigration reform and the Republicans all want to secure the borders first.....then offer a pathway to citizenship. Amazing how stupid they think Americans are.

STOP THE MAGNATES... This is what needs to be fomost in reform IMHO.

Originally Posted by bigtex

Originally Posted by SecureTheBorder

O'Reilly is a "secure the borders first" guy.

What really upset me this week was finding out that Charles Krauthammer is also a "secure the borders first" guy.

I love these politically correct way to hide amnesty. Secure the borders first, the same thing McCain, Bush, Ted Kennedy, Pelosi, Reid, Obama and all the rest want. Just different words. The Democrats all want comprehensive immigration reform and the Republicans all want to secure the borders first.....then offer a pathway to citizenship. Amazing how stupid they think Americans are.

Well said Bigtex and I believe you're right! They for the most part, are playing the same game with just a slightly different sent of rules, but it's all the same in the end - whether you call it amnesty or a pathway to citizenship – rewarding illegal behavior!

Palin said she would make them register, but I took that to mean she, literally, wants them to register as their REAL selves - not to be confused with any one of their fraudulent identifications that they have in multiples for every given character they have to perform as to steal from the USA's tax dollar base.

Remember she backed McCain's "border first", then amnesty, but they both hedged against saying it.

We can't throw them all out.

We have to choose a human, unless the anti-christ takes over for his time on earth, then Jesus will arrive from where He ascended into the clouds AFTER the two witnesses have laid in the arena in Jerusalem for three days (to parallel His three days in the tomb).

Is THAT about to happen? Has the world been destroyed enough humans and the governments of the world for THAT to happen?

If not, then we have time for more discussions.

There was a time way back when Californians were the only state fighting against illegal aliens, screaming at all forms of government, and passing laws against illegal aliens.

Back then, all Bill O'Reilly did was to repeat over and over that "if he needed to feed his family he would do the same thing as illegal aliens".

Many of these conversations happened with Geraldo Ravera, but now O’Reilly has Geraldo on to speak about things that are other than illegal aliens. Even about soft stuff like sports and celebrities.

Wonder why?

Yes, O'Reilly is a popular guy and he's watched by a huge majority. But O'Reilly has always backed the illegal aliens "with what he's said" and "what he's NOT said". Because O’Reilly isn’t stupid, and won’t outright throw his ratings out the window by proclaiming that he’s for amnesty.

Only recently did O'Reilly draw a firm line and say, in essence, "this has to stop"! And he meant the whole illegal aliens invasion thing.

The rancher being murdered changed something inside Fox News for some reason, and everyone (except Geraldo) is speaking out loud and clear against amnesty – for now, so enjoy it while it’s there.

I’m not complaining, because “we the peopleâ€