Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Airbornesapper07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    17,544

    Paul Craig Roberts Slams Dems & Western Media: "It's Open Season On All White People"

    Paul Craig Roberts Slams Dems & Western Media: "It's Open Season On All White People"



    As the US government has lied to us about so much for so long about so many big events, we have no alternative but to question everything...

    Sun, 08/11/2019 - 23:30
    61SHARES

    Authored by Paul Craig Roberts,

    Survival of The Fittest


    CJ Hopkins doesn’t say it, but he shows that within all of the Western countries in which the white core populations are experiencing fierce attack from anti-white ideologues in the media and governments that rule them, there is unity of voice from the media that “Trump is a White Supremacist who inspires Terrorism.”

    This unity of voice is suspicious as there are many different possible explanations of the El Paso shooting. The unity of voice is so uniform—in some cases identical phrasing—and so repetitive that it certainly looks like an orchestration against Trump and raises suspicions that the shooting itself was an orchestration.
    The question naturally arises, to achieve such an uniformity of response from the Western world, who organized it? How was the explanation that blames Trump ready at hand all over the US, UK, Europe, Canada and Australia, the minute the shooting occurred? Does it remind you of the BCC announcing the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 a half hour before it occurred?
    Anytime an explanation is ready at hand the minute an event occurs, the natural question is who had advance information? If there is advance information, where did it come from? Why did not authorities with their advanced information prevent the attack? Why after “Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction,” “Iranian nukes,” “Russian invasions,” “Assad’s use of chemical weapons,” etc., do media organizations continue to provide unexamined explanations? Why did the media suppress the shooter’s manifesto? Because it did not support the story line and attack on Trump?
    As the presstitutes speak with one voice, little wonder that some of the few and diminishing number of Americans still capable of thought conclude that the El Paso shooting was an orchestrated event designed to discredit Trump and to abolish the 2nd Amendment. We have long known about CIA mind control programs. Many experts believe that Sirhan Sirhan, the alleged assassin of Robert Kennedy, was a product of the CIA’s mind control program.

    As the US government has lied to us about so much for so long about so many big events, we have no alternative but to question everything. But the presstitutes never do. Russiagate was a politically motivated hoax, but the presstitutes had one voice proclaiming the truth of a hoax.The American people have been misled by the media and gone along with Washington’s destruction of entire countries, such as Iraq and Libya, with millions of people killed, maimed, widowed, orphaned, and displaced, based on Washington’s lies and fabricated “evidence.” If we cannot believe the reasons that the government takes us to war, how can we believe anything we hear from media and politicians?
    The media and Democratic Party’s response to the El Paso tragedy make the facts irrelevant. The controlled explanation wraps people up in emotions over guns and Trump’s wall. The dead in El Paso are portrayed as Trump’s fault for being a White Supremacist and enforcing US law, which specifies border controls. Only White Supremacists kill people and build walls, unless they are Israelis, but we are not permitted to say anything about that.
    By law the US has borders that the law demands be enforced. If immigrants can simply walk across the border, why can’t they fly into the country or come by ships? What is the point of passport control? Indeed, what’s the point of passports? The concept of citizenship simply disappears.
    US borders have always been enforced. Badly no doubt, but enforced. Trump is simply trying to do a better job of enforcing the law than has been done in the past.
    If the US would simply stop overthrowing reformist governments in Latin America, the resources of those countries would be taken out of foreign hands and be put to work for the local people, which is what Venezuela is doing much to the chagrin of American oil companies. The last time Honduras elected a reformer, America’s first black president—Obama—overthrew him. Brazil’s Workers Party was destroyed with the US-orchestrated imprisonment of its leader, Lula da Silva, and removal from office of his successor. In their place Washington has installed a corrupt agent of the Americans. Oppression is applied to the supporters among the people of reformist politicians to ensure that voting ceases to put reformers in power. As General Smedley Butler said, “I was the enforcer in Latin America for the New York Banks and the United Fruit Company.” Perhaps it is poetic justice that the peoples whose resources are carted off to America decide to go with the resources.
    If the Democrats want open borders, why don’t they draft legislation and fight for its passage? Why blame Trump for enforcing the laws on the books?
    The El Paso shooting has been turned not only into an attack on President Trump but also into an attack on white people. Suddenly the “Muslim terrorist threat” has disappeared. Its replacement is the domestic terrorist threat of “white supremacy.” The attack on whites is indiscriminate. The attack on Trump extends to all of the Americans who elected him—“Trump deplorables”—in Hillary’s words. All whites become “racists” and are covered in guilt.
    The anti-white propaganda is effective. Actress Rosanna Arquette said that her white skin makes her ashamed. The success in teaching emotionally and mentally weak white people to feel guilt is to make it easier for those who wish to displace them to run over them. And most definitely, the core white populations of the Western world are being overrun.
    As white populations have become too brainwashed and loaded with guilt to defend themselves, perhaps the Social Darwinists were correct after all. The fit survive, and white people are no longer among the fit.
    CNN former host Reza Aslan, now a professor at the University of California, tweeted:
    “The President is a white nationalist terror leader. His supporters—ALL OF THEM—are by definition white nationalist terror supporters. The MAGA hat is a KKK hood. And this evil, racist scourge must be eradicated from society.”
    How can it be that Trump wanting to enforce US law inspires a person to shoot Hispanics, but Aslan’s call to eradicate all Trump supporters doesn’t inspire a person to attack Trump supporters? Why wasn’t Aslan disciplined by the University of California for his hate speech? Why wasn’t he blocked by Twitter?
    How can NBC Universal’s film, “The Hunt,” produced by Jason Blum, a Jew, depict liberal elites hunting and killing “Trump deplorables” for sport and escape the charge of hate speech and encouraging deadly violence against half of the US population?
    If wanting to build a wall to keep out illegal immigrants encourages Americans to shoot Hispanics, how much violence is encouraged by a movie in which Trump supporters are hunted and shot? There is scant complaint about Israel’s wall that keeps Palestinians out of their own country. Try to imagine someone making a film about hunting Jews for sport and calling it a satire.
    Clearly in the Western media and US Democratic Party it is open season on all white people. The most intense hatred is expressed against them—even calls for their extermination—and it doesn’t qualify as hate speech or encouraging violence.
    The hatred and demonization of white people in America is no different from the propaganda against Jews in the Third Reich. Yet not a single member of the Democratic Party or American print, TV, and NPR radio protests.
    That fact tells us all we need to know. If white people don’t get organized and defend themselves there is likely to be a white holocaust.


    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-...l-white-people
    If you're gonna fight, fight like you're the third monkey on the ramp to Noah's Ark... and brother its starting to rain. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member Airbornesapper07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    17,544
    How whites became pariahs in academia

    You've probably never heard of Noel Ignatiev


    August 13, 2019
    By Cam Brown

    Likely you've never heard of Noel Ignatiev, yet he's been influential in much of what is going on in culture and politics today. A left-wing Jewish American author and historian, Ignatiev has been one of the main voices in helping shape and direct what is commonly called "Whiteness Studies," a subset of Critical Race Theory, which is itself a subset of Critical Theory (basically Marxism by another name).
    Normally, when one sees the word "studies" attached to anything, it tends to make anyone not fully enamored of Progressive thought cringe, if not contemplate (metaphorically, at least) getting out the pitchforks and torches. It means something steeped in a Marxist-tinged ideological understanding of the world, which casts victims and perpetrators within a power-play framework that suits its ultimate vision of a Heaven on Earth once the perpetrators are vanquished from the scene.


    As one might guess, in this particular iteration of "studies," it is the so-called "white" person who has been cast as the villain. As Ignatiev has said, "The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race. Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive, because white influence permeates every issue in U.S. society, whether domestic or foreign."
    Defenders of Ignatiev's views argue that he was simply being metaphorical. "Whiteness" here is simply a social construct, not a reference to race or ethnicity. This becomes harder to defend as one reads more quotes from Ignatiev and realizes that this isn't just a social construct he has difficulty with; it's actual flesh-and-blood human beings he sees as intrinsically evil and worthy of eradication. When reading the following quotes, are you left with the conclusion he is merely speaking of a metaphorical, socially constructed system that he hopes to bring down, or is it something more than that?
    "If you are a white male, you don't deserve to live. You are a cancer, you're a disease, white males have never contributed anything positive to the world!"
    "The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists[.] ... Keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as 'the white race' is destroyed — not 'deconstructed' but destroyed."
    "Whiteness is not a culture[.] ... Whiteness has nothing to do with culture and everything to do with social position[.] ... Without the privileges attached to it, the white race would not exist, and the white skin would have no more social significance than big feet."
    "Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity."
    Replace the word "whiteness" with "blackness" — or, considering his background, "Jewishness" — would you write this off as nothing more than an academic speaking of a social construct's need to be re-evaluated and deconstructed? I highly doubt it. I am sure Ignatiev would cry foul at such hateful anti-Semitism if you did that. Yet he seems content to do it for "whites." Why is that, and why is that now deemed acceptable in society? Does he not consider himself white, too?
    What Ignatiev began teaching a short few decades ago has filtered down into the young minds of those coming out of our universities and filling many parts of our culture. It has seeped into the various avenues and institutions that will become intrinsic to the next generation and the decision-making of the government. All you are hearing today about the inherent evil of "whiteness" stems from people like Ignatiev, who was one of the most prominent behind it.
    We should not idly accept this. We should call out the Ignatievs of the world, shine a light on their dark corners, and ferret them out so they do not get away with their heinous belief systems. Such people are not merely ivory-tower academics; they are aggressively calling to destroy a group of people, a civilization. Why are we allowing them and their acolytes a pass?

    Likely you've never heard of Noel Ignatiev, yet he's been influential in much of what is going on in culture and politics today. A left-wing Jewish American author and historian, Ignatiev has been one of the main voices in helping shape and direct what is commonly called "Whiteness Studies," a subset of Critical Race Theory, which is itself a subset of Critical Theory (basically Marxism by another name).
    Normally, when one sees the word "studies" attached to anything, it tends to make anyone not fully enamored of Progressive thought cringe, if not contemplate (metaphorically, at least) getting out the pitchforks and torches. It means something steeped in a Marxist-tinged ideological understanding of the world, which casts victims and perpetrators within a power-play framework that suits its ultimate vision of a Heaven on Earth once the perpetrators are vanquished from the scene.
    As one might guess, in this particular iteration of "studies," it is the so-called "white" person who has been cast as the villain. As Ignatiev has said, "The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race. Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive, because white influence permeates every issue in U.S. society, whether domestic or foreign."
    Defenders of Ignatiev's views argue that he was simply being metaphorical. "Whiteness" here is simply a social construct, not a reference to race or ethnicity. This becomes harder to defend as one reads more quotes from Ignatiev and realizes that this isn't just a social construct he has difficulty with; it's actual flesh-and-blood human beings he sees as intrinsically evil and worthy of eradication. When reading the following quotes, are you left with the conclusion he is merely speaking of a metaphorical, socially constructed system that he hopes to bring down, or is it something more than that?
    "If you are a white male, you don't deserve to live. You are a cancer, you're a disease, white males have never contributed anything positive to the world!"

    "The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists[.] ... Keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as 'the white race' is destroyed — not 'deconstructed' but destroyed."
    "Whiteness is not a culture[.] ... Whiteness has nothing to do with culture and everything to do with social position[.] ... Without the privileges attached to it, the white race would not exist, and the white skin would have no more social significance than big feet."
    "Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity."
    Replace the word "whiteness" with "blackness" — or, considering his background, "Jewishness" — would you write this off as nothing more than an academic speaking of a social construct's need to be re-evaluated and deconstructed? I highly doubt it. I am sure Ignatiev would cry foul at such hateful anti-Semitism if you did that. Yet he seems content to do it for "whites." Why is that, and why is that now deemed acceptable in society? Does he not consider himself white, too?
    What Ignatiev began teaching a short few decades ago has filtered down into the young minds of those coming out of our universities and filling many parts of our culture. It has seeped into the various avenues and institutions that will become intrinsic to the next generation and the decision-making of the government. All you are hearing today about the inherent evil of "whiteness" stems from people like Ignatiev, who was one of the most prominent behind it.
    We should not idly accept this. We should call out the Ignatievs of the world, shine a light on their dark corners, and ferret them out so they do not get away with their heinous belief systems. Such people are not merely ivory-tower academics; they are aggressively calling to destroy a group of people, a civilization. Why are we allowing them and their acolytes a pass?

    Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook


    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog..._academia.html

    If you're gonna fight, fight like you're the third monkey on the ramp to Noah's Ark... and brother its starting to rain. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member Airbornesapper07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    17,544
    If you're gonna fight, fight like you're the third monkey on the ramp to Noah's Ark... and brother its starting to rain. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-11-2019, 10:21 AM
  2. "It's Like A Western Movie" - Paul Craig Roberts Fears A US-Russia Showdown
    By Airbornesapper07 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-24-2018, 02:19 AM
  3. Paul Craig Roberts: Armageddon Rides In The Balance "Life on earth is faced with
    By Airbornesapper07 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-13-2018, 03:13 PM
  4. Paul Craig Roberts: Empires Then And Now - American people are victims of the empire
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-09-2014, 10:05 AM
  5. The Western Onslaught Against International Law ~ Paul Craig Roberts
    By kathyet in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-29-2012, 10:00 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •