Results 1 to 2 of 2
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Judy

Thread: Resolution rejecting "white nationalists" heads to Trump's desk

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005

    Resolution rejecting "white nationalists" heads to Trump's desk

    Resolution rejecting "white nationalists" heads to Trump's desk

    By Kathryn Watson CBS News September 12, 2017, 9:04 PM
    Last Updated Sep 12, 2017 9:55 PM EDT

    The House and Senate passed a bipartisan resolution Tuesday "condemning the violence and domestic terrorist attack" and "rejecting white nationalists, white supremacists, the Ku Lux Klan, Neo Nazis, and other hate groups" in Charlottesville, Virginia, sending the measure to President Trump's desk.

    The resolution, introduced by Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Colo.) and Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) urges Mr. Trump to speak out against racist hate groups.

    In the days after a white nationalist rally attendee appeared to deliberately ram his car into counter-protesters, killing Heather Heyer, 32, Mr. Trump commented there was "blame on many sides." His remarks sparked intense criticism from Democrats, some members of his own party and led to some members of the president's business committees to resign.

    "Condemning the violence and domestic terrorist attack that took place during events between August 11 and August 12, 2017, in Charlottesville, Virginia, recognizing the first responders who lost their lives while monitoring the events, offering deepest condolences to the families and friends of those individuals who were killed and deepest sympathies and support to those individuals who were injured by the violence, expressing support for the Charlottesville community, rejecting white nationalists, white supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, and other hate groups, and urging the president and the president's' cabinet to use all available resources to address the threats posed by those groups," the resolution reads.

    The House passed the resolution Tuesday evening, and the Senate passed it Monday. Resolutions don't institute new law -- they are mostly declarations intended to make a statement for the record.

    How people viewed Mr. Trump's response to Charlottesville largely depended on their party affiliation, according to a CBS News poll. The August CBS News poll found 55 percent of respondents disapproved of the president's actions in the Charlottesville aftermath, while 34 approved. But breaking that down, 67 percent of Republicans approved and 22 percent disapproved, while 10 percent of Democrats approved and 82 percent disapproved.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Every member of Congress, the President of the United States, and every member of the Cabinet of the United States takes an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States that in the First Amendment protects the rights of these people in these organizations to have their organizations, to belong to their organizations, and say whatever they want as part of their free speech rights and rights to peacefully assemble. We may not like it, we may not agree with it, but they have their rights.

    In no way. at no time, can a Congress reject them or urge the Executive Branch to "use all available resources to address the threats posed by those groups".

    These groups had nothing to do with the deaths of the two state troopers whose helicopter crashed. These groups had nothing to do with the death of Heather Heyer. An individual drove his car into a crowded street and injured several people and tragically killed Heather. There is a police investigation of her death, as well as a DOJ investigation already underway which was announced by the DOJ within a couple of days of the rioting that broke out at this event in Charlottesville.

    This resolution is completely inappropriate and unconstitutional because of its prejudicial effect on on-going criminal investigations and potential prosecutions. It also violates the 14th Amendment because it's racial profiling and the worst possible example of grotesque labeling and generalizations, all of which represent the epitome of bigotry and outright primitive ignorance.
    artist likes this.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-15-2017, 07:54 PM
  2. Cudahy Vice Mayor calls Trump Supporters "White Supremacist", CHAOS BREAKS OUT!
    By Newmexican in forum Pictures & Videos of Illegal Immigration
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-19-2017, 11:37 AM
  3. Trump Reveals Policy Goals: "Building That Wall", End "War On Coal", Repeal Obamacare
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-10-2016, 05:54 PM
  4. White Democrats Call Black Reporter "RACIST" For Being Pro-Trump
    By European Knight in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-31-2016, 01:06 PM
  5. Tensions high in British town after "Muslim youths" attack "white girls"
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-28-2014, 05:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts