Thread: Romanians sleeping rough in London have tripled just months after borders opened.

This is the vision of the Obama Administration, the UN and the Democrats for this country. All one has to do is look at England to see where we are headed. The EU rules for migration are in accordance with the UN Agenda 21 migration plan.

Romanians sleeping rough in London have tripled just months after borders opened... (and 2,000 are arrested in 12 weeks)

• More than 1,000 charges laid for crimes ranging from murder to shoplifting
• Aggressive begging, pickpocketing and prostitution on the rise
• Romanian beggars seen washing in fountains and defecating in public
• MP Mark Field calls for Government to take urgent action
  

By SANCHEZ MANNING
PUBLISHED: 16:07 EST, 28 June 2014 | UPDATED: 16:10 EST, 28 June 2014


The number of Romanian immigrants sleeping rough in some of the wealthiest areas of the capital has trebled since EU restrictions on movement were lifted in January.

The rise in vagrants is reported to have sparked a spate of aggressive begging, pickpocketing and prostitution, which is blighting exclusive London addresses such as Park Lane.

Revelations about the influx come after politicians dismissed predictions that there would be a fresh wave of immigration when Bulgarians and Romanians were given unrestricted rights to work in the UK on January 1. Yet now the problem has become so acute that Westminster Council is set to hold high-level talks with Home Office officials next week.


Homeless immigrants seen sleeping rough outside shops in Park Lane last week

Bands of up to 20 Romanian beggars were witnessed last week setting up camps to bed down overnight around Marble Arch and Hyde Park.

Those living or working nearby said the Eastern European gangs have been washing in fountains, dumping rubbish, urinating and even defecating in public.

Aaron Devaney, a sightseeing tour sales agent based in Marble Arch, said: ‘They rob, they steal, they make a mockery of the country and then the police come and give them free flights home. I know what they’re up to because I see them every day. They sleep around the edges of the grass and shower in the fountains.’

Mark Field, Conservative MP for Cities of London and Westminster, last night called for the Government to take urgent action.

He said: ‘Romanians are entitled to come to this country, and many I know have come to take up employment and make a contribution. What is unacceptable is the vast increase in the number sleeping rough on the streets of our capital and there must be urgent action to ensure they are sent back to Romania.’


Those living around Marble Arch and Hyde Park said they have seen Eastern European gangs washing in fountains, dumping rubbish, urinating and even defecating in public during the last week

Last month, Treasury Chief Secretary Danny Alexander called warnings of a rise in Eastern European migration ‘inflammatory rhetoric’ and ‘scaremongering’.

His comments came in response to official figures showing the number of Bulgarians and Romanians working in the UK had fallen by 4,000 in the three months since employment restrictions were lifted.

However, Scott Blinder, from Oxford’s Migration Observatory, said those figures had come too early to ‘tell us anything apart from what had happened in a very short period’.

He added that it was ‘certainly possible there will be an increase’ in numbers of Bulgarian and Romanian migrants when further figures are released later this year.



A pedestrian walks past Romanian's sleeping rough in Park Lane in December last year

Conservative MP Mark Reckless, a member of the Home Affairs Select Committee, said: ‘The previous figures were wrongly seized upon to show no influx of Romanians and Bulgarians.

‘They were no basis for concluding that numbers will be low, so it is perhaps no surprise to see these real figures from Westminster showing Romanian immigration remaining a very serious concern.’

Westminster Council’s report shows that the number of Romanian rough sleepers in Central London has risen from 20 in January to 59 last month.

The local authority has been working with the UK Border Agency to use new powers to crack down on homeless groups.

Under legislation introduced at the beginning of this year they can deport EU nationals sleeping rough and bar them from re-entry for 12 months if they cannot prove ‘they have a proper reason to be here, such as a job’.

Meanwhile, the Home Office has been footing the bill for flights to return offending Romanians to their own country.

But Westminster’s report states that in spite of these efforts ‘we continue to see an increasing number of Romanian nationals on the street’.

It continues: ‘Despite this excellent partnership work, there [were]... 91 new non-UK rough sleepers recorded as bedded down on the streets of Westminster in May, the largest nationality were Romanian with 59 individuals.’

Council leader Philippa Roe said the authority wanted to take more stringent actions, but were limited by EU rules. She said: ‘We would like to crack down on it, but I’m just not sure what more we can do than we’ve already done... with the Border Agency because of EU regulations. Until something is done about free movement there is a limit to what we can legally do.’1,069 charges laid against Romanians in just three months

Figures from Britain’s biggest police force show that almost 2,000 Romanians were arrested in the first three months after immigration restrictions were relaxed.

The Metropolitan Police said 1,906 Romanians were held in London between January 1 and March 31, along with 220 Bulgarians.

These led to 1,069 charges against Romanians and 100 against Bulgarians, from murder to sex offences and shoplifting.
By contrast, in the first three months of 2013 there were 852 charges against Romanians and 76 against Bulgarians.
It means there has been a 25 per cent increase in the number of charges against Romanians this year.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz362uzPxfY
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

They just want to create Global "Markets".

Divorce is now the only course left for Britain and the EU (but here is how we can make it amicable)

By DANIEL HANNAN, CONSERVATIVE MEP FOR SOUTH EAST ENGLAND
PUBLISHED: 20:03 EST, 28 June 2014 | UPDATED: 20:03 EST, 28 June 2014
At teatime on Friday, it became clear that Britain could no longer remain a member of the EU. Any hope that we might change its nature – make it looser, more flexible, more attuned to its nation states – was coldly extinguished. Knocking British objections aside, EU leaders entrusted the top slot to a man who has never hidden his support for a United States of Europe.

Jean-Claude Juncker, the former Luxembourg leader who has just been chosen to run the world’s most powerful bureaucracy, wants a common EU citizenship, with reciprocal voting rights at national elections.

He wants to merge the various foreign offices into a European diplomatic corps. He wants a pan-European minimum wage, a federal police force and army, and harmonised taxes.


Time to go: Ahead of the appointment, David Cameron told fellow heads of state that choosing Juncker would push Britain towards leaving the EU

He has – to his credit, I suppose – been open about all these things. And he has just been appointed, by 26 votes to two (Britain’s and Hungary’s) to Europe’s most important job.

As president of the European Commission, Juncker won’t just run the EU’s executive – its cabinet, so to speak. He will also have the right to initiate new laws.

It’s an extraordinary concentration of power.

Not bad for a man who was thrown out by his own voters in December and whom Brussels insiders describe as imperious, idle and overfond of a drink.

No one can now credibly claim that Europe is turning away from integration. The middle way that many British people had hoped for – the idea we could remain involved but on better conditions – has been closed off.

The choice we face is between leaving the EU or becoming, over time, a province of a country called Europe.


Chin, chin buddy: German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean Claude Juncker raise their glasses

Other prime ministers weren’t even pretending to respect our sensitivities. On his way into the summit, Finland’s new leader, a Euro-fanatical former MEP called Alexander Stubb, brusquely informed the British people that they had better ‘wake up and smell the coffee’ and realise how economically dependent they were on the EU.

Afterwards, Angela Merkel, who had supposedly given David Cameron private assurances about blocking Juncker’s candidature, told the press that as far as she was concerned, ever-closer union was an obligation for all 28 members – albeit one they might fulfil at different speeds.

Viviane Reding, Luxembourg’s veteran Commissioner, was more succinct: ‘Game, set, match!’ she tweeted. So much for the ‘influence’ that our Sir Humphreys keep harping on about.

David Cameron had pleaded with his fellow heads of government to choose someone more palatable to public opinion. Juncker’s appointment, he told them, would push Britain towards leaving the EU.

Yet, in the event, his opposition served only to solidify support behind the abrasive Christian Democrat. A number of EU leaders who disliked Juncker felt obliged to back him rather than be seen to have given in to British pressure.

David Cameron ruefully told reporters afterwards that he wouldn’t publicly endorse any candidates for the other big jobs in case his support blighted their chances.

That’s the true measure of our ‘influence’ in Brussels: it’s not just empty, it’s negative.

Juncker’s appointment is especially bad news for our Foreign Office mandarins. Their strategy ever since Cameron announced the in/out referendum 18 months ago has been to make the minimum necessary changes to persuade the country to vote for continued membership.

These changes didn’t have to be substantive; they could be wholly presentational. After all, a similar tactic worked for Harold Wilson in our 1975 referendum which, though they were soon forgotten, had supposedly also been held on ‘improved terms’.


'Soz Dave':Merkel had supposedly given David Cameron private assurances about blocking Juncker's candidature

In March, the PM set out his goals in a newspaper article. None of them would have fundamentally altered the terms of our relationship and, indeed, none of them would have required a new treaty – the original justification for delaying the referendum to 2017.

The talk we used to hear from the PM about taking back social and employment policy, about unilateral repatriation of power, had been dropped. No wonder Nick Clegg and Ken Clarke cheerfully endorsed all the proposed ‘reforms’, pointing out that they didn’t change anything.

That strategy has now been blown to sparks and cinders. The country won’t fall for cosmetic changes being presented as a grand new deal – not now we have seen where the rest of the EU wants to go.

A British Prime Minister who came back trumpeting some memorandum about ever-closer union not applying to Britain, or some agreement to limit benefits claims for migrants, would be laughed at.

The electorate would see perfectly clearly that we were still full members of the EU, subject to the Common Agricultural Policy, Fisheries Policy, the Common External Tariff, the European Arrest Warrant and all the rest
.
What, then, are Cameron’s options? One is to stick to Plan A: to get whatever concessions he can, oversell them and rely on our aversion to change to win the referendum. That strategy looks a lot less attractive now: he would risk defeat and, with defeat, resignation.

A second is to campaign for a No vote in the referendum – to announce that he had given reform his best shot, had got nowhere, and could not now in conscience recommend remaining part of what the EU was turning into. He would almost certainly win such a referendum comfortably – indeed, he’d break all records for popularity – but he won’t do it, because he fears that an acrimonious break with the EU would be harmful.

That leaves option three. An amicable separation that would leave us in the free market but outside the political institutions.

Britain could angle for the sort of deal Switzerland has: that is, free movement of goods, services, labour and capital, but not much else.

Switzerland pays only a token contribution to the EU budget, does not recognise the primacy of EU law on its own territory and – critically – is free to negotiate trade deals with non-EU states such as China.

And you can’t help noticing that it’s doing rather well.

If Britain secured such a deal – and Eurocrats keep indicating that it’s on offer – it might save face all round to dress it up as some form of associate status or semi-detached membership.

Other European states, both within the EU and outside, might want something similar.

After all, with the partnership pacts signed with Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia on Friday, the only European country that doesn’t enjoy free trade with the EU is Belarus.

We could create a pan-continental market, stretching from Iceland to Georgia, with 40 or 45 members – some 20 or 25 of which might also choose to have a single currency and shared political institutions.

If we can’t negotiate such a deal from within, we should do so from outside, replacing our current membership with a Swiss-type free-trade agreement. The Swiss, after all, manage to sell four-and-a-half times as much per head to the EU as we do.

More to the point, the EU is declining as an export market: every continent is now experiencing growth except Europe.

There is a teeming world across the oceans, a world where we still have friends. Why stay in a declining customs union when the rest of the planet is waiting?

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/ar...#ixzz362wzoEtF
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Originally Posted by Newmexican

This is the vision of the Obama Administration, the UN and the Democrats for this country. All one has to do is look at England to see where we are headed. The EU rules for migration are in accordance with the UN Agenda 21 migration plan.

Romanians sleeping rough in London have tripled just months after borders opened... (and 2,000 are arrested in 12 weeks)

• More than 1,000 charges laid for crimes ranging from murder to shoplifting
• Aggressive begging, pickpocketing and prostitution on the rise
• Romanian beggars seen washing in fountains and defecating in public
• MP Mark Field calls for Government to take urgent action
  

By SANCHEZ MANNING
PUBLISHED: 16:07 EST, 28 June 2014 | UPDATED: 16:10 EST, 28 June 2014


The number of Romanian immigrants sleeping rough in some of the wealthiest areas of the capital has trebled since EU restrictions on movement were lifted in January.

The rise in vagrants is reported to have sparked a spate of aggressive begging, pickpocketing and prostitution, which is blighting exclusive London addresses such as Park Lane.

Revelations about the influx come after politicians dismissed predictions that there would be a fresh wave of immigration when Bulgarians and Romanians were given unrestricted rights to work in the UK on January 1. Yet now the problem has become so acute that Westminster Council is set to hold high-level talks with Home Office officials next week.


Homeless immigrants seen sleeping rough outside shops in Park Lane last week

Bands of up to 20 Romanian beggars were witnessed last week setting up camps to bed down overnight around Marble Arch and Hyde Park.

Those living or working nearby said the Eastern European gangs have been washing in fountains, dumping rubbish, urinating and even defecating in public.

Aaron Devaney, a sightseeing tour sales agent based in Marble Arch, said: ‘They rob, they steal, they make a mockery of the country and then the police come and give them free flights home. I know what they’re up to because I see them every day. They sleep around the edges of the grass and shower in the fountains.’

Mark Field, Conservative MP for Cities of London and Westminster, last night called for the Government to take urgent action.

He said: ‘Romanians are entitled to come to this country, and many I know have come to take up employment and make a contribution. What is unacceptable is the vast increase in the number sleeping rough on the streets of our capital and there must be urgent action to ensure they are sent back to Romania.’


Those living around Marble Arch and Hyde Park said they have seen Eastern European gangs washing in fountains, dumping rubbish, urinating and even defecating in public during the last week

Last month, Treasury Chief Secretary Danny Alexander called warnings of a rise in Eastern European migration ‘inflammatory rhetoric’ and ‘scaremongering’.

His comments came in response to official figures showing the number of Bulgarians and Romanians working in the UK had fallen by 4,000 in the three months since employment restrictions were lifted.

However, Scott Blinder, from Oxford’s Migration Observatory, said those figures had come too early to ‘tell us anything apart from what had happened in a very short period’.

He added that it was ‘certainly possible there will be an increase’ in numbers of Bulgarian and Romanian migrants when further figures are released later this year.



A pedestrian walks past Romanian's sleeping rough in Park Lane in December last year

Conservative MP Mark Reckless, a member of the Home Affairs Select Committee, said: ‘The previous figures were wrongly seized upon to show no influx of Romanians and Bulgarians.

‘They were no basis for concluding that numbers will be low, so it is perhaps no surprise to see these real figures from Westminster showing Romanian immigration remaining a very serious concern.’

Westminster Council’s report shows that the number of Romanian rough sleepers in Central London has risen from 20 in January to 59 last month.

The local authority has been working with the UK Border Agency to use new powers to crack down on homeless groups.

Under legislation introduced at the beginning of this year they can deport EU nationals sleeping rough and bar them from re-entry for 12 months if they cannot prove ‘they have a proper reason to be here, such as a job’.

Meanwhile, the Home Office has been footing the bill for flights to return offending Romanians to their own country.

But Westminster’s report states that in spite of these efforts ‘we continue to see an increasing number of Romanian nationals on the street’.

It continues: ‘Despite this excellent partnership work, there [were]... 91 new non-UK rough sleepers recorded as bedded down on the streets of Westminster in May, the largest nationality were Romanian with 59 individuals.’

Council leader Philippa Roe said the authority wanted to take more stringent actions, but were limited by EU rules. She said: ‘We would like to crack down on it, but I’m just not sure what more we can do than we’ve already done... with the Border Agency because of EU regulations. Until something is done about free movement there is a limit to what we can legally do.’1,069 charges laid against Romanians in just three months

Figures from Britain’s biggest police force show that almost 2,000 Romanians were arrested in the first three months after immigration restrictions were relaxed.

The Metropolitan Police said 1,906 Romanians were held in London between January 1 and March 31, along with 220 Bulgarians.

These led to 1,069 charges against Romanians and 100 against Bulgarians, from murder to sex offences and shoplifting.
By contrast, in the first three months of 2013 there were 852 charges against Romanians and 76 against Bulgarians.
It means there has been a 25 per cent increase in the number of charges against Romanians this year.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz362uzPxfY
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

FIRST OF ALL WHAT ABOUT THE MAYOR OF THIS TOWN DON'T HE HAVE SOME SAY IN THIS ? IT HIS TOWN WHY DON'T THE CITIZEN OF THE TOWN SAY SOMETHING THEY PAY TAX'S YOU ALL HAVE TO STAND UP & FIGHT .THIS IS ALL BS