Results 11 to 15 of 15
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
06-02-2005, 02:23 PM #11
I believe the people of California have more intelligence than to approve such a ridiculous piece of legislation.
If not, it's their money and they have reaped what they have sown by failing to initiate their California National Guard to control entry into their state by illegal aliens who have obviously become part of their electorate illegally that would elect such an anti-American person as Senator Dunn.
California doesn't have enough money to educate its children, fix its roads, take care of its Citizens and I'm sure doesn't have the money to fund this legislation concerning an event that occurred over 75 years ago and long beyond the statute of limitations for any wrong-doing, if in fact, any wrong-doing occurred to begin with.A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy
Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
06-02-2005, 03:25 PM #12
California state senator Joe Dunn
If you want a get a good look at the kind of specimen we're dealing with here, check out the excellent article about Joe "ambulance chasing" Dunn in the Jewish World Review, titled: "The Runaway Trial Lawyer." http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0704/m ... 070904.asp Now lets watch and see if this two-bit lawyer can get away with shaking down the American taxpayers for a couple hundred million bucks.
-
06-02-2005, 03:55 PM #13
His moment of accounting will come!!
A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy
Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
06-02-2005, 06:23 PM #14
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Posts
- 33
Re: Senator Dunn's "apology" bill for deported Mex
Originally Posted by Acebackwords"Bring it on"
-
06-02-2005, 09:02 PM #15
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Posts
- 353
An illegal alien comes to the United States with his wife and has three or four children. In the old days, those children were returned to Mexico with the Mother and Father. In this day, the ACLU is working the hardship plea for everyone, and suggesting there would be significant retrobution if the illegal aliens were returned to their homeland... Mexico. But then you realize Bush is smoozing with Fox, and THAT is the place where political repression is going to take place if the illegal's and their families are returned. Do we all see a problem here?
Sooo... back in the 1950's, millions, and two million sounds about right, of illegal aliens were in Southern California and in fact, they were a hell of a problem almost all the Unions complained about.. workers complained about.. and Public Health complained about. (Living conditions for those illegal aliens was horrendous by the way.) In that circumstance in 1950, father, mother and children were returned to Mexico.
This is directly to the point of this post: the 14th Amendment was used to allow Fathers and Mothers to remain in the United States in recent times. But it appears it was misinterpreted and Citizenship does NOT automatically move to the children of those illegal aliens. Because that is the case, the 'Anchor Babies' may not have any claim at all. Not only that, the Anchor Babies that are here may be deported.
What is going to happen? A lot of smoke, a lot of fire. But this issue of the Anchor Babies could become the basis for significant immigration reform and enforcement. On the other hand...
72 Hours Till Deadline: Durbin moves on Amnesty
04-28-2024, 02:18 PM in illegal immigration Announcements