Results 1 to 2 of 2
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
09-08-2013, 06:44 AM #1
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
- Posts
- 117,696
Should Congress give Obama authority to attack Syria? WND Poll
Should Congress give Obama authority to attack Syria?
- Yes, the U.S. should do everything possible to topple Bashar Assad's regime
- Yes, this is a humanitarian mission of the highest order
- Yes, Syria's use of chemical weapons must be stopped at all costs
- Yes, the U.S. will never be taken seriously again if we don’t back up our posturing
- Yes, House Speaker John Boehner is right: Only the U.S. has the capability to stop Assad
- Yes, how can anyone look at innocent, suffering children and not act?
- Yes, even the Republican leadership is in favor of it. Bipartisanship has finally come to Washington
- Yes, John Kerry says the U.S. has evidence of Syria's sarin use, and I believe him
- Yes, it might help distract the media from all their so-called 'scandal' coverage and the impeachment movement
- Yes, the U.S. has to stop abuses like governments gassing their own people
- Yes, Syria's chemical weapons likely came from Iraq while it was ruled by Saddam Hussein. The U.S. must not let them get away again
- Yes, Congress should give the OK so Obama can continue making a buffoon of himself
- No, U.S. military action might not even have a real effect. The regime could use the affair as propaganda to stoke anti-Western sentiment
- No, there are no vital national security interests at stake in Syria
- No, the U.S. had more support going into the Iraq war, and look how that turned out
- No, not one drop of American soldiers' blood should be shed in Syria
- No, we have enough problems here to worry about
- No, we're already broke. How can we afford a war?
- No, didn't we learn our lesson from Egypt and Libya?
- No, we're supporting the wrong side!
- No, both sides are evil – but the current regime is better than what's coming if it's overthrown
- No, Americans are overwhelmingly opposed to new overseas military intervention
- No, let's pick our fights intelligently. This would be a weak, ineffective, face-saving, limited bombing of Syrians to maintain our credibility
- No, Obama still hasn't provided proof it was Assad who used chemical weapons
- No, this Syrian misadventure threatens to put the U.S. on a very perilous collision course with Russia, China and Iran
- No, this will be the beginning of World War III
- Other
http://www.wnd.com/2013/09/is-this-w...-really-about/Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
09-08-2013, 06:46 AM #2
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
- Posts
- 117,696
Should Congress give Obama authority to attack Syria?
- No, this will be the beginning of World War III (18%, 806 Votes)
- No, this Syrian misadventure threatens to put the U.S. on a very perilous collision course with Russia, China and Iran (16%, 725 Votes)
- No, both sides are evil – but the current regime is better than what's coming if it's overthrown (12%, 536 Votes)
- No, there are no vital national security interests at stake in Syria (11%, 487 Votes)
- No, Obama still hasn't provided proof it was Assad who used chemical weapons (9%, 395 Votes)
- No, let's pick our fights intelligently. This would be a weak, ineffective, face-saving, limited bombing of Syrians to maintain our credibility (8%, 340 Votes)
- No, not one drop of American soldiers' blood should be shed in Syria (7%, 330 Votes)
- No, Americans are overwhelmingly opposed to new overseas military intervention (5%, 222 Votes)
- No, U.S. military action might not even have a real effect. The regime could use the affair as propaganda to stoke anti-Western sentiment (3%, 118 Votes)
- No, didn't we learn our lesson from Egypt and Libya? (3%, 112 Votes)
- No, we're supporting the wrong side! (2%, 110 Votes)
- No, we have enough problems here to worry about (2%, 97 Votes)
- No, we're already broke. How can we afford a war? (1%, 50 Votes)
- Other (less than 1%, 34 Votes)
- No, the U.S. had more support going into the Iraq war, and look how that turned out (less than 1%, 16 Votes)
- Yes, Congress should give the OK so Obama can continue making a buffoon of himself (less than 1%, 10 Votes)
- Yes, the U.S. should do everything possible to topple Bashar Assad's regime (less than 1%, 9 Votes)
- Yes, Syria's use of chemical weapons must be stopped at all costs (less than 1%, 6 Votes)
- Yes, it might help distract the media from all their so-called 'scandal' coverage and the impeachment movement (less than 1%, 4 Votes)
- Yes, Syria's chemical weapons likely came from Iraq while it was ruled by Saddam Hussein. The U.S. must not let them get away again (less than 1%, 4 Votes)
- Yes, the U.S. will never be taken seriously again if we don’t back up our posturing (less than 1%, 4 Votes)
- Yes, the U.S. has to stop abuses like governments gassing their own people (less than 1%, 2 Votes)
- Yes, this is a humanitarian mission of the highest order (less than 1%, 2 Votes)
- Yes, House Speaker John Boehner is right: Only the U.S. has the capability to stop Assad (less than 1%, 2 Votes)
- Yes, how can anyone look at innocent, suffering children and not act? (less than 1%, 2 Votes)
- Yes, John Kerry says the U.S. has evidence of Syria's sarin use, and I believe him (less than 1%, 1 Votes)
- Yes, even the Republican leadership is in favor of it. Bipartisanship has finally come to Washington (0%, 0 Votes)
http://www.wnd.com/2013/09/is-this-w...iewPollResultsJoin our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
Biden may hand out green cards to 4,000 illegal migrants per year
03-28-2024, 01:54 PM in Videos about Illegal Immigration, refugee programs, globalism, & socialism