Thread: If and when deportation arrives deport the women first

Deport the women first (with their children)

The Pew Hispanic Center says of the 12 million undocumented immigrants in the United States, 4 million of them are women. No statistics of how many are pregnant at crossing.

Decades ago Mexican migrants were primarily male. They were seasonal workers who helped out on the farms . They all sent money back to their wives, and most returned home after the picking season. But our loose border made it easier for the women to arrive. After that the men saw no reason to return. They settled in to stay and started looking for other jobs because they were no longer just interested in seasonal work

Their women are now busy birthing anchor babies with the intention of using these children as a lever to gain entry for the entire clan back home. The illegals claim not to be doing this intentionally, but why wouldn't they be? The law, as it stands offers them this major loophole to US legitamacy. There's no way they wouldn't take advantage of this.

If and when deportation arrives, deporting the women and children ahead of the men may encourage the men to go back home voluntarily. At least they would be much more likely to do so when the jobs dried up. On the other hand, if the women stayed on, they would likely dig in their heels and refuse to leave the comforts that the USA provides.

Is this a "racist" thought? If so, sorry about that. Just trying to think sensibly.

Nope, it's neither racist nor sexist....simply the truth. I'm female. I agree.

The illegal women around here are seldom married to the illegal fathers of their children. They have learned that being single is the easiest way to collect the benefits, and the easiest way to get various types of assistance.

These people know how to work the system. Our social services offices teach them how to work the system. The social services employees never (that I know of) call INS to report them. Afterall, the more people collecting benefits, the greater job security the social services people have. Again, it's our own govenment officials working against us. This is just another reason why having so many government jobs is so dangerous to our system of government.

Deport the women and children first, deport the men next. Close the borders and lock the gate. Ellis Island must be reinstated.

And the illegals are having these anchor babies as fast as they can. Because as soon as that baby is born, the illegal mother and father, get a social security card in the babies name, and then that card opens up other avenues for using emergency room, social services and every other service paid for by hard working American taxpayers.

Those services should rightfully go to American citizens that have fell on hard times. Not foreign illegal immigrants, that have no allegiance to our Ameican heritage and culture.

And this is not to endorse the entitlement mentality that prevades the nation. But American taxpayer money should go to Americans. Period!!

Anchor babies are still "Illegal" according to the constitution. And this should be brought light and made known . Maybe they'll stop droppin when they cross the border and continue after they get here. It's sickening to me to see a mexican baby machine with 3 little ones, one infant, and one in the oven since I know why they are doing it.

This is going to sound terrible but, I can pretty much gauge the influx of illegals invading my town by my weekly grocery shopping trips.

While the increase in the spanish speaking shoppers in the last 2 years has been alarming, one would have to be blind not to notice that the vast majority of young spanish speaking women have infants and/or toddlers (usually both) in tow.

One of our the local school districts (Chistiana) had to be bailed out by the state last week, to the tune of several million dollars, to simply meet payroll. No doubt our property taxes are going to sky rocket in the near future.

This is from my personal story:


Another thing that needs to change...that just being born here conveys
citizenship. If a person is born to a non-citizen who is NOT a green card
holder... then the baby shouldn't be a citizen. In the ER, I took care
of a child of Brazilian parents, who proudly presented her with her
Medicaid card. Now these folk arrived in their big Mercedes, with 2
(men's and ladies) Presidential Rolexes and expensive jewelry, handmade
clothes and shoes and with even the child wearing more real jewelry
(diamonds) than I'll ever be able to afford. They explained that this is
the "greatest country". That it is well known in Brazil that if you come to Disney
World in Orlando, Fl. for the last month of pregnancy and to just stay
till the baby's born...then you have a US citizen and can get help. These
people are millionaires. OUTRAGEOUS! My tax money going to people like
this! My oldest daughter is disabled. She has a very rare disease which
doesn't have a federal code. It's progressive and the doctors who are the
federal gatekeepers acknowledge that she CANNOT work and needs SSDI. Yet,
she's been told to her face that she's" white, so she can work". I told
her to get a lawyer. Yet, she's been a taxpayer since she was a teenager,
and can't get help! I have a doctor friend who works as a gatekeeper.
This doc told me recently that the law is that a Hispanic who never learns
English and is depressed, and has never worked, gets SSDI.
ARRRRRRRGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!

************************************************** **
Boy , do I ever agree with you!

A little personal story - in 2002 I had a Christmas party for about 20 guests. I asked that everyone bring a toy for the local toy drive for supposed disadvantaged and underprivileged children.

Party was great and everyone really joined in the spirit with most bringing more than the one requested toy. I spent over $100 at Tuesday Morning picking up Barbie dolls and all sorts of great items at bargain prices. I had three large bags of toys to deliver to the fire deparment who was in charge of the drive.

That year, the local news station showed people driving up in brand new cars picking up these toys. Some of the cars were brand spanking new. The story was presented, though not reported that way, as a kind of expose. It certainly looked suspicious. These did not look like parents who couldn't afford to buy the children even the most basic of Christmas - toys.

OK .. maybe some people had fallen on hard times - perhaps lost jobs - but not THAT many - it's just not possible.

The clincher for me was when an elderly friend who attended the party told me a little story. Her daughter was working at the local WIC office. It's some type of benefit for "women and children." Her daughter told her how one of the Hispanic female workers had the nerve and audacity to sign up for the toy drive for her children.

After hearing that story, I've never participated in the toy drive again. Sorry for the children who are really deserving who might miss out but the employed woman who applied for the program BLATANLY AND UNASHAMEDLY was the proverbial straw for me.

If we contribute again, we'll choose a child from the angel tree. That way you can purchase what the child wants and/or needs and some kids ask for basics like socks/underwear/clothing and don't even mention toys. And we'll hope it goes to a needy child and not some illegal bambino whose parents are always looking for freebies.

Anyone had this experience in your area?

My oldest daughter is disabled. She has a very rare disease which
doesn't have a federal code. It's progressive and the doctors who are the
federal gatekeepers acknowledge that she CANNOT work and needs SSDI. Yet,
she's been told to her face that she's" white, so she can work". I told
her to get a lawyer. Yet, she's been a taxpayer since she was a teenager,
and can't get help! I have a doctor friend who works as a gatekeeper.
This doc told me recently that the law is that a Hispanic who never learns
English and is depressed, and has never worked, gets SSDI.
ARRRRRRRGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!

Just think how much more money would be available for your daughter (and everyone else that needs it) if so many foreign illegals were not on the dole. It's dispicable!

And the taxpayer money that would be available for schools and "American" childern. Not to mention class rooms being less crowded.
GRRRRRRRR!!!!!!! IS RIGHT!

Was I an anchor baby? Other folks in another chat area accuse me of being such and call me a hypocrite. I would like your take. Here's the deal:

My birth mother, a Canadian citizen, was 14 when she became pregnant with me. Because of the stigma of illigitimacy at the time (mid 1960's) her parents arranged for her to come to a highly regarded U.S. "unwed mothers home" for the duration of her pregnancy, one that would place the baby in a loving home that had been carefully screened.

I ended up with the most loving, supportive parents on the planet while my birth mother (I assume) returned to Canada to resume her trip to adulthood.

I was born in September and the adoption was finalized two months later, in November. Knowing what I know now, I can only assume the process was expedited because I was, for all intents and purposes, a U.S. citizen, simply because I was born here.

Your thoughts?