Results 11 to 17 of 17
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
01-26-2011, 03:45 PM #11Originally Posted by Justthefacts"Mother Sick of Sending Her Child to A School Overflowing With Anchors and Illegals!"
http://the-drama-of-my-life.blogspot.com
-
01-26-2011, 05:16 PM #12Originally Posted by vistaladServe Bush with his letter of resignation.
See you at the signing!!
-
01-26-2011, 08:18 PM #13Originally Posted by BearFlagRepublic
IMO if they don't do that, 'Bama the Closet Republican will out speechify any Republican nominee. His BS State of the Union message was all about seizing Republican's talking points, so that he can say that he's been working on all of them.
************************************************** *************************************
Americans first in this magnificent country
American jobs for American workers
Fair trade, not free trade
-
01-26-2011, 08:28 PM #14
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- montana
- Posts
- 1,308
It was a bland speech, little in the way of any type of strong direction. Made more of a plea to work together. Problem is Obama's idea of working together is working to enact his plans of Amnisty and Dreams. GOP is dead set against both of that. We as a people need to keep up the pressure on those in office to let them know we are still firm in our demand that addressing and fixing immigration means secure the borders tight, deport the illegals and that includes the anchor brats as well. Take them out of the schools, cut the funding to all social services to illegals including medical. Time to get tough. The more illegals deported, the more jobs open up. Its time we stop sending American money to Mexico, time to keep it here where it belongs.
-
01-26-2011, 09:24 PM #15Originally Posted by vistalad
Lamar Smith is great on illegal immigration, and I assume that quote dealt with that. I don't know his views on trade, but I hope he was also refering to fair trade with that quote. When Duncan Hunter Sr. was in the House he was excellent on trade, and Tom Tancredo was good for the most part. The problem is that these guys are actually the exception when it comes to Republican politicians. Most favor the Wall Street Journal's views on trade. Afterall, its less government, less regulation, free market capitalism blah, blah, blah. Pat Buchanan is an anomally for the current Republican Party. He is more of a paleocon/populist/isolationist. His views on fundamental issues differ widely from most Republican politicians.
You're right that if the Reps don't change their views on free trade, they will lose again. Obama picked up a lot of support from Reagan Democrats in the "rust belt" and elsewhere, plus independents, because he ran with at least fair trade rhetoric. McCain did not even try to appear as a fair trader. He ran as a proud free trade globalist, as most politicians in his party are.Serve Bush with his letter of resignation.
See you at the signing!!
-
01-26-2011, 11:52 PM #16
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Posts
- 4,714
O N E B I G A $ $ M I S T A K E AMERICA OBAMA
-
01-27-2011, 12:04 AM #17Originally Posted by topsecret10Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn
Report: White House Considers Inviting Gaza Palestinians as...
05-01-2024, 04:27 AM in General Discussion