Thread: Suggested Election Day Strategy

Many or most of our choices on election day will be globalist vs. globalist, hence, liberal vs. liberal.
100% - Probability that the Democratic candidate will be liberal and globalist.
>90% - Probability that the Republican candidate will be liberal and globalist.

Example: Kay Baily Hutchison - Ultra LEFT, liberal, pro-illegal, pro-Communist-La-Raza, Pro-Kennedy, pro-Mexico, condescending, GLOBALIST!

Our choices suck. Where are the independent candidates?

I'll be carrying around an airline-style barf bag on election day, especially into the voting booth. Recommend ALIPAC membership decide if this idea has any merit. Ultimately, maybe, a news reporter might see barf bags being carried around on election day and to the polls - to symbolize that there are no [real] conservative candidates on the ballot.

ROFL,

That's funny in a sick sort of way. I don't know what is funnier, your choices of globalist or the barf bag.

Speaking of Hutchison of Amnestyville Horror. I'm not voting for her.

Dixie

Just saw this, Coto. Love the idea.

What do ya think about the ALIPAC banner, or flyer, blown up on one side and the Miller Boycott Dump on the other?

Many or most of our choices on election day will be globalist vs. globalist, hence, liberal vs. liberal.
100% - Probability that the Democratic candidate will be liberal and globalist.
>90% - Probability that the Republican candidate will be liberal and globalist.

If that's the choice then we need to differentiate between globalists.

You may choose a globalism that embraces socialism while seeking to deal with the threat of Islamo-Fascism.

You may choose a globalism that embraces socialism and seeks to just ignore or deny the existence of Islamo-Fascism with the assistance of the UN.

Choose your poison. Who should rule the world?

Seriously and jmho, I think Democrats are going to be about 9 in 10 globalists. Republicans should end up about 3 out of 10 globalists.
A third party will be along, but here's where we are this year.

Hi LoservilleLabor,

Originally Posted by loservillelabor

You may choose a globalism that embraces socialism while seeking to deal with the threat of Islamo-Fascism.

Example might be Lamar Smith - globalist supporter of CAFTA, but recognizes the threat of Islamo-Fascism. Says he is opposed to amnesty

Originally Posted by loservillelabor

You may choose a globalism that embraces socialism and seeks to just ignore or deny the existence of Islamo-Fascism with the assistance of the UN.

Hillary comes to mind - a rabid, foaming at the mouth Tata ass kissing globalist, and a damn COMMUNIST. Ted Kennedy comes to mind, drunk or sober.

Choose your poison. Who should rule the world?

That, Loservillelabor, is why I need to take poison antidote (charcoal comes to mind) and at least 1 or more barf bags to the polls.

Seriously and jmho, I think Democrats are going to be about 9 in 10 globalists. Republicans should end up about 3 out of 10 globalists.

I would love to share your optimism, Loservillelabor, that Republicans are going to lose some of their globalists in the primaries. - uh, I think that's what you're implying....

A third party will be along, but here's where we are this year.

To stand between us and the NEW WORLD ORDER .

Thanks, Loservillelabor, for sharing your insights.
Coto

Campaign materials and campaigning is prohibited within the voting area and within 50 feet of any precinct threshold.

W

Hutchison is one of those pols that loves to play both sides of the aisle. Publicly claiming that she's against illegal immigration while simultaneously doing everything in her power to shove amnesty down our collective throat.

The only reason people don't realize what a useless lib she is is because of favorable comparisons with her predecessor, i.e. the execrable Lloyd Bentsen.

Fellow Alipac members, I think I have ascertained the difference between Democrats and Republicans - vis a vis - a Democratically controlled Congress vs. Republican.

As we know, both parties DEMAND full, unconditional amnesty and citizenship for illegals.

If the Democrats gain control - we won't have time to go buy Preparation-H.
If the Republicans win control - we might have time to run to the drugstore.

The Republicans and Democrats are just obeying orders - both are subservient to the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations.

Recommendation:

Before the election, stock up on the real thing.
Not these:


Get the real thing while you still have a job. :


Disclaimer - No, I don't own stock in any pharmaceuticals. Good hygene and health are always important - while we can still get it.

The Republicans and Democrats are just obeying orders - both are subservient to the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations.

And so, if both parties were to 'ignore' the CFR, what would happen to them? Why are they so afraid to speak up?

Originally Posted by Dixie

ROFL,

That's funny in a sick sort of way. I don't know what is funnier, your choices of globalist or the barf bag.

Speaking of Hutchison of Amnestyville Horror. I'm not voting for her.

Dixie

The problem is that her opponent is WORSE. About the only thing I agree with Barabara Radnofsky on is stopping the Trans-Texas Corridor project and the selling of toll roads to foreign interests.

On immigration, Radnofsky is on record as opposing what she calls "vigilante border security proposals" (read: Minutemen and simlar groups). She favors a "workable" (read: open and easy) registration system so that illegals (she calls them "residents") will register and earn the potential for citizenship. She opposes any plan that would require illegals to return to their own country before being granted work permits.

On pretty much every other issue she's a flaming Socialist Liberal. She opposes drilling in ANWR, she favors wacky environmentalist policies that are often at odds with private land ownership. She also uses the codeword of "deficit reduction" to indicate that she is for tax increases. We can safely say this because of her other policies that indicate she is for increased federal spending, not federal austerity.

Beyond all that, she has little chance of winning. She currently trails Hutchison by a 58%-32% split.