Results 1 to 7 of 7
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: T’was the night before elections, And all thru' the town, -

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546

    T’was the night before elections, And all thru' the town, -

    T’was the night before elections, And all thru' the town, -



    T’was the night before elections, And all thru' the town, -
    gopthedailydose.com
    By JD Cash T’was the night before elections, And all thru’ the town, Tempers were flaring, Emotions ran up and down. I, in my bathrobe With a cat in my lap, Had shut off the TV, Tired of political crap. … Continue reading →









    T’was the night before elections, And all thru’ the town,


    Posted on 1 November, 2014 by Dylan

    By JD Cash
    T’was the night before elections, And all thru’ the town,
    Tempers were flaring, Emotions ran up and down.
    I, in my bathrobe With a cat in my lap,
    Had shut off the TV, Tired of political crap.
    When all of a sudden, There arose such a noise,
    I peered out my window, Saw Obama and his boys.
    They had come for my wallet, They wanted my pay
    To hand out to others Who had not worked a day!
    He snatched up my money, And quick as a wink,
    Jumped back on his bandwagon As I gagged from the stink.
    He then rallied his henchmen Who were pulling his cart.
    I could tell they were out To tear my country apart!
    On Fannie, on Freddie, On Biden and Ayers!
    On Acorn, on Pelosi’ He screamed at the pairs!
    They took off for his cause, And as they flew out of sight,
    I heard him laugh at a nation Who wouldn’t stand up and fight!
    So I leave you to think On this one final note…
    If You Don’t Want Socialism, Get Out And Vote!!!
    TUESDAY NOVEMBER 4TH IS THE MOST IMPORTANT VOTE OF YOUR LIFE!


    http://gopthedailydose.com/2014/11/0...ns-thru-town/#

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    Don't Forget to Vote!!! lol.




  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    WHICH ARE YOU? Several Kinds of Voters





    Written by Vic Landry on November 1, 2014
    The are several kinds of voter. I’m sure there are others, but these come to mind.

    1. The non-voter who says, “I don’t know and I don’t care.” They are too busy making a living and raising a family to worry about politics, besides, all politicians are crooks.

    2. The low information voter who only votes in presidential campaigns. They vote for one party because, “my granddaddy voted for (fill in the blank), my daddy voted for …, and I, always, vote …” They make no effort to find out a candidate’s positions.

    3. The low information voter who votes in most elections but only for one party because, “All … sleaze bags. ” They don’t bother to learn a candidate’s positions. They just vote for a candidate because they have a certain letter after their name. However, they do vote.

    4. The moderate information voter who goes by the ads on TV. If he/she identifies with the party, he/she believes the ads and spouts the talking points, blindly. They ignore any ad that doesn’t fit their mindset. “My mind is made up. Don’t confuse me with the facts.”

    5. Then there is the high information, committed voter. He/she votes in every election. They look at the incumbent’s voting record and the challenger’s position papers. They, carefully, vet each candidate and vote for the best candidate.

    Most people are a combination of two or three of the types. They may be one type on one race and another type on another race. They may know a lot about presidential candidates but not much about agriculture commissioners. Our republic relies on an educated, moral electorate. Every educated vote is vital to a functioning republic.


    In my many years I have come to a
    conclusion that one useless man
    is a shame, two is a law firm,
    and three or more is a congress.

    — John Adams




    Vote them all out, a new broom sweeps clean!!!

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    Schultz Voters - The Refinery 10/28/14 (SNIP)





    Schultz Voters - The Refinery 10/28/14 (SNIP)


    The Conservative Union

    Published on Nov 2, 2014
    #TheRefinery crew discuss the segment of voters who claim that they don't know enough about the candidates days before the election, and what we need to do to address them.

    Ace piece on undecideds - http://ace.mu.nu/archives/330160.php

    How to Reach the Walmart Mom Voter - http://thefederalist.com/2014/10/28/h...

    See the full conversation here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10lAU...

    Catch us LIVE Tuesdays at 9:30pm eastern at http://conservativeunion.net/refinery/

    Join our G+ community - https://plus.google.com/b/11777888061...

    A collaborative project of Free Radical Network (http://freeradicalnetwork.com/), The Party Of Choice (http://www.thepartyofchoice.com/), and The Conservative Union (http://conservativeunion.net/). Members of each group come to together to discuss messaging successes, failures, and strategies in an effort to make ourselves, and the movement as a whole, better at selling Liberty.


  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    Midterm Identity Crisis
    On election eve, the two major parties don't seem to know who they are any more.

    Scott Shackford from the December 2014 issue

    colarusso / Foter / CC BY-NC

    In the run-up to the 2006 midterm elections, voters had grown weary of a second-term president with his large-scale domestic bungles (like Hurricane Katrina) and never-ending wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. As punishment, they stripped the president's party of majority control over both House and Senate.

    RELATED ARTICLES




    Eight years later, voters have grown weary of a second-term president with his large-scale domestic bungles (like Obamacare) and never-ending wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. (And Syria. And Libya.) The big question for the 2014 midterms is whether the opposition party, having already retaken the House of Representatives, will gain a majority in the Senate as well.

    For much of the summer, nearly every independent analyst predicted that the GOP would narrowly re-take the Senate in November's elections. At the start of September, popular political prognosticator Nate Silver gave the Republicans a 62.2 percent chance of taking majority control of the body. But as the month wore on, the likelihood of Republican restoration inched down to 58.5 percent.


    Even though Americans continue to be depressed about the weakest economic recovery in the post-war era, and even though they consistently tell pollsters that they are fed up with the political status quo, it's still a coin flip as to whether Republicans will be able to take advantage of the dissatisfaction. One possible explanation for the hesitation is that the GOP, after a raucous six years of internecine struggle, still appears to be philosophically mixed up.


    Efforts to replace milquetoast GOP incumbents with fire-breathing Tea Party conservatives largely failed in the 2014 primary seasons, with the notable exception of the scalp collected from House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.). Establishment stalwarts Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Lindsay Graham of South Carolina, and Lamar Alexander of Tennessee easily swatted down insurgent efforts to dislodge them.


    But the establishment also suffered losses during incumbent-challenging season, most notably in the expensive, nasty campaign to dislodge Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.). Amash, a staunch anti-interventionist and privacy advocate who has emerged as the leader of the House libertarian faction, squared off against primary insurgent Brian Ellis, who was backed by such establishment conservatives as Karl Rove, Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), and Michigan's Chamber of Commerce. After a campaign that called Amash "Al Qaeda's best friend," Ellis lost by 15 percentage points, causing Capitol Hill's Liberty Caucus to breathe a collective sigh of relief.


    Even though Congress has repeatedly hit new lows in public opinion polls over the past few years, only four House incumbents, and no incumbent Senators, lost their primaries. But the challenges to party orthodoxy keep coming, on issues ranging from gay marriage to foreign interventionism.

    Both parties are struggling to adapt to the late Obama era. The fault lines are more obvious in the Republican Party, but the Democratic Party is also riven by divisions over economic populism, immigration reform, and war. If midterm elections are the first shake of the Magic 8 Ball to divine what a post-Obama America is going to look like, the best answer available right now may be: Ask Again Later.


    Pink Elephants on Parade

    The existence of openly gay Republicans is not a new phenomenon. The Log Cabin Republicans, an organization for gay men and women within the party, was founded in California way back in 1977.

    But gay candidates have been grabbing more headlines in recent years, as the GOP struggles to fit into a world growing increasingly comfortable with same-sex unions. The Republican Party has long campaigned on the primacy of heterosexual marriage, re-upping that stance in its most recent national platform, but that position seems demographically unsustainable in coming election cycles. More than half of Americans now say they favor legalizing gay marriage. Even among evangelical Christians, support for same-sex marriage has doubled over the past decade, to 27 percent, according to the nonpartisan Public Religion Research Institute.


    In this context, it makes sense that the three gay Republicans running for Congress this year have drawn significant national media attention. They are Carl DeMaio, challenging Democrat Scott Peters to represent California's 52nd District in San Diego; Richard Tisei, running against Seth Moulton (one of the few Democrats to dislodge an incumbent in a primary this year) to represent Massachusetts' 6th District; and Dan Innis, who lost a primary fight for New Hampshire's 1st District.


    Innis, who called for federal surveillance reforms, lost his primary in September to a more traditional Republican named Frank Guinta. DeMaio (who is an independent contractor for the Reason Foundation, the nonprofit that publishes reason) is a pension-reform crusader who came in second in California's top-two primary system earlier this year and will face Peters in November. Tisei, a deregulation-focused business conservative, was not challenged in his primary.

    If either DeMaio or Tisei wins in the fall, he'll be the first openly gay Republican elected to Congress. (Retired Arizona Rep. Jim Kolbe came out in 1996 while he was serving in office, not prior to his election.) If Republican voters embrace DeMaio or Tisei, that could send a strong signal to the national party that it's time to move on from the anti-gay-marriage focus championed by strategists such as Karl Rove.

    Although none of the three has made gay issues part of his campaign, they don't hide their sexual orientations either. All three included their partners in their public personae, including appearances at photo ops and in campaign literature.


    Innis says the media appeared to be more interested in his sexual orientation than the voters were. "Here in New Hampshire not that many people pay attention to it," he said. "I've been asked about it maybe two or three times. Here, it's settled law." (Same-sex marriage recognition came to New Hampshire in 2010.) "We have our 'live free or die' mentality...I think the party has come to a place where it's much more accepting of us now and with us running for office."


    DeMaio hopes that sexual orientation will eventually become a non-issue for the party, and that candidates will be judged on their positions and effectiveness on issues of national import. "On [primary] election night, I said this should send a national message that the Republican Party should return to its traditional roots: freedom in all aspects, lower taxes and regulation," he said. "If you're willing to trust people to spend their own money, are you willing to trust people to live their lives?"


    DeMaio and Tisei have libertarian threads in their policy portfolios. DeMaio has been pushing for privatization. Tisei opposes tax increases, supports medical marijuana, and is against parts of the PATRIOT Act.


    (Page 2 of 2)

    Do the openly gay Republican candidates see the GOP moving in a more libertarian direction? "Let me put it this way-I'm a candidate that supports small government, low taxes, low regulation, and keeping the government out of my daily life," says Innis. "I think here in New Hampshire the Republican Party is turning in that direction."

    DeMaio is more direct: "I think American people have grown libertarian. And the party has been flirting with it. It's time the flirtation blossomed into a full romance."

    Democratic Fissures

    Rifts have appeared on the Democratic side as well: progressives vs. centrists, anti-imperialists vs. interventionists, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) vs. Hillary Clinton.

    It's still too soon to know whether Warren will give Clinton a challenge from her left in 2016, though the Massachusetts senator is on the record saying she does not want to run. But there was a preview of what such a fight might look like in September, when New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo fended off a spirited campaign from the progressive academic Zephyr Teachout. Cuomo represented the centrist, pro-business Democrats (complete with accusations of corruption), while Teachout wanted to ban fracking, raise the minimum wage, and roll back business-friendly tax cuts. Cuomo won, but Teachout managed to grab 34 percent of the vote despite being vastly outspent and never having previously run for office.


    The Occupy Wall Street movement may not have amounted to much politically compared to the Tea Party, but there's still a whiff of dislike for government-business collusion on the left. Democrats who ignore this trend may end up facing their own Cantor-style surprise down the line.


    One of the more interesting and potentially momentous Democrat-on-Democrat issues is the public-sector pension crisis, which is blowing up budgets across the country-especially in blue states such as New York, Illinois, California, and Rhode Island. In that last state, arguably the most affected by the pension crisis, Rhode Island Treasurer Gina Raimondo demonstrated by winning the Democratic primary for governor in September that pension-reform politics can work for Democrats.


    Raimondo's most notable accomplishment in office was orchestrating a massive overhaul of Rhode Island's collapsing public pension program in 2011. She modified benefits for current retirees and existing workers, not just future hires, as other states have done. Most public employees in the Ocean State now have "hybrid" plans that blend 401(k)-style defined contributions with annuities.


    As The Wall Street Journal noted in September, "The reforms have saved Rhode Island and its local governments $400 million this year alone. That's not chump change for a state that collects $3.5 billion annually in tax revenues. The money preserved thousands of public jobs and freed up money for schools and public works."


    Raimondo also declared at a primary debate that she doesn't want to raise taxes. Disaffected public-sector unions have attempted to cast her as a tool of Wall Street, but Raimondo was able to win a plurality with 42 percent of the vote against two other Democratic candidates.


    A Reason-Rupe poll from 2013 shows that Americans are on Raimondo's side, preferring to move public sector employees into 401(k)-style savings programs and make employees pay more into their benefit packages. The public simply is not buying the tool-of-Wall Street narrative, not even union-loving Democrats.


    War Drums

    Will any of these issues, or the many other policy problems and scandals that have plagued the Obama administration for the past couple of years, even matter in November now that the country is once again involved in a bombing war in the Middle East?

    Polls have shown that around two-thirds of Americans favor military strikes against the Islamic State (ISIS) but not the deployment of ground troops. (The fact that there are active military personnel on the ground wearing boots seems not to factor into either the policy preferences of the public or the pronouncements of politicians.) And while Americans are still significantly less likely to support foreign intervention than they were in 2003, in the wake of the ISIS beheadings there has been an uptick in their willingness to do something, even if the precise threat that the Islamic State presents to the U.S. remains unclear.


    President Barack Obama launched the latest U.S. war in Iraq, and the new one inside Syrian borders, without explicit congressional authorization and in the absence of an imminent threat. He said he welcomed "congressional support" but did not need it.


    While some Republican leaders, such as Amash and Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, along with some Democrats, such as Rep. Adam Schiff of California and Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa, argued forcefully for a congressional vote, most of their colleagues quietly acquiesced to the president. Congress easily passed a bill to spend $500 million to help arm and train Syrian rebels, and then it ended its session for fall campaigning. The rising left/right anti-war, anti-surveillance bloc that has received so much press attention over the past 18 months suddenly looked a lot less powerful.


    The Bums Stick Around

    America's perception of Congress is in the dumpster. Gallup's September poll put congressional approval at a mere 14 percent, one of the lowest ever seen prior to a midterm. According to a Washington Post/ABC News poll from August, half of voters were not just sick of the institution as a whole, but also unhappy with their own representative. And yet when it came down to it during primary season, there was very little punishment administered at the ballot box.

    The most notable primary defeat this cycle was Eric Cantor's loss in Virginia to the unknown academic David Brat in June. Cantor was exactly the sort of Republican whom Tea Partiers had hoped to put on the chopping block-a big-government conservative and D.C. showhorse who supported the use of Washington to prop up his big- business buddies and voted "aye" on bailouts, war, and No Child Left Behind.


    But that proved to be the high-water mark for throw-the-bums-out. No matter which party controls the Senate come January, we will likely see much more of the same that got us into our present morass.


    Scott Shackford (scott.shackford@reason.com) is an associate editor at Reason 24/7.


    http://reason.com/archives/2014/11/0...dentity-crisis

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    ELECTING COWARDS: Bend The Constitution, Bow To Islam; Toss ‘Em!



    Written by Audrey Russo on November 2, 2014

    It’s almost here…the moment America chooses a new Congress. But unlike former years when our problems were simply economic…we are facing issues that could end the Great American Experiment.
    The Founders spent blood and treasure to gift us a system that was unique, because:
    — It recognized that individual rights are derived from a Creator.
    — It was based on enduring principles compatible with “the laws of nature and of nature’s God.”
    — It recognized human imperfection and that a tendency to abuse power is ever present in the human heart.
    — It restrained those in power through a written Constitution which carefully divided, balanced, and separated the powers of government and then intricately knitted them back together again through a system of checks and balances.
    — It left all powers with the people, except those which, by their consent, the people delegated to government *-and then made provision for their withdrawing that power, if it was abused.


    We have slowly, but surely, given our Republic away to those looking to violate those principles…and bring our system down. They gave paltering promises, in order to secure their positions. They worked arduously with America’s enemies within, serving their careers rather than the citizens they vowed to serve.


    They have betrayed America.


    Now they have found a new weapon for their arsenal: Bowing to the ideology of Islam.


    Out of either sheer ignorance…but more likely lowly cravenness…Lawmakers have been bowing to followers of an ideology that neither respects the country they invaded, NOR the Constitution which guides that country’s people.


    One recent example of this grotesque acquiescence can be seen in Wisconsin. A Green Bay Alderman, Chris Wery, questioned Heba Mohammad, after the University of Wisconsin-Green Bay graduate asked the alderman why city bus service is not free on Election Day.


    Wery agreed to check into the bus service question, but then he asked Mohammad about her involvement in starting a Muslim Student Association (MSA) group at UW-Green Bay. MSA is a branch, on campuses, of the Muslim Brotherhood.


    “I just want to be assured that your group in no way promotes or defends militant Islamic ideology,” Wery wrote, asking if Mohammad and the association condemn “terrorist groups such as Hamas.” Mohammad refused to answer Wery’s questions and then posted the exchange on

    Facebook, prompting many users of the site to accuse the alderman of bigotry and profiling.


    Wery backed down and apologized. Mohammad never answered a legitimate question, but rather bullied the Alderman into shame for doing his job: Looking out for the Republic.


    Starting from a State representative, to a Federal Representative…Americans can no longer allow themselves the luxury of honoring spineless, career politiques. If they betray their oath, and therefore the Republic: TOSS ‘EM on Election Day.


    In the notes of Dr. James McHenry, one of Maryland’s delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787, at the close of the Convention, Ben Franklin was queried as he left Independence Hall, by a lady who asked Dr. Franklin, “Well Doctor what have we got, a republic or a monarchy.” Franklin replied, “A republic . . . if you can keep it.”


    The question still remains: Can we keep it?

    About the author: Audrey Russo


    Audrey Russo is the Host of the weekly REELTalk Radio Show (NYC). Audrey writes a column for ClashDaily.com and handles Middle East/National Security/Terrorism/Cultural Issues, and her articles can be read in several other news/opinion journals. She is also a contributor on Barbwire.com. Audrey's Radio Show can also be heard on the Leading Edge Radio Network. Audrey is also an active member of the NYC performing arts community as a singer and actor.

    Image: http://jackbrummet.blogspot.com/2010_06_01_archive.html

    http://clashdaily.com/2014/11/electing-cowards-bend-constitution-bow-islam-toss-em/



    It's not too late to rsvp to our next global week of anti-corruption actions starting this Saturday Nov. 1st, through and including voting day in the U.S. on Nov. 4th and the Million Mask March on Nov. 5th.
    Last edited by kathyet2; 11-02-2014 at 11:47 AM.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    Eric Holder – First Attorney General in History to Actively Support Vote Fraud

    1 November 2014




    Theft: As “calibration errors” switch votes in Illinois and Maryland, an election watchdog group sues the latter over massive voting by noncitizens in one county after discovering voters registered in multiple states.
    The fact that many people will do anything to get out of jury duty has exposed massive fraudulent voting in Frederick County, Md., that may have been going on for years. Illegal aliens who stated they were noncitizens on jury duty forms were found to have cast votes in elections.
    The Virginia Voters Alliance (VVA) cross-checked jury duty forms with individual voting records and found that hundreds of voters in that one Maryland county cast votes after reporting they were noncitizens. One in seven Maryland residents are noncitizens, so extrapolating the number of possibly illegal votes cast in recent elections over the entire state hints at possible election-changing fraud.
    Maryland is one of many states that in the process of making it easier to vote has also made vote fraud easier to commit. Maryland both issues driver’s licenses to illegal aliens and has a Motor Voter law that allows that license to be used to register and vote.
    The VVA filed suit Friday in U.S. District Court in Maryland asserting that individuals who opted out of jury duty as noncitizens have been able to cast votes in at least three Maryland elections.
    Based on the number of these unqualified voters in Frederick County, it is estimated that up to 7% of Maryland’s registered voters could be illegal immigrants, enough to swing elections.

    Read More: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/



    Friday, October 31, 2014

    HISTORIC: Eric Holder is the First Attorney General in History Who Actively Supports Vote Fraud



    By Investor's Business Daily

    Theft: As "calibration errors" switch votes in Illinois and Maryland, an election watchdog group sues the latter over massive voting by noncitizens in one county after discovering voters registered in multiple states.
    The fact that many people will do anything to get out of jury duty has exposed massive fraudulent voting in Frederick County, Md., that may have been going on for years. Illegal aliens who stated they were noncitizens on jury duty forms were found to have cast votes in elections.The Virginia Voters Alliance (VVA) cross-checked jury duty forms with individual voting records and found that hundreds of voters in that one Maryland county cast votes after reporting they were noncitizens. One in seven Maryland residents are noncitizens, so extrapolating the number of possibly illegal votes cast in recent elections over the entire state hints at possible election-changing fraud.

    Maryland is one of many states that in the process of making it easier to vote has also made vote fraud easier to commit. Maryland both issues driver's licenses to illegal aliens and has a Motor Voter law that allows that license to be used to register and vote.

    The VVA filed suit Friday in U.S. District Court in Maryland asserting that individuals who opted out of jury duty as noncitizens have been able to cast votes in at least three Maryland elections.

    Based on the number of these unqualified voters in Frederick County, it is estimated that up to 7% of Maryland's registered voters could be illegal immigrants, enough to swing elections.

    "Their continued appearance on these lists makes it nearly impossible for Maryland law to prevent these declared noncitizens from casting votes in elections and significantly affecting the integrity and outcomes of overall electoral processes," said VVA President Reagan George.

    As we noted earlier, when the VVA cross-checked voter rolls in Virginia and Maryland, it announced that it had turned up 44,000 people registered to vote in both states at the same time. The group also identified 31,000 dead voters via the Social Security Administration's Death Master File.

    Maryland has also produced cases of "calibration error," where a person casting a vote sees in the voting summary the machines display that the vote has been counted for their candidate's opponent. In Illinois, when Illinois Republican state representative candidate Jim Moynihan voted early, he was stunned to find the vote he had cast for himself had been counted as a vote for his rival.

    In another episode in downstate Illinois, which has a tight race for governor, the GOP candidate for Congress in IL-17, Bobby Schilling, says he has received 20 reports from supporters who said that when they tried to cast votes for him, their votes were counted for his opponent, incumbent Democratic congresswoman Cheri Bustos.

    Early voting is also underway in Maryland, and reports of machine switching of votes are emerging there, as well. Kathy Szeliga, a GOP member of Maryland's House of Delegates, told CBS Baltimore reporter Meghan McCorkell that it happened to her.

    "I kept pushing the Republican guy's name and the machine kept going beep, beep, beep," as it steadfastly refused to count her vote as cast.

    Democrats have long pushed for voting ease at the expense of voting integrity, pushing measures from voting by mail, to Motor Voter laws, to same-day registration, while opposing voter ID laws that require people to show up on election day with proof that they are who they say they are.

    The day after resigning as attorney general, Eric Holder told the Congressional Black Caucus that the voter ID laws he and his Justice Department opposed were answers to a problem that "doesn't exist."

    The problem of vote fraud does exist, but when all the errors seem to benefit your political party, it's easy to turn a blind eye.



    http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2014/10/historic-eric-holder-is-first-attorney.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=tw itter

Similar Threads

  1. Administration's incompetence on full display.
    By kathyet2 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-12-2014, 03:56 PM
  2. Must be something in the air and the water.
    By kathyet2 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-04-2014, 03:25 PM
  3. 'Twas The Night AFTER Elections
    By TexasBorn in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-03-2008, 03:27 PM
  4. 'Twas the night before elections
    By Dianer in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-02-2008, 02:14 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •