Results 1 to 2 of 2
Like Tree3Likes

Thread: Time for Some Strategic Thinking about Debarment of Unethical Immigration Attorneys

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Super Moderator GeorgiaPeach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006

    Time for Some Strategic Thinking about Debarment of Unethical Immigration Attorneys

    Time for Some Strategic Thinking about Debarment of Unethical Immigration Attorneys

    By Dan Cadman on March 16, 2018

    Law360 (partially behind a paywall) is reporting that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) "imposed a full associational and penny stock bar against attorney Hui Feng and his law firm months after a California federal judge found them liable for defrauding Chinese nationals looking to obtain visas".

    That got me to thinking: What happens to Feng and his firm for purposes of representing clients before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), the division of the Department of Justice (DOJ) responsible for the immigration courts and appellate reviews? And what happens to Feng and his firm for purposes of representing alien clients seeking benefits — such as EB-5 visas, the source of Feng's current troubles — before U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the division with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that adjudicates immigration benefits?

    While the notoriety associated with Feng may bring on the desired result of cross-disciplinary debarment in his particular case, I doubt that there is any automatic mechanism or electronic system that permits these disparate entities to routinely share debarment information so that when debarment occurs in one forum, it's picked up and concurrently imposed elsewhere.

    But where this is not only the appropriate but commonsensical response, as it so self-evidently is in the instant case, why doesn't such a system exist?

    I cannot help but wonder how many lawyers or firms of unscrupulous character manage to navigate their way through these cracks in our various bureaucracies, to the deficit of the "clients" they purport to serve, as well as to the deficit of the American public, which needs to be reassured that attorneys representing clientele of any type before government agencies are of unblemished reputation.

    Last November, I wrote a blog post about the need for better strategic thinking and less stove-piping among and between the various immigration-related DHS components. In that post, I quoted a DHS plan for "[t]he Office of Strategy, Policy and Plans (PLCY) ... to charter a senior level cross-component Immigration Policy Council … [in order to] provide an institutionalized structure for Department-wide strategic planning related to immigration policy and operations" that was likely to fail because it wasn't high enough in the bureaucratic food chain to make a difference.

    It's been several months now, and I find myself pondering whether that policy council has even taken shape, let alone done much of anything. If so, I haven't heard about it.

    Here's a suggestion for DHS/PLCY and USCIS: Start humbly. Not all strategic thinking needs to be at the level of rocket science, quantum physics, or string theory.

    How about reaching out to DOJ/EOIR (and the SEC where investor visas are concerned) to discuss how to establish a mechanism that systematically ensures that immigration attorneys and law firms engaging in unethical practices are uniformly banned from appearing before any of these entities?

    And, equally important, establish a shared database of debarments that is available to all immigration judges and USCIS adjudicators (and, for that matter, trial attorneys for Immigration and Customs Enforcement who prosecute government removal proceedings), so that if/when a member of the private bar files a notice of representation, the name of the lawyer and firm can be checked.
    Last edited by GeorgiaPeach; 03-16-2018 at 09:59 PM.
    Matthew 19:26
    But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    I'd just deport them. 2 birds, 1 stone. Almost all of these immigration lawyers are immigrants themselves.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at

Similar Threads

  1. Two undocumented Americans are spending a lot of time in court—as attorneys, not defe
    By lorrie in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-16-2017, 09:48 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-03-2013, 04:44 PM
  3. AL-Time for logical thinking: How we discuss immigration
    By American-ized in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-28-2009, 02:06 PM
  4. U.S. Teens Portrayed as Violent, Unethical
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-21-2008, 01:40 AM
  5. WINNING....Time for an Important, Positive Strategic Move
    By LegalUSCitizen in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-07-2005, 11:19 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts