Thread: UK Rogues Gallery Website of Recent Immigrants

The tiniest fraction of those first and second-generation immigrants, who have killed, raped and otherwise violated British men, women and children in Britain, is represented...How many of these were you aware of before you saw them HERE?

OMG!
Here are the first three:

Peter Bryan is a serial killer of at least three people. He was frying the brains of one of his victims when the police caught up with him. Since his incarceration he has murdered a fellow mental patient.

icknamed "The Stockwell Strangler" by the media, Kenneth Erskine was convicted of the murder of 7 London pensioners in 1986. The police are sure that he killed many more. He buggered all of his victims before or after they died.

In 1999, the black homosexual, Richard Fielding, murdered Lee Day, his girlfriend and 5 members of Lee's family. He killed them because he blamed Lee for preventing him becoming a "famous male model" and a "famous DJ".

After looking at their immigrant crimes, I guess we should feel kind of fortunate, huh?

Originally Posted by camilleinchicago

Peter Bryan is a serial killer of at least three people. He was frying the brains of one of his victims when the police caught up with him. Since his incarceration he has murdered a fellow mental patient.

WOW

If you've never seen it, here is a similar U.S. web site:

http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/te ... inals.html

The thing that stuck me was this: Britain has very strict gun control laws yet that did not slow down any of these dudes by one second. They simply stabbed, bludgeoned, strangled or stomped their victims to death. So much for Gun Control Laws Will Make Us A Safer Country. Not that there was ever any doubt that idea is total fiction.
Something is very definitely wrong here. When you bring in people from violent and corrupt Third World countries where it is OK to stab someone to death if they cut you off at a parking space, you cannot expect their behavior to change simply because they are in a different environment. The OBL lobby refuses to acknowledge that the pervasive violence of many of these societies makes people from them poor candidates for life in the US.

The thing that stuck me was this: Britain has very strict gun control laws yet that did not slow down any of these dudes by one second. They simply stabbed, bludgeoned, strangled or stomped their victims to death. So much for Gun Control Laws Will Make Us A Safer Country. Not that there was ever any doubt that idea is total fiction

IN FACT I THINK GUN CONTROL LAWS MAKE SOCIETY LESS SAFE. THE LAW ABIDING CITIZENS THEN ABIDE BY THE LAW AND CANNOT PROTECT THEMSELVES FROM THE THUGS THAT THE LAWMAKERS FAIL TO PROTECT THEM FROM.

Originally Posted by redpony353

The thing that stuck me was this: Britain has very strict gun control laws yet that did not slow down any of these dudes by one second. They simply stabbed, bludgeoned, strangled or stomped their victims to death. So much for Gun Control Laws Will Make Us A Safer Country. Not that there was ever any doubt that idea is total fiction

IN FACT I THINK GUN CONTROL LAWS MAKE SOCIETY LESS SAFE. THE LAW ABIDING CITIZENS THEN ABIDE BY THE LAW AND CANNOT PROTECT THEMSELVES FROM THE THUGS THAT THE LAWMAKERS FAIL TO PROTECT THEM FROM.

I am with you 100%. How many of these british citizens would have survived if they had a way of defending themselves? Especially older folks and women. If you are up against some young immigrant thug armed with a knife, there is no way you can overpower them. One of the safest countries in the world is Switzerland where everybody keeps a gun in the house because if the country is attacked, the entire population is called on to defend it.

The Swiss army has long been a militia trained and structured to rapidly respond against foreign aggression. Swiss males grow up expecting to undergo basic military training, usually at age 20 in the Rekrutenschule (German for "recruit school"), the initial boot camp, after which Swiss men remain part of the "militia" in reserve capacity until age 30 (age 34 for officers). Each such individual keeps his army-issued personal weapon (the Sig 550 5.56x45 mm assault rifle for enlisted personnel, the SIG 510 battle rifle and/or the SIG-Sauer P220 9 mm semi-automatic pistol for officers, medical and postal personnel) at home with a specified personal retention quantity of government-issued ammunition (50 rounds 5.56 mm / 48 rounds 9mm), which is sealed and inspected regularly to ensure that no unauthorized use takes place. [1]

A "shooting society" somewhere in Switzerland; people come to such ranges to complete mandatory training with service arms, or to shoot for sport and competition.
When their period of service has ended, militiamen have the choice of keeping their personal weapon and other selected items of their equipment. In this case of retention, the rifle is sent to the weapons factory where the fully automatic function is removed, the rifle is then returned to the discharged owner. The rifle is then a semi-automatic or self-loading rifle.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politi ... witzerland

We need more countries like them.

I LIKE THAT SYSTEM WHERE ALL ARE ARMED. WE SHOULD FOLLOW THE EXAMPLE OF SWITZERLAND. AND ARE THERE MORE MURDERS OR CRIMES IN SWITZERLAND? DONT THINK SO. AND ALL ARE TRAINED TO USE THE ARMS, SO THAT IS ALSO GOOD.