Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Santa Clarita Ca
    Posts
    9,714

    Update: Criminals--not enemy combatants?

    Update: Criminals--not enemy combatants?
    Governor tells mayor: ignore the law


    Wes Vernon Wes Vernon
    May 12, 2007


    Let's see if we have this straight.

    1 — Six terrorists right here on U.S. soil plot to kill American soldiers. Those are the charges.

    2 — Thankfully, they were nabbed by the FBI in a sting operation.

    3 — Three of the alleged terrorists are illegal aliens. Nonetheless, we cannot treat any of the six as enemy combatants. We must go through the criminal justice system, the same system that is available to a masked bandit who knocks off a 7-Eleven.

    By any standard, that is nothing short of outrageous. Late Wednesday, this column pointed out that no one had asked the White House whether the Ft. Dix (New Jersey) Six would be charged as criminals or enemy combatants.

    We now have the answer

    At a White House briefing, Human Events Political Editor John Gizzi put that inquiry to presidential spokesman Tony Snow, who replied, "That is not a question for me. Direct it to the U.S. Attorney [in the case]."

    Greg Reinert, a spokesman for U.S. Attorney Christopher Christie told Gizzi he didn't know why the six were charged as criminals, but that it "came from higher ups," suggesting the "higher ups" meant the FBI.

    It appears that in order to qualify as "enemy combatants," the accused must have been captured outside the United States. If that is the law, it must be changed.

    The investigation

    The six accused terrorists are charged with planning a heavily armed attack against soldiers at Ft. Dix as part of a jihad against the United States. The accused were identified as Dritan Duka, Eljvir Duka, Shain Duka, Serdar Tatar, Mohammed Shnewer, and Agron Abdullahu.

    The Dukas were illegal aliens, and that raises all kinds of questions. All three of them have multiple arrest records. However, at no time have they ever been charged with immigration violations — not until they were nabbed in this jihad plot against the United States.

    The record

    Blogger Enlighten New Jersey has done some digging:

    Dritan Duka has been arrested for disorderly conduct and possession of drugs and drug paraphernalia. Between 1997 and 2006, he was stopped by police 11 times for speeding.

    Shain Duka has been charged with obstruction of justice, hindering apprehension and making physical threats. He was repeatedly stopped by police and had 19 suspensions of his license.

    Eljvir Duka has past drug counts and 24 suspensions of his driving permit. The state tagged him as a persistent violator.

    And with all this, never — until now — were any of them charged with being here illegally, nor were they deported. Why?

    Ask the "compassionate" governor

    The Newark Star-Ledger reports that New Jersey's speed demon governor, Jon Corzine, is out front as a staunch opponent of the federal Homeland Security program that makes it legally possible for state and local enforcement to work with the feds to identify and detail immigration violators.

    Congratulations, Governor. New Jersey's estimated illegal alien population is now at 1 million. But then when you tell your driver to floor it to 91 MPH in a 55 MPH zone, what's a measly million illegals — three of whom plot mass murder? Of course, you could say that killing soldiers qualifies as one of those "jobs Americans won't do."

    And that's not all

    Corzine also has chastised the city of Morristown in his state because that municipality wants to enforce federal immigration laws. Morristown Mayor Donald Cresitello told the governor — in so many words — to buzz off.

    Another New Jersey jurisdiction — Hightstown — has enacted a no-questions asked policy on immigration. Hightstown Mayor Robert Patten thinks his community would be a ghost town without illegal aliens.

    The problem — twofold

    First, after our last column a couple of days ago, a friend of mine in Montana said the Ft. Dix Six "are the enemy and should be summarily shot." Emotionally, I understand that reaction. But the law — at least as interpreted — does not even allow them (the three "legals" or the three illegals) to be treated as enemy combatants, let alone be "summarily shot." As it stands, the law — forged pre-9/11 — needs to be changed. As currently interpreted, it gives new meaning to the saying "The law is an ass." The solution is to change it, not ignore it.

    Secondly, once again, we have had a wake-up call on the broader issue of illegal immigration. Do we have to wait until a jihad against our military personnel succeeds before politicians like Corzine make a distinction between a law and "a complex issue" (as he describes the immigration statutes)?


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Wes Vernon is a Washington-based writer and veteran broadcast journalist.
    http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/vernon/070512
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member Paige's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Salt Lake City Utah
    Posts
    2,847

    It is going to have to be a huge event to stop this.

    There is going to have to be a huge event to make our states and our nation to wake up to the danger of illegal's in our country. It is not just the physical danger it is also the economic threat to the middle class. If there is not a middle class who is going to pay for all these corporations and the government to be so reckless with our lives and our economy? What state and what area is going to be attacked one day? I feel it is time to start suing the pollice departments and the cities for not protecting us. I know there are some lawsuits going on just for this reason. Then when the cities try to pass it off to the state government and then the state government tries to hand it off to the federal government then maybe a big giant lawsuit would work. What do you think? Is it possible to citizens to sue the federal government for breaking the constitution and putting all of our lives at stake?

    Paige
    <div>''Life's tough......it's even tougher if you're stupid.''
    -- John Wayne</div>

  3. #3
    Senior Member Americanpatriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,603
    I'm all for a huge lawsuit; that is something I would love to be involved in. WE have to take this country back from the liberals, socialist, communist, globalist, elite. I know we are up against an enormous conspiracy. It seems we are making some progress though as the Senate 2611 bill to demolish America was stalled last year. If all Americans were asleep as some say that would of passed.

    The milktoast liberals drive me nuts and I'm tired of them.
    <div>GOD - FAMILY - COUNTRY</div>

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •