Thread: The US Government is under Foreign Control

Bill and Hillary are both on the take.

--

500M PROBLEMS FOR MADAME SECRETARY

By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN
Click to see a graphic of where Bubba's cash came from.
Click to see a graphic of where Bubba's cash came from.

Last updated: 9:00 am
December 19, 2008
Posted: 1:39 am
December 19, 2008

NOW that Bill Clinton has re leased the list of his 205,000 donors who have given close to $500 million to his library and foundation, it is clear why he resisted releasing the list while his wife was running for president.

Bubba Sheik-ing the Money Tree

Contractor Gifts Could Put Hillary in Blackwater

Bill's Pals Are Hillary's Problems

Now, compelled by the Obama transition team to make it public as a condition of his wife's appointment as secretary of state, it becomes clear that the list is a virtual encyclopedia of conflicts of interest for the husband of a senator - to say nothing of the husband of an incoming secretary of state.

Particularly troubling are the massive donations from Arab governments in the Middle East.

Pardon us for looking such generous gift horses in the mouth, but it is hard to imagine so many governments, monarchs and businessmen in the Middle East giving money unless it was with some hope of a political return. Will that return now come with the appointment of Sen. Clinton as secretary of state?

How can Hillary Rodham Clinton mediate and negotiate conflicts in the Middle East impartially when her husband's library and foundation - over which he has total control - have been bankrolled by the very nations with whom she must negotiate?

The list reveals another key center of conflicts of interest in Kazakhstan, the former Soviet republic, now home to some of the world's greatest mineral deposits and ruled by a corrupt dictator, Nursultan Nazarbayev, who, according to The New York Times, has all but quashed political dissent.

Bill Clinton visited Kazakhstan and met with its president on Sept. 6, 2005, accompanied by Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra.

Soon after, Giustra was awarded a highly lucrative contract to mine uranium there. Now, lo and behold, Frank Giustra turns up having given the library and foundation between $10 million and $25 million and the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative of Canada gave $1 million to $5 million more.

And Clinton got $1 million to $5 million from Lakshmi Mittal, the fourth-wealthiest person on the Forbes billionaire list and a member of the Foreign Investment Council in Kazakhstan.

In addition, Clinton further fished in troubled waters by taking $1 million to $5 million from Victor Pinchuk, the son-in-law of the controversial former president of the Ukraine.

Given the complexities of US policy toward the former Soviet republics in Central Asia, it is hard to see how this massive and incestuous relationship cannot but complicate Hillary's independence.

One of the largest donors to the library and foundation was UNITAID, an international organization largely controlled by France, which donated more than $25 million. And the conflicts of interest are not all just foreign. Corporate bailout recipients and recipient wannabes donated to the Clinton fund. They include AIG, Lehman, Merrill, the Citi Foundation and General Motors.

And, almost as an afterthought, the list reveals a donation of at least $250,000 from Denise Rich, presumably in return for her ex-husband's presidential pardon.

How could a US senator possibly serve dispassionately while her husband was collecting money from these donors on this kind of scale? And how could we have almost elected a president without realizing these conflicts existed? And how on earth can a secretary of state function with these conflicts hanging over her head?

http://www.nypost.com/seven/12192008/ne ... 144933.htm

I have shouted this to the roof tops for the past 10 years, American
is up for sale to highest bidder...........


Greed, has put the American worker,taxpayer,consumer in our current
position and I see no leaders current or future who can or will fix the problem.

How could a US senator possibly serve dispassionately while her husband was collecting money from these donors on this kind of scale? And how could we have almost elected a president without realizing these conflicts existed? And how on earth can a secretary of state function with these conflicts hanging over her head?



It's easy enough when you have no conscience, no concern for the people you are supposed to be serving, and are only in it for your own self serving interests as well as those of your globalist elite friends.

They all do it ......

Look at Obama, he won't even tell who his are!

Obama's money bought the WhiteHouse.

Clintons donations are for the stupid Library.

Both Bushes and Reagan did it too!

Reagan = http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index ... topic=8489

A Bill Clinton library??? Are you talking about Billy's adult book store down on Market ave.? :P

Originally Posted by MountainDog

A Bill Clinton library??? Are you talking about Billy's adult book store down on Market ave.? :P

Well, not to be a smart***, but the US Government has been at the beck and call of the international banking cartel since December 23, 1913. And this was reinforced in I think May of 1914 with the Incorporation of the Federal Reserve.

Well, our prezs are corrupt. Clinton took money from the Chinese when he was a prez, and from Saudis afterward. And both Bushes were Saudi-lovers. That Saudi influence is why we're still dependent on their oil, and Bush would do nothing to change that.

But here's a solution. If we could get Congress to mandate that only flex-fuel cars are sold in US, that'd end the Saudi oil monopoly because everyone could choose to use gas, ethanol or methanol to power their cars. Brasil already has over 90% of their cars flex-fuel. That'd also end the high gas prices, which incidentally will come back when our economy recovers.

The welfare application for food stamps in my state reads:

You can apply for and get food stamp benefits for eligible family members, even if
your family includes other members who are not eligible because of immigration
status. For example, immigrant parents may apply for food stamp benefits for their
U.S. citizen or qualified immigrant children, even though the parents may not be
eligible for benefits.
➤ You do not have to provide immigration status information, social security numbers,
or documents for any family members who are not eligible for food stamp benefits
because of immigration status and who are not asking for food stamp benefits.
➤ Using food stamp benefits will not affect your immigration status or the immigration
status of your family. Immigration information is private and confidential."

I say this calls for a revolt!

Originally Posted by black_phoebe

The welfare application for food stamps in my state reads:

You can apply for and get food stamp benefits for eligible family members, even if
your family includes other members who are not eligible because of immigration
status.

I say this calls for a revolt!

This kind of crap is why California is almost bankrupt, $billions in debt. And instead of cutting spending, the Calif. Dems just tried to increase taxes to keep their spending orgies going. And you can expect the same thing from Obama and Democratically-controlled Congress.

High taxes to cover all kinds of social(ist) government programs are in our future, with Obama in White house.