http://www.diversityalliance.org/docs/wp-ad.html

Are Vicente Fox's Immigration Demands
More Political Than Economic?


Prize-winning Mexican novelist Elena Poniatowska was quoted 8/15/01 in WorldNetDaily.com as saying: “Mexico is recovering the territories yielded to the United States by means of migratory tactics,” and that Hispanics are “imposing their culture” on the U.S. Ms. Poniatowska has taught at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton.

If the United States grants an amnesty to 3 million illegal Mexican immigrants, each adult naturalized citizen could potentially bring in dozens of extended family members via legal immigration over time. In addition, children born in the U.S. of illegal immigrants, guest workers, and naturalized citizens are also U.S. citizens. In 1997 then Mexican President Zedillo said in Chicago, “I have proudly affirmed that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders and that Mexican migrants are an important, a very important part of it.” Presently, Vicente Fox is advocating a change in Mexican law to permit expatriates to vote absentee in elections in Mexico.

Is Mexico using immigration to extend the Mexican nation and to influence American policies?

Many Mexican American leaders, such as former HUD Secretary Henry Cisneros and former California Secretary of Health and Welfare Mario Obledo, have publicly said that it is only a matter of time before Latinos dominate California, the Southwest, and eventually the entire United States.

Well established French weekly news magazine Le Nouvel Observateur recently wrote that Mexicans are retaking what was lost to the U.S. in the Guadalupe Hidalgo Treaty.


No nation's borders have been permanent.
Mexican President Vicente Fox's demands for an amnesty, hundreds of thousands of guest worker visas, and benefits for illegals are more political than economic and they should be considered from a historical perspective.