Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,370

    Brits Canada access and illegals...

    The Brits have about 60 million to take care of and their system is collapsing.

    We have that many in the USA that pay nothing into the system and that is why our rates are so high...insurance and access... We are already socialized in that way. Medical bills for indigents and illegals in entitlement programs like access (which never is talked about) are passed onto insurance premiums and taxes. This cost is reflected in doctor and hospital bills that attempt to cover these losses with excessive billings.

    If government takes on total control...the only thing that will change is that it will take twice the amount of money to take on a new bureaucracy of thieves over seeing all the money in the system. This is dooms day for America and a sure path to much much lower health care for everyone.

    They keep talking about the uninsured in this country...but no one is denied help and the cost is passed on to the insurance companies. Now...lets talk about what real reform would encompass...

    Bottom line...the Dems do not want an American system of free commerce because they want "everyone" to cover all their illegal entitlement programs for none Americans and all all their kids.

    Now that is the reality of it all...period. Government needs this bill to cover their illegal progams with yet another illegal program.

    Now put that in your Canadian pipe and smoke it... The illegals cost our country 3 times what the health care plan would cost us. That is our "American" problem.

    British Healthcare
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqzRuUnu ... re=related

  2. #2
    Senior Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    5,262
    It is not the 14th amendment which is the problem it is the interpretation of the citizenship clause which came out of Supreme Court Horace Gray's opinion in the case of Wong Kim Ark vs United States.
    I support enforcement and see its lack as bad for the 3rd World as well. Remittances are now mostly spent on consumption not production assets. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member Bowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    North Mexico aka Aztlan
    Posts
    7,055
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard
    It is not the 14th amendment which is the problem it is the interpretation of the citizenship clause which came out of Supreme Court Horace Gray's opinion in the case of Wong Kim Ark vs United States.
    Richard,
    I agree that was a case of Judicial Activism but at the time there really were not any illegal aliens in the USA, if there were I am sure the decision would have been limited to legal immigrants, and if your read their brief that is essentially who the Justices were talking about in the decision.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,370
    This is true too. The story of the 14th is a very interesting one at dirtyunclesam.com

  5. #5
    Senior Member 4thHorseman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Gulf Coast
    Posts
    1,003
    We have that many in the USA that pay nothing into the system and that is why our rates are so high...insurance and access... We are already socialized in that way. Medical bills for indigents and illegals in entitlement programs like access (which never is talked about) are passed onto insurance premiums and taxes. This cost is reflected in doctor and hospital bills that attempt to cover these losses with excessive billings.
    That is part of the problem. The other major part is that the US governement is already "managing" over 50% of the healthcare. Invariably when the government does pay, be it for Medicare, Medicaid, or Tricare (health care paid for military members and families), it underpays the provider. It ought to be obvious to even the far left folks that if you force providers to give uncompensated care to millions, and under-compensated care to millions more, the providers will do one of three things:

    1. Pass the costs on to paying customers (insurance companies and patients paying for their own health care). The result is higher insurance premium costs because the insurance companies pass their additional costs on to their clients.
    2. Refuse to take Medicare, Medicaid, or Tricare patients. Result: Fewer providers available for patients using those government programs. This in turn will lead to reduced care, or in some cases, no care. Recent example: Walgreens will no longer fill prescritions for Medicaid patients because of the undercompensation issue.
    3. Go out of business altogether. This includes closing of hospitals, clinics and emergency rooms; doctors, both GPs and specialists giving up their practices; nurses and other care-givers leaving the field. Result: More reduced care and expanded areas of no care.

    This is the actual health care crisis we have right now, and most of it has been created by the government...not the insurance companies, not the patients, not the providers.....the government. This why the Health Care Bill is so offensive to me. The very people who created the crisis are going to turn it into catastrophe.
    "We have met the enemy, and they is us." - POGO

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •