Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    67,825

    What goes around comes around! - "BorderGate"

    I received this via email and present it as is....


    ---


    WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND!

    On January 17, 2007, the media at large reported that U.S.
    Attorney Carol C. Lam, the top federal prosecutor in San
    Diego, CA, was removed from her job. The Justice Department
    said Tuesday that, “Ms. Lam’s dismissal had nothing to
    do with the prosecution of Mr. Randy (Duke) Cunningham, but
    was based on her overall record in prosecuting firearms
    violations and crimes along the California border with
    Mexico.”

    At the very same time that U. S. Attorney Lam was
    responsible for the Cunningham case, she was also
    responsible for the landmark case Fitzgerald – Nunn Vs.
    Department of Homeland Security. A year before this civil
    trial began, Lam’s Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) Timothy
    Stetler had been made aware of the ostensible corruption
    that U.S. Customs Special Agents Darlene Fitzgerald and
    Sandy Nunn had uncovered and attempted to expose.
    Darlene’s investigation uncovered tons of narcotics and
    contraband being facilitated into the U.S. via railroad
    tanker cars with the apparent approval of Customs managers.

    AUSA Timothy Stetler listened to the testimony of Superior
    Court Judge Yvette Palazuelos in her pre-trial deposition.
    She corroborated Darlene’s suspicions when she stated that
    the managers at Customs were “torpedoing our rail
    operation” and criminal cases. She further stated, “At
    the very least these managers were committing Obstruction of
    Justice.” AUSA Stetler told Gastone Bebi, attorney for
    Fitzgerald and Nunn, that he was concerned that it was in
    fact corruption and that he felt he had a duty to report it.
    He should have reported this to his boss, U.S. Attorney
    Lam.

    There was no investigation into the well-documented,
    well-witnessed allegations of Sandy and Darlene. At the
    trial, Superior Court Judge Yvette Palazuelos took the stand
    and made history that day by being the first sitting Judge
    ever to testify against the U.S. Government. A complete
    transcript of her historic testimony may be read at
    . The essential fact of her testimony was
    that she witnessed high-level Customs managers shut down
    Operation Rite Rail. In that operation Darlene had already
    seized 8000 pounds of marijuana and 34 kilos of uncut
    cocaine in just one pressurized railroad tanker car. She
    had secondaried (placed on hold pending inspection) five
    more of these cars. These five cars importing from Mexico
    were improperly manifested as empty yet contained 25 to 40
    tons of unknown contraband. They had been sent from the same
    front company in Mexico where the previous seized- tanker
    car was from. Darlene had high-level information from a
    reliable informant as to the contents of these five cars –
    yet Darlene was ordered off the case and told to shut down
    her operation.

    At the trial, Assistant Special Agent in Charge (ASAIC) Gary
    Pinkava took the stand for Customs (See Federal Transcript
    of Pinkava’s testimony at ). During the
    course of his testimony, he admitted that he would not allow
    Darlene and her Supervisor Robert Mattivi pressure test, at
    no charge to the government, these highly suspect tanker
    cars. This would have been the largest seizure on record
    for any agency (25 to 40 tons) and it was under the command
    and control of ASAIC Pinkava. Subsequently, as testified to
    by numerous witnesses (see other testimony at the BorderGate
    web site); these tanker cars were released into the commerce
    of the U.S. uninspected by anyone.

    As shocking as this testimony was, there was also evidence
    of witness tampering during the course of the trial. The
    Honorable Roger T. Benitez, United States District Judge,
    while presiding over this case, responded to the efforts by
    U.S. Customs Attorneys who threatened U.S. Customs employees
    with the loss of their jobs if they dared to answer
    subpoenas and testify against Customs managers. Judge
    Benitez stated, “Boy, there’s something about this that
    doesn’t pass the smell test!” (see ).
    All these crimes remain uninvestigated.

    What Darlene and Sandy exposed at this trial is the
    horrendous National Security Terrorist Threat that these
    tanker cars pose to our nation. Timothy McVey blew up the
    Federal Murrah Building in Oklahoma City with about one ton
    of ammonium nitrate in an unsealed-cargo truck. This
    cowardly attack killed scores of people and resulted in at
    least fifteen damaged buildings being torn down. A
    terrorist can put forty times this amount of ammonium
    nitrate in a railroad tanker car and pressurize it. This
    would result in the world’s largest pipe bomb. This is
    almost too frightful to image, yet America has enemies who
    relish such a possibility. Darlene has repeatedly said that
    the national security threat she has exposed is apolitical
    because exploding tanker cars do not just kill Republicans,
    Democrats or Independents, they kill everyone. This too was
    made known to the San Diego U.S. Attorney’s Office, which
    was headed by U.S. Attorney Lam.

    During the course of this trial sufficient evidence to
    warrant a Grand Jury investigation into the following was
    absolutely exposed: Facilitation of the Importation of 25
    to 40 tons of contraband into the U.S., Witness Tampering,
    Perjury, Misprision of Felony, and possible Subornation of
    Perjury. This evidence was sufficient to warrant the
    initiation of a Grand Jury Investigation – yet there was
    none. The most shocking federal transcripts of this
    testimony can be found at . U. S.
    Attorney Lam knew, or should have known, about this
    ostensible corruption committed by the Customs managers
    before the trial, and later exposed at the trial. Yet to
    date, nothing has been done to investigate any of this.

    What is even more telling in this case is the fact that
    Senator Dianne Feinstein has publicly defended U.S. Attorney
    Lam. This is most interesting when you consider that well
    before this case (Fitzgerald – Nunn Vs. Department of
    Homeland Security) was ever filed in federal court, 24
    Customs employees signed a letter begging Senator Feinstein
    to investigate their allegations of corruption. Two weeks
    after Senator Feinstein’s Office received this letter
    (sent certified mail & fax) Senator Feinstein was seen by
    several of these Customs employees out on one of the U.S.
    Customs Yacht “rubbing elbows” with one of the very
    managers the brave 24 wanted Feinstein to investigate. It
    was later learned by a reporter who covered this story, that
    Senator Feinstein’s husband may have had a financial
    interest in the very companies over whose rails this
    contraband was rolling. Senator Feinstein initiated no
    investigation into the 24 Customs employees’ allegations.
    Customs turned up the retaliation heat on the agents
    involved in this rail project. Details of this horrendous
    retaliation are chronicled in the book “BorderGate.”

    It is important to note that there have been no other rail
    tanker car seizures since Darlene’s seizure in 1998. Have
    the drug smugglers and terrorists simply quit trying to
    enter the U.S. or have they simply been operating freely
    under the un-watchful and accommodating eyes of U.S. Attorney
    Lam and Senator Feinstein.

    The real victims here are Darlene, Sandy, and all other
    brave Whistleblowers who have come forward with important
    information that exposes threats to our National Security.
    There is no real protection for Federal Whistleblowers.
    There seems to be a pattern at the U.S. Attorneys Office and
    the Department of Homeland Security of acting against
    employees for doing their job instead of prosecuting
    corruption. Another clear example of this is the two Border
    Patrol Agents who now face prison because they defended
    themselves in a firefight against a known drug smuggler.
    Again, it was a U.S. Attorney’s Office who appeared to
    take the side of the drug smuggler and went after the Border
    Patrol Agents. Yet there has been no investigation into the
    motivation of the AUSA prosecuting this case against the
    Border Patrol Agents. This raises the question – Who is
    overseeing those who are responsible for prosecutorial
    oversight?

    U.S. Attorney Lam at worst condoned and at best ignored the
    retaliation by U.S. Customs managers against Whistleblowers
    Fitzgerald and Nunn. Ironically, now she complains when she
    is the object of “possible” retaliation for her role in
    exposing the Cunningham scandal. What goes around comes
    around.

    By: Attorney Austin Price
    Attorney for Darlene Fitzgerald
    and Peter Ferrara, Authors of “BorderGate, the story the
    government doesn’t want you to read.”
    ea.price@yahoo.com
    (606) 376-5931

    Their site with the documents is

    http://www.bordergate.net/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    was Georgia - now Arizona
    Posts
    4,477
    Through the looking glass...

  3. #3
    Senior Member Beckyal's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,900
    corruption is at all levels of the federal government. No one is ever responsible for anything that goes wrong. bush was going to hold people accountable but he never got around to looking at that part of his pre-election promise.

  4. #4
    Senior Member CCUSA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    7,675
    Disgraceful and criminal. All should be investigated and charges brought against all who knowingly turned a blind eye to this criminal activity.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5
    April
    Guest
    CCUSA wrote:

    Disgraceful and criminal. All should be investigated and charges brought against all who knowingly turned a blind eye to this criminal activity
    Until we make them, all of those in govenment accountable who are turning a blind eye, starting with the president who is the ring leader, and bring them up short with a LOUD NO YOU CANNOT DO THIS ANYMORE, this is going to continue.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •