Thread: What McCain's South Carolina win suggests about illegal immi

Beyond the Border
What McCain's South Carolina win suggests about illegal immigration.
by Duncan Currie
01/22/2008


IN 2007, much of America's political oxygen was consumed by the two I-words: Iraq and immigration. If the former was supposed to boost John McCain's GOP primary campaign, the latter was supposed to torpedo it. Not only did the Arizona senator favor a relatively liberal immigration policy, he had cosponsored legislation with left-wing lion Ted Kennedy to establish a temporary worker program and offer millions of illegal immigrants a path to citizenship. In the summer of 2005, the cover of National Review had assailed McCain as "Amnesty John." In the late spring and early summer of 2007, McCain supported a comprehensive immigration reform bill that provoked furious opposition from conservative talk radio and the Republican base. It nearly destroyed his presidential bid.

But McCain survived the immigration debate and eventually climbed back into the race. He won the New Hampshire primary, and now he has triumphed in one of the most conservative states in the Union.

South Carolina is not a border state. But according to one estimate, the number of illegal immigrants living there jumped by a whopping 1,000 percent between 1990 and 2004. It is now "estimated at between 150,000 and 400,000," the Guardian reports. (The overall population of South Carolina is about 4.4 million.) Just before the primary, the Guardian quoted Francis Marion University political scientist Neal Thigpen as saying, "This is the new Confederate flag issue in South Carolina on the Republican side." A recent Goldman Sachs study notes that South Carolina's Hispanic
population "grew almost 7 percent per year from 2000 to 2007," which ranked among "the fastest rates in the country." (The number of Hispanics "grew from a small base in 2000," Goldman added, "but we expect continued rapid expansion.")

According to the CNN exit poll numbers, 26 percent of GOP primary voters in South Carolina said that illegal immigration was the most important issue, compared to 40 percent who said the economy, 16 percent who said Iraq, and 15 percent who said terrorism. Overall, 47 percent of voters said the best way to handle illegal immigrants is either to give them a path to citizenship (28 percent) or to implement a temporary worker scheme (19 percent). A plurality (44 percent) of those favoring a path to citizenship voted for McCain, as did a plurality (37 percent) of those endorsing a temporary worker program. No surprises there.

But here's the interesting part: Among the majority (52 percent) of voters who said the best way to handle illegal immigrants is to "deport them," 26 percent went for McCain while only 19 percent went for Fred Thompson and 15 percent went for Mitt Romney. A plurality (34 percent) went for Mike Huckabee, who has taken a sharp right turn on the issue. But McCain (24 percent) beat both Thompson (21 percent) and Romney (16 percent) among the 26 percent of voters who said illegal immigration was the most important issue. This despite Romney's repeated efforts to paint McCain as soft on illegals, despite Thompson's embrace of a more hardline position, and despite the last-minute warning from Jim DeMint, South Carolina's popular GOP senator, that "we cannot afford to have a president who has fought for amnesty for illegal immigrants."

Illegal immigration does not currently dominate the front pages, cable chat shows, and political blogs the way it did in mid-2007. This helped McCain. But he has also recalibrated his message, emphasizing border security first and denying (somewhat disingenuously) that he ever supported "amnesty." Unlike in 2000, observes Byron York of National Review, McCain had the backing of a large portion of South Carolina's GOP establishment. He ran even with Huckabee (32 percent to 32 percent) among voters who said the economy was the most important issue, held a narrow edge (33 percent to 30 percent) among voters who ranked terrorism first, and won big (52 percent to 24 percent) among voters who said Iraq was most important.

McCain dominated among liberals and moderates--who compromised less than a third of all primary voters--but he also beat Thompson and Romney among self-described conservatives, winning 26 percent to Thompson's 19 percent and Romney's 16 percent. McCain even topped Huckabee, albeit barely, among the narrower group of "somewhat conservative" voters, winning a 32 percent plurality to Huckabee's 30 percent.

The electorate was heavily pro-Bush: 52 percent of voters said they were "satisfied" with the administration, while 17 percent said they were "enthusiastic" about it. And yet President Bush, like McCain, has vocally championed a path to citizenship for millions of illegal immigrants. Curiously, among the 17 percent of "enthusiastically" pro-Bush voters, McCain won a plurality (34 percent). But he also won pluralities among the 25 percent of voters who said they were "dissatisfied" with
the Bush administration and among the 5 percent who said they were "angry" with it.

A plurality (43 percent) of voters reckoned that McCain stood the best chance of winning the general election in November. Among this group, more than two-thirds (69 percent) voted for the Arizona senator. Yet only 6 percent of all voters said that "electability" was the top quality they were looking for in a candidate. However, McCain won an overwhelming majority (67 percent) of the 23 percent who ranked "experience" as their top quality, and he carried a plurality (34 percent) of the 26 percent who most wanted a candidate who "says what he believes." Crucially, McCain won a plurality (44 percent) among the 46 percent of voters who said "personal qualities" were more important to their vote than "issues."

To be sure, McCain trailed behind both Huckabee and Thompson among "very conservative" voters, winning 19 percent to Huckabee's 41 percent and Thompson's 22 percent. That mirrored his poor showing among strong conservatives in New Hampshire. But McCain benefited from the four-way race with Huckabee, Thompson, and Romney. "If there had been just a single 'conservative' candidate to oppose him" in South Carolina, notes RealClearPolitics blogger Jay Cost, "McCain might have lost."

True enough. He is still a long way from securing the GOP nomination, and many Republicans still distrust him. Among other influential conservatives, Rush Limbaugh has been hammering away at the Arizona senator and predicting that a McCain nomination would "destroy the Republican party." Former GOP lawmakers Tom DeLay and Rick Santorum have publicly blasted him. McCain may yet stumble. But the results in South Carolina, one of the reddest states on the map, suggest that his immigration record is not the insurmountable obstacle it appeared to be last year.

Duncan Currie is managing editor of The American.


www.weeklystandard.com





This ALIPAC member has posted this entity be it editorial opinion, news article, column, or web creation as information for the General Population (public) only. It is not intended as an endorsement for this candidate by this poster. Its use here has not been anticipated to be used as, or used to discredit any candidate mentioned herewith.

There will be absolutely no change whatsoever if McCain is elected, other than the fact that our country will be destroyed. Lame Brain will continue the invasion. He is not fit to be President, mentally or physically.

What McCain's South Carolina win suggests about illegal immigration.

Shouldn't this read:
What McCain's South Carolina win suggests about South Carolina.

Originally Posted by Rockfish

There will be absolutely no change whatsoever if McCain is elected, other than the fact that our country will be destroyed. Lame Brain will continue the invasion. He is not fit to be President, mentally or physically.

What McCain's South Carolina win suggests about illegal immigration.

Shouldn't this read:
What McCain's South Carolina win suggests about South Carolina.

I smell something rotten in South Carolina.

Why would people settle for the bottom feeders?

I want the Best of the Best, I'm focused on Saving America, and will not settle for the Worst of the Worst/ everything we never wanted.

Originally Posted by Americanpatriot

Originally Posted by Rockfish

There will be absolutely no change whatsoever if McCain is elected, other than the fact that our country will be destroyed. Lame Brain will continue the invasion. He is not fit to be President, mentally or physically.

What McCain's South Carolina win suggests about illegal immigration.

Shouldn't this read:
What McCain's South Carolina win suggests about South Carolina.

I smell something rotten in South Carolina.

Why would people settle for the bottom feeders?

I want the Best of the Best, I'm focused on Saving America, and will not settle for the Worst of the Worst/ everything we never wanted.

AmericanPatriot, that rotton smell your nose is detecting is probably coming from all of those corrupt DIEBOLD machines. The corruption continues and no one does anything about it. To win, our opposition has to become criminal. This WILL turn around one day and bite them badly.

The economy and illegal immigration goes hand in hand, for those idiots out there who do not seem to get it!!


"State Legistatures for Legal Immigration" PETITION
http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=F ... ic&t=84944
WECOME NEW "ALIPACers"
http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=F ... ic&t=83274
Help keep "alipac" in the illegal immigration fight "Donate Today"
http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=C ... page&pid=9

McCain barely won SC (by only 3 pts. with big help from independents) despite being pushed by the MSM, an unimpressive win in this open primary state by any measure, and has been trying to hide his terrible record on illegal immigration and other matters (such as abortion, as Laura Ingraham mentioned this morning).

In Florida, he is running ads that say he will be tough on illegal immigration, which is ludicrous.

Our challenge is to properly define him as the open borders zealot and hypocrite that he is.

The media is trying to push McCain down our throat and make illegal immigration a none issue.

http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/rnovak ... 1221.shtml

Post a comment if on this site, if you can. I'm on my way.

Delta, pls see the post I posted in your other thread.

Only Republicans, and McCain is not a Republican.

He is done as is Huckabillygoat, no more money, to many lies.

What you read and see is the lies of the msm, and they want McCain.

Not going to happen, and when is done money is McCain will switch
to a Democrat.

Remember, in SC only three in 10 voters there who said they voted for McCain characterized themselves as Republicans. The conservative base does not like McCain and are not fooled by him trying to hide his record.