Thread: When Did Military Bases Become ‘Gun-Free Killing Zones’?

Today is Saturday, September 21, 2013

When Did Military Bases Become ‘Gun-Free Killing Zones’?



Published on Tuesday, September 17, 2013
Tags:AWR Hawkins|Bill Clinton|Gun Banners|Gun Free Zones|Self Defense
Clinton with a Gun Free Military

Washington DC - -(Ammoland.com)- It hasn’t always been the case that only MPs can carry firearms on U.S. military bases.

A mere twenty years ago, “gun free zones” made their way to these facilities under the watch of President Bill Clinton.

According to a Washington Times editorial written days after the Nov. 5, 2009 attack on soldiers at Fort Hood, one of Clinton’s “first acts upon taking office… was to disarm U.S. soldiers on military bases.”

Clinton’s actions birthed Army regulations “forbidding military personnel from carrying their personal firearms and making it almost impossible for commanders to issue firearms to soldiers in the U.S. for personal protection.”

In other words, thanks to Clinton, citizens who join the military to use guns to defend liberty abroad cannot practice their constitutional right to keep and bear arms while on active duty at home.

As the Times editorial board put it: “Because of Mr. Clinton, terrorists would face more return fire if they attacked a Texas Wal-Mart than the gunman faced at Fort Hood.”

The same theme ran true at the Navy Yard in DC on September 16 2013. Police were called after the shooter opened fired, and reports indicate it took approximately three to seven minutes for them to arrive. Each minute is an eternity when a lunatic with a weapon decides the “gun free zone” rules do not apply to him.

http://www.ammoland.com/2013/09/when...#axzz2fWM8Uxlc

I can remember back in the mid-70s that you were allowed to keep weapons in your residences and freely bring them on/off base. Now signs are plastered up "No Firearms" yet on some military installations you can buy firearms at the base exchange as well as ammo.