Thread: Who were the first Americans?

As we debate this issue of illegal immigration and the OBL and their sheeple claim that the supposed "indigenous" peoples of the Americas were the rightful owners of this land, thus in their feeble attempt to win the debate, which they would not otherwise win, they make these claims to justify illegal immigration. Here is scientific fact, promoted by Discovery Channel, that in fact, no, the indo-Americans (from Asia via the Bering land bridge) were not the first, they were late comers to the party. Buy this video folks, let all you know watch it, and blow the illegal aliens the Open Borders Lobby and ethno special interests out of the water on this lame and losing argument.

http://shopping.discovery.com/product-5 ... 06045C412C

Pe?on Woman III in Mexico City's National Museum blows that OBL theory out of the water.

http://www.alipac.us/ftopicp-282254.html#282254

You know why they think that don't you? Mexico has told everyone that they are all descendents of the Meso-Indians, but really members of the ruling class are descendents of White Europeans the Spaniards.

Dixier

I had been hearing this before, and really had not looked into it till it mentioned to me here (can't remember who that was and on what thread...).

http://www.soundchristian.com/man/

This website was where I first read some interesting information that lead me to wonder if the firsts were really those of indo-American (as they are now being called) from Asia. As one who does not believe in the idea of "millions" of years, but along the lines of creationism, I believe that mankind and the land are in the same general "age group", and after the fall flood, man has wandered the earth.

I watched part of this video someone put on Youtube, and it was really interesting, and had solid facts to back up the claims made by the very experienced scientists.

So, who's going to break the news to La Raza that they and their illegal puppets were not the first ?......lol

Since it wasn't 'America' until it gained independence from The King of England in what...1776 maybe.? That year ring a bell with anybody?

I guess the first Americans were the ones living in the 13 original colonies then.

That's a no brainer.

Welcome to Alipac, Brando! Good photo.

Welcome "LegalBeagle" and "Brando" thanks for joining in , love both your AVATAR'S...beagle looks like my sons dog

Very interesting, but my family came here a little before 1700 and as far as i'm concerned thats long enough for me to call America Home.

Just went and read it...AH HA so euorpeans were the first going to have to order the video...thanks for the info!!


****ACTION ALERT****
WASHINGTON DC AT IT AGAIN..."DREAM ACT" Stop in-state tuition for illegal aliens!
this will GIVE path to citizenship and amnesty for millions of their relatives! ACT NOW!!!
Instructions and contact information
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-151805.html
Colorado pulls dirty trick!!
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-151928.html

I honestly do not care what their arguments are, this is my country, it has laws. Blood has been spilled to give it to us, freely, independently, and with a charge to us to defend it from days such as these.

I do not debate the land or its origins, nor do I debate who is to be allowed here, that is set in our laws, which are broken, even by our own politicians!

But, the first Americans indeed would have been those in the thirteen colonies.

Welcome Judicatus! And you are right. This is nothing but a stupid diversion from the real issue of our country and our laws. The continent is named after Amerigo Vespucci, an Italian cartographer and explorer who realized there was something beyond the West Indies.
In those days there was no America, nor United States of America, and the America we know today from coast to coast is mainly the work of NC born James K. Polk during his presidency. He even tried to purchase Cuba from Spain. Cuba was producing too much income for Spain for them to give it up, while Florida was a real thorn in Spain's side. They tried to give it to the Brits, but the Brits gave it back. Spain finally gave it to the US, because that was where so many runaway southern slaves found help with the local tribes (1851, I think).
So who are the real Americans? How far back in theoretical history does one need to go, all the way to the primordial soup believed to have been caused by some meteorite or comet with the right mix of chemical elements to start primitive life?

To appease them, yes, you would have to go back to that time. But if that proved that they were not the true ones, they would want to go back to the creation of the world itself, thus, the argument is null, it has no valid point in our broad cause except to cause distraction, annoyance, and more hatred.

And thank you, I look forward to helping out.

Welcome to ALIPAC Brando and Judicatus and LegalBeagle