Thread: Why is John Kelly Censoring Trump’s News Feed?

Originally Posted by Judy

Oh really? What were the reasons given by the White House?

They didn't go public with a reason ........ but you already knew that or why else would you be speculating?

Originally Posted by MW

They didn't go public with a reason ........ but you already knew that or why else would you be speculating?

So you don't know if my reasons are speculation or fact.

Originally Posted by Judy

So you don't know if my reasons are speculation or fact.

Well, since you've provided no evidence .........

spec·u·la·tion¹
/ˌspekyəˈlāSH(ə)n/
noun

1. the forming of a theory or conjecture without firm evidence:

You are the one speculating.

Originally Posted by Judy

You are the one speculating.

Perhaps you should go back a read the comment you made that started this discussion:

Judy wrote:

Bannon was fired because he talked to the press about North Korea, said there were no viable military options against North Korea, and "they got US".

Flynn was fired because he wouldn't stop talking to the Daily Caller.

Priebus was fired because he couldn't or wouldn't control the leaks.

Those are all speculations because you have zero evidence that substantiates your claim.

Originally Posted by MW

Perhaps you should go back a read the comment you made that started this discussion:

Judy wrote:



Those are all speculations because you have zero evidence that substantiates your claim.

It's what I would have done, which is all the evidence I need. Any person in the White House who speaks to a reporter and tells them the US has no viable military option against North Korea would not work for me, one more second. Any person who can't stay off the telephone with the Daily Caller when I'm trying to tap down the media hysteria over his chats with the Russian Ambassador, would not work for me, one more second. Any Chief of Staff who can't control the privacy and confidentiality of my meetings and prevent these outrageous leaks, can't work for me.

It's pretty simple stuff, MW. Sorry if it flies over your head, but being President is a very important job with vitall responsibilities. This unauthorized chatting with the press isn't tolerated in business and there's no reason at all why it should or would be tolerated one second in the American White House by a responsible President of the United States.

Originally Posted by Judy

It's what I would have done, which is all the evidence I need. Any person in the White House who speaks to a reporter and tells them the US has no viable military option against North Korea would not work for me, one more second. Any person who can't stay off the telephone with the Daily Caller when I'm trying to tap down the media hysteria over his chats with the Russian Ambassador, would not work for me, one more second. Any Chief of Staff who can't control the privacy and confidentiality of my meetings and prevent these outrageous leaks, can't work for me.

Being a Trump cheerleader and excuse maker, doesn't make you Trump, nor does it mean you think like him. Deserved or not, he could of fired these folks for any number of reasons.