Thread: O'Reilly FOR Guest Worker plan & AGAINST employer sancti

I just saw Bill O'Reilly say on his nightly TV show, that he supports a guest worker program but is against any plan of workplace enforcement. Did anyone else see this? I know he has ben calling for the use of the National Guard to back up the Border Patrol for years, bu this is the first time that I've heard him being in favor of a guest worker plan for illegals. And from what I thought I heard jhim say, he is against any kind of employer or workplace enforcement or sanctions is because he says it would be impossible to implement. How friggin' ridiculous is that? For one thing, we already have laws against the use of faked, forged or stolen ID's for employment, if only our govt. would step up and start enforcing the laws already on the books against the illegal workers. And as far as the employers go, we do have Social Security number verification systems in place, if only they would use them. But of course, without any fear of penalty for employing illegals, why bother? I never have been a huge fan of O'Reilly, I think he is all mouth and no spine (That's why I call his show, the "No Spine Zone") but now I'm afraid I have lost what little respect I had for him in the forst place, what a disappointment. He sure isn't looking out for me, what do you think?

IMHO O'Reilly is a globalist, he thinks that it is capitalism at its finest and is a "good thing". It is only bad when a company makes 23 Billion in 3 months like the oil pigs. When is the line drawn Mr. O'Reilly? When "You" have to pay more money on a necessity?

Yes, O'Reilly has always been for a Guest Worker Program. He is a Globalist and totally supports the Wackident. He hates the illegals crossing the borders and that's why he covers the subject. He is an attorney, a law and order man, wants it legal and orderly...the only difference between him on this this subject and the Wackident.

Either he doesn't understand the problems or he does and doesn't care.

I stopped watching him a few weeks back when he said he felt sorry for the illegal bus driver that was charged in Texas. The only person he is looking out for, is himself

His guest for that segment was Col. Randall Larsen, who is the "Founding Director of The Institute for Homeland Security."

Impact Segment
Building a fence on the border
Guest: Author Col. Randall Larsen
Bill talks to our guest about a controversial proposal that would build a fence along our border with Mexico.

No matter what O'Reilly suggested to resolve the illegal situation, Larsen was against it.

I think he, Larsen, said that he was in favor of implementing bush's guest-worker plan.

What was it about the guy that is so out of touch? Why did he echo the same bogus ideas?
Why did his spiel sound so familiar?

The retired colonel is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
That explains his smarmy, sacharine responses.

http://www.speakersonhealthcare.com/spe ... er2283.php

The CFR members are the chief architects of globalism, and the illegal invasion is one of their many means to end U.S. sovereignty.

Also, the CFR is the means by which Presidents and Officials get a suggestion that they want to come forth so that it does not appear to be their idea when it is a controversial or unpopular notion. The CFR feeds it into the press, society, the think tanks, and then officials can claim the idea originated with the esteemed CFR and by the way, this is a great idea and we're going to pursue it.

The CFR is a deception tool for Globalists to con the American People into believing they know better than we do because of their Ph.Ds, former Secretary of States, Corporate Chairmans, etc., etc., etc.

AND there are over 2,000 members. This is a large group that represents our largest corporations, major universities, and government agencies all committed to Globalisation.

It is the reason it was founded by David Rockefeller.

I did see it and he IS for a guestworker program. That bothers me a lot and that's why I don't support him for President anymore. And, he is WAY too easy on the Wackident. He's not a lawyer, Judy. Or did I misread that statement??? He taught school in Florida before going back to Harvard and getting a post-grad degree in Government or Journalism or something like that. I'll check that one out.

I used to be a FANATIC FAN of his but, ever since he started supporting Bush on Iraq, I'm having a harder time watching him. His guest about the border was way out in left field. At least O'Reilly is FOR a fence and, more importantly, for putting the National Guard on the border. But, he definitely IS for the guestworker program.

I can't remember his stance on the "free" trade agreements. I know he has argued with every economist out there about the gouging by the oil companies. He thinks it IS gouging when all of them keep arguing that it's just capitalism.

I'm not going to waste my time ever listening to him again.

Bootsie--you're right, Bill is not an attorney. I just checked his BIO..his Master's Degree from Harvard is in Government, not law. I swear during one of his shows he was arguing with someone in one of his nasty phases and he said I realize I may have an advantage because I'm an attorney...and you're not....blah blah blah????? I must have misunderstood him.

Thanks for the clarification.

Here's the link:

http://www.billoreilly.com/pg/jsp/general/billbio.jsp

Well, he can argue like one!!! Maybe that was what you were thinking about. I think he said, "you're an attorney and I'm not but....". Somehow I remember a conversation like that!