Thread: YouTube debate question: Pledge to oppose Amnesty.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10wxOEZSd6o

Tom Tancredo is AWESOME!!

Side note: I think CNN was discriminating against Democrats for not having Spanish subtitles.

LOL.

Originally Posted by corhanem

Tom Tancredo is AWESOME!!

Side note: I think CNN was discriminating against Democrats for not having Spanish subtitles.

LOL.

Tancredo was loving it! Immigration is the number one issue.
I might be willing to support Romney if he is chosen as the GOP candidate. His one-liners are pretty good.

Romney-Hunter or Romney-Tancredo could be a great ticket for the Republican party.

I'm just sorry they didn't ask all the candidates that question. I think we all know Guilani, McCain, and Huckabee would definitely give amnesty to illegal immigrants. Thompson and Romney probably would at some point. I'm not sure about Paul because I have never heard him say he supports the deportation of every illegal in the country. The only two candidates I'm 100% convinced would never give illegals amnesty are Hunter and Tancredo!

I support this ticket:

Lou Dobbs / Tom Tancredo with Hunter as Sec of Defense.

Originally Posted by corhanem

I support this ticket:

Lou Dobbs / Tom Tancredo with Hunter as Sec of Defense.

That would be awesome. I support that ticket as well.

MCPain would be a DISASTER for this country. He lies, (said he didn't try to pass amnesty!!) and he calls the American people complaining about millions of people entering our country ILLEGALLY..."rhetoric".

McPain would be a NIGHTMARE as president of the USA.

We're going to have to support someone soon. I'm leaning towards Romney as, at this point at least, Thompson is not gaining traction and it won't be Tancredo or Hunter. And now we have a MSM push on the "aw shucks" amnesty-loving Huckabee.

Both Giuliani and Huckabee, if elected, would likely be even worse on illegal immigration than Bush (along with any of the Dems). Think of it, honeymoon period after election, political capital, here comes the "comprehensive" amnesty push.

Therefore, Romney, however imperfect, makes the most sense at this point. He has made strong statements against illegal immigration and has NOT endorsed amnesty (unlike Giluiani and Huckabee).

CNN is so stupid.
this should have been a yes or no answer.
and not a minute spewing crapola

Originally Posted by Populist

We're going to have to support someone soon. I'm leaning towards Romney as, at this point at least, Thompson is not gaining traction and it won't be Tancredo or Hunter. And now we have a MSM push on the "aw shucks" amnesty-loving Huckabee.

Both Giuliani and Huckabee, if elected, would likely be even worse on illegal immigration than Bush (along with any of the Dems). Think of it, honeymoon period after election, political capital, here comes the "comprehensive" amnesty push.

Therefore, Romney, however imperfect, makes the most sense at this point. He has made strong statements against illegal immigration and has NOT endorsed amnesty (unlike Giluiani and Huckabee).

IF I HAD TO CHOSE FROM THE TOP TIER CANDIDATES, Romney would be my choice.