Thread: No Apologies for Bloody Islam

No Apologies for Bloody Islam

Posted 3 hours ago by Common Constitutionalist

It’s time for a get-real moment about radical Islam, and why anyone would support those who espouse the false religious dogma.
Everywhere they go, they leave nothing but destruction and death behind.

They persecute and murder Christians just because they are Christians. Then they whine when anyone opposes their beheadings, bombings, genital mutilation, child brides, and degrading of women.
Oh, and they want to exterminate all Jews.

They have this dumb-ass rule about women having to remain completely covered.

You can see it practically everywhere you go – even here in New England. I was witness to the practice just recently. It’s summer. It’s hot – 90 degrees plus with 80% humidity. A Muslim man is taking a walk with his son. They are dressed in shorts, tank tops and flip-flops. Beside them is who I assume is the man’s wife, covered from head to toe in black. Her headscarf was a Niqab. The only things visible were her eyes.
How completely absurd! The practice of women covering up is supposed to be rooted in some sort of religious “modesty” code or something, that women should only be seen by their husbands.

Bullcrap. It’s just another way for Muslim men to manifest power over women who have rights equal to that of dogs that have no rights.

And don’t tell me the women don’t mind dressing that way, as the males dress down to practically nothing in the hot summer sun.

The Clarion Project reported on July 29th that the Deputy PM of Turkey Bülent Arınç said that women should refrain from laughing in public because it’s immodest. Arınç, who spoke at an Eid el-Fitr gathering, said, “[The woman] will know what is [forbidden] and not haram. She will not laugh in public. She will not be inviting in her attitudes and will protect her chasteness.”

“Not be inviting in her attitudes”? In other words, women should not be seen or heard. You have nothing at all to contribute.

And are you kidding me? Protect her chasteness? How are they supposed to do that when Muslim fathers are marrying off their pre-teen daughters?

Who could do that to his child? I’ll tell you who. Someone who sees no value in their female offspring.

Meanwhile, the “Islamic State” (formerly ISIS), is busily expanding its empire, has captured a Syrian Army base near Raqqa. And what did they do with the captured soldiers? Did they treat them humanely as one would expect Americans or Israelis to do? That would be a big NO! They beheaded them and stuck the severed heads on fence posts around the city. A truly gruesome sight.

A picture is worth a thousand words. You may witness the barbarism for yourself.

FAIR WARNING! It is graphic and gruesome. Here is the Video:

graphic video at link below

Breitbart reported that actors Javier Bardem and wife Penelope Cruz signed a statement earlier this week that decried Israel’s military actions against Hamas, equating the efforts to genocide. Cruz released a statement yesterday attempting to do some damage control. The couple is back peddling from their idiocy, but in my book, it’s too late. It’s not like they just hastily put out a tweet without thinking. They signed a written statement, which means they thought about it . . . or they’re just morons. I choose both.

Rockets aimed at Israel are routinely launched from hospitals, mosques, schools and dense population centers Although Israel has been careful to warn the Gaza population before a strike – through leaflets, telephone calls and even text messages – Hamas has forbidden residents to leave buildings that are being targeted. But according to Hollywood and the main stream media, Israelies are the bad guys.
And who does what Israel is forced to do? Who warns the enemy of an impending attack? Answer: NOBODY! But the Israelis are the bad guys.

Yet all we ever see are dead innocents – women and children. Wonder why? Here’s why. This from a journalist who just beat a hasty retreat from Gaza: “It’s very simple, we did see Hamas people there launching rockets, they were close to our hotel, but if ever we dared point our camera on them they would simply shoot at us and kill us.”

Frankly, I could continue on for pages citing human/women’s rights violations and atrocities all in the name of Islam.

I’m simply tired of these radicals getting a pass, or the press they really deserve. Yes, only a small minority of Muslims are radicals. I know that, but we don’t see the outrage from the Muslim community or any of the religion hating lefty groups.

Where’s the outrage – like that of the Catholic Priest molestation incidents from years ago. All Catholics were called upon by every member of the press, every leftist group and every politician to condemn what occurred – and rightly so.

So again – where’s the outrage? Where are these people demanding the same from all Muslims?

They’re hiding under their desks, not wanting to upset CAIR, or ISNA, or maybe they just like their heads firmly attached.


Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/16533/a...c0XOiE1Jldh.99

Obama, Islam’s Best Friend: Committed To Israel’s Destruction.

Posted by Adina Kutnicki on Aug 16, 2014 in Islam


IT is a self evident truth that Barack HUSSEIN Obama despises Israel, yes, for manifold reasons.
SIMILARLY, it has been proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that he is Islam’s greatest champion within the free world. Tragically, it has become obvious that Israel’s PM has no intention of allowing the vaunted IDF to vanquish Hamas’s top leadership, as a strategic necessity for the welfare of Israel.
TO wit, where is the nexus between all of the above…the guideposts?
Commentary by Adina Kutnicki

REPEATEDLY, ad nauseum…ad infinitum…this site has warned: Barack HUSSEIN Obama is a clear and present danger, not only to America and Israel but to western civilization. That’s a mouthful.
AGREED, in general, such a sweeping statement sounds so over the top it is easy to dismiss it as hyperbole. Crazy-talk. Alas, have no fear, this blogger remains in good company. A stalwart American patriot, ex Rep. Colonel Allen West, has publicly stated the same thesis.
On Wednesday, former GOP Rep. Allen West minced no words,calling Barack Obama an “Islamist” whose administration is “working counter to the security of the United States of America.” And, he added, “all” of the evidence points to that conclusion.
According to West, that is the only way one can rationalize Obama’s actions regarding foreign policy, especially on matters pertaining to the Middle East. He cited six specific examples:

1. The unilateral release of five senior Taliban back to the enemy while the enemy is still fighting us.
2. Providing weapons of support to the Muslim Brotherhood-led Egyptian government — F-16s and M1A1 Abrams tanks — but not to the Egyptian government after the Islamist group has been removed.
3. Negotiations with Qatar and Turkey, two Islamist-supporting countries.
4. Negotiations with Hamas, a terrorist group.
5. Returning sanction money, to the tune of billions of dollars, back to the theocratic regime led by Iran’s ayatollahs and allowing them to march on towards nuclear capability.
6. Obama’s evident support of Islamists in Libya.

MANY others are finally jumping on board. Better late than never. Welcome to“Adina’s world”. Heartburn.
YET, even when the proofs are so overwhelming and manifest, countless still equivocate, preferring to deny the obvious by burying the evidence in the sand. On the other side of the spectrum, the verily malignant agree with said anti-western outcome! Damn them…

FOR the absolute record, being that this site’s inception coincided with the campaign for 2012, several high decibel shout outs came from this quarter.
Shout Out One:
WITHOUT mincing words, this blogger predicted: ushering in Barack HUSSEIN Obama for a second-term would be nothing short of a national disaster. To wit, how’s that for a prognosis, as America keeps sinking further down the abyss since his re-election?
Shout Out Two:
IN tandem, no stone was left unturned, as leftist-addicted Jewish voters were taken to task, forewarned: an unrestrained second-term would raise the stakes to the nth degree, not only for America but for the Jewish homeland. Alas, leftist Jews are incorrigible in their fixed “religious” ideology, therefore, they too bear the onus for shepherding him into office. Pathological.
Shout Out Three:
TRAGICALLY, three weeks after his re-election it was mandatory to recap, once again, the awaiting western disaster: treason by any other dressage is still treason; the POTUS and his Brotherhood Mafia! As prognosticated in Nov. 2012, the level of treachery, in a little less than 2 years, has come to pass. How could it not?
NOW, exposing the Muslim Brotherhood is a top priority for this investigative journalist and ground zero is always the best place to begin the hunt. Resultant, in relation to the Islamist-in-Chief, even if one attempts to ignore his childhood Wahhabi roots, his adult alliances are more than resonant.
CONSIDER his close relationship with (the late, non-lamented) Edward Said, an Islamist and close collaborator with the godfather of suicide terror, “Chairman” Arafat! Yes, having connections with some who “watched” Said’s reign of terror from his perch at Columbia U., it should be understood: what is written about him, re his anti-American, anti-Israel, anti-western activities, is merely the tip. Let us leave said “birdies” out of the mix. Nevertheless, the following speaks volumes but just scratches the surface:

From left to right, Michelle Obama, then Illinois state senator Barack Obama, Columbia University Professor Edward Said and Mariam Said.
One of Obama’s founding fathers who remains relatively unknown is the Palestinian radical Edward Said. Prior to his death in 2003, Said was the leading anti-colonial thinker in the United States. Obama studied with Said at Columbia University and the two maintained a relationship over the next two decades. Obama attended a Palestinian fundraiser in Chicago in 1998 in which Said was the featured speaker, and Obama also befriended Said’s protege Rashid Khalidi, who currently occupies the Edward Said chair of Arab Studies at Columbia.
Said wasn’t a mere academic; for a time, he served as a member of the Palestine National Council. In this capacity he worked closely with Yasser Arafat. Said has been photographed throwing rocks at Israel to symbolize his support for armed resistance against the Jewish state; one Jewish magazine dubbed him a “Professor of Terror.”
While Said was hired by Columbia to teach literature, his main interests were always political. We see this in the titles of his books: Culture and Imperialism, The Question of Palestine, and The Politics of Dispossession. He was a vehement critic of the United State and an even-more-vehement critic of Israel. America, Said argued, is a genocidal power with a “history of reducing whole people’s, countries, and even continents to ruin by nothing short of holocaust.”

IT is within said association(s) and mental prism that one must view the Islamist-in-Chief’s latest treachery. Visceral hatred. Obama’s, for lack of a more accurate descriptor, fu-k you to Israel.
Obama Reportedly Blocks Israel Missile Shipment


A new report reveals that US President Barack Obama’s administration stopped a shipment of missiles to Israel late last month and tightened weapons shipment procedures to Israel, as tensions between the two nations grow amid Operation Protective Edge.
The report in the Wall Street Journal, released Wednesday night, cites US officials in Obama’s administration, who say they discovered Israel had requested a large number of Hellfire missiles directly through military-to-military channels. An initial batch of the missiles was about to be shipped, according to sources in Israel and the US Congress.
At that point, the Pentagon stepped in and put the transfer on hold. Further, top White House officials instructed various US military agencies to consult with the US State Department before approving any additional requests from Israel.
A senior Obama administration official was quoted in the report as saying the transfer shouldn’t have been a routine “check-the-box approval,” given Israel’s defensive operation in Gaza against Hamas, which is recognized as a terrorist organization by the US.
The decision to clamp down on future transfers was the equivalent of “the United States saying ‘the buck stops here. Wait a second…It’s not OK anymore,’” said the official.
A Israeli defense official confirmed the reports to Walla! on Thursday, saying “the US delayed a shipment of Hellfire missiles to the Israeli airforce.” He added “apparently it was (done) on the background of national tension” with Israel.
Obama has been at odds with Israel over the defensive operation in Gaza, making various attempts to press Israel into accepting a truce with the adamant terrorist organization of Hamas. Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu reportedly responded to the pressure by telling the administration “not to ever second guess me again,” after Hamas committed one of its many ceasefire violations.
Currently a new five-day ceasefire has come into effect as of Wednesday at midnight, with Obama calling Netanyahu shortly thereafter to push for a“sustainable” ceasefire.
According to US officials cited in the Wall Street Journal report, the Wednesday night phone call between Obama and Netanyahu was “particularly combative.”
“Discovering” military-to-military arms transfers
The report noted that on July 20, ahead of the Hellfire missile cancellation, the IDF asked the US military for various munitions such as 120-mm mortar shells and 40-mm illuminating rounds, without the knowledge of Obama’s administration.
Three days later the request was approved by the military, without Obama or US Secretary of State John Kerry being approached for approval, given that their approval was not required for such a transfer.
A US defense official added that the standard review process in such requests was properly followed.
The transfer without Obama’s unnecessary approval was followed by asimilar incident ahead of the Hellfire cancellation, which occurred the same day as the July 30 IDF strike on terrorists adjacent to a UN school, which the US slammed as “disgraceful.“
In response, the IDF confirmed it targeted Islamic Jihad terrorists in the vicinity of the school. Previously the IDF provided video evidence that Hamas fires rockets from inside schools; further, UNRWA schools have been used in at least three cases to store Hamas rockets, after which UNRWA repeatedly returned the rockets to Hamas.
On the same day as the UN school strike, US reports said the 120-mm and 40-mm rounds had been released by the US army to the IDF, with one Obama administration official saying “we were blindsided.”
A US defense official responded, saying “there was no intent to blindside anyone. The process for this transfer was followed precisely along the lines that it should have.”
Demonstrating the tense ties between Obama’s administration and Israel, a senior official of the administration told the Wall Street Journal “we have many, many friends around the world. The United States is their (Israel’s) strongest friend.”
“The notion that they are playing the United States, or that they’re manipulating us publicly, completely miscalculates their place in the world,” added the official.
The US decision to tighten down on arms transfers to Israel comes as the UK is threatening similar actions. On Tuesday, the British government threatened to suspend 12 arms export licenses to Israel if fighting resumed in Gaza.
Lessons Learned:
THE fact of the matter is that if one truly subscribes to professional (and personal) integrity and honesty as ones barometer, one cannot, one dare not, let PM Netanyahu (other top Israeli leaders too) off the hook, in relation to “taking care of urgent business”. How so? For if “Bibi” had any inclination to finally end Hamas’s reign of terror – their decade-long missile attacks upon Israel’s population centers - destroying Hamas’s top leadership, their command and control center, is a prerequisite to said victory. In effect, such an operation, according to top Israeli military experts, should have taken place the first week of Israel’s latest – out ofnumerous such “campaigns” – smoke and mirrors show. This site’s high level defense-related contacts concur. Understood?
INHERENTLY, the heavy-duty ordinances needed for such an operation have always been at the ready, current re-supply needs notwithstanding. Yes, hell fire missile “hold ups” by the Islamist-in-Chief are the mark of an avowed enemy. Let there be NO doubt.
The Obama administration has tightened its control of arms transfers to Israel, requiring White House and State Department approval for even routine munitions requests by Israel, according to the piece.
“Instead of being handled as a military-to-military matter, each case is now subject to review – slowing the approval process and signaling to Israel that military assistance once taken for granted is now under closer scrutiny,” the story said.
The report came out on the same day that the Istanbul-basedHurriyet Daily News reported that the US cleared a potential $320 million advanced medium-range airto- air missiles sale to Turkey “amid increasing security risks in the region.”
STILL, the question begs: why wait until supplies run low, if, in fact, the goal is to put an end to the attacks? Common sense dictates that enough missiles be reserved for the coup de grace, not for the “tit for tat” responses, or the bizarre, counter-intuitive, mantra “quiet will be met with quiet”. Truly, when operating against a genocidal foe, what kind of rational leadership would ever adopt such an Orwellian “strategy”? Indeed, as a result, Israel’s missile supplies are wasted on attacking empty buildings via the smoke and mirrors show, all the unintended, yet unavoidable, collateral damage beside the point.
REGARDLESS, in reality, Israel’s PM (for a host of reasons, best left for another discussion) has decided in the negative to remove the threat in its entirety, and will accede to as many “case-fires” as it takes to keep from toppling the top terror leadership. Believe it – or not.
NEVERTHELESS, the above Israeli malfeasance towards its majority Zionist publicdoes not obviate Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s palpable hatred. It just gives “Bibi” a tailor-made excuse for not FULLY vanquishing an admittedly genocidal foe. History will be the judge….this American-Israeli is just stating things as they are. Period.
MOST significant of all, the heretofore leader of the free world is aiming for America’s and Israel’s jugular, whatever it takes! Concomitantly, the rest of the west will fall. That’s the plan… almost on track!
THE fact that Washington effectively owns (you read that right) Jerusalem’s decision makers (for decades) makes the Islamist-in-Chief’s task that much easier. Hmm…the ever “elusive” IDF victory, at least since 1973, understood for what it is. More succinctly, for what it isn’t!



About the author: Adina Kutnicki


Adina Kutnicki is an investigative journalist and independent op-ed contributor to various Zionist and Conservative media outlets. She contributed to an in-depth investigative series at FrontPage Magazine with Lee Kaplan from 2003-2007. They are still working together. Her op-eds have been featured at American Thinker, Israel National News,Israel Insider, The Jewish Press, MidEast Outpost, The Freeman Center For Strategic Studies, HONENU – Providing Legal Aid To Israeli Soldiers & Civilians In Distress, JEWSNEWS.co.il(http://adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/10/...ewsnews-co-il/) as well as at other sites. Some interviews include: The Inquisitr Interviews Adina Kutnicki: The Reality Of Life For An Israeli Patriot and ‘The Muslim Brotherhood’s Quest For Global Dominance – An Interview With Adina Kutnicki.’ Her recent book review On A Wing From The Holy Land [Review Of An Exciting New Novel About The Spiritual Journey Of An Israeli Woman] was also spotlighted at Inquisitr. In addition, she is the Israel Administrator at Islam Exposed Online Her blog - www.adinakutnicki.com - received a ‘Watcher of Weasels’ Award - see within – scroll down to ‘Non-Council’ winners. Her full profile can be found at - http://adinakutnicki.com/about/
View all articles by Adina Kutnicki


Read more at http://joeforamerica.com/2014/08/oba...5hQQTCBmIHq.99



He is committed to our Countries destruction too!! Never forget 9-11

Muslim Terrorists Massacre 100 Men – Rape the Women take the Children and Escape into Syria


By Onan Coca / 16 August 2014

Does it not grow tiring to hear the talking heads speak out of both sides of their mouths? They fawn and gush over Hamas but hate the despicable acts of the ISIS terrorists. Newsflash – the two groups are practically mirror images of each other; the difference is one has been successful and one has not.

I’m also getting tired of reporting the horrors being carried about by ISIS terrorists because of the impotency of the Obama White House. I am not one to argue for expanded American missions around the globe – just the opposite; I believe it would be in our best interests to cut back on our involvement around the planet. However, in Iraq and Syria we face an evil similar to the Nazi scourge faced by our ancestors leading into WWII. Again, there is a difference.

Back then the American public did not realize the full weight of the evil residing in Europe. They didn’t understand that the Nazis were committing the most heinous crime of the 20th Century. They didn’t know about the ovens, the execution squads, the mass graves or the torture chambers of Nazi “doctors.” If they had, how do you think the “Greatest Generation” would have responded?

There are moments in history when basic moral decency cries out, and those who can respond, must. This is one of those times.

Just a couple of days ago President Obama decided that the American airstrikes on ISIS positions had done the damage intended and the people trapped on Mount Sinjar would now be safe. Because of this, he chose to end the air assault on ISIS and only use the strikes from here on out to protect American interests and positions in the region. Then he said exactly this to the entire world…




Two things were borne from this news out of the President mouth.

The first was a massacre. ISIS used the break from American bombs to slaughter almost 100 men in one village and at least 500 people in the surrounding area. Not only did ISIS slaughter at least 100 men in one village, but they also spent time capturing, raping and carrying off the women and children who were left behind as well.

An informed source in Mosul, speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat on condition of anonymity, said that ISIS had killed all Yazidi men in the villages it had besieged around Sinjar after a deadline for them to convert to Islam expired. “[ISIS fighters also] raped the women and girls, and took the children to Mosul,” he added.

The second effect of President Obama’s speech was that the leaders of ISIS chose to flee Iraq and head back into Syria, where they were assured safety from American bombs by the President himself!
In comments to Asharq Al-Awsat, Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) spokesman Saeed Mamo Zinni said: “Caliph of the Islamic State Abu-Bakr Al-Baghdadi left Mosul for Syria a few days ago.”

“According to our intelligence sources, Abu-Bakr Al-Baghdadi traveled to Syria as part of a convoy of 30 Hummer vehicles after fearing being targeted by US airstrikes,” Zinni said. He added that Kurdish Peshmerga forces have been able to kill a number of ISIS senior leaders.

In Syria, the leaders of ISIS feel they will be safe from American attack because there is no threat to American interests there. So Al-Baghdadi, the coward, is hiding a safe distance from the American threat.

My fellow Americans, we are facing the gravest threat to humanity since the fascist Nazi and Soviet Communist plagues: the threat of Islamic terrorism.
After a decade of losing to us on the battlefields and in their cities, the terrorists have turned to softer targets… the non-radicals in their own countries. If they succeed in destroying all opposition within their own borders, we will soon be facing national terrorist armies… not just the rabble we see today.
We must cut this threat off before it spreads.

Make no mistake; ISIS (and their ilk) is a grave threat to humanity. Like their brothers in Hamas, they love death.

[video[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyXS9072jCc[/video]

“Today you [Israelis] are fighting divine soldiers, who love death for Allah like you love life, and who compete among themselves for Martyrdom like you flee from death,” said Hamas Chief of Staff Muhammad Deif…
“We love death like our enemies love life!” he said. “We love martyrdom, the way in which [Hamas] leaders died.” -- Former Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh.



Read more at http://eaglerising.com/8008/muslim-t...2uc5XL0PTaB.99

Why Islamists Don’t Have the Right to Build Mosques, Proselytize Or Institute Sharia Law In America

Published on: August 17, 2014




Publius Huldah, a retired attorney, Constitutional scholar and JAG, addressed the Act for America Chapter in Fayetteville, Tennessee recently and demonstrated that the First Amendment does not give Islamists the right to build mosques, proselytize, and institute Sharia law in the United States. She also took time to point out that multiculturalism is not and that Islam is not a peaceful religion.

video at link below

http://vimeo.com/63431881


“We face a grave threat,” she began. “Islamists are infiltrating our country and taking over. Our Federal, state and local governments won’t even acknowledge the threat.”
Publius Huldah points out that the “Islamists seek to replace our Constitution, our religion and our culture with Sharia, their totalitarian political, economic, military, social and legal system. They are making progress and conquering our country because we are not resisting. We are not resisting because people actually believe Islamists have ‘constitutional rights’ to build mosques and proselytize here and that those who oppose them are haters, racists, xenophobes (someone who hates and fears other cultures), and intolerant.”
“So the dreadful message we are getting from all sources, “she continues, “is that our Constitution renders us powerless to resist because, and this is the great lie, the First Amendment gives Islamists the right to do what they are doing and that oppose them are bad people.”
Publius Huldah refers to our God given rights as our “shield” against the Islamic conquest in America and says that a proper understanding of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution is needed and this is what she then sets out to put forth. “Rights come from God. Rights do not come from the Constitution,” she declared. “We cut our own throats, when we say that rights come from the Constitution. Our sword is our Constitution.”
Publius Huldah then lists four provisions in the Constitution are available to stop the Islamic conquest in our country.

• The “Supremacy Clause” in Article Six, clauses 2 and 3. Since the U.S. Constitution is the law of our land, there is not a corner of our country in which Sharia is not forbidden because it is contrary to the Constitution.
• Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1 delegates the power to Congress to control immigration.
• Article 4, Section 4 requires the Federal government to protect the states from invasion.
• Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15 authorizes Congress to call forth the militia (the armed citizens) to suppress insurrections and repel invasion.

She then pointed out that we are allowing an Islamic invasion, and I’ll add a Hispanic invasion as well, because we simply do not know what the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution says and that we have been “conditioned” to think that all cultures are equal and that nothing special happened when America was formed.

• Publius Huldah then went on to point out that the prevailing dogma of our day is that multiculturalism, the belief that all cultures and religions are equal, is good, except for Western culture which is really, really bad. This is also tied to the rhetoric we hear being perpetrated that unrestricted immigration is a really, really good thing and those that oppose it are “bad people,” because they are racists and xenophobes.
• Second she points out the lie of Islam being a peaceful religion.
• Finally, she pointed out a prevailing dogma that the First Amendment gives Islamists the right to build mosques, proselytize and institute Sharia.

The issue of multiculturalism was addressed first and Publius Huldah points out that those who have sought to destroy us have told us that we have been bad from our inception claiming the Founders had slaves, were bad to the Indians and so on. Because many of the founding principles have not been taught in the public education system for some time, there is no wonder that many do not understand them, but instead misrepresent them.
Because of the intimidation of multiculturalists, many are afraid to claim that the American culture was better in any respects to other cultures. However, Publius Huldah declares, “But we were the shining city on a hill. We were a Christian country, based on Judeo-Christian principles of morality and civil government.” She pointed to the Declaration of Independence’s reference to God as the Creator, Supreme Judge of the World and as our divine Protector. Article 7, just above the signatures, recognizes the Lordship of Jesus Christ she says.
Publius then quotes John Jay from Federalist 2 (additional citation mine):

“Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people — a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs, and who, by their joint counsels, arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war, have nobly established general liberty and independence.”

While she does note that our culture was not perfect because man is fallen, the culture that had been established was superior to other cultures. Some of the things she specifically referenced of our imperfections was slavery. “We fixed that (the issue of slavery) at great cost, which is what a culture deserves when it violates God’s laws,” she said. However, she now points to the fact that we murder babies which must also be addressed.
“You can’t protect your culture if you permit it to be overrun by people with different cultures who import their own inferior cultures and refuse to embrace your culture,” she declared. “Our Framers knew this.” This is why they put in writing Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1.
In 1965 multiculturalists insisted that we had to let anyone in. They hated our culture because it was based upon the Bible. They set out against our once Puritan, English speaking, and Christian culture with people from different cultures, religions, and languages who had no comprehension of limited, civil government set forth in the Constitution and Bible. It was Teddy Kennedy who pushed for the Immigration Act of 1965 and those that opposed it were silenced by being called names. It abolished the National Origins quota system which limited immigration primarily to those coming from cultures that were similar to ours.

“Multiculturalism never works. Cultures clash and the sub cultures who have the most children and are the most violent wipe out the host culture. It’s happening in Western Europe.”

Publius Huldah said that we don’t need to import Mexican culture because it is a criminal culture and they need to work that out there, not import it into the U.S. “Why is it a good thing to import third world people who don’t share our language, our culture or our values?” she asks.
With this she transitioned into the Islamic culture and told the audience she spoke to, “Look at the photos of the mutilated Muslim women who have been disfigured or murdered by their husbands, fathers and brothers. Look at the way they kill each other.” She went on to speak about cultures and ethnicities and the need and provision for redemption through Jesus Christ being available to all men. The idea of allowing believers or those of similar culture in smaller numbers to immigrate here was to force them into the culture, not allow them to transform it. We wanted them to leave their former cultures, languages and such behind and embrace the American culture.
Publius Huldah then stated there wasn’t a need to spend much time on the idea that Islam is a “peaceful religion.” She then referenced Allen West as the only politician who has had the guts to tell the truth about this, though he did capitulate shortly before his re-election bid last year in a congressional letter. She pointed out that George W. Bush babbled about Islam being peaceful while Ron Paul tried to say their cruelties and actions were America’s fault. Paul said what the CIA had said and that was the fact that 9-11 was part of “blowback,” but I’ve never heard him defending their cruelties under Shariah or such, but the point is taken that Paul is naive about Islam. “Islam is not even a religion,” she said. “Islam is a totalitarian system which controls every aspect of the lives of those who have the misfortune to be subjected to it. It masquerades as a religion in order to intimidate us and to claim what we have been told are First Amendment protection, but once we understand that Islam is just another vicious totalitarian system like Communism and Fascism, we can deal with it.”
She then gave encouraging words to those willing to stand up and demand that those who are ignorant of Islamic history and what is taking place around the world today at the hands of Muslims. Publius Huldah encouraged people not to be afraid to call out the multiculturists and show them the photos of what Islam does to its women. “Remember,” she said, “multiculturists are just ignorant little people who have repeated what they have been told.”
She then took on the final lie in her presentation and that is that the First Amendment gives Islamists rights to build mosques, proselytize and institute Sharia. She then quotes the First Amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Publius Huldah rightly points out that the First Amendment doesn’t grant rights to anyone, but rather prohibits Congress from making laws about religion, speech, the press or assembly. The states retained powers to make laws about religion and speech. The states have always held that power and if you say they don’t, then why is slander, libel, intentional affliction of emotional distress and other such “speech” considered criminal? It’s because that is the states’ powers retained under the Constitution. Many of the states, even following the ratification of the Constitution had established state religions.
Therefore, Islamists don’t have a right to engage in any of their activities because the First Amendment restricts Congress, but not the states from dealing in matters of speech and religion. Also it does not put forth any right in the First Amendment.
Publius Huldah then points to the Declaration of Independence and states that it provides the source from where men’s rights come from, God.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men.”

Therefore, any and all government are there to secure the rights God gave the people, and I’ll add, to punish evildoers (Romans 13). They do this primarily by protecting us from those who seek to take from us our God given rights away from us. Liberty is God’s model for society.

“Proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof…”
–Leviticus 25:10

I would highly encourage you to listen to her entire speech. The words I’ve put together in this article cover up to about the 24 minute mark where she begins comparison of the Islamist culture to Christian culture. You will find it encouraging.
UPDATE: Many of you have asked how you can obtain a copy of the message in audio format to send to others, including local and state officials. Well, I have complied and added a downloadable mp3 file which you can share or put on CD and give out to educate the masses, including elected officials. Please feel free to download the file here or feel free to link to this article for friends to download from.
Don't forget to Like SonsOfLibertyMedia.com on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.


Read more at http://sonsoflibertymedia.com/2014/0...rEgMMxYairr.99

Russian Government Gets Sick Of Muslim Violence, Has Police Officers Search Veiled Women And Islamic Schools


Theodore Shoebat 5 hours ago


Russia, being fed up with Muslim violence, will be passing a law, by 2015, that will prohibit certain Islamic literature deemed as extremist and dangerous to society. As of now, Russian police are already searching Muslim schools (madrasas) and stopping veiled Muslim women to interrogate them in Crimea.

It is the Russian Inquisition, and I can already hear the empty leftist and modern-minded Christians complaining about it. Eider Ismailov, the assistant mufti of Crimea, said:

>
This shows that Russian police do not trust headscarfed women, and see them as a separate group in the general public … This is nothing but an insult against our beliefs as Muslims

One report informs us:

Recently, Muslim women in the capital Simferopol and Bakhchysarai have accused Russian police of pulling women with Islamic hijab over for passport checks.

Women added that they were being treated as if they were 'enemies' on their Facebook profiles.

Security check did not target women only.

Over the past few days, Crimea religious schools, or madrassahs, have been searched for banned Islamic literature.


Three madrasas were searched during August 13, ahead of the law that will come into force in 2015 that bans a number of popular Islamic books, another assistant mufti, Esadullah Bairov, said.

"The books are removed as a warning, as the law is not in force in Crimea yet. Still, no extremist literature was found in Crimean madrasas that were searched," Bairov said.

Russia needs to continue and pursue such laws. Thank God for the Russian Orthodox Church and the Russian government, working together to fight and suppress this evil. Let the Two Swords of St. Peter, that is, the Church and the State, be unleashed on the forces and principalities of darkness that so wish to destroy Christianity.
This is part of militancy: having the state to obliterate the works of Satan.
Source
Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.


Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/08/ru...8HTOMqyVYeB.99

President Obama just spoke from Martha's Vineyard after ISIS beheaded an American journalist. 


'Entire World Is Appalled': Obama Reacts to ISIS Beheading of American Journalist
Fox News Insider

President Barack Obama says the United States will continue to confront Islamic State extremists despite the brutal murder of journalist James Foley.

#ISIS





Islamic State Beheads Kidnapped American Journalist James Wright Foley as “Message to America” - Freedom Outpost http://ow.ly/Ax0hL




Islamic State Beheads Kidnapped American Journalist James Wright Foley as “Message to America” - Freedom Outpost
ow.ly
Islamic State Beheads Kidnapped American Journalist James Wright Foley as “Message to America”






Pete Santilli Episode #779 - Special Guest Walid Shoebat Discusses ISIS/Beheading Of James Foley

GMN Telemedia






Started on Aug 20, 2014
THE PETE SANTILLI SHOW

Pete Santilli with Walid Shoebat:

Walid Shoebat joins Pete today to discuss the rise of ISIS and the beheading of journalist James Foley. http://shoebat.com/

Is ISIS true Islam?

Beheading? 'Magnify That a Million Times Over,' Cheney Says


August 21, 2014 - 7:18 AM

---

By Susan Jones
Subscribe to Susan Jones RSS

Follow Susan Jones on Twitter


Former Vice President Dick Cheney. (AP File Photo)

(CNSNews.com) - Former Vice President Dick Cheney, who helped push the United States into war with Iraq in 2003, says "there's no question" that ISIS terrorists are "very much a threat to the United States, to our friends and allies, not only in the Middle East but in Europe."

"And when you see them behead an American reporter...that's obviously a terrible development, but magnify that a million times over because that's what's in store for the rest of the world if we don't deal effectively with this crisis," he told Fox News's Sean Hannity on Wednesday night.

http://www.mrctv.org/videos/cheney-i...-united-states

Cheney said he doesn't think President Obama understands the "enormous" danger posed by radical Islam:
"The intelligence is there for all to see. There's no question about what's happening. But this president and the people around him refuse to recognize it and certainly refuse to deal with it.

"The damage that is being done as we talk tonight, Sean, to the American military, is enormous. They're taking our Army down below levels we haven't seen since Pearl Harbor. They've made major reductions in the Air Force and the Navy...So it's a train wreck. And there's one more train wreck every day. It's hard to believe that this president is as ineffective as he clearly is."

Cheney said he's reached the conclusion that Obama is finally discovering that the world is a "mean, nasty place" sometimes -- unlike the world Obama would prefer to see.

"He's not up to speed and does not want to believe all that's going on out there. But every day, we find new evidence that he'd rather be on the golf course than he would be dealing with the crisis that's developing rapidly in the Middle East."

Cheney said Obama is the first president of either party, going back to Harry Truman, who "simply refuses to recognize the reality of the world we live in."

It's understandable that Americans are war-weary, but that's where leadership comes in -- "and Barack Obama's not providing it," Cheney said.

"Of course, it's difficult to persuade the American people that we ought to send our sons and daughters off to fight a war. But sometimes, it's absolutely necessary. And that's why we have presidents. And that's why they have the authority as commander-in-chief to make those decisions and why those of us who are involved need to do everything we can to support them and support our troops in the field.

Cheney said he's "absolutely certain" that another mass-casualty attack is in store for the United states. "Only next time, they'll have far deadlier weapons," he warned.

"The issue is whether or not we're going to allow them to succeed in their basic fundamental objective in achieving a caliphate, a true caliphate, representative of the kind of thing we saw centuries ago in the Middle East, and follow their ideology, which calls not only for the destruction of Israel but also the United States.

"Now, are we going to pull ourself up by our bootstraps and get on with the business of destroying ISIS, or are we simply going to sit back and agonize every time they commit another outrageous act?"

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/...er-cheney-says



Former Vice President Dick Cheney. (AP File Photo)



Oh Hurry we need to get into another war and go after ISIS, hey Cheney, you go first!!!!! Remember those Weapons of Mass destruction, where were they again!!!

No Comment From Islamic Bloc on Beheading of American Journalist


August 21, 2014 - 5:00 AM

---

By Patrick Goodenough
Subscribe to Patrick Goodenough RSS


Organization of Islamic Cooperation Secretary-General Iyad Ameen Madani and Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal at one of two meetings it has held on the Gaza Strip in the last two months. The OIC has held no such session on the crisis in Iraq. (Photo: OIC)

(CNSNews.com) – The bloc of Muslim nations remained mum Wednesday on the killing of U.S. journalist James Foley by terrorists claiming to act on behalf of Islam and led by a man who – by naming himself “caliph” – lays claim to the mantle of Mohammed.

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) posted no statement on either its Arabic or English websites about the death of Foley, whose decapitation featured on a video clip posted online by the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant.

(The OIC did find time Wednesday to post one new statement on its Arabic site, relating to Jerusalem’s al-Aqsa mosque.)

An OIC-affiliated news agency carried a single story of Foley’s murder, written from a Washington angle and containing no Muslim reaction to the killing.
Queries sent to the OIC’s headquarters in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, and its U.N. offices in New York and Geneva brought no response by press time.
Some Islamic groups and figures have repudiated ISIS this week, but the silence from the OIC is noteworthy, given its status as the official representative body of the world’s Muslim-majority states.

Over the 10 weeks since ISIS’ capture of Iraqi territory including the second city of Mosul, its declaration of a “caliphate,” mass executions of captives, and atrocities against civilians including Christians and Yazidis have galvanized international concern, the OIC’s secretariat has given the issue relatively little attention.

Since the beginning of June it has issued four statements on Iraq – one on Jun. 12 voicing concern about the fall of Mosul three days earlier; one on Jul. 2 welcoming a Saudi offer of humanitarian aid to Iraq; one on Jul. 21 condemning ISIS atrocities towards Iraqi Christians; and one on Aug. 13 welcoming steps towards the formation of a new government in Baghdad.

Over the same period, the OIC issued at least 17 statements on the Gaza Strip and “Palestine.”

Further, the OIC during that period convened two “expanded extraordinary meeting” at the foreign minister level, one on Jul. 10 and one on Aug. 12 – both relating to Gaza.

The period in question also saw the OIC hold its 41st annual foreign ministers’ gathering in Jeddah. Despite ISIS’ advances at the time across northern and western Iraq, the two-day conference on Jun. 18-19 gave virtually no time to Iraq:
--A 4,000-plus word keynote speech by OIC secretary-general Iyad Ameen Madani mentioned Syria and Iraq directly just once, lumped together in one sentence with Libya. (The single issue receiving the most attention in the speech was the Palestinian one, and Madani also referred to several other crisis situations, among them the Central African Republic and Nigeria.)

--A 1,200-word official OIC readout of the meeting mentioned Iraq and Syria just once, again in one sentence along with Libya. (“Palestine” got nine references and Jerusalem another 10.)

--A seven-page “Jeddah Declaration” issued at the end of the conference did not include a single direct reference. (Almost 600 words were dedicated to the Palestinian issue.)

Like other Islamic bodies, the OIC has taken pains to distance terrorism from Islam, insisting that notwithstanding the names, professed Qur’anic inspiration and religious terminology employed, jihadists like those in ISIS and al-Qaeda are not acting on behalf of their faith.

“The practices of ISIS have nothing to do with Islam and its principles that call for justice, kindness, fairness, freedom of faith and coexistence,” Madani said in his Jul. 21 statement.

In an Aug. 2 end-of-Ramadan statement, Madani warned, without mentioning any groups by name, about “the dangers emanating from extremist groups that have hijacked Islam and set themselves up as its spokespersons whereas Islam, with its values, civilization and inclusiveness, can in no way be associated with their abominable acts.”

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) on Wednesday called Foley’s murder “a violation of Islamic beliefs and of universally-accepted international norms.”

On Tuesday, in a statement issued before the Foley video appeared, Saudi Arabia’s grand mufti Abdulaziz al-Sheikh called ISIS and al-Qaeda the “number one enemy of Islam.”

In his statement on Foley’s murder Wednesday, President Obama declared that ISIS “speaks for no religion.”

“Their victims are overwhelmingly Muslim, and no faith teaches people to massacre innocents,” he said. “No just God would stand for what they did yesterday, and for what they do every single day.”

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/...can-journalist

Saudis Denounce ISIS, But They Behead People, Too


August 21, 2014 - 4:21 AM

---

By Patrick Goodenough
Subscribe to Patrick Goodenough RSS


Saudi grand mufti Abdulaziz al-Sheikh Sheikh, leads prayers at a Riyadh mosque to mark the end of Ramadan on September 9, 2010. (AP Photo/Hassan Ammar, File)

(CNSNews.com) – After State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf on Wednesday pointed to a statement by Saudi Arabia’s highest religious leader condemning the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIS/ISIL), a reporter pointed out that beheadings form part of the kingdom’s system of criminal punishment. The exchange took place during a daily press briefing in which the beheading by ISIS of U.S. journalist James Foley featured prominently, and in the context of Harf underscoring that the terrorist group does not represent Islam.

“I’d note that the grand mufti of Saudi Arabia, that nation’s highest religious authority, yesterday said that the Islamic State and al-Qaeda were the enemy number one of Islam and not in any way part of the faith,” Harf said. “So I certainly don’t want to speak for him, but he was very clear about how, at least, Muslims in his country should view what ISIL is doing.”

Later, Matt Lee of the Associated Press returned to the subject.

“You mentioned the grand mufti in Saudi Arabia,” he said. “But Saudi Arabia is a country in which beheading is actually the legal form of execution.”

The State Department has long criticized the kingdom’s human rights record, he added.

“That is true,” said Harf. “I was just highlighting comments made by their chief religious leader.”
http://www.mrctv.org/videos/after-st...-behead-people

Harf acknowledged that when the U.S. has concerns about “some of their practices,” it raises them with the Saudis, “but that’s wholly separate from our counterterrorism cooperation.”

She described Saudi Arabia as “an incredibly close counterterrorism partner.”

“All you have to do is look at the partnership we’ve had and how – the success they’ve really had when they went after al-Qaeda in their own country and really degraded its ability to operate there,” she said.

Harf said she had brought up the comments by the top Saudi cleric “in response to what publics around the world and who people should listen to and think about when they’re looking at what ISIL is doing.”

Saudi Arabia is ruled according to the strict Wahhabi interpretation of Sunni Islam. Churches are banned, public practice of non-Muslim religion is outlawed, and apostasy – the act of leaving Islam for another faith – carries the death penalty.

Shari’a-based punishments include public beheadings and amputation of limbs. The State Department’s most recent human rights report cited the Jan. 2013 beheading in Saudi Arabia of a Sri Lankan domestic worker who was convicted of having killed a four-month-old infant, after a trial in which local human rights activists said the accused had been denied due process by not having an interpreter during her interrogation and trial.

According to Amnesty International, Saudi Arabia accounted for the third highest number of executions carried out around the world last year, after Iran and Iraq. (Amnesty’s figures do not include China, where the statistics are a state secret.)

The statement by grand mufti Abdulaziz al-Sheikh which was cited by Harf was issued on Tuesday, shortly before a video showing the execution of Foley appeared online.

“Extremist and militant ideas and terrorism which spread decay on earth, destroying human civilization, are not in any way part of Islam, but are enemy number one of Islam,” the official Saudi Press Agency quoted al-Sheikh as saying.

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/...ead-people-too

August 25, 2014

CAIR: Anti-Constitutional, Anti-Israel, and Anti-Semitic Hate Group

By William A. Levinson


The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) regained its 501(c)(3) tax exemption after it was revoked for failure to file tax returns. The group was also accused credibly of ties with Hamas, a foreign terrorist organization, although not of providing it with material support such as money or weapons.

The Government has produced ample evidence to establish the associations of CAIR, ISNA and NAIT with HLF, the Islamic Association for Palestine (“IAP”), and with Hamas. While the Court recognizes that the evidence produced by the Government largely predates the HLF designation date, the evidence is nonetheless sufficient to show the association of these entities with HLF, IAP, and Hamas.

The purpose of 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status is to promote donations to genuine charitable, educational, religious, and humanitarian activities that benefit our society. It is difficult to see how promotion of illegal activities, and verbal support for terroristic violence, conforms to this purpose.
As reported by WorldNet Daily,

“If we are practicing Muslims, we are above the law of the land,” said Mustafa Carroll, executive director of the Dallas-Fort Worth CAIR branch.

It is difficult to see how a seditious statement of this nature is consistent with any kind of charitable, educational, humanitarian, or legitimate religious mission. Advocacy of the overthrow of the Constitution's Bill of Rights makes matters even worse.

Omar Ahmad, CAIR's chairman, announced in July 1998 that "Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran ... should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth."
... Ihsan Bagby, a future CAIR board member, stated in the late 1980s that Muslims "can never be full citizens of this country," referring to the United States, "because there is no way we can be fully committed to the institutions and ideologies of this country."

This makes CAIR the equivalent of an organization like the German-American Bund, which was outlawed on December 11, 1941, the day Nazi Germany declared war on the United States.
CAIR Supports Terroristic Violence
It is a felony only to provide material support for terrorists, and this means weapons, money, and/or training. It is not illegal to advocate for terrorists verbally or in writing, although one can question whether an organization that does this should benefit from tax exempt status.

October 12, 2001: Ghazi Kankan, executive director of CAIR's New York office at the time, defended Hamas's targeting of Israeli civilians. He told the Jewish Week that, like Hamas, he considered all Israelis over the age of 18 to be "military" because "they are all reserves."
During a panel discussion at Barry University in Florida, Nihad Awad said: "I used to support the PLO, and I used to be the President of the General Union of Palestine Students which is part of the PLO here in the United States, but after I researched the situation inside Palestine and outside, I am in support of the Hamas movement more than the PLO."

CAIR also hosts, on its own website, an article called "The Zionist Attack on Jewish Values" by Lawrence Davidson, professor of Middle East history, West Chester University. The last two paragraphs, which advocate boycott, divestment, and sanctions, are highly instructive. Davidson is also popular with the Electronic Intifada and Intifada-Palestine.com, where he talks about the "Israeli lobby." CAIR has therefore self-identified as an enemy of Israel, and a friend of Islamist terrorists.

All this evidence indicates that CAIR is a problem reminiscent of the German-American Bund, and an enemy of the United States Constitution. Its members should remember that the many rights they enjoy in the United States includes the right to renounce their citizenship and leave. If they believe in statements like "Freedom Go to Hell" and "Islam will dominate the world," there are plenty of countries in the Middle East and
Central Asia where they would feel far more at home.

Remember that the last ideology that said it would dominate the world came with a swastika. The owner of this page, incidentally, included a post favorable to Osama bin Laden, and right below it a cartoon (copyrighted) that complains of media bias that depicts Muslims as terrorists. This is known as "tripping over one's own taqqiya." Although the Nazis also said openly that they were going to dominate the world, they were at least smart enough to lie intelligently.
The takeaway is, however, the fact that CAIR officials have made similar statements. This makes the organization a problem, and we need to watch it carefully for anything it might do to deserve permanent revocation of its tax exemption. Here is the form one uses to file an official complaint with the IRS. Remember, though, that the organization must actually do something that violates its tax-exempt status; mere dislike of its activities does not qualify. Until this happens, public opprobrium is the best recourse, and CAIR's invitation to Al Sharpton has just put it on record as an anti-Semitic hate group. Racism is somewhat less credible only because CAIR's membership includes Caucasians.
Al Sharpton: the Klan with a Tan
As reported by The Clarion Project:

Reverend Al Sharpton, host of PoliticsNation on MSNBC and former presidential candidate, will be the keynote speaker at the annual fundraiser for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity with an extremist history.
CAIR’s 20th Annual Banquet will be held on September 27 in Arlington, Virginia and also features Rep. Jim Moran (D-VA) and Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN).

Keith Ellison compared the 9/11 terrorist attacks to the Reichstag fire, and hinted that the U.S. government might have been involved. "The fact is that I'm not saying September 11 was a U.S. plan or anything like that because, you know, that's how they put you in the nut-ball box – dismiss you." Moran made a "Jews control America" statement prior to the Iraq war.

If it were not for the strong support of the Jewish community for this war with Iraq, we would not be doing this. The leaders of the Jewish community are influential enough that they could change the direction of where this is going, and I think they should.

Al Sharpton is, however, even worse. If somebody made the grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan his keynote speaker, it would be pretty clear what his organization thought of black people and Jews. CAIR has similarly made its opinion of Jews perfectly clear, and if its membership did not include Caucasians, racism also would be on the table. Sharpton's history speaks for itself.

• In 1988, Sharpton and his entourage falsely accused citizens of Wappingers Falls, NY, of raping Tawana Brawley. Sharpton was later convicted of defamation (civil tort) as a result.
• In 1991, Sharpton helped provoke the Crown Heights riots, in which a rampaging mob murdered a Jew. Sharpton has used anti-Semitic language like "diamond merchants" to describe Jews.
• In 1995, Sharpton's National Action Network paraded around a Jewish-owned store, Freddy's Fashion Mart, while screaming about "bloodsucking Jews," "cracker lovers," "don't give the Jew a dime," and "white interloper," the last from Sharpton himself. A deranged individual acted on this hate speech by setting the store on fire, and killing seven workers.

The fact that CAIR, despite its full knowledge of Sharpton's history, invited him to be its keynote speaker self-identifies the organization as an anti-Semitic hate group. Its other actions self-identify it as an enemy of the Constitution's Bill of Rights, and a friend of Islamist terrorism.
William A. Levinson is the author of several books on business management including content on organizational psychology, as well as manufacturing productivity and quality.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/...#ixzz3BPnqlRdD
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook