Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

If Obama Made This Up, Then What Else Is He Making Up?
May 5, 2012 byGary DeMar

A Huffington Post article asks, “Why Is Everyone Talking About Obama’s Composite Girlfriend?” Good question. In Obama’s autobiographical book Dreams from My Father, he describes an affair that he had with a white woman who he describes as his “New York girlfriend.” That’s not the real story. The real story is that Obama created a “composite” woman who he passed off as one woman.

Dreams from My Father was published in 1995. In the book he tells readers that the storyline contains “composites.” So how do we know what’s true or made up? Is a composite an accurate accounting of a person’s life? I don’t think it is. How hard can it be to describe events as they happened?

As usual, the leftist media have come to Obama’s defense. “He told us right in the book that some of the events were compressed into ‘composite’ stories. It’s no big deal,” media supporters of Obama are telling us.

You might recall the controversy surrounding the author James Frey. Frey appeared with Oprah in 2006 where they discussed his book A Million Little Pieces (2003). Investigators later “discovered that major elements of A Million Little Pieces, a purportedly autobiographical account of the author’s struggle with addiction, were untrue.” The difference, of course, is that Frey didn’t tell anybody about the fabrications. If he had, he wouldn’t have gotten to sit down with the Queen of daytime talk. The point is, people don’t like to be lied to even if they’re being told up from that what’s coming is not true.

The media have been diligent in keeping Obama’s ties to radicals under journalistic lock and key, treating them like they’re the secret Coke formula. There are significant questions about Obama’s background that only trickle out from alternative news sites. In January of this year, White House press secretary Jay Carney was asked why President Obama hasn’t released his college transcripts. He dodged the question.

A good amount of ink was spilled over Rick Perry’s college transcripts when it was learned that he was a C student at Texas A&M. Liberals saw this as a disqualification for a presidential candidate. At least we had the governor’s transcripts. George Bush’s transcripts were released by The New Yorker in November 1999, a year before the election. We shouldn’t forget the media frenzy over Bush’s National Guard records.

An organization called The Trenches “is offering a $10,000 reward to anyone who can provide an authentic copy of President Barack Obama’s course transcripts from his days at Occidental College, Harvard University or Columbia University.”

The media pundits know all about the “composite Obama.” His own book told them that he had things to hide. They don’t want us to know. They need Obama to bring down America.


If Obama Made This Up, Then What Else Is He Making Up? - Godfather Politics | Digg Politics

guess his birth certificate is a composite as well???? The composite President

The Huffington Post has anointed Sen. Marco Rubio as the Republican Vice Presidential candidate this November.

Originally Posted by Bill Schneider for the Huffington Post

Psssst... Marco Rubio Will Be on the Ticket

Posted: 08/29/11 11:50 AM ET

The Republican race for President is wide open. But the party has already settled on its vice presidential nominee: freshman Sen. Marco Rubio.

Rubio spoke at the Reagan Library last week at the personal invitation of Nancy Reagan. During his speech, he remarked, "The reality is, I'm not going to be the vice presidential nominee..." At which point a man in the audience shouted, "Wanna bet?" The audience responded with whoops and cheers.

If you asked a computer to design the perfect Republican candidate for vice president, it would come up with Rubio. He's got three big things going for him. He's a Tea Party favorite. He's Latino. And he's from Florida.

Plus a few smaller things. He's young (40 years old). He's the son of working-class immigrants. He's an impressive speaker. He's close to former Florida Governor Jeb Bush. In last year's Senate race, he defeated popular incumbent governor Charlie Crist (in fact, he drove Crist out of the Republican Party).

Then there's the 2012 Republican convention. It will be held in Tampa, Florida, where Rubio is certain to give a prime-time speech. When's the last time a prime-time convention speech propelled an obscure political figure into national stardom? That would be Barack Obama in 2004. And the time before that? John F. Kennedy in 1956.

There are some potential negatives, of course. Rubio doesn't have much of a legislative record even though he served in the Florida House of Representatives for nine years, two of them as Speaker. There are some lingering controversies over his financial records. And he's Cuban-American, not Mexican-American.

Cuban-Americans are only three percent of the nation's Latino population. Because they come from a communist country, Cuban-Americans enjoy a privileged immigration status. Like most Tea Party Republicans, Rubio takes a tough line on illegal immigration. That has opened him up to criticism from some Latino activists.

Continued at Bill Schneider: Psssst... Marco Rubio Will Be on the Ticket

Comments are closed for this entry

The U.S. Constitution, Art. ii, § 1, ¶ 5, states. "No person except a natural born Citizen... shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Sen. Marco Rubio was born in the U.S., but his parents were not U.S. citizens at the time of his birth.

Therefore, he is a native-born citizen, but not a natural-born Citizen, one born in the country to parents who are citizens.

{See U.S. Supreme Court decisions Minor v. Happersett (1875); The Venus (1814); Shanks v. DuPont (1830); and U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark (1898 ), in which Justice Gray quoted Minor.}

However, to thwart enforcement of the Constitution concerning Mr. Obama after his departure from office, TPTB absolutely must have a similarly ineligible candidate in the next administration, lest that administration be obliged to throw the whole sorry lot of complicit U.S. Judges, Representatives, and Senators into prison at Fort Leavenworth.

Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC

The Huffington Post has anointed Sen. Marco Rubio as the Republican Vice Presidential candidate this November.

The U.S. Constitution, Art. ii, § 1, ¶ 5, states. "No person except a natural born Citizen... shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Sen. Marco Rubio was born in the U.S., but his parents were not U.S. citizens at the time of his birth.

Therefore, he is a native-born citizen, but not a natural-born Citizen, one born in the country to parents who are citizens.

{See U.S. Supreme Court decisions Minor v. Happersett (1875); The Venus (1814); Shanks v. DuPont (1830); and U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark (1898 ), in which Justice Gray quoted Minor.}

However, to thwart enforcement of the Constitution concerning Mr. Obama after his departure from office, TPTB absolutely must have a similarly ineligible candidate in the next administration, lest that administration be obliged to throw the whole sorry lot of complicit U.S. Judges, Representatives, and Senators into prison at Fort Leavenworth.

There is only one choice Ron Paul!!!!

Obama's Conn. Social Security Number hits Rush

Caller on talk show warns of president's mysterious red flags

Published: 4 hours ago
by Joe Kovacs

Rush Limbaugh, the nation’s top-rated radio talk-show host, briefly brought up the issue of Barack Obama’s potentially criminal use of a Connecticut-based Social Security Number, since the president has never lived in the Constitution State.

While speaking with a caller named Rob about Obama’s alleged deception of citizens, Limbaugh tossed out the question: “What are your thoughts on the fact Obama’s Social Security Number is from Connecticut and he’s never been there?”

Rob responded, “That’s what you call a red flag. A red flag is also, ‘First of all, I don’t need to give you my birth certificate,’ and then finally, ‘I’ll give you a copy,’ Oh, that’s a modern copy … We don’t need copies, we need originals.”

Rob continued, “How about releasing all of your college papers and let’s see what you really thought about America when you were in college? He’s deceiving us.”
“That’s true,” said Limbaugh. “They don’t want [us] to see what those term papers, doctoral theses and so forth actually were about, nor do they want us to see the grades. They don’t want us to see the grades.”

Rob had originally focused on Obama’s birth certificate, which Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio has investigated and believes is a likely forgery.

Find out all there is to know about Obama’s Connecticut Social Security Number in Jerome Corsi’s “Where’s the Birth Certificate,” both in hardcover and an additional ebook.

And we also have the results of Sheriff Joe’s probe into Obama’s birth certificate!

“He says he was born in the United States,” said Rob. “He has not shown a genuine, authentic, viable, verifiable – in order to authenticate any document, you need to have the original.”

“Now wait just a second,” said Limbaugh. “They did release a birth certificate. Even Donald Trump said he’s satisfied with it.”

“The original? But a copy of anything you can’t be satisfied. You have to actually examine the original. … In order to have an expert authenticate it, you can’t go by a copy.

You actually have to go by the ink on the paper, as well as many other things.”

An audio clip of today’s Rush Limbaugh program concerning this topic has been posted on YouTube:



Obama’s Social Security Number was not discussed again in today’s radio exchange, but its mention is notable because few members of the national media have treaded near that subject.

As WND reported last August, Obama’s possibly criminal use of a Connecticut-based Social Security Number should become an important issue in his quest for re-election in 2012, said Alan Keyes, a former presidential candidate and ambassador in Ronald Reagan’s administration.

The first three digits of Obama’s SSN are 042. That code falls within the range of numbers for Connecticut, which according to the Social Security Administration has been 040 through 049.

“I believe that when you are confronted with a situation that is filled with these kinds of – what shall we call them – anomalies, disparities, it is reasonable common sense to want to try to get straight answers,” said Keyes.

“If you’re trying to ascertain whether or not somebody ought to be sitting with, as they used to say, their finger on the button of nuclear weapons that can blow up the world, their power extending to decisions that can collapse our economy, their influence extending to areas that can destroy the standards and moral conscience of our people in the eyes of the world, I think you might want to know who they were. It might be a good idea!”

Keyes’ comments came during an online interview with Stan Solomon, as he addressed an issue that has been avoided by the White House and almost completely ignored by national news agencies.

“Let’s say that you’re trying to establish someone’s identity for the purposes of an investigation and you come across a Social Security Number that has that person coming from a state that all the other records of their life indicate they’ve never been to,” Keyes explained.

“I think you would look at that as an anomaly that suggests, among other things, that you better probe a little harder to make sure that the identity that you’re dealing with is a real identity – that it’s not something that’s been in some sense fabricated for some particular purpose, because one of the things you want to do if you’re tracking somebody down is make sure you’re tracking them down, not following some phony figment down to dead ends. That’s common sense.”

2nd video: Dr. Alan Keyes Discusses Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number.- 8/9/11 - YouTube


Keyes thinks there are many Americans who are aware of this Social Security Number mystery and simply can’t understand why it’s not being addressed.

“Is it incompetence? Is it cowardice?” he asks rhetorically. “Is it just indifference and nonchalance of this elite in the courts and in politics, in the Congress and elsewhere?”
Steve Davis, police chief for Southport, Ind., was a co-host on the program, chiming in, “If anyone believes Barack Obama is gonna make an identity-theft commercial soon, forget it. It’s not gonna happen.”

Keyes then went on a scathing indictment of the current crop of political candidates and their apparent unwillingness to take on the issue.

“You know there’s hardly a one of them had the guts to stand forward and speak truly to the issues that are raised by these anomalies and to address the constitutional issues that are involved in [presidential] eligibility,” he said.

“And that, it seems to me, is a big strike against you because at the end of the day if you’re not willing to respect the requirements of integrity with regard to the most potently damaging office that it is in the gift of the American people to give, then I guess you’re willing to misinform and lie to them about just about anything. Because if you don’t care whether their vote for president – the most important vote they cast – can be cast with integrity, then you don’t care whether they’re represented or not.”

Keyes continued: “I know very few – I don’t care which party label they wear – who have had respect for the people, the respect for the Constitution, the respect for the requirements of real and true representation and choice in our elections to stand forward and deal with these matters forthrightly. They’ve allowed folks like myself and others who are outside the purview of government to kind of just twist in the wind. First they called us names and then they tried to tear us down, and as the facts and other things became evident and more and more people lined up, now they’re just silent and cowering in some dark corner, unable to voice their shame. And I think that’s where they belong, most of them.”

In June 2010, WND’s Washington correspondent, Les Kinsolving, asked former Obama Press Secretary Robert Gibbs specifically why Obama had a Connecticut-based SSN despite not having lived there, but Gibbs completely dodged the question and changed the subject, lamenting about inquiries over Obama’s birth certificate.

3rd Video: Robert Gibbs Is Asked About Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number.flv - YouTube

“There is obviously a case of fraud going on here,” said private investigator Susan Daniels. “In 15 years of having a private investigator’s license in Ohio, I’ve never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly.”

Just this week, a California lawyer who has been leading the legal effort to probe Obama’s SSN made some progress in Hawaii.

As WND reported, attorney Orly Taitz secured an order from United States District Court Magistrate Judge Richard L. Puglisi demanding representatives of the Hawaii Department of Health appear in federal court Sept. 14 to show why Taitzshould be prevented from seeing whatever original 1961 documents theagency has on record regarding Barack Obama’s birth.

To date, most national media have refused to even mention the question of Obama’s possibly fraudulent Social Security Number.

On April 27, 2011, the day Obama released a scanned image of what he claims to be his long-form birth certificate from Hawaii, MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell angrily shouted down California attorney Orly Taitz to prevent her from exposing on national television what she claims is Obama’s Social Security crime:

4th video: Taitz Thrown Off MSNBC For Bringing Up Obama's Social Security Number - YouTube

Also in April of last year, some 11 months after WND began publicizing Obama’s Connecticut-based SSN, Bill O’Reilly of the Fox News Channel briefly addressed the issue while reading his viewer mail on the air.

Unfortunately for O’Reilly, the news anchor falsely asserted the president’s father lived in Connecticut.

In his viewer email segment April 13, 2011, O’Reilly was asked: “What about Obama having a Connecticut Social Security Number? He never lived there.”

“His father lived in Connecticut for several years,” O’Reilly claimed, adding that “babies sometimes get numbers based on addresses provided by their parents.”

In reality, there is no evidence Barack Obama Sr. ever lived in Connecticut. He left Hawaii in 1962 to study at Harvard in Massachusetts and then returned to his home country of Kenya.

When WND publicized O’Reilly’s major error, the information vanished from the Fox News Channel’s website, as well as BillOReilly.com.

O’Reilly’s full explanation of the “truth” of Obama “myths” is here:

5th video: O'Reilly Lying About Obama's Social Security Number Fraud - 4/13/11 - YouTube

The BirtherReport.com website, responding to complaints by Fox podcast customers that O’Reilly’s Social Security claim, broadcast on Fox, had gone missing from the audio archive, trumpeted the headline: “Busted: Fox News scrubbed Bill O’Reilly’s 4/13 mailbag segment on Obama’s Social Security Number reserved for Connecticut applicants.” The site added, “Not only did Fox News scrub the podcast, they also left out the viewer email about Obama’s Social Security number at O’Reilly’s website. I report, you decide!”

Obama’s Conn. Social Security Number hits Rush

We do not have a valid Social Security No. application for Barack Obama II. Certain Obamapologists intuit a possible clerical error at the Social Security Administration, one of misreading ZIP Code "96826" as "06826", or "96814" as "06814", resulting in Barack Obama II being assigned a Connecticut Social Security number, an SSN beginning with 040 through 049.

However, we cannot inspect any such hypothetical Social Security No. application for Barack Obama II in order to check the ZIP Code. About 39 Social Security numbers are known to be linked to Barack Obama II's name and/or address. To the best of my limited knowledge, none is a valid SSN for Barack Obama II, none matches his name in an e-Verify check, and none was issued to him by the SSA . . . AFAIK. Therefore, any SSN application which led to the issue of any of these 39 SSNs bears a name other than Barack Obama II; and any SSN application which does bear the name of Barack Obama II points to yet another occult or buried SSN on top of the 39 SSNs he has which do not belong to him . . . or else such an Obama SSN application, yet to be revealed to the suspecting public, is totally bogus on the face of it.

Without an SSN application submitted before his first employment, his 1978 summer job at the Baskin-Robbins at 1633 King St. in Honolulu, the closest document for handwriting analysis is his Selective Service registration form. It was purportedly submitted two years later, but it bears an altered U.S.P.O. stamp (U.S.P.O. became U.S.P.S. in 1970) with a faked year ("08" rotated 180° and missing the "19"). Fake or not, it's all we've got showing how he wrote "9" on the ZIP Code line. The Social Security No. (#3) was redacted.



"80", or "90" with an "8" typed over the "9"?

1. On the above form provided by the Selective Service System in response to an FOIA request, the "9" in the ZIP Code is very legible and unmistakable, not readable as a "0" by an impartial observer under normal circumstances.

2. For the Hawaii ZIP Code provided, "96826", there is no corresponding Connecticut ZIP Code, "06826".

3. One could conceivably use "96814", a Honolulu, Hawaii, ZIP Code, nearby but not for 1617 S. Beretania Ave., to muddle through to "06814", a Danbury, Connecticut, ZIP Code. But "96814" for 1617 S. Beretania Ave. on a hypothetical SSN application in 1978 is not what was written on the above Selective Service registration form, purportedly from 1980. "96814" is more likely an Obamapologist fabrication pulled out of thin air, selected for reasons known only to the Obafabricator. In 1978, a USPS ZIP Code lookup of Beretania Ave. in Honolulu, Hawaii, might conceivably have returned "96814", but verification with a USPS lookup makes it all the less likely that the SSA clerk might have transcribed "06814" by mistake.

4. The enormous computer database at the Social Security Administration in Baltimore would surely have included a ZIP Code reasonableness test that would have kicked out "06814" as an invalid entry for Honolulu, HI. Now, there is always the possibility that the clerk intentionally typed "Honolulu, CT 06814" - thinking, of course, in 1980 that this would be the future President of the United States, and that he would surely need an SSN which indicated an established residence in one of the original 13 states, the Constitution State, instead of an SSN for a residence in Hawaii, only 21 years a state. But we shall leave such strawman conjectures to diehard Obots.

No matter how one explains away Mr. Obama's Social Security No. beginning with "042", he is linked to 38 other equally inexplicable Social Security numbers, and his mother, Stanley Ann Soetoro, also used numerous Social Security numbers not issued to her. The reasonable, logical, and obvious explanation for every one of these many instances of identity theft is that his grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, worked as a volunteer in the Honolulu Co. Judge of Probate Office. There Mrs. Dunham had easy access to thousands of Social Security numbers assigned to people from all over the country who had died in Honolulu Co..

Those numbers would never be used again, and the Social Security accounts were probably closed or soon would be. No one would ever submit a conflicting claim to use of such a number, and the identity thief did not have to use the number for employment purposes. All of that minimized his risk of being caught by the SSA. The perfect crime? We shall see.

WWW.IFORGEDOBAMASBIRTHCERTIFICATES.COM

Impeachment: The Obvious Answer to Obama Dictatorship

Posted on February 15, 2014

There are lots of problems with this. Most important being that we don’t have enough conservatives in DC at the moment.
Check it out:
The case for impeaching and removing President Obama grows stronger each week, as the president continues to violate the constitutional limits on his executive powers. His latest move in delaying the enforcement of yet another part of Obamacare should be article 20 in a bill of indictable offenses against the Constitution.
Citizens of all persuasions and parties should take encouragement in the fact that impeachment is fast becoming a respectable topic of debate even in the mainstream media. Of course, it is usually discussed with the disclaimer that it is a practical impossibility with Democrats in control of the Senate.
That Beltway conventional wisdom will soon change as Republican control of the Senate in 2015 becomes increasingly likely. But what Republicans do not yet understand is that the call for impeachment can be a winning issue in gaining control of the Senate in the November elections.
The rising tide of public opposition to Obamacare may soon be reinforced by a rising tide of demand for Obama’s removal before he can do any more damage to our liberties and our national security. In fact, the steady decline in Obama’s approval rating – now at about 39 percent – is due as much to the growing public awareness of his arrogant disregard for the Constitution as it is to disillusionment with Obamacare.

Continue Reading on www.wnd.com ...


Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2014/02/...7qI8zwOWDKh.99

Today's Politically Incorrect Laugh:
(Click to Enlarge)

www.wnd.com/2014/02/impeachment-the-obvious-answer-to-obama-dictatorship/

While a trial of impeachment is a non-starter in the Democratically-controlled Senate, impeachment by the House can be effective, if it involves a no-holds-barred, official House Investigation, which would make official much or most of what has already been uncovered and laid bare.

Even without a vote to impeach in the House or a trial of impeachment in the Senate, the official findings of a House Investigation would make Mr. Obama's Constitutional ineligibility to the Presidency a matter of both public record and judicial record, officially recognized by a competent governing authority with legal jurisdiction.

Even without a vote in the House or a trial in the Senate, a House Investigation publicly exposing Mr. Obama as a fraudulent, ineligible usurper would so cripple his power to rule and delegitimize his authority to govern that he would have to step down, just as public exposure by reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein forced then-Pres. Richard M. Nixon to resign, on Aug. 9, 1974. Reporters could do that then because Nixon was a Republican. Yet Mr. Obama's fraudulent usurpation of the Presidency is a far, far greater crime than Watergate.

About that "Impeach Obama!" bumper sticker...

Just the one word "Impeach!" is quite sufficient, yet discrete enough to park the car in WDC or Chicago's South Side. Would you expect anyone who is able to read "Impeach!" to think, "Impeach WHOM?" - or even, "Impeach WHO?"

KNUS: Obama's Forged Birth Certificate; Selective Service Card; Media Blackout
Posted: 19 Feb 2014 10:59 AM PST

WOBC Founder: Obama's Forged Birth Certificate;
Connecticut Social Security Number; Media Blackout

AUDIO HERE:
( Audio via Peter Boyles @ 710-KNUS )

Peter Boyles' Website: www.710knus.com/peterboyles

Mike Volin's Website: www.wheresobamasbirthcertificate.com



KNUS: Obama's Forged Birth Certificate; Selective Service Card; Media Blackout

WOBC Founder: Obama's Forged Birth Certificate;

Connecticut Social Security Number; Media Blackout

AUDIO HERE:

( Audio via Peter Boyles @ 710-KNUS )

Peter Boyles' Website: www.710knus.com/peterboyles

Mike Volin's Website: www.wheresobamasbirthcertificate.com

RELATED:

Mike Volin on Live Now

“WHO IS BARACK OBAMA?”

By Sharon Rondeau | The Post & Email

(Feb. 19, 2014) — Mike Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com is on live now with radio show host Peter Boyles of KNUS.

The website is not functioning well, but the show can be heard here.

At 8:07 a.m. EST, Volin has given the history of his website and quest to find more information about Barack Hussein Obama, who has obscured his background through design.

Volin thanked Mike Zullo of the Maricopa County, AZ Cold Case Posse for conducting the criminal investigation into Obama’s long-form birth certificate which was posted on the White House website on April 27, 2011 but quickly declared a forgery by experts.

Volin’s “Sheriff’s Kits” contain the presentation Zullo gave to the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers’ Association (CSPOA) last May.

In November, Volin and a team of volunteers visited Congress to distribute approximately 200 kits and give presentations to inform chiefs of staff, aides and in some cases, the congressmen themselves, of the findings of the posse.

Volin commented to Boyles that members of Congress are “scared” to tackle the issue of the forgery. Boyles responded that he has heard that “everybody knows the story is not straight,” meaning Congress.

Boyles asked Volin why no one in the media will “step forward” and expose the fraud. Volin responded that confidential information was shared between Zullo and Volin’s congressman during a presentation, who failed to act on it. Rather, the congressman countered that “We think he’s [Obama] is an American.”

Boyles then mentioned the Social Security number apparently issued in the state of Connecticut which Obama is reportedly using, although he never lived or worked in the state. His life story says he was born in Hawaii, not Connecticut.

The posse also found that Obama’s purported Selective Service registration form to be fraudulent.

Boyles asked if current citizen investigators could hold “a symposium” and produce a set of conclusions about the forgery and inconsistencies in Obama’s background. Boyles said he believes that Obama attended university as a foreign student and became “politically active” in Chicago, hypothesizing that Obama was found to not have a valid Social Security number.

One of Obama’s acquaintances from Chicago, former domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, stated in his book that he became an expert at creating false identities using birth certificates from deceased children and then obtaining Social Security numbers.

Boyles does not believe the Atty. Judith Corley delivered certified copies of Obama’s birth certificate to the White House as has been reported in the news. “Why would she fly all the way to Hawaii to pick up a PDF file?” Boyles asked, as he did when he interviewed Linda Jordan on February 13.

At 8:28 a.m., following a commercial break, Boyles described Volin as “a wonderful guest.”

At 8:31 a.m., Boyles stated that the investigation into Obama’s background has expanded and “there is a generally acceptance…that this guy’s story is not straight,” meaning Obama. He then asked Volin what he thinks about Obama’s “life story.”

Volin hypothesized that Obama might not want the public “to know his real father” or his “communist” connections. He stated that by going to Congress, he “did it the old-fashioned way” by visiting in person and “knocking on doors.”

Volin graciously thanked The Post & Email at 8:33 a.m. for its work on the Obama eligibility/identity issue.

Regarding his Sheriff’s Kits, Volin said “I have doctors calling me and asking for 20 copies.” He said that Obamacare is slashing work hours and that people are “getting angry” about Obama’s actions, which then translate to their looking harder at the questions surrounding Obama.

In response to Boyles’s question about an announcement from the Cold Case Posse next month, Volin responded that new information will be released, perhaps in “the middle of March,” and that prosecutions will follow. In December, Tea Party Power Hour host and citizen researcher Mark Gillar had announced the same in a video sent to The Post & Email.

Boyles raised the question of Frank Marshall Davis and the time Obama might have spent with him if reports by Joel Gilbert of “Where’s Obama’s Real Birth Certificate?” are accurate. Gilbert theorizes that Davis is Obama’s biological father.

Boyles then raised the specter of Obama’s alleged connections to Islamic terrorism which involve his half-brother, Malik.

Volin said that “We just don’t know” who Obama is.

“Hold on; it will happen,” Volin said, in regard to the new information expected to be released.

Volin then invited Boyles on his radio show, WheresObamasBirthCertificate, on Blog Talk Radio.

Update, 8:53 a.m. EST: Mike Volin contacted The Post & Email following his appearance on the show and can report that he is “working on more exciting things which will be announced in the near future.”

Source link. © 2014, The Post & Email. All rights reserved.

Aug. 9, 2011 - Dr. Alan Keyes discussed Mr. Obama's use of a Social Security number which was issued to a Connecticut resident, Harrison (Harry) J. Bounel (b. 1890, d. 1977). Dr. Keyes decried the unworthiness or uselessness of pols who shy away from the issue of Mr. Obama's Constitutional ineligibility for office, not being a natural born Citizen,.

A natural born Citizen is one born in the country of parents who were citizens, as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett (1875), the interpretation of nbC confirmed as controlling by the U.S. Supreme Court in Wong Kim Ark (1898 ).

Originally Posted by Dr. Alan Keyes

If you're not willing to respect the requirements of integrity with regard to the most potently damaging office that it is in the gift of the American people to give, then I guess you're willing to misinform and lie to them about just about anything. 'Cause if you don't care whether their vote for President, the most important vote they cast, can be cast with integrity, then you don't care whether they're represented or not.

Originally Posted by Chief (of Police?) Steve Davis on "The Talk to Solomon Show LIVE" at CPNLive.com

If anyone believes that Barack Obama is gonna make an identity theft commercial any time soon, forget it. It's not gonna happen.