Results 1 to 3 of 3
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: The reason for this illegal immigration scare

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012

    The reason for this illegal immigration scare

    The reason for this illegal immigration scare

    Dr. Joel McDurmon
    Aug 11, 2014

    All I’ve heard about the recent illegal immigration hype is that Obama is orchestrating this to bring about amnesty and to flood the U.S. with new Democrats. Well, it is orchestrated, but not for the reasons you may be led to believe. Specific Answers has a great article exposing an inconvenient statistic that you won’t hear in any of the news media—liberal or neocon alike. The facts are these: 1) this is not news, because not much has really changed statistically; 2) Obama is doing nothing but continuing W’s trend of reduced arrests; 3) The toughest level of border enforcement occurred under a recent Democrat, Clinton; and 4) This is really nothing more than a scare tactic to bring about—not amnesty—but national ID cards. Conservatives may be vulnerable enough on this issue enough to fall for it. Conservatives think they are making Obama look bad on this issue. They are doing nothing but setting themselves up for a trap.
    Moreover, you won’t believe what I dug up that predicted all of this . . . in 1983! More on that in a moment.

    First, some facts. Gary North posted this articlelast Wednesday. A U.S. Border Patrol charthighlighted by CNSNews.com shows the stats for arrests of illegal aliens since 1992. The fact is that apprehensions rose to a peak under Bill Clinton. They fell drastically in 2000 and trended strongly downward during W’s administration. Since then, Obama only continued W’s trend, though he did increase arrests slighty since 2011.


    The points here are as I said. The recent “flood” of illegal immigrants across the border is not news. It has been steady with steadily fewer arrests since 2000.

    So why has the media all of the sudden alarmed and panicked the public with this out of nowhere? Why? Because the powers that be want to finish off their agenda with the REAL ID Act—that is, a national ID card. Here’s what North reveals, and what the media says nothing about:

    I cite the Wikipedia article on The REAL ID Act. It’s the law. It has been for nine years.

    The REAL ID Act of 2005, Pub.L. 109–13, 119 Stat. 302, enacted May 11, 2005, was an Act of Congress that modified U.S. federal law pertaining to security, authentication, and issuance procedures standards for the state driver’s licenses and identification (ID) cards, as well as various immigration issues pertaining to terrorism.

    The law sets forth requirements for state driver’s licenses and ID cards to be accepted by the federal government for “official purposes”, as defined by the Secretary of Homeland Security. The Secretary of Homeland Security has currently defined “official purposes” as presenting state driver’s licenses and identification cards for boarding commercially operated airline flights and entering federal buildings and nuclear power plants.

    The Social Security card has functioned as an ID card for decades. I am old enough to have a card that says on the front: “NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION.” From the beginning, defenders of civil liberties saw the threat. The card is now widely used for identification purposes.

    The SS card is not current. Driver’s licenses are. So, the DHS is attempting to create a federal ID card that is tied to state driver’s licenses. The goal is to get the federal camel’s nose into the privacy tent. The DHS is encountering resistance.

    The REAL ID Act implements the following:

    Title II of the act establishes new federal standards for state-issued driver licenses and non-driver identification cards.

    Changing visa limits for temporary workers, nurses, and Australian citizens.

    Funding some reports and pilot projects related to border security.

    Introducing rules covering “delivery bonds” (similar to bail bonds but for aliens who have been released pending hearings).

    Updating and tightening the laws on application for asylum and deportation of aliens for terrorist activity.

    Waiving laws that interfere with construction of physical barriers at the borders
    Unlike the vast majority of federal laws, this one created widespread resistance. Half of the states have resisted or have refused to participate. This has thwarted the DHS.

    But Why now? Because the Act has a looming deadline:

    The DHS has a timetable for implementing this law. The Wikipedia article is clear about this timetable.

    On December 20, 2013, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security announced that implementation of Phase 1 would begin on January 20, 2014, which followed a yearlong period of “deferred enforcement”. As of January 2014, 21 states are compliant, 20 states and territories have been granted renewable extensions (until October 10, 2014), and 15 states and territories are noncompliant (but are eligible for extensions).

    Let me ask the obvious question: When did the publicity begin about this “tidal wave of immigration”? When did the headlines begin?
    Hint: not in 2013.

    This is an orchestrated event. Watch for “relief” from the “wave of immigration” — formal calls for the acceptance and implementation of the REAL ID law.

    For any specific destruction of our liberties, the destroyer knows exactly what weak spot to target in order to get voters to succumb. In this case, the illegal immigrant angle will be played up and hyped beyond measure, and conservatives will squeal and not be able to line up fast enough to demand National ID cards. This is the destroyer’s hope and plan anyway.

    I recommend you read the rest of North’s article to learn more about how the REAL ID Act will destroy your privacy and freedom, if there is not continued resistance and repeal.

    But just in case you think this is all too conspiratorial, convenient, coincidental, tangential, or whatever—I want you to consider what was predicted over 30 years ago precisely in regard to these two issues: orchestrated illegal immigration “scares” and National ID cards:
    Another problem is looming. In early 1982, I spoke with Prof. Lewis Tambs, who is a specialist in Latin American history at Arizona State University in Tempe. (I must add that he is now the American ambassador to Columbia, and he has not repeated his opinion publicly since joining the government.) He pointed out that a traditional tactic of the Communists is to destabilize a society and then encourage refugees to flee to a nearby country. This destabilizes the recipient nation. The next step is obvious. Destabilize nations close to the United States.

    Where are the most likely candidates today? In Central America. They are being helped by Mexico, at least to the extent that “free zones” appear to be established for the Marxists to use as bases (as in Cambodia before 1970). . . .

    Tambs does not claim to be a prophet, but he thinks that 3 million to 5 million refugees from Latin America could come across the U.S. border over the next five years [1983–1988], if panic hits Mexico. To counter this sort of threat, Sen. Simpson of Wyoming [Republican] has introduced a bill to issue “worker identity cards,” which every person must show to an employer before being hired. . . .
    In terms of lost civil liberties and the growth of Federal bureaucratic power, a National Identity Card would be a national disaster. It sounds like something out of Nazi-controlled Europe or the Soviet Union today. But it may well be accepted without serious protests if people get scared by headlines about the “Latin peril,” and they forget about the real peril, “bureaucracy peril.”

    Same issues 31 years ago as today. Same agenda: reduce freedom in America. It gets even more specific, and even more relevant to todays “headlines”:

    A wave of illegal immigrants will bring diseases with them, possibly mosquito-born [sic] diseases. The threat of malaria and even the ultimate killer, yellow fever, will increase.

    Influxes of infectious disease get people’s attention real quick.

    But let’s be smart. The main reasons such an influx will be a threat is because of the already-existing welfare state, and worse, the already-existing mentality among American voters who cannot think outside of the welfare state or its custodians—the police state. The call is for greater “security,” which means more bureaucracy and more police-state controls. The analysis continues:

    What should be done about illegal aliens? First, require proof of immunization, or require those without proof to be immunized. Second, abolish the minimum wage law. Third, abolish all public welfare programs. Fourth, abolish the requirement that the children of illegal aliens be required to attend schools at taxpayers’ expense. Just let them work, at whatever wage they can get. In short, let them enjoy the freedom that we all want. But our home-grown socialist programs have made a threat out of those who are willing to work. Our great[-great]-grandparents were welcomed, or at least tolerated, because there was no American welfare State in the nineteenth century.
    These subtleties will be lost on voters, should such a wave of refugees hit this nation. . . . The inability of the welfare State to deal with these immigrants so far has been obvious. What if we get millions of them? The free market will not be tried; they will not be absorbed by the legal labor markets; and the populists will be in hog heaven.

    . . . If there were no State welfare costs, and there were a true free market for labor, what would be the problem? Cheap labor is as valuable to buyers as cheap anything else. As advertisers love to ask, “Why pay more?” Unfortunately, I fear that a lot of conservatives will be yelling for some sort of freedom-denying “national identity card.” Socialist, welfare State legislation has made immigrants a threat to economic stability, not the immigrants themselves. So let’s abolish welfare State restrictions, not adopt a national identity work card. Let’s blame the problem, not potential economic assets.

    Voters will demand order. They will not live in anarchy. The Marxists and other late-nineteenth-century revolutionaries understood this. They promoted anarchism, assassination, and terrorism in order to force the State into repression, which in turn was supposed to lead to the great revolution of the masses. What it led to was more police bureaucracy, reduced civil liberties, and (in Russia) a far worse bureaucracy after the promised revolution.

    This is all from Gary North’s book The Last Train Out, published in 1983, pages 131–133.

    The REAL ID Act was introduced in January 2005 by a Republican congressman, Jim Sensenbrenner, who is also famous as the architect of the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001. The REAL ID Act was introduced under the guise of fighting terrorism by requiring stringent certification of citizenship for state drivers licenses. Gotta keep terrorists from immigrating and traveling among us. The bill had 140 cosponsors, mostly Republicans, including Todd Akin, Eric Cantor, Phil Gingrey, Paul Ryan, and many more. The bill passed the House 261-161 along mainly partisan lines, but was later attached as an appendix to an $85 billion Emergency “Global War on Terror” Spending bill to make its passage appear even more unified. It was not debated at all on the floor of the Senate. It ended up passing the Senate 99-0, and the final version passed in the House 368-58.

    President George W. Bush signed the REAL ID Act into law on May 11, 2005. In that same year, the trend for reducing arrests of illegal immigrants started back downward on essentially the same percentage of decline which Obama has continued.

    What is coming? A flood of new Democrats? Maybe. But much more likely is a tidal wave of propaganda aimed at scaring you into the need for further reduced freedom—a nation ID card. Just listen to what is already planned with the REAL ID:

    There are four planned phases, three of which apply to areas that affect relatively few U.S. citizens—e.g., DHS headquarters, nuclear power plants, and restricted and semi-restricted federal facilities. The timeline for Phase 4, which applies to boarding federally regulated commercial aircraft, will be determined after DHS conducts an evaluation of how the first three phases were implemented. To “ensure that the public has ample advanced [sic] notice”, DHS says that Phase 4 will not be implemented before January 1, 2016.
    Phase 1 has already been resisted in several states. The government has backed off and given these states a “renewable extension” for “deferred enforcement.” These expire on October 2014. This is why the tidal wave of headlines has hit now: to spook the public, especially conservatives.

    Notice how the progression is planned: the first phases don’t affect many people. Many people should not have squealed—although they did. This is good. DHS is trying to coax them along over time. But the last phase will affect everyone who gets on a commercial airplane. Without softening up—i.e. frightening—the public, such a step will not go over well. We have already with some success caused them to back off of the earlier phases. DHS itself has said it will only implement the last phase based upon how well they can achieve compliance with the earlier, easier phases. This will come “no sooner than 2016.”

    But in their minds, it will come. And the massive attempts at propaganda will continue, because they will be necessary. I think they will certainly increase, especially toward that latter phase. I would not be surprised at all to see national headlines hyped with a new terror event with an airline as we approach that 2016 deadline. It could be another “event” like an “underwear bomber,” or it could possibly be something more major. I am not predicting this, but I would not be surprised by it. And such an event will be used to press for final implementation of such policy, and probably more.

    For now, the crisis du jour is a flood of illegal immigrants from Central America, carrying disease, and who will eventually vote Democrat.

    This is designed to scare conservative voters and herd them toward a common goal. The agenda for the REAL ID Act is perfectly consistent with this goal. The process has been predictable since at least 1983. It is even more predictable now.
    It’s time to go beyond partial resistance. We need mass awareness and mass resistance not only to withstand this, but to push to get it repealed. In this effort, we must withstand the propaganda and scare tactics carefully designed to hit us where we fear the most. Stand, don’t fold.

    http://americanvision.org/11180/the-...on-scare11180/

    [/COLOR]

  2. #2
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012
    A Flood of Teenage Immigrants? The DHS's Solution: ID Card Compliance

    Gary North - August 06, 2014
    This was posted yesterday on one of my GaryNorth.com site's forums.
    You seem to have little to say about the illegal immigration issue unfolding on our southern border. Do you have any information why this is occurring now? Do you have any thoughts on how it should be dealt with and why?First, I invoke Franklin Roosevelt's law of politics: "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way."

    Second, the story has two halves: outside the USA and inside. We need to consider both in order to make sense of either.
    Third, immigration arrests were down by 75%, FY 2000 to FY 2013.



    Fourth, the media are focusing on a small component of this immigration this year: immigration from Central America. It's up this year to about 204,000. With three months to go until the end of fiscal 2014, this might hit 250,000.

    There is not a word from the Border Patrol on immigration from Mexico in FY 2014. There is also not a word on former immigrants from Mexico who are returning to Mexico. This has increased since 2000. Net immigration from Mexico has been close to zero for a decade.

    Fifth, the lure is the hope of amnesty. If they can get on this side of the Mexican border, they may be allowed to stay.

    My subscriber wants to know "Why now?" I'll tell you why now.

    1. INSIDE THE USA

    I cite the Wikipedia article on The REAL ID Act. It's the law. It has been for nine years.

    The REAL ID Act of 2005, Pub.L. 109--13, 119 Stat. 302, enacted May 11, 2005, was an Act of Congress that modified U.S. federal law pertaining to security, authentication, and issuance procedures standards for the state driver's licenses and identification (ID) cards, as well as various immigration issues pertaining to terrorism.The law sets forth requirements for state driver's licenses and ID cards to be accepted by the federal government for "official purposes", as defined by the Secretary of Homeland Security. The Secretary of Homeland Security has currently defined "official purposes" as presenting state driver's licenses and identification cards for boarding commercially operated airline flights and entering federal buildings and nuclear power plants.
    The Social Security card has functioned as an ID card for decades. I am old enough to have a card that says on the front: "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION." From the beginning, defenders of civil liberties saw the threat. The card is now widely used for identification purposes.

    The SS card is not current. Driver's licenses are. So, the DHS is attempting to create a federal ID card that is tied to state driver's licenses. The goal is to get the federal camel's nose into the privacy tent. The DHS is encountering resistance.
    The REAL ID Act implements the following:

    Title II of the act establishes new federal standards for state-issued driver licenses and non-driver identification cards.

    Changing visa limits for temporary workers, nurses, and Australian citizens.

    Funding some reports and pilot projects related to border security.

    Introducing rules covering "delivery bonds" (similar to bail bonds but for aliens who have been released pending hearings).

    Updating and tightening the laws on application for asylum and deportation of aliens for terrorist activity.

    Waiving laws that interfere with construction of physical barriers at the borders
    Unlike the vast majority of federal laws, this one created widespread resistance. Half of the states have resisted or have refused to participate. This has thwarted the DHS.

    The DHS has a timetable for implementing this law. The Wikipedia article is clear about this timetable.
    On December 20, 2013, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security announced that implementation of Phase 1 would begin on January 20, 2014, which followed a yearlong period of "deferred enforcement". As of January 2014, 21 states are compliant, 20 states and territories have been granted renewable extensions (until October 10, 2014), and 15 states and territories are noncompliant (but are eligible for extensions).

    Let me ask the obvious question: When did the publicity begin about this "tidal wave of immigration"? When did the headlines begin?

    Hint: not in 2013.

    This is an orchestrated event. Watch for "relief" from the "wave of immigration" -- formal calls for the acceptance and implementation of the REAL ID law.

    What's coming? This:
    IDs and driver's licenses as identificationIn the United States, driver's licenses are issued by the states, not by the federal government. Additionally, because the United States has no national identification card and because of the widespread use of cars, driver's licenses have been used as a de facto standard form of identification within the country. For non-drivers, states also issue voluntary identification cards which do not grant driving privileges. Prior to the REAL ID Act, each state set its own rules and criteria regarding the issuance of a driver's license or identification card, including the look of the card, what data is on the card, what documents must be provided to obtain one, and what information is stored in each state's database of licensed drivers and identification card holders.

    Federally mandated standards for state driver's licenses or ID cards

    Driver's license implications

    The REAL ID Act's implications for driver's licenses and ID cards is detailed in Title II of the Act. Title II of REAL ID -- "Improved Security for Driver's License and Personal Identification Cards" -- repeals the driver's licenses provisions of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act, also known as the "9/11 Commission Implementation Act of 2004", that was enacted in December 2004. Section 7212 of that law established a cooperative state-federal process, via a negotiated rule-making procedure, to create federal standards for driver's licenses.

    Instead, the Real ID Act directly imposes specific federal driver's license standards.

    The REAL ID Act Driver's License Summary details the following provisions of the Act's driver's license title:
    Authority
    Data Retention and Storage
    DL/ID Document Standards
    Grants to States
    Immigration Requirements
    Linking of Databases
    Minimum DL/ID Issuance Standards
    Minimum Standards for Federal Use
    Repeal of 9/11 Commission Implementation Act DL/ID Provisions
    Security and Fraud Prevention Standards
    Verification of Documents
    After 2011, "a Federal agency may not accept, for any official purpose, a driver's license or identification card issued by a state to any person unless the state is meeting the requirements" specified in the REAL ID Act. The DHS will continue to consider additional ways in which a REAL ID license can or should be used for official federal purposes without seeking the approval of Congress before doing so. States remain free to also issue non-complying licenses and IDs, so long as these have a unique design and a clear statement that they cannot be accepted for any Federal identification purpose. The federal Transportation Security Administration is responsible for security check-in at airports, so bearers of non-compliant documents would no longer be able to travel on common carrier aircraft without additional screening unless they had an alternative government-issued photo ID.

    People born on or after December 1, 1964, will have to obtain a REAL ID by December 1, 2014. Those born before December 1, 1964, will have until December 1, 2017, to obtain their REAL ID.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/REAL_ID_Act

    This caught my eye: "The DHS will continue to consider additional ways in which a REAL ID license can or should be used for official federal purposes without seeking the approval of Congress before doing so."

    The public now wants action on immigration. The DHS is going to provide it.

    There are at least 10 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. There may be 20 million. There is no way to deport all of them. But they can be forced to use a federal ID card to get a job. The DHS can eventually prosecute employers who do not comply.

    The Supreme Court will not allow racial profiling. So, this means we must all get cards. This is the law. But the law is being resisted.

    Some U.S. Senators think the REAL ID law does not go far enough. What we need is an ID card with extensive data. Which two Senators are supporters for a high tech biometric ID card? Chuck Schumer and Lindsey Graham. Does this come as a surprise?

    How can the DHS reduce public resistance? I'll tell you how: with stories about a tidal wave of illegal immigration.

    There is no tidal wave of immigration. It's an uptick in what has become a fading social phenomenon. There is tidal wave of orchestrated stories about teenagers from Central America. As media orchestrations go, this is one of the more effective examples.

    The REAL ID card is part of the government's inevitable quest for more data. It is part of the illusion of rational economic planning. Murray Rothbard wrote about this in 1961. Once the planners have this tracking system operational, there will be an announcement: "The worst of the immigration problem is solved. The government can now track undocumented aliens." Then the stories about kids from Central America will fade away. Mission accomplished.

    Small businesses, not big businesses, are employers of illegal aliens. Big businesses have more difficulty hiring them. It is difficult to conceal digital payments to aliens. But with the REAL ID cards, small businesses will find it more difficult to hire illegals. This will reduce competition for big businesses.

    The southern border can be secured by means of drones and military troops. Pull the troops out of every U.S. military base that is outside the U.S. Let them defend America closer to home. Call this "Operation Home Base." Or let the governors use the National Guard.

    Until the immigrants are sent back to their nations of origin, house them in the FEMA camps being held in reserve for what the DHS thinks of as "documented Americans." Call this "Operation No Vacancy." (Note:FEMA is under the authority of the DHS.) If some curious reporter should ask where these camps came from, ready-made, tell him. (Yes, I'm joking. No reporter would bother to ask. It might lead to the next question: "Hey, how did all these people get here? Black helicopters?" Reporters know where their bread is buttered. Some questions simply are not asked. Careers are at stake.)

    Nothing like this will happen. The DHS does not want this to happen. It wants to be in charge of border security. (Note: the phrase "border security" is an oxymoron.) The DHS wants a lot of immigrants to cross. How many? Not enough to build public support to put the Army in charge of the border, but enough to build public support for acceptance of the REAL ID law.

    It's time to transfer the policing of the southern border to some agency other than the DHS. The DHS wants to police too far north of the border. We need to head this off at the border.

    2. OUTSIDE THE USA


    These teenagers are Central Americans. Why Central America? Because Mexicans stopped coming in 2005.
    The Mexican government is letting these kids into Mexico. It then makes sure they do not stay in Mexico.
    You think this is random? You think teenagers walk or ride freight trains 2,000 miles across Mexico, unnoticed and unassisted? Give me a break!

    The Mexican government officially wants an open border with the USA. So, it is letting these kids cross Mexico. The Mexican government for years has made it easy for Central Americans to get through Mexico on trains. On July 9, the story hit the American media that the President of Mexico had made a deal with the governments of Belize and Guatemala to give emigrants from those nations extra time in Mexico -- enough time to make it close to the U.S. border on top of trains, which has been going on for years. A few days later,a government <acronym title="Google Page Ranking">PR</acronym> stunt created the illusion that Mexico's government is not behind this flight across Mexico.

    3. SYMBIOSIS
    Did the gangs get more powerful during Prohibition? Yes. Did the federal government get more powerful? Yes.

    Did the gangs get more powerful after the federal government put Harry Anslinger in charge of eliminating drugs in 1930? Yes.

    Did the federal government get more powerful? Yes.

    There is a pattern here. It's called symbiosis.

    The "kids across the border" scenario is rigged. It is rigged from outside the country. It is rigged from inside the country. The kids are the cover.

    It's not about kids from Central America.

    Gang members are getting in. Drug runners are getting in. There is nothing new here. The drug-running scenario goes back over 50 years. My friend Joe Douglass described it in his book, Red Cocaine, in 1990. The 1999 update is here. The Soviets began this strategy in the 1960's. The operation today goes on, over two decades after the designers went out of business. The Soviets let the genie out of the bottle. The Russian mafia still uses it. That's because it works.

    It's all about gang money and power (outside) and federal money and power (inside). It's not about kids from Central America.

    Fact: so far this fiscal year, arrests of non-Mexican alien families are up by five to one. Fact: arrests of unaccompanied teenagers are up by about two to one. The statistics are here.


    But "the flood of unaccompanied children" stories get more readers. They creates more sympathy. They call for a solution.

    "Save the children!"

    A veritable flood of children. Here is the imagery of vast quantities of unaccompanied children flowing across our southern border like a tsunami. What a powerful image! Compelling! The public believes these reports.
    Reports can be exaggerated.

    http://www.garynorth.com/public/12753.cfm

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,201
    This quote from the article below: "...the illegal immigrant angle will be played up and hyped beyond measure, and conservatives will squeal and not be able to line up fast enough to demand National ID cards. This is the destroyer’s hope and plan anyway."

    My first concern is that this theory demeans the importance of the fight against illegal immigration to that of a peripheral issue of secondary importance.

    Additionally, I find most (but not all ) conspiracy theories dubious. Firstly, since when has the Marxist left ever felt it was necessary to manipulate conservatives or the public into supporting any of their schemes? They simply do whatever they want because nobody stops them. They do not need public and especially not conservative support.


    Historically the Marxist controlled news media always plays down the illegal alien crisis to weaken public opposition to amnesty. It seems unlikely they would change that strategy now for something as abstract as a national ID. With computer email information harvesting and security cameras everywhere--what's the point?

    The public wants the border secured and deportation of illegal aliens and it is ignored by the Obama junta and there is no border control and kids are being bussed throughout the U.S. Overwhelmingly the people did not want Obamacare but we have it and the Republicans will never fight to repeal it.

    National ID cards may be a peripheral benefit for the despot wanna-bes, but it is not likely the main reason for the orchestrated flood of illegal aliens. It is what it obviously is, an effort to drastically change the ethnic composition of the American population for the benefit of the RINOS and Democrats, and additionally it is partly motivated by a racist Hispanic hatred for European Americans.
    Last edited by csarbww; 08-13-2014 at 04:07 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Activists invoke KKK as reason to oppose illegal immigration
    By topsecret10 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-28-2011, 01:18 AM
  2. US Employers - The Real Reason For Illegal Immigration
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-22-2011, 12:02 PM
  3. The best reason to fight illegal immigration
    By Chexfive in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-05-2008, 09:01 PM
  4. A big reason why I hate illegal immigration
    By GFC in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-20-2008, 09:00 PM
  5. What is #1 reason you're concerned about Illegal Immigration
    By Acebackwords in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 09-09-2005, 10:02 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •