Thread: ALIPAC IN WALL ST JOURNAL: In Immigrant Fight, groups boost

New Backlash

In Immigrant Fight,
Grass-Roots Groups
Boost Their Clout

Internet, Talk Radio Are Used
To Affect State, City Laws;
Critics Slam 'Hate Groups'

Mr. Turner vs. Home Depot
By MIRIAM JORDAN
September 28, 2006; Page A1

SAN BERNARDINO, Calif. -- Armed with a computer and less than $100, Joseph Turner two years ago formed a group called "Save Our State." His goal: save California from turning into a "Third World cesspool" of illegal immigrants, he says. The group doesn't have a formal membership, and Mr. Turner counts barely 2,000 people on his email list and message board.

Yet this meager base has proved to be a powerful springboard. Through his Web site, Mr. Turner has recruited supporters to hold confrontational protests outside Home Depot stores, where unauthorized workers often gather to seek jobs. He has also helped ignite a nationwide movement by local governments to crack down on illegal immigration. So far, about 10 towns have passed ordinances to drive out undocumented immigrants after getting the idea from Mr. Turner. Dozens of other towns are considering such measures.

"My idea of activism is aggressive, street-level and in-your-face activism," says Mr. Turner, who strikes a clean-cut look with slicked-back black hair and icy blue eyes. He adds: "I don't believe in turning the other cheek."

Mr. Turner is part of an anti-immigrant brushfire that is gathering force at the grass-roots level around the U.S. Small groups like Mr. Turner's Save Our State are cropping up from coast to coast, recruiting members and devising tactics to tackle illegal immigration in their communities. Critics call many of these groups racist, a charge organizers deny. What no one disputes is that they are tapping into widespread frustration over the federal government's failure to adopt a national immigration policy while a deeply divided Congress clashes over how to deal with 12 million illegal immigrants.

The Center for New Community, a Chicago organization that tracks immigration issues, says there are 211 so-called nativist groups -- groups that advocate protecting the interests of native inhabitants against those of immigrants -- across the U.S., up from 37 two years ago. The Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks extremist groups, also says nativist groups are on the rise and that several are hate groups, including Mr. Turner's Save Our State. The law center defines a hate group as one that singles out and promotes hatred of another group, based on ethnicity, language, religion, sexual inclination or immigration status. Mr. Turner denies he runs a hate group.

These grass-roots organizations are having an impact. In North Carolina, state legislators say the fierce opposition of one anti-illegal immigration group torpedoed a bill proposed last year that would have allowed undocumented students who graduate from state high schools to pay in-state college tuition. In Georgia, another group's mobilization efforts were crucial to passing a bill last spring to curb illegal immigration. In Arizona, a group called Protect Our City is pushing for local officials, including police officers, to help federal authorities enforce immigration laws within Phoenix.

The groups are often one-man shows, steered by tech-savvy leaders who creatively use the Web to mobilize support for immigration protests, boycotts, legislation and media coverage in their areas. Their influence is amplified as they find each other online and coordinate their efforts. Save Our State has occasionally joined forces with a North Carolina group as well as the volunteer group Minuteman Project, which patrols the border with the goal of stopping illegal immigrants from entering U.S. soil.

Several budding groups receive funding from older, well-endowed national organizations, such as the Federation for American Immigration Reform, which has been battling immigration for decades. Ron Woodard, head of NC Listen, a North Carolina group, says he improved his public-speaking skills in courses sponsored by FAIR. The Washington, D.C.-based national group, which advocates curbing legal immigration as well as stopping illegal entries to the U.S., also provided his group with "minor" financial support, he says.

Striking a Chord

These groups often strike a chord in small towns and areas where Hispanics are relative newcomers. Immigrants are increasingly bypassing traditional Hispanic centers in big cities, California and the southwest. Instead, they're settling in smaller, homogeneous towns and in Middle America, where many residents are still unaccustomed to them and fear that wages are being undercut by immigrants taking blue-collar jobs in their community.

"The financial costs to Georgia taxpayers of supplying [bilingual] education, incarceration, medical care and social benefits to the hundreds of thousands of people who are here in violation of our laws is becoming impossible to ignore," declared one Web site run by a Georgia grass-roots group, the Dustin Inman Society. "Someone please point to a case of wages in Georgia having gone up because of illegal immigration!"

Anti-immigrant sentiment has swept the U.S. before, targeting Irish, Italian, Jewish, Chinese and Japanese newcomers. In response to public outcry against the influx of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe after World War I, Congress passed the Quota Act of 1921 and then the even more restrictive Immigration Act of 1924. These days, hostility is directed at Spanish-speaking immigrants, especially illegal immigrants who are decried as a burden on taxpayers and a threat to national security.

William Gheen, a former conservative campaign strategist and legislative assistant, formed the Americans for Legal Immigration-PAC, or ALIPAC, on Sept. 11, 2004, the anniversary of the terrorist attacks. Hispanic illegal immigrants aren't blowing up skyscrapers, "but they steal American jobs, depress American wages and can wreck American lives," Mr. Gheen says. "They're the enemies in our streets." He says his group, run from his home in Raleigh, N.C., boasts supporters from all 50 states and has raised $40,000 so far this year. "Most contributions come from concerned individuals, checks for $25 to $50," Mr. Gheen says.

The money comes from people like Lisa Mercier, a Hartselle, Ala., homemaker and devout southern Baptist who says the issue piqued her interest when Latino gangs moved into her former neighborhood on the outskirts of Washington, D.C. "With terrorism the way it is, we can't have our border wide open," she says, adding: "All the poor would like to come here."

Last year, four North Carolina lawmakers introduced a bipartisan bill that would entitle undocumented students who graduate from North Carolina high schools to attend universities paying in-state tuition. Mr. Gheen mounted an opposition campaign on the Web, lobbied in the halls of the state legislature and spread his message on a conservative radio talk show.

Several state legislators who signed the bill subsequently asked to remove their names from it. The bill never moved out of committee.

"This little organization got it on talk radio and created a firestorm," says North Carolina State Representative Paul Luebke, a Democrat and a primary sponsor of the bill. "Right-wing talk radio amplified the message. They hammered away on it incessantly. This enraged large numbers of people."

Mr. Luebke also says Mr. Gheen preyed on the discomfort felt by many white North Carolinians over the increased visibility of Latinos -- the spread of Mexican restaurants and stores, Spanish-language signs and Spanish-language movies at video stores. With manufacturing jobs also moving overseas, "the brown immigrant was an easy scapegoat," says Mr. Luebke.

Mr. Gheen says his is a "moderate group" and denies trying to stir up racial animosities.

In Marietta, Ga., the local grass-roots group is the Dustin Inman Society, named for a teenage boy killed several years ago in a car accident that allegedly involved an illegal immigrant. The group is led by D. A. King, a 54-year-old former Marine who sports a close-cropped haircut and says he was snubbed by Mexicans who moved into a house in his neighborhood in the 1990s. He says he grew even more frustrated when local and immigration officials ignored his calls to take action against the house, which he believed was overcrowded with illegal immigrants.

Mr. King shuttered his insurance business of 20 years in 2003 to devote himself full-time to educating Georgians about the adverse impact of illegal immigration, organize rallies around the issue and work the halls of the Georgia state legislature.

The crowning of his efforts was the passage in April of the Georgia Security and Immigration Compliance Act, a state bill chockablock with provisions to stop illegal immigration that will begin to go into effect in July 2007. "We were sliding down a slippery slope on the way to 'Georgiafornia,' " says Mr. King, referring to California, which is often used as the poster child of excessive Latino immigration.

Effective Weapon

A key proponent of the immigration bill, his single most effective weapon was organizing protests at the Capitol "for the media and state governments to see," says Mr. King. He also praised the bill on radio and in newspaper columns. "I made it impossible for politicians to ignore the issue," he says.

Republican State Senator Chip Rogers, who wrote the Georgia bill, says Mr. King was "instrumental in ensuring people interested in illegal immigration were aware of the bill. He sent lots of email, went on radio often and wrote in local papers about it. He touched just about every potential media outlet."

In the network of anti-illegal immigrant activists, few have risen higher or faster than Joseph Turner. He still relishes a moment 12 years ago, when he took the stage at his half-Hispanic high school in working-class Riverside, Calif., to endorse a controversial ballot initiative to ban illegal immigrants from receiving state benefits. The senior drew such a heated response that he was sequestered in a gym afterward until tempers were calmed.

"I believe in the superiority of America and American culture," he says. If the federal government isn't doing its job, he says, direct democracy should provide solutions. He calls for deporting all illegal immigrants, saying, "the net benefit of illegal aliens is negative."

Mr. Turner grew up in Southern California's so-called Smog Belt, which includes San Bernardino and other working-class towns. His biological father, an alcoholic, walked out of his life when he was about eight years old, he says. His mother remarried a Mexican-American, whom Mr. Turner considers his father. He heard a lot of Spanish growing up. Mr. Turner says his mother was a drug addict who spent time incarcerated, and describes his stepfather as a "former gang banger" who abused drugs and was imprisoned. Both have since been rehabilitated, he says. Mr. Turner's mother, Janice Aguayo, confirms his account.

Incensed by the outcry of civil-rights and Hispanic groups against roundups of undocumented immigrants by U.S. authorities in southern California in 2004, Mr. Turner started his own group to battle illegal immigration, Save Our State. His first target was Home Depot, where immigrants often wait for homeowners seeking an extra hand at gardening or painting.

"With as little as five people you can shut down a day-laborer center," says Mr. Turner, because employers will be too intimidated to stop and hire them. Contractors have been deterred from hiring from these sites during the protests and in several days that followed. Home Depot declines to comment on Mr. Turner.

At a rally outside the day-laborer center in the ritzy coastal town of Laguna Beach, neo-Nazis and white supremacists waved Nazi and confederate flags. Mr. Turner says they weren't welcome at the event but that he couldn't stop them and that Save our State members left shortly after they arrived. Mr. Turner says he also deletes white-supremacist rhetoric when it pops up on his Web site's message board.

About a year ago, Mr. Turner drafted a three-page ordinance -- the "City of San Bernardino Illegal Immigrant Relief Act." Although it was derailed before it could come to a citywide vote, the ordinance went on to be imitated, and passed, by several towns and cities across the country.

The law as proposed in San Bernardino would have revoked the license of any business deemed to aid or abet illegal immigrants, even unknowingly. It also would have banned landlords from renting to an illegal immigrant, and required that all rental agreements be filed with the city for verification. One provision would have prohibited the city from conducting business in any language other than English.

Over four months, Mr. Turner spent evenings and weekends gathering signatures outside grocery stores and knocking on doors in the more-affluent northern end of San Bernardino. As fear spread in Hispanic-heavy communities, the Archbishop of San Bernardino called an emergency meeting of all parish priests and dioceses to discuss how to counter the measure. Community leaders, interfaith groups and town officials gathered soon afterward. "We wanted to portray this as a human issue, not a political or religious issue," says Auxiliary Bishop Rutilio del Riego.

Before the ordinance could go to a citywide vote, a judge ruled that Mr. Turner hadn't collected enough signatures and granted him 10 days to make up the difference, or nearly twice the original number of signatures. Concluding he couldn't achieve that, Mr. Turner let his hometown effort die.

But over the next few weeks, it sprang back to life -- in the form of copycat initiatives taken up in small towns across the country, including Valley Park, Mo., Riverside, N.J., and Hazleton, Pa. Hazleton Mayor Louis Barletta was searching for ways to crack down on illegal immigration when he found Mr. Turner's petition on the Internet, though he says he isn't familiar with the views of Mr. Turner or his group. Hazleton now prohibits anyone from renting to or hiring illegal immigrants, and has made English the town's official language. Civil-rights groups are challenging the legislation in court.

Mr. Turner, who has a young son with his girlfriend, recently decided to run for the local San Bernardino school board. He says that he plans to challenge the Supreme Court ruling that allowed all children living in the U.S. to attend school, regardless of their immigration status. He also works as a field representative for Republican state assemblyman Ray Haynes, who represents a district on the Mexico-California border about an hour's drive from San Bernardino.

Mr. Haynes says he doesn't agree with all of Mr. Turner's views and rhetoric but admires his work ethic and energy. "He's on fire," says Mr. Haynes.

Representative Paul Luebke is such a sore loser. He is obviously very angry at us for destroying his bill.

Also, I was not on a single talk radio show about this. I was on on about six different talk radio shows in this state alone and discussing this NC in-state issue on several talk radio shows outside of NC.

We are not, nor were we a "small group". I also pointed out to her that ALIPAC is run out of about 7-8 offices some are home offices and others are not. We completely have zero need for the expense of a walk in office at this point.

It was not "several" lawmakers that dropped their names from that bill it was 10! or "close to a dozen"

"the brown immigrant was an easy scapegoat," says Mr. Luebke.

No Representative, your pathetic bill was an easy scapegoat. The polls show that over 81% of NC's LEGAL citizens oppose the horse crap you proposed. I guess 81% of our citizens are RIGHT WINGERS looking to scapegoat the brown skins in your ultra liberal Sociology professor in liberal Durham eyes!

This woman intentionally left out almost all of our strong points as an organization.

W

These groups often strike a chord in small towns and areas where Hispanics are relative newcomers.

Look at this biased crap! Not one word about ILLEGAL or ALIEN, just RACE.

Shrewd how they turn the race card in yet another twist.

Originally Posted by 2ndamendsis

These groups often strike a chord in small towns and areas where Hispanics are relative newcomers.

Look at this biased crap! Not one word about ILLEGAL or ALIEN, just RACE.

Shrewd how they turn the race card in yet another twist.

She never asked about our supporters being urban vs rural. That is a complete opinion statement mounted as fact.

W

At least it's not a total smear piece and did have some redeeming qualities. Like a national audience! Interesting that she avoided the Miller Boycott.

Dixie

She never told me the attack Luepke made on me and ALIPAC. According to the ethics of journalism I should have been notified of the direct accusation and been able to respond.

I even discussed this with her specifically and said if anyone attacks me or ALIPAC directly I have a right to respond.

W

Right you are, William.

DIX, they're trying to infiltrate negatives into a positive now by twisting words in such a way that the average person, who's reading quickly, will miss it yet it's planted in the subconscious.

They can't get that RACISM garbage to stick in a frontal attack so it's getting very sophisticated.

Anyhooo, still a great article, especially for people who are afraid to come out into the light and state their concerns about ILLEGALS. This will give them courage knowing there are like minded folks out here.

AS USUAL....they don't play fair, but expect you to!

I think that this is a run of the mill article written by a typical OBL sympathetic journalist. I don't think she will get any prizes for journalistic integrity.
The typical party line comparing previous immigrant groups to Mexicans (85%) and other South American nationalities displays an ignorant and elitist attitude.
No previous immigrant group was allowed to enter this country without health examinations, or being documented, this was done to protect the overall population. There were never boatloads of Irish or Italians that assaulted our shores in mass without control.. Whereas there is always a criminal element included in any large group of people, I don't think the percentages were as large as one in twelve, as it is with this group.
No other immigrant group has been allowed to become a burden on social welfare and the legal system, nor toll it takes on people when they move into their neighborhoods and turn them into barrios with gangs drugs and prostitutes.
My daughter and her family moved from outside of Washington and I helped with the move. The neighborhood that she lived in had been a nice older neighborhood with young families, it turned into a ghetto of cars racing up and down the streets and houses with 10-15 men living in them, and hanging out on the old sofas that had been put out on the porches. I saw the prostitute, that was the gangbanger's girlfriend, turning tricks on the street in front of the house. I watched her make her deal jump into three different cars in the space of 2 hours. Did I mention the chickens?
My 12 year old granddaughter was leered at and intimidated by grown men that hung out in the fronts of stores and she was not allowed to be in the front yard unless an adult was there. These men weren't out "working hard" they were just hanging out in every public place you went.
I was there for 4 days before the move and every night there were gunshots. This neighborhood is 30 miles from downtown Washington DC and if our elected politicians want to know the impact of illegal immigrants to communities, all they have do is take a short drive and get out of the limo.
This is country of laws and the citizens of ths country by and large obey them. These new "immigrants" are somehow above the law, and they know it. They can get away with anything, they can steal your identification, they can drive drunk without insurance on stolen licenses plates, they can kill or rape you and just steal another ID and go somewhere else and do it again. This country has been founded on the idea of fairness, so lets be fair to the citizens of this country that are having this crap shoved up their noses on a daily basis.
A very small percentage of these undocumented "new immigrants", usually those that have used falsified documents to buy homes, pay the property taxes that support the schools and hospitals, but they get more use out of them than anyone else seems to be able to. They have multiple children that become "citizens" and then get paid for these children until they are 18, then expect another free ride for secondary education. This country is not a social welfare state for the world, but it seems to be turning into one.
I do not feel guilty because I am an American, but I am beginning to get mad about being penalized for it.
I am tired of hearing how hard the illegals work, we all work hard but most of us don't work for "cash under the table". The government has got our number and we have to pony up large percentages of our incomes. What makes this group so special? Resent them, you bet. They are getting away with it and it is the fault of our own vote pandering politicians that would rather fight a power struggle btween the two parties than do their job.
No other immigrant group has come to this country with the attitude that they are entitled to this country because they are native to some part of this continent. Aztecs and Mayans were never indigenous to this part of the Americas, they were in the Southern part of Mexico and what is now Guatemala. The claims that this is their country and it was "stolen" from are ludicrous. The Mexican government sold the land in the Southwest to this United States. They took the money and were glad to have it because the land was considered a barren desert without much value, and it was until Americans turned it into something.
I don't care if people try to label me a racist because I am against a Group of foreign nationals that have come to this country to suck it dry in the name of their country, Mexico. I know that in reality I am a "culturalist", who finds this culture of larceny and entitlement unacceptable.
I believe that many Americans are tired of supporting the rest of the world's social problems. They made the problems, they need to fix them. We need to find our backbone and stop being PC, we need to take care of our own citizens, because it looks like the cavalry is going in the other direction.

I am not too pleased with this article either. She did not say what William told her in their interview. Trys to make us look like we are out to get the "hard working people looking for a better life" for no reason. No mention of all the murders, rapes, etc in the article. Totally biased. The one redeeming quality is that is got the ALIPAC name out there and I am sure we will get more hits on this site because of that. Believe it or not there are people who read WSJ that do have a brain and can figure out what she is trying to do and will join us in this fight, could have been worse.