Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Born Free?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443

    Born Free?

    Born Free?
    YouNewsTV™
    Story Published: Jun 6, 2008 at 5:59 PM PDT

    By Heather Reese

    A local Democratic blog asked us to look into an issue recently approved by State Republicans. The party's 2008 proposed platform says children born in the U.S to illegal aliens should not be citizens.

    Republicans argue the 14th Amendment actually supports this provision. They say the original intent of the 14th Amendment was to recognize the citizenship of ex-slaves, not to grant citizenship to children born to illegals. The local Republican party chair says he's not strongly opposed to making this law.

    But blogger Ron Bonlender, a Democrat, says changing our constitutional rights is not an option.

    "There's abuses but you don't change the constitution you address the abuses in other ways," Bonlender said.

    It takes two-thirds vote of each house to pass a bill, should this become a bill. The State Republican party will send 40 delegates to its National Convention in September.


    http://www.kimatv.com/news/local/19620094.html
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member agrneydgrl's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,760
    It's not chaniging the constitutuion. It is clarifying it. It was never meant for illegal immingrants coming over here just to have babies. It was for children of slaves. Illegal aliens weren't even a consideration when this was written. IF they had been around then, it would have been written more clearly to exclude them.

  3. #3
    Senior Member USA_born's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    916
    But blogger Ron Bonlender, a Democrat, says changing our constitutional rights is not an option.



    Wrong. It is an option and must be done. And it probably will be done sooner or later. It must be clarified. This has been abused for too long. This amendment must be reworded to say what it was meant to say. Not the distorted version we have now. This is one of the most widely abused loopholes in the Constitution.
    People like to define our "constitutional rights" to suit their own agendas.

  4. #4
    Senior Member MyAmerica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    5,074
    But blogger Ron Bonlender, a Democrat, says changing our constitutional rights is not an option.
    The Fourteenth Amendment was a change to the Constitution which is the purpose of Constitutional Amendments. The Amendment is being abused by illegal aliens for a purpose not intended.

    The clarification should be retroactive to a certain time.
    "Distrust and caution are the parents of security."
    Benjamin Franklin

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443
    Can anyone tell me what other country allows babies born in their country automatic citizenship?
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •