Thread: AZ NUTJOB Legislator's Bill To Stop Volunteer Border Patrols

http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Feature- ... oNo=014211 -


AZ Legislator's bill to shut down volunteer border patrols

Ernest Hancock
Website: www.ernesthancock.com

(No matter what your position is on the issue of Immigration, it will be this bill that will do this legislator the most damage that she will not be able to recover from,... and she will not understand why)

Rep. Kyrsten Sinema intends to shut down volunteer border patrols

HB 2286 Domestic terrorism; classification

13-2320. Domestic terrorism; classification

A. AN INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS COMMITS DOMESTIC TERRORISM IF THE INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS ARE NOT AFFILIATED WITH A LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITY AND ASSOCIATE WITH ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS AS AN ORGANIZATION, GROUP, CORPORATION OR COMPANY FOR THE PURPOSE OF PATROLLING TO DETECT ALLEGED ILLEGAL ACTIVITY OR TO INDIVIDUALLY PATROL FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETECTING ALLEGED ILLEGAL ACTIVITY AND IF THE INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS IS ARMED WITH A FIREARM OR OTHER WEAPON.

B. ANY CITY, TOWN OR COUNTY THAT SUFFERS INJURY ARISING OUT OF A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION MAY MAINTAIN AN ACTION IN SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE RECOVERY OF DAMAGES OR FOR AN INJUNCTION, OR BOTH. THE COURT MAY AWARD THE SUCCESSFUL PARTY REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES.

C. IF THE COURT SENTENCES THE DEFENDANT TO A TERM OF PROBATION, THE COURT SHALL ORDER THAT AS AN INITIAL CONDITION OF PROBATION THE DEFENDANT BE IMPRISONED IN THE COUNTY JAIL FOR A PERIOD OF NOT LESS THAN SIX MONTHS. THIS JAIL TERM OF INCARCERATION SHALL NOT BE DEFERRED, DELETED OR OTHERWISE SUSPENDED AND SHALL COMMENCE ON THE DATE OF SENTENCING. THIS SUBSECTION DOES NOT APPLY TO PERSONS WHO ARE SENTENCED TO SERVE A PERIOD OF INCARCERATION IN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.

D. A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION IS A CLASS 5 FELONY

Sponsored by

Kyrsten Sinema

Democrat District 15

Phone Number: (602) 926-5058

Fax Number: (602) 417-3015

Email Address: ksinema@azleg.gov


Make a Comment about this Article • Read 0 Comments

This woman is un-American. Is she an anchor baby?

I think she should plead "temporary insanity" and revoke this before the hammer comes down. Absolutely ludicrous!

This would make "Neighborhood Watch Groups" terrorists!

This will fly when elephants take up roller blading.

Re-elect Kyrsten Sinema
in District 15

Civil Rights and Liberties - Kyrsten believes strongly that ALL Americans should have equal rights and fair protections under the law, and that is why she sponsored a bill which would have erected a monument to the Bill of Rights in Wesley Bolin Memorial Plaza. Kyrsten will continue to defend the constitutional rights of all Americans.

"Kyrsten was the champion for breastfeeding moms across the state this session. Without her, we would not have passed a law protecting my baby's right to breastfeed." - Amy Milliron, Republican Mom

http://www.ksinema.org/

DENNIS DURBAND



October 22, 2004


A Glimpse of the Far Left 'Suppressives'

Don’t ask the Arizona Democratic Progressive Caucus to exert any effort of its own to prepare endorsements for the 2004 elections. It’s apparently asking way too much of the lazy liberal Democrat organization of nut cases, based in Fountain Hills. Especially when the “Suppressives” can leech off the work of others – such as The Arizona Conservative.

After The Arizona Conservative posted its election endorsements earlier this fall, the “Suppressives” copied and pasted the judicial endorsements section from The Arizona Conservative website into their own website. The “Suppressives” then endorsed the liberal judicial candidates and marked “vote no” on the conservative candidates favored by The Arizona Conservative.

The “Suppressives” were contacted and politely asked to remove The Arizona Conservative’s endorsement list from their website. However, they ignored Internet etiquette and refused to do so. These left-wing nuts merely posted my handsome "mug shot" -- thank you very much! -- and my message, along with a link to this site. They also recommend that their colleagues do Google searches on my name. Bring it on!

The "Suppressives" recently heard a report from friends of theirs who were arrested at the Republican National Convention (looks darn good on a resume!). Their website also listed a really cool event in conjunction with the recent presidential debate -- a "die-in." They love their culture of death. Perhaps their next great event will be an evening of wine, cheese and custard pie with the two liberal girly goons who attacked Ann Coulter. Or possibly a "how-to" workshop by the Dem goons who ransacked the GOP office in Flagstaff (their resumes keep getting more and more impressive!).

Call them Democrats, liberals, progressives or radical leftists. Whatever descriptor you choose, it still comes down to the fact that they have absolutely nothing of social redeeming value to contribute. I prefer to call them "Suppressives."

What is a Typical "Suppressive"?

On their “Endorsements” web page, the “Suppressives” are endorsing Kyrsten Sinema for the District 15 House of Representatives. Winner of the Sept. 7th Democratic primary, Sinema is a flag bearer for everything that is wrong with the radical leftist "Suppressives."

For starters, Sinema supports the creation of day laborer centers in Arizona, requiring taxpayers to educate and train illegal aliens. She is endorsing law breaking and requiring taxpayers to subsidize it.

Sinema also recommends giving driver’s licenses to “undocumented residents.” Drivers licenses for illegals increase the risk of home invasions and terrorism by allowing illegal aliens to blend into American society and qualify for services that their own respective governments should provide. Illegals are costing Arizona taxpayers $1.3 billion a year.

An adjunct professor in social work at Arizona State University, Sinema opposes the Protect Arizona Now proposition and claims it is unconstitutional and there is no evidence of voter fraud in Arizona.

Stories of Democrat vote fraud around the nation are legion. Prop 200 is constitutional and will require state employees to do their jobs without requiring additional resources.

How about the homosexual agenda? Sinema is all for it. On her website, she says: “All individuals, regardless of sexual orientation or identity, should be afforded full and equal rights. I support the passage of all legislation granting equal rights to the LGBT community, such as ENDA (the Employee Non-Discrimination Act), domestic partner registration, domestic partner benefits including health care, medical decision rights, adoptive and foster parent rights, and the right to marry.”

Judicial activists and a tiny minority affecting 2 percent of the nation should not be allowed to overturn the will of the people on marriage. A majority of Democrats, Republicans, Blacks and Whites oppose same-sex marriage. Research points out that homosexual relationships last 18 months on average, and many of the Massachusetts same-sex marriages are already breaking up. The children of homosexual couples suffer higher rates of juvenile delinquency and depression and do more poorly in school. Pedophilia rates among homosexuals are 46 times as high as among heterosexuals, and violence rates between homosexual partners are very high.

It goes without saying that Sinema is cashing in with Planned Parenthood for campaign funding by supporting abortion rights.

Sinema is clicking on all radical liberal kneejerk fronts. She says, “Environmental racism and environmental justice should be a major concern to Arizona residents, as Arizona has the highest concentration of hazardous waste facilities in the Southwest. These facilities are disproportionately concentrated in low-income and minority communities.” Along with a disproportionate number of abortion mills planted there by racist organizations like Planned Parenthood.

Let’s start examining Sinema’s nanny state dreams.

“Housing costs throughout the state have been skyrocketing, and now are reaching a pitch so astronomical that working class families can not (sic) afford to purchase homes,” Sinema says. “Many residents are left to rent substandard apartments, condominiums, and homes for high prices that do not match the quality of the living space. Newly built homes have increased in average price, and the availability of low-cost housing is declining. This unfairly prejudices against low-income (many of whom are women and minorities) individuals and families. I support the expansion of public housing and capital grants to non-profit housing developers to ensure that all people can obtain decent housing at no more than 30% of their income.”

Sinema continues to work those minorities! Her plans would merely result in substandard, tenement-style housing that would not improve the living conditions of the lower class. Home ownership is not a right. Middle class people also live in apartments due to the high cost of housing; are we also going to subsidize the middle class? And are we going to subsidize anybody who can’t afford everything?

In Sinema’s liberal world, affirmative action is still needed today. However, affirmative action is racism which punishes non-minority persons. It does not even the playing field, but merely tips it in reverse direction. A high percentage of minorities find affirmative action patronizing and offensive, and they do not regard themselves as the mascots of the left. Affirmative action has not prevented some schools from under performing. More minorities own homes now than ever before, and poverty was on the decline at the time President Johnson launched his gargantuan welfare programs. Affirmative action leads to cycles of dependency on government. Minorities are not lacking in intelligence and can accomplish great things when left to their own resourcefulness. Loans and grants are available to all Americans.

Sinema supports “universal access to child care in a manner similar to public education. Education is provided free of charge to all children, and quality child care with a focus on socialization, teaching, and learning should be provided in the same manner.Research shows that birth to three years are (sic) the most important years for a child's brain development.” And, Ms. Sinema, that development occurs at higher rates when a parent provides the care.

“Quality child care provided by highly trained professionals to children from birth to kindergarten would increase their chances of academic success in grade school and beyond,” Sinema continues. Quality child care is no match for the care provided by a mother. “I support legislation to index subsidies for childcare, allowing low-income women to truly afford childcare when returning to the work force." Realizing the importance of being present in the lives of their children, not every woman wants to be a part of the work force. Childcare is not a right and taxpayers should never be forced to make it one.

If Sinema had her way with all of her high-priced social program demands, taxpayers would have to work until Thanksgiving to pay for everything.

Theresa Heinz Kerry and Sinema are in lockstep with radical feminists who disparage stay-at-home mothers. They believe that women should contribute to the GNP rather than the well-being of their children. That type of thinking doesn’t sit well with pro-family leaders.

Karen Hughes, assisting with the Bush/Cheney campaign, said of Heinz Kerry’s dissing of stay-at-home mothers: "I think it's just unfortunate to try to disparage women who have made the choice of making their families a priority."

Dr. Janice Crouse, speaking on behalf of the Concerned Women for American Legislative Action Committee, says Mrs. Kerry's remarks "indicate disapproval of those American women who sacrifice a career and all of its benefits in order to care for and train their children at home.

These radicals appeal to feminist myths while insulting the majority of American women.

Sinema did do one good thing by winning the Dem primary: she knocked out incumbent liberal Wally Straughn. But if she wins election, she will be precisely the type of "Suppressive" legislator we don’t need undermining families.

Dennis Durband is publisher and editor of The Arizona Conservative, is also a freelance writer and webmaster and a longtime journalist.

http://www.azconservative.org/Durband14.htm

WHAT A FRIGGING NUT CASE!!!!!! AZ, RESIDENTS BETTER JUMP ON THIS ONE.

Now they want to put the National Guard in jail as domestic terrorists. Next we'll round up the neighborhood watches. We really need to open more mental facilities rather than employ these nuts in our government.

This is why your momma warned you about smoking crack.

ARIZONA STATE LEGISLATURE



HB 2286

REFERENCE TITLE: domestic terrorism

Introduced by

Representatives Sinema: Ableser, Gallardo, Lopes, Lujan, Meza, Prezelski, Tom

amending section 13-2301, Arizona Revised Statutes; amending title 13, chapter 23, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 13-2320; relating to organized crime and fraud.

START_STATUTE13-2320. Domestic terrorism; classification

A. An individual or group of individuals commits domestic terrorism if the individual or group of individuals are not affiliated with a local, state or federal law enforcement entity and associate with another individual or group of individuals as an organization, group, corporation or company for the purpose of patrolling to detect alleged illegal activity or to individually patrol for the purpose of detecting alleged illegal activity and if the individual or group of individuals is armed with a firearm or other weapon.

B. Any city, town or county that suffers injury arising out of a violation of this section may maintain an action in superior court for the recovery of damages or for an injunction, or both. the court may award the successful party reasonable attorney fees.

C. If the court sentences the defendant to a term of probation, the court shall order that as an initial condition of probation the defendant be imprisoned in the county jail for a period of not less than six months. This jail term of incarceration shall not be deferred, deleted or otherwise suspended and shall commence on the date of sentencing. THis subsection does not apply to persons who are sentenced to serve a period of incarceration in the state department of corrections.

D. A violation of this section is a class 5 felony.

http://azleg.gov/DocumentsForBill.asp?B ... ber=HB2286

http://azleg.gov/