Results 1 to 5 of 5
Like Tree4Likes

Thread: CA - LAPD Impound Lawsuits

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443

    CA - LAPD Impound Lawsuits

    Wednesday, August 08, 2012
    Posted by David Perez
    KFI News

    LOS ANGELES (CNS) - A judge today consolidated for trial two lawsuits challenging the Los Angeles Police Department's recently modified policy for impounding cars driven by unlicensed drivers.

    Special Order 7 was aimed at lessening the financial burden on drivers who have their cars impounded for as long as month for driving without a valid license.

    The Los Angeles Police Protective League, the union representing about 9,900 rank-and-file LAPD officers, and the group Judicial Watch opposed the moved and sued to stop it.

    Today, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Terry Green said he would hold a nonjury trial to decide issues raised in the lawsuits.

    ``I think the issues are common in both cases,'' Green said. ``I donít see what the prejudice is. We should have one court hear them.''

    Green's ruling came despite concerns expressed by LAPPL attorney Richard Levine, who said the Judicial Watch suit dealt with taxpayer issues, while his case deals with Special Order 7's effects on labor.

    The judge did not set a date for trial, pending a ruling on a motion by the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles and LA Voice to intervene in the lawsuit in defense of Special Order 7. A hearing is scheduled Sept. 25.

    In the May 16 lawsuit filed by Washington, D.C.-based Judicial Watch, plaintiff Harold Sturgeon of Los Angeles wants a judge to find that the department's recently relaxed impound policy is an unlawful use of taxpayer money ``to help unlicensed illegal aliens.''

    But CHIRLA/LA Voice court papers argue that without Special Order 7, people who are not U.S. citizens and who cannot get California driver licenses would be disproportionately affected by 30-day impounds. Charges can amount to more $1,000.

    In February, the Police Commission, which set LAPD policy, approved the executive order, which enables an officer to let an unlicensed driver stopped for a moving violation avoid a 30-day impound, as long as he or she has valid identification, vehicle registration, proof of insurance and a clean driving record.

    A driver at fault in a wreck or who has conviction for unlicensed driving would not qualify for a shortened, one-day impound.

    Chief Charlie Beck proposed the policy, with the backing of immigrant rights groups and Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. In May, Beck said the old policy of impounding vehicles for 30 days unfair to undocumented immigrants.

    Beck has said the change was an attempt to eliminate officer confusion over conflicting laws on impounding vehicles and for how long.

    Between April 22, when Special Order 7 took effect, and May 8, mandatory 30-day impounds dropped by 45 percent, compared to the same period in 2011, according to the police union.

    LAPD Cmdr. Andrew Smith said he could not verify the union's figure, but that police were analyzing towing and impound data.

    LAPD Impound Lawsuits | KFI NEWS - KFI AM 640 More Stimulating Talk Radio
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member Kiara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    2,393
    "But CHIRLA/LA Voice court papers argue that without Special Order 7, people who are not U.S. citizens and who cannot get California driver licenses would be disproportionately affected by 30-day impounds. Charges can amount to more $1,000."
    Get legal and avoid the high cost. Better yet, go home to your own country and you won't have to worry about it.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Kiara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    2,393
    "In May, Beck said the old policy of impounding vehicles for 30 days unfair to undocumented immigrants."
    I'll tell you what's unfair, having illegals here. That's what an undocumented immigrant is_ illegal! They don't belong here, they shouldn't be driving here, they shouldn't be making demands at every turn. It is unfair to the citizens of this country to have to put up with their constant whining and demands for everything they want. Fight for things in your own country and make it better for yourselves and your fellow countrymen.

  4. #4
    Senior Member MontereySherry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,370
    But CHIRLA/LA Voice court papers argue that without Special Order 7, people who are not U.S. citizens and who cannot get California driver licenses would be disproportionately affected by 30-day impounds. Charges can amount to more $1,000.
    They cannot get a California drivers license because it is not legal for them to drive. Plain and simple they are breaking the law. They are disproportionately affected because they are disportionately breaking American Laws. They don't like our laws, then they can leave. I think their cars should be confiscated and sold.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    11
    I agree we have to be held accountable. We have to have a drivers license and we have to have insurance. If we get stopped if we don't have either we have to deal with the results. what makes illegal immigrants better than us? You see their cars and most of them are just pieces of crap and if they hit us we have to suffer. Send them home. Let them come here legally.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •