I understand that and I supported Kelli Ward too because I'm part of ALIPAC. Once the primaries are over, though, I support the Republican candidate, even if that candidate wasn't the one I supported. The alternative is to elect a DemoQuack. Why would any Republican want to do that? I don't understand that view. A lot of Republicans have their own views on certain issues for lots of different reasons, McSally may have that view because of these illegal alien DACAs who are in the military, you just don't know what's behind her position or why she has it. Jan Brewer, toughest Governor in the country against illegal immigration, supported McSally. Jan Brewer also supports a limited DACA, so does Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas who filed the suit against Obama's DACA. So does Texas Governor Abbott.

I don't know how we deal with our supporters who for whatever reason support this DACA stuff, other than to keep trying to convince them that DACA is wrong, it's not right, we can't give illegal aliens an inch, so we just have to keep selling the facts and message of why DACA is wrong even if done through the Congress. DACA is wrong on the merits, because it's unfair to citizens and legal immigrants, something I think those few Republicans will be receptive to changing their minds about.

But, you'll never change the mind of a DemoQuack on our immigration ssues or any other major issue for that matter, no way in hell, not ever, on any level.

So that's why I don't understand Horowitz's article. We're 30 days from a General Election, so why is he attacking Republicans instead of DemoQuacks?