Thread: "We cannot kick people out who have been here for awhil

I thought this was an awesome commentary!

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=50990

"We cannot kick people out who have been here for awhile."

That's what President Bush said last week.

And he means it.

That is his policy toward those who have broken into our country, defied our immigration laws, cheapened our way of life and driven a stake through the heart of what it means to be an American.

This is amnesty, no matter what the president says.

If we "can't kick people out who have been here for awhile," then we have no alternative but to forgive and forget they broke the law.

What other possibility is there? How else can one define amnesty?

By making this ludicrous, untrue declaration, Bush has once again waved the white flag of surrender to the hordes who continue to invade our country. He has thrown out the welcome mat for more illegal entry.

Though no statistics are yet available, you can be sure this sign of weakness in leadership was a great encouragement to those still seeking to break into America. Every time this guy opens his mouth on this issue, more illegals make their way across the Rio Grande seeing what could be their last chance to get in, what could be the last wave of an open-door policy by the U.S.

Bush is a lame duck, and he doesn't care. He doesn't care what continued illegal immigration will do to his country. He doesn't care what it will do to his legacy. He doesn't care what it will do to his party in November and in 2008.

He's serving some other master. He's got some other agenda. He's carrying out his father's promise to usher America into a New World Order.

Can I ask some simple questions? What does it mean that we can't kick out people who have been here for awhile? Why is that? What does "for awhile" mean?

Where does Bush get off making such a statement? He was elected and sworn into office to enforce the law of the land. The law of the land is clear on what happens to lawbreakers. They are punished. Those who break immigration laws are deported. There are no special provisions in the law for those who have been here "for awhile," whatever that means.

How does he get away with this kind of trash talk?

I understand he is speaking his mind. I understand he is advocating a viewpoint. But when the president's viewpoint runs contrary to the law of the land, there is no question that he is obligated to enforce the laws, not ignore them, not subvert them, not undermine them.

If Bush wants to change the laws, he is welcome to try. But while he remains president, he is sworn to execute the current laws – whether he likes them or not.

So far, Bush has found little support among the people for his promotion of amnesty. Yet he continues to promote it. Again, whatever his objectives, he is welcome to try. But he defies the Constitution, the Congress, his oath of office, the rule of law and the will of the people when he refuses to enforce the law.

Bush is recklessly irresponsible on immigration. He's like a spoiled child who refuses to do the right thing simply because he has staked out a position against it.

He has no credibility on his primary mission as president – protecting the American people and defending the homeland – as he continues to promote the idea that anyone and everyone is welcome in the U.S.

Bush's behavior can no longer be confused with political tone deafness. He's got an agenda he is promoting. It is not a traditional American agenda. It is an internationalist agenda. It is a multinational corporate agenda. It is an elitist agenda.

It has never been more obvious than it is today. [/url][/u]

This President's stance on illegal immigration should come as no surprise to the American people. He stated it immediately after being elected. He has not waivered one bit on it. The intent was very clear from the beginning.

So was his intention to form his Western Hemisphere Union. That has not come to pass yet, but I don't think it was from lack of trying. His alternative is the Canada-US-Mexico pact.

We have gotten so use to tuning out politicians with some of their silly rhetoric and assume that much of what they say is just posturing, and they will change if the American people complain. Not so with this man. He stated what he was going to do and terrorist attacks, loss of jobs, healthcare crisis, national debt, education crisis, no matter what - he is going to give this country to the illegal aliens.

We were warned.

As stated in this commentary, that he is not upholding the law which is his primary function. There has to be some legal grounds to charge him with not upholding his duty in office. Why is this not being done? How can we get it done?

The one thing I cannot comprehend between my ears is Bush says he is going to keep the terrorists out of our country. He is going to "Keep the American People safe at all cost." His words.
IF that is the case........how the hell can he do that if he erases the borders and allows easy entrance to our country?
AM I MISSING THE BOAT OR WHAT?

Bush will never close the borders. It is entirely contradictory to the North American Union plan which he is pushing for.

sworn into office to enforce the law of the land. The law of the land is clear on what happens to lawbreakers. They are punished

The law as we "the people" understood it to be based upon the United States Constitution is clear about what happens to lawbreakers. The law of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC is another matter ... who knows what those "bi-laws" or Charter state.

The second question is which did he pledge to protect... "Our" Constitution or the Charter of the corporation?

Since the corporation copyrighted "OUR" constitution he can easily say he swore to uphold "the" constitution implying ours but in truth not.

Bush is an a-hole. Is there really anything else that needs to be said?

"We cannot kick people out who have been here for awhile."

I don't know what "we" he is referring to but he is not talking about most Americans. With the will of We the people amazing things can be acomplished.

If a-hole Bush knew his history and had an IQ higher than 4, he'd know that Eisenhower was able to kick out millions of invaders who were in the US for quote on quote "a while".

Originally Posted by ruthiela

The one thing I cannot comprehend between my ears is Bush says he is going to keep the terrorists out of our country. He is going to "Keep the American People safe at all cost." His words.
IF that is the case........how the hell can he do that if he erases the borders and allows easy entrance to our country?
AM I MISSING THE BOAT OR WHAT?

Hey, CONGRESS is there to hold his feet to the fire!

What the hell have they been doing?

This is a broken system because we've voted for liars, thieves and power hungry bastards to fill the hallowed halls. Because many didn't realize that during Vietnam, no matter what you may have thought about that war, Americans allowed communists to take a strong hold of our government through the looney left anti-war groups. Who do you think set them up and controlled their every move? They're doing the exact same thing with the Pro Illegal groups now!!

We need to take some of the responsibility for this mess and work to turn it around. Blame is fine but blame ALL those that deserve it. We must learn from our past mistakes and open our eyes to the total picture.

Bush is a disgrace but CONGRESS is worse! They are the checks and balances that our Founding Fathers put in place so that this very thing would be prevented and the Executive could be held in check.

my 2 cents