Thread: EU and NAFTA: Towards tyranny and the New World Order

Note this source is from the UK.
~~

EU and NAFTA: Towards tyranny and the New World Order


EU correspondent reports.




The North American Union is up and running in all but name, with about as much chance of not being officially ratified as Gordon Brown, or David Miliband, not signing the Lisbon Constitution... sorry, Treaty. This North American counterpart of the European Union was born out of the same mould. It started with the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) – the American doppelganger of the Common Market – and, whilst remaining under the legislative radar of the American people, became a new entity controlling transportation, law enforcement, banking, manufacturing, education, construction, military and, not unsurprisingly, immigration between the three former nations at the SPP (Security & Prosperity Partnership) Summit in Banff, Canada in September 2006.

The agreement gives U.S. corporations, amongst other things, the right to break-up and exploit Mexico’s nationalised oil industry, PEMEX, in return for mass immigration of unskilled Mexican workers into the U.S. and its economy. Cheap labour and fat profits all round. Of course, there are losers; American workers find themselves out of work and unable to survive when competing for jobs with people prepared to work for pitifully low wages – a scenario with which many Britons are acquainted – and, in addition, the Mexicans just get exploited. But who cares? Profits are up, costs are down and it’s trebles all round for the fat cats!

The Canadian and Mexican armed forces helped out with the aftermath of hurricane Katrina, and are now available to assist U.S. civil enforcement agencies to deal with domestic disturbances (read as: the anticipated mass demonstrations as the American people begin to realise what’s happened whilst their backs were turned). But we know where they got that idea from, don’t we? Enter Eurogendfor (European Gendarmerie Force) which, according to its own website, was set up to “respond to the need to rapidly conduct all the spectrum of civil security actions, either on its own or in parallel with the military intervention, by providing a multinational and effective tool.â€

I guess we will just sit on our fat bottoms and let it happen.

No one has the will to Impeach so be prepared to watch your kids grow up in this crazy new country.

You Americans are at fault... you do nothing so Welcome to AmeriKa; suck it down and enjoy your life in poverty

American citizens cannot impeach, only the house of representatives can impeach.

Most American's have tried to fight this, there is alot against us. We can only continue to try, and hope. Giving up is not the answer. Things will go where they will, I do not believe that all Americans or even citizens of other nations will give up their freedosms easily.

We are fighting this. When we make them build fences and enforce our laws, it puts a dent in their plan. When we refuse their national id card and when we Buy American and when we demand they stop passing FTA's, we hurt their plans. Of course. They passed the Peru FTA despite our objections, that includes North Carolina's own Sellout Sue Myrick.

I don' t see we have made them do anything. WE have dragged some, kicking and screaming, to the debate on illegal immigration, but so far it's all talk.

If, and when, this fence gets built, it will be because Mexico says it is OK, and it won't be designed to actually work.

If the NAU is as far along as they say, there will be no need for this fence. There may, however, be a need for our government to own all the land along the border - talk is of up to 2 miles in from the border in places.

Maybe it won't be to keep them out - but to keep us in -----

After 30 years of a flood of illegal immigration and drugs across that border, years after 911 - suddenly our government is jumping on this fence with such speed - why?


We didn't make them do anything - they are going to build this fence, or talk about it, or take land on the border because it suits their agenda - not ours.