Thread: Government to Limit Planned Crackdown on Illegal Immigrants

Government to Limit Planned Crackdown on Illegal Immigrants

washingtonpost.com readers have posted 52 comments about this item.
View All Comments »


By Spencer Hsu
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, November 14, 2008; 11:50 AM

The Department of Homeland Security has significantly narrowed the scope of a planned crackdown on federal contractor's employment of illegal immigrants.

The agency announced yesterday that it would go forward with a new policy requiring federal contractors to check the work documents of existing workers and subsequent hires using an electronic government system. The new policy will apply to contracts and solicitations issued after Jan. 15, but it will apply to far fewer contractors than would have been affected under the original proposal.

The Bush administration has made the work eligibility system, called E-Verify, a main pillar of its fight against illegal immigration, proposing to make its use mandatory for nearly 200,000 government contractors, covering about 4 million U.S. workers. Participation in E-Verify is now generally voluntary, although 13 state legislatures have enacted similar legislation for state contractors.

However, a revised final rule to be published today in the Federal Register would limit its application to contracts worth $100,000 or more, instead of $3,000, and require employers to check the eligibility only of workers on those contracts, instead of all their workers. The changes would apply to solicitations or awards made after Jan. 15, and exempt workers who have already received security clearances, contracts for commercial, off-the-shelf items, and contracts lasting less than 120 days.


Randel K. Johnson, vice president and spokesman for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said the administration "had been responsive to a substantial amount of business concerns," particularly by limiting the rule to large contractors, to new contracts and to workers on those contracts.

"The chamber met with a variety of companies this morning and are reviewing our litigation options," Johnson said, adding, "but litigation is expensive."

Still, federal contractors said the lame-duck administration was trying to force through the sweeping change before it might be cancelled by its successor.

The proposal "vastly understates the burden imposed on employers, and leaves unanswered a number of fundamental questions," said Eric Bord, an attorney at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius who represents companies facing immigration investigations.

Bush officials in early June proposed to double the number of companies in the program, mandating participation by 169,000 federal contractors and requiring them for the first time to verify the eligibility of existing employees, not just new hires.

Using E-Verify, companies can check federal Social Security and immigration databases to determine whether an employee is authorized to work. Enrollment in the program has grown from 3,000 companies to 92,000 since it was expanded nationwide in 2003, but it covers only 1 percent of an estimated 6 million U.S. employers and about 11 percent of annual hiring.

Business groups had complained the proposal goes beyond what Congress intended when it created the voluntary system in 1996. The U.S. chamber initially claimed the rule would cost $10 billion to implement, 100 times the government's estimate, if contractors and subcontractors with even a small piece of the $430 billion that the federal government awards each year needed to review their entire payrolls.

The American Civil Liberties Union today sharply criticized the new rule.

"E-Verify has been problematic since its inception ¿ hobbled by bureaucratic errors in individuals' Social Security files and runaway costs ¿ preventing innocent Americans from working," added Timothy Sparapani, ACLU Senior Legislative Counsel. "The costs of moving forward with such a troubled initiative will be felt by all Americans, either in lost tax revenues for the elderly and disabled, or by those who will be prevented from working due to systemic errors out of their control. During times of such economic hardship, the federal government should be wary of any initiative that would compound the struggles of our American workforce. E-Verify represents bad policy, as well as bad politics, and should be scrapped by Congress."

The announced changes will slow E-Verify's expansion, but federal officials stood by their prediction that the initiative will eventually cover more than 20 percent of U.S. hiring, DHS spokeswoman Laura Keehner said.

Grand-fathered contracts will eventually expire, Keehner said, and big employers also may choose under the rule to verify the immigration status of all employees, not just those working on federal business.

"Many will find doing so easier than parcelling out their workforce" for verification, Keehner said. The new rule "provides a transition period, but will eventually cover substantially more employees," she added.


In a statement released on the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services website, the Bush administration said it took into account 1,600 comments and made changes "designed to lighten the burden on small businesses who decide to accept federal contracts, and to provide contractors with flexible means of complying with the basic requirement that all persons working on federal contracts be electronically verified."

http://tinyurl.com/5eq4u4

In other words, members of the US Chamber of Commerce have bought our government off.

Not Cool!

"E-Verify has been problematic since its inception ¿ hobbled by bureaucratic errors in individuals' Social Security files and runaway costs ¿ preventing innocent Americans from working," added Timothy Sparapani, ACLU Senior Legislative Counsel. "The costs of moving forward with such a troubled initiative will be felt by all Americans, either in lost tax revenues for the elderly and disabled, or by those who will be prevented from working due to systemic errors out of their control. During times of such economic hardship, the federal government should be wary of any initiative that would compound the struggles of our American workforce. E-Verify represents bad policy, as well as bad politics, and should be scrapped by Congress."

More doublespeak.....

I would rather have my tax dollars "wasted" on E-Verify, rather than bailing out banks or attacking other countries.

They aren't worried about the American workforce.....they're worried about their illegal workforce illegally in America.

My guess is that the current administration has already chatted with the incoming one ,which has informed DHS of their intent in this direction, and DHS is modeling this new "plan" after what obama already plans to do.

This way they don't have another ill piled on the heap on their way out, and obama will appear to fully cooperative and wanting to do something about illegal immigration when he doesn't change a thing about the plan allegedly put into place by Chertoff.

But defnitely.....nice going allowing illegal aliens to maintain jobs on federal contracts when millions of Americans have already lost their jobs and countless others will be losing them in the future.