Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040

    ICE Targets 700 Miami Firms for Money Laundering Scrutiny

    ICE Targets 700 Miami Firms for Money Laundering Scrutiny

    MIAMI — Apr 21, 2015, 2:31 PM ET
    By CURT ANDERSON AP Legal Affairs Writer

    Federal investigators are targeting 700 businesses in the Miami area for enhanced scrutiny to detect trade-based money laundering schemes involving Latin American criminal organizations, authorities announced Tuesday.

    U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement said the focus would be on electronics exporters, including those in the cellphone business, in five ZIP codes near Miami International Airport. The targeted companies will be required to file certain Treasury Department forms for transactions over $3,000 rather than the current $10,000 threshold.


    In addition, the companies will be required to identify people involved in the transactions, focusing especially on third parties who put up the money to complete the deals. Authorities say the program enhances law enforcement's ability to find and prosecute money launderers, including those in the illicit drug trade, counterfeit merchandise sales and human trafficking.


    "It's very prevalent among the electronic exporters," said John Tobon, assistant special agent in charge of ICE homeland security investigations in Miami. "These are items that are very easily sold overseas."


    The Miami businesses were not identified by name. Tobon said not all of them are wittingly involved in money laundering, although some are created solely for criminal groups to evade U.S. currency laws. Some legitimate exporters view the complex, often all-cash transactions as necessary for doing business in Latin America.


    "We want to let them know this is not an acceptable business practice," Tobon said.


    The new rules, formally known as a Geographic Targeting Order, were issued by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, which is part of the Treasury Department. A similar order was issued last year covering some 2,000 businesses in the Los Angeles area after raids in that city's fashion district resulted in seizure of $90 million in cash and $30 million in bank accounts traced to Mexican drug cartels.


    FinCEN Director Jennifer Shasky Calvery said her agency would continue issuing such orders "to ensure a transparent financial system that impedes money launderers and other criminals from masking their identity and illicit activity."


    The Miami order will remain in effect from April 28 until Oct. 25, although businesses must retain records related to the order for five years after its final date, according to FinCEN.

    http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/i...utiny-30473745

    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    3,185
    I know not who or what to trust in American law enforcement in America today. I do not even believe that Americans are aware of how much they themselves emulate whoever is the current President, thus the dishonesty being practiced by many law enforcement agencies. That could engage one in conversation for hours.

    This past week-end the FBI admitted that over the past few decades that testimony that they provided in cases involving hair forensics, they had been wrong NINETY-FIVE percent of the time on cases reviewed from those past decades. I have maintained since the Ruby Ridge fiasco that I would not deliver a guilty verdict if a juror against any defendant prosecuted based upon FBI evidence. I have been ridiculed about that decision, too, but the FBI's admission this week should exonerate me. The trouble is now who will vote guilty on FBI evidence? Few should, IMO, if any.

    All the police shootings and beatings coming to light these past several weeks up to a few months are troubling. Finding the truth behind the "thin blue line" is difficult, we already know. But, is this rash of incidents common to American law enforcement or a sign of the times? I believe there is reason to ask.

    With the sparse information available about the Baltimore street beating this week-end it seems quite evident that police brutality is obvious. But no arrests yet, if I had beat someone on the street like that, would not I be in jail under arrest? Does that remind you of Congress allowing Pres. Obama to override the law?

    It all has relationship to DHS also, issuing directives that interfere with and deter Border Patrol from fully implementing their duties. Who is in charge? Who is supposed to be in charge?

    Who is in charge? President Obama? Not really, he bends laws to the breaking point. Congress? Certainly not! Congress aids and abets the Presidents disregard for law. Law enforcement? Nope, the attorney General is appointed by the President and has aided in the President's scourge for law and order! Who has ultimate authority of providing America with responsible government?

    The voters of America have the final say in who serves as governor's. So, they have approved, at least passively by re-electing time and time again, the same groups as well as the same individuals. Those people have become all powerful and unafraid of Americans or America's laws! Those individuals see themselves as omnipotent, and the voters can be credited for instilling that in those persons.


    This will soon spill into schools, and further challenge law enforcement. When overwhelmed they will resort to what we question today. Are they to be trusted to police our children?


    If we do not soon become a nation of anarchists it is because we already are such a nation.

  3. #3
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040
    Quote Originally Posted by kevinssdad View Post
    . . . All the police shootings and beatings coming to light these past several weeks up to a few months are troubling. Finding the truth behind the "thin blue line" is difficult, we already know. But, is this rash of incidents common to American law enforcement or a sign of the times? I believe there is reason to ask. . .
    We're not seeing more police shootings, just more news coverage

    By Eliott C. McLaughlin, CNN

    Updated 7:26 AM ET, Tue April 21, 2015

    (CNN)It feels like every week, a name is added to the list: another man, often black and unarmed, has died at the hands of police.

    Michael Brown, Eric Garner, Tamir Rice, Jason Harrison, Walter Scott,Eric Harris, Freddie Gray, to name a few.

    The headlines make it feel as if the country is experiencing an unprecedented wave of police violence, but experts say that isn't the case. We're just seeing more mainstream media coverage, and for a variety of reasons.


    Let's be clear: That's just each expert's sense of things. We rely on hunches because real numbers don't exist, likely because no one thought it important to keep a tally until recently.


    Chat with a publisher or editor at one of the country's African-American newspapers, and she or he can tell you they've been covering these cases for a long time.


    How long?


    "We've been in business for 130 years," said Robert Bogle,president and CEO of The Philadelphia Tribune, without a hint of sarcasm.


    "What is being exposed nationally is something that's been troubling us in Philadelphia as African-Americans," he said. "Yes, we have written about it. We've talked about it. This is the African-American experience, and for some reason non-African-Americans don't believe it."

    W.H.: Media coverage shines spotlight on cop shootings 01:39

    PLAY VIDEO
    Sea change?

    They're starting to believe it, thanks to cell phones, said Cedric Alexander, the DeKalb County, Georgia, deputy COO of public safety and president of the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives.

    "Black and brown people have been making these complaints for years, but they fell on deaf ears because no one wanted to believe some officers would act that way," he said.


    After video of Cleveland police killing the 12-year-old Rice outside a recreation center, New York police choking Garner as he cried "I can't breathe" and Scott being repeatedly shot in the back as he fled an officer, the public's skepticism is waning, he said.


    People are realizing, "Wow, they really did shoot this guy in the back. Wow. Oh, s**t, there's some truth to this," Alexander said.


    Black newspaper executives feel the videos lend credibility not only to black victims' versions of events in specific situations, but also to their versions of events historically. Where a victim's race could affect a story's perceived veracity, video permits no such prejudice.


    Alexander concurred, citing a common dilemma for inner-city kids: "If police say that's what happened and you don't have something to prove otherwise, you're screwed."



    South Carolina police officer charged with murder 02:41

    PLAY VIDEO

    Had there been no video of Scott's shooting, Bogle said, the public might have believed Officer Michael Slager's story that he'd been attacked and had no choice but to fatally shoot Scott.

    The video, though, taken by a bystander who happened upon the incident, showed Scott running as Slager shot him in the back. Slager now stands charged with Scott's murder.


    "When you have clear evidence that would contradict a different story, it's difficult to engage in denial," Bogle said.


    Added Publisher Tracey Williams-Dillard of the Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder, another African-American newspaper: "Things are being recorded by others. There's now no way it can be disputed."


    Where are the numbers?


    Today, it seems like there's a stat for everything.

    Want to know the most common offense for which people are incarcerated? No problem. Need to know the percentage of fatal plane crashes caused by pilot error? Easy. The score of every Monday Night Football game since 1990? A breeze.



    How often are police officers indicted? 04:44

    PLAY VIDEO

    But if you want to know how many times a police officer has killed someone in the line of duty, you're out of luck.

    "It's really ridiculous we don't have that count," said David Klinger, an associate criminology professor at the University of Missouri-St. Louis. "For whatever reason, the powers that be that collect data for the feds ... decided that how often police kill people doesn't matter."

    Despite that the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 required the government to keep "data about the use of excessive force by law enforcement officers," no such database exists. A study published 14 years ago sought to nail down numbers, but its author conceded to CNN that only 564 of the nation's 18,000 law enforcement entities participated.

    The closest thing to a statistic
    is the FBI's assertion that police were responsible for about 400 "justifiable homicides" annually between 2008 and 2012.


    Even if there were an accurate count, Klinger said, we'd still be "missing a huge part of the picture when it comes to deadly force."

    Cops tend to shoot to kill -- and gunfire is the predominant means by which police kill suspects -- so more illuminating would be knowing how many times police opened fire, period, he said.


    Can videos end cycle?


    Bogle doesn't need statistics, he said. It wasn't many generations ago that black Americans could not find justice in lynchings and other racially motivated crimes, he said, explaining that extrajudicial killings by police are just a continuation.

    "Black Americans and black Philadelphians have been talking about and addressing these issues, to no avail," he said. "There's no way to actually determine that there's more or less. What's occurred is there are more ways to expose it."



    Victim's family meets man who filmed son's death 01:21

    PLAY VIDEO

    Not only are we in a better position to capture video of police misbehavior today, we're also better equipped to disseminate the footage. Instantaneity is important, he said.

    Events that 10 years ago would've come down to a suspect's word versus an officer's are now recorded on cell phones and officers' body and dashboard cameras. And where a news reporter could have taken days to travel to a city, find and interview witnesses and obtain a police narrative, a bystander can post video of a police encounter to the Internet minutes after it happens.


    "That's critical. If you see an incident a week later, that has an impact on the reaction," Bogle said. "It's not a timely event, and people's reactions are different."


    Because humans are visual creatures, videos impact people more than might a written or spoken narrative, and many experts feel the images help drive coverage of the incidents.


    "It not only feels like there's more coverage, there is more coverage. ... It's not a perception, it's definitely real," Williams-Dillard said.

    Don't expect the videos to be a panacea for the violence, said Klinger, who counts police use of force among his research interests.

    Yes, video can refute a lie, but just as police have lied about suspects, suspects have lied about police as well.


    "Most of the time when there's video, it demonstrates the officer did the right thing," he said. "I think it's going to cut both ways. ... We're going to have a bunch of cried wolf."


    A 'sensitized' nation?


    People's attitudes are changing as well, said Irv Randolph, managing editor of The Philadelphia Tribune. Not only do you have people as influential as Attorney General Eric Holder speaking out, but civil rights is "front and center in terms of what young people are protesting against."

    Look no further than the rallies for Trayvon Martin, the teen killed in 2012 by a Florida neighborhood watch volunteer, or Scott in North Charleston. The protests drew diverse crowds, Randolph noted.

    Likewise, the nonfatal but still racially charged incidents at two major American colleges -- the arrest of a black student at the University of Virginia and racist chants by fraternity members at the University of Oklahoma -- were condemned by folks of all races, he said.



    Martese Johnson's violent arrest sparks protests 02:13

    PLAY VIDEO

    "People are saying they're not going to tolerate this anymore," Randolph said.

    Asked which factor -- videos, social media or attitudes -- was driving the recent spate of media coverage, Alexander said, "I think it's all of the above."


    The nation, and especially its "communities of color," is more "sensitized now to any contact with police," he said.


    But he's reluctant to put the recent shootings under a single umbrella. For one, race isn't always a factor in police brutality, he said, pointing out that the California man beaten after running from police on a horse, as well as James Boyd, the mentally ill man killed by Albuquerque police last year, were white.


    The circumstances in many of the shootings also require that they be scrutinized differently, he said.


    Similar yet different


    In the Scott case, it's "disturbing" to see Slager open fire on the 50-year-old, said Alexander, who has worked in a variety of local, state and federal law enforcement capacities since 1977.

    "Something is wrong with that officer there," he said. "Walter Scott was no threat. He wasn't even able to run well when you watch the tape. We can pretty much clearly see that this guy was no threat to the officer."



    Reserve deputy charged in fatal Tulsa shooting02:33

    PLAY VIDEO

    In Tulsa, Oklahoma, you have a septuagenarian reserve deputy providing containment in a "high-threat undercover gun sale" who shoots Eric Harris with his gun instead of his Taser. The debate has revolved around the deputy's age, stress level and the fact he was a benefactor to the police department.

    And in Ferguson, Missouri, you have a police shooting -- ruled justified by investigators -- occurring in a town that the Justice Department determined "was deliberately, outright, straight-up racist," Alexander said.


    You have three different shootings involving a white officer and black victim, yet they involve wholly different sets of circumstances, he said.


    It's also important to remember that there are far more good police officers than bad ones, and just like the media has failed to tell the stories about police violence against minorities, "there are officers out jumping in front of bullets and doing the right thing, and those stories aren't being told as well."


    "Don't paint your whole police department as bad guys," Alexander said. "I support police, but the bad ones, we need to go in and pull those guys out. We need police, and police need community, and there's a lot of good cops doing good work out there everyday."


    Bogle, The Tribune CEO, agreed, saying, "Just like there are some bad police, there are bad people out there, no doubt, that need to be taken off our streets."



    Policing different in black communities? 21:04

    PLAY VIDEO

    He'd like to see people participating more in surveillance and crime prevention in their neighborhoods, while police should receive more training and return to a community-oriented model, he said.

    "There needs to be training because we're not going to end how people feel about each other," he said. "We need a good, strong police force, but we don't need them adding to the problem because they don't understand who is living in these communities."


    Yet no matter how much people participate and how many policing reforms are enacted, the American public is fickle and "law enforcement, by nature, is contentious, not just in the black community," Klinger said.


    Just as support for the death penalty spikes during periods of high crime in the country, that support drops when crime is down, Klinger said. He suspects police use of force follows a similar pattern.


    "Everybody loved the cops on September 12," he said.

    http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/20/us/pol...dia-attitudes/
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  4. #4
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040
    Caught On Video: U.S. Marshal Grabs Woman’s Cellphone, Smashes It On Ground

    April 21, 2015 3:39 PM

    SOUTH GATE (CBSLA.com) — Federal officials said Tuesday they are investigating the actions of a U.S. Marshals Service employee who was caught on video grabbing a woman’s cellphone in South Gate, throwing it to the ground and kicking it away.

    The video, which was filmed by another woman across the street from the police activity, was posted on YouTube and shows a woman using her cellphone to record a law enforcement operation. In the video, a Marshals Service employee approaches her, grabs the phone and slams it on the ground.


    “On (Sunday), a YouTube video entitled ‘South Gate Police Attack Cop Watcher: Destroys Cellphone’ surfaced online that appears to show a law enforcement officer removing an object from a woman’s hand,” South Gate police Capt. Darren Arakawa said.


    “The South Gate Police Department confirmed none of the individuals shown in the video involve South Gate police personnel,” Arakawa said. “The caption on the video suggesting that the officer is a member of the South Gate Police Department is erroneous.


    “South Gate police determined that the officer involved is employed by the United States Marshals (Service), and their staff is aware of the incident,” Arakawa said.


    The woman in the video, Beatriz Paez, was apparently out for a walk when she came upon what appeared to be a massive federal operation in her neighborhood involving local bikers.


    The video shows Paez standing away from the law enforcement officers, wearing tactical vests emblazoned with the word “POLICE,” holding her phone up as she records the scene and occasionally speaking to the officers.


    At one point, a bald man in a tactical vest, safety glasses and a large gun slung over one shoulder runs up to the woman and grabs for her phone, wrestles it away from her, throws it on the ground and kicks it at her.


    Paez is then seen backing away, then coming back for what’s left of her phone as the officers walk away.

    http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2015/...-it-on-ground/

    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  5. #5
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-30-2013, 04:51 PM
  2. Mexico targets money laundering with plan to limit cash
    By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-26-2010, 11:54 PM
  3. GA-More Firms increase worker scrutiny
    By American-ized in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-24-2009, 10:52 AM
  4. Money remitter sentenced to 9 years for money laundering
    By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-04-2008, 09:29 PM
  5. IN: Illegal immigration bill targets firms
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-05-2008, 11:52 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •