Thread: Iowa Republican Kingmaker Makes Immigration a Household Issu

This ALIPAC member has posted this entity be it editorial opinion, news article, column, or web creation as information for the General Population (public) only. It is not intended as an endorsement for this candidate by this poster. Its use here has not been anticipated to be used as, or used to discredit any candidate mentioned herewith.


Iowa Republican Kingmaker Makes Immigration a Household Issue

http://www.bloomberg.com
Dec. 6 (Bloomberg) -- When a roofing crew arrived at U.S. Representative Steve King's Iowa home earlier this year, he made a ``point to check the people pounding nails,'' his ear tuned for any hint of Spanish.

The lawmaker, who's positioning himself as the state's Republican kingmaker before the Jan. 3 presidential caucuses, is subjecting his party's candidates to similar scrutiny over their policies on illegal immigration to ensure they share his views.

``If you're not willing to send someone back to their home country under U.S. law, then you are by definition supporting an amnesty,'' says King, 58, the only Republican lawmaker in Iowa who plans to back a candidate, in the first contest of the presidential election.

Immigration is increasingly resonating across the country among likely Republican voters, with 23 percent of them citing it as their top priority, according to a Bloomberg/Los Angeles Times poll. Forty percent of all Republicans say undocumented workers and their families should be denied all social services, compared with 22 percent of Democrats.

King may be leaning toward former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, whose failure to check the immigration status of workers at his home exposed him to attacks from Rudy Giuliani, who accused Romney of running a ``sanctuary mansion.''

On Dec. 4, Romney, 60, fired his landscaping company for ``failure to comply with the law.'' He has attacked Giuliani, 63, of New York as the former mayor of a ``sanctuary city'' for not terminating social services to paper-less immigrants.

Romney has been courting King for more than a year-and-a- half. King says Romney is ``solid'' on the issue. ``I have taken him down this path, and he's willingly gone,'' he says.

`Important Message'

A King endorsement would send ``an important message'' to voters concerned about immigration ``that they are better off going to Romney,'' says Dennis Goldford, a politics professor at Drake University in Des Moines. ``Steve King certainly has his credentials on immigration,'' says Goldford.

Immigration isn't as burning an issue for Democratic voters, although Senator Hillary Clinton's recent stumble over the question of whether undocumented residents should be allowed to get driver's licenses suggests it might also pose a danger to candidates in that party.

Many of the leading Republican candidates, including Romney and Giuliani, have only recently adopted strong anti-immigration platforms, having left behind a paper trail for their opponents to criticize.

Fertile Ground

As Mike Huckabee, 52, has risen in Iowa and national polls, Romney has highlighted the former Arkansas governor's earlier support for allowing children of illegal immigrants to compete for college scholarships.

That charge may find fertile ground among party voters: Only 8 percent of Republicans nationwide support providing in-state discounts on college tuition to undocumented residents, according to the Bloomberg/L.A. Times poll.

The poll of 1,467 adults, including 1,245 registered voters, was taken Nov. 30-Dec. 3. It has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

In Iowa, the presence of mostly Hispanic-speaking illegal immigrants, who come to work in the meat-packing industry, is driving this year's political conversation more than any other issue, say local Republican officials.

``At the county level, we have to deal with the social ills of immigration,'' says Sheriff Randy Krukow of Clay County in northwest Iowa. ``We're looking for a national solution from the candidates.''

Eighty percent of those incarcerated at his county jail are Hispanic and all are ``illegals,'' says Krukow, president of the Iowa State Sheriffs and Deputies Association.

Impact on Communities

Iowa has 115,000 Hispanics, just 3.8 percent of the state's population of almost 3 million, according to 2006 U.S. Census estimates. Still, the number of Hispanics is up 38 percent from six years ago, says Jeff Passel, a senior research associate at the Pew Hispanic Center.

Nationally, 42 percent of Republicans say illegal immigrants have had a negative impact on their communities, compared with 29 percent of Democrats, according to the Bloomberg/L.A. Times poll.

Of those who think immigration has had a negative impact, 39 percent of Republicans cited crime, drugs and gangs as the ways it has most affected their communities. That compares with 23 percent of Democrats who cited those ills.

Democrats are more likely to blame undocumented workers for taking jobs from Americans or hurting their wages, with 40 percent citing those as the main drawbacks to illegal immigration.

Both Parties Angry

Providing driver's licenses to undocumented workers angers members of both parties. Only 14 percent of Republicans and 31 percent of Democrats think undocumented workers should have access to driver's licenses.

Confusing the matter for King is that almost all the candidates now claim to share his views.

During the summer, he was moving toward endorsing his ``good friend,'' Representative Tom Tancredo, a Colorado Republican who has taken the lead in Congress in opposing illegal immigration. Now, King says Tancredo may lack ``the juice'' to influence ``the debate beyond the earliest part of January.''

Huckabee worries him for two reasons. First, King hasn't ``heard him say anything that would convince'' him he has the proper ``conviction'' on immigration. Second, an Iowa triumph for Huckabee might amount to a tactical win for Giuliani nationally, King says, because it might mortally wound Romney.

King says he expects to make his endorsement soon.

To contact the reporter on this story: Hans Nichols in Washington at hnichols2@bloomberg.net

Articles like this do not help our cause. This article promotes the idea that those against illegal immigration are against hispanics. It is the article itself that links the two.

Repeatedly this article equates the idea that illegals are hispanics, hispanics are illegal. That is going to end up hurting us and that is why these articles are written like this.

The way this is written it is propaganda, partly to increase fear in hispanics so they fear immigration enforcement, partly to make our cause look like it is about the ethnicity of the illegals rather then the real issue that they are here illegally and breaking our laws.

Why would you think any mainstream media outlet would be interested in helping our cause?

As for the article itself, I have to take issue with Rep. Steve King, who I usually support.

I understand the need to be as influential as possible in the nominating process-especially when our side has been so marginalized within the Republican Party power structure-but leveraging your power shouldn't come at the expense of principled policy stands.

Yes, we need to do everything we can to ensure Suckabee doesn't win the Hawkeye Cauci, but King needs to remember that the voters of Iowa sent him there for a reason, and it wasn't to be invited to cocktail parties hosted by Hugh Hewitt.

Notice the remark "ear tuned to any hint of Spanish is not quoted in the article" . That suggests that King did not say it, the author did.
The article is written to make it seem like King has this stance. This article is quoted on hispanic news, probably because they view it as anti-hispanic.

When a roofing crew arrived at U.S. Representative Steve King's Iowa home earlier this year, he made a ``point to check the people pounding nails,'' his ear tuned for any hint of Spanish.

Steve King has been one of our greatest allies on illegal immigration, this seems to me the Author is using King, and anyone who quotes the LA times is not our friend.

Although I really do not trust any of them that has changed their stance on illegal immigration during this campaign, they will more than likely get into office and say screw the American Majority, then pander to special interest and corporations and give us all the hard luck stories like " they are doing jobs Americans won't do" "They just come here to work" " you can't deport 12 million people" etc.

We need to throw those out of office who have worked against Americans and put in a president who has a record and stuck to his convictions.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEASE TAKE ACTION!!!! 12/7
HELP STOP "NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGES" FROM ADMITTING ILLEGALS !!(This could come to your community college next)
WATCH VIDEO!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zxJZBecp_0
ACTION THREAD( Instructions @ contact information)
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-92808.html
WHAT WOULD WE DO WITHOUT ALIPAC Please Contribute!!
http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=C ... page&pid=9

My first thought was that the piece was aimed at discrediting King because he himself is up for re-election. Might have something to do with some people suggesting he give up his seat in the Iowa legislature to run for the U.S. Senate. He would have gotten my vote had he chosen to challenge Dem. Sen. Tom Harkin. Senator Harkin is so pro amnesty it's pathetic. Unfortunately, only one of his flaws.

He is not a member of the Iowa state legislature. He is a United States congressman.

Here's his bio page:

http://www.kingforcongress.com/aboutme.asp

He's one of the most effective members of Congress when it comes to derailing bad immigration legislation.

If you got rid of him, Brian Bilbray, Peter King, Duncan Hunter, Tom Tancredo, Lamar Smith, and Jeff Sessions you would probably already have 11-20 million new American citizens courtesy of this wretched Congress.

I seriously believe that Rep. King needs to reconsider this.

I'm not saying that Romney isn't better than most of the other frontrunners in the GOP field-although I can't say that I trust him on this issue to any great extent-however he needs to weigh other factors when making this momentous decision.

Shapka

Your right I had the wrong info from a local online paper.
At least they got the facts right on his stand on immigration.

To be honest with you I'm casting around for anyone to oppose Harkin and there isn't much in the news around here about who will run.

He wants amnesty because his mother was an immigrant. I just can't feature an immigrant from back then, with the pride they had in being an American, that would advocate amnesty.

Originally Posted by 1_paint

To be honest with you I'm casting around for anyone to oppose Harkin and there isn't much in the news around here about who will run.

Harkin is a horrow show. Not just on the subject of borders/immigration, but on almost everything! It's like they took him out of deep-freeze from the Soviet politburo, ca. 1978.

We could definitely use King in the Senate-especially if he's able to displace Harkin. To me that would be as big a coup as Rep. Thune getting rid of Little Tommy Daschle.

We're going to need him up there f the Udalls and that nitwit Mark Warner are elected next time around.

Why doesn't King consider endorsing Ron Paul? He is better than Mitt Romney and has the money to go well past January.